Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Leonard and Nelson both named AP All Pro


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

https://www.stl.news/ap-all-pro-team-has-kansas-city-accent/238886/   HUGE honor for these guys!    

Leonard an All Pro but not voted as a pro bowler.   

Niiiiice for the Maniac and QHOP.   I tend to think this is more of an honor than the pointless pro bowl.

1 minute ago, Superman said:

 

Fan voting is only one third of the vote, so media and league people deserve blame for that one also.

 

I was under the impression the fans voted then anyone the fans didn't vote for, the league and media would include as pro bowl worthy as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow...first rookie duo since Butkus and Sayers????  That's some accomplishment!

 

Well deserved and we know they both work their * off to prepare for games.

 

I imagine both will be team captains in the near future.

 

They have both brought an attitude to their side of the ball and we're lucky to have them.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I was under the impression the fans voted then anyone the fans didn't vote for, the league and media would include as pro bowl worthy as well.

 

I don't know the exact process, but I'm pretty sure the coaches and players votes (I said media earlier, it's actually the players themselves) are factored into the initial roster determinations.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Superman said:

 

I don't know the exact process, but I'm pretty sure the coaches and players votes (I said media earlier, it's actually the players themselves) are factored into the initial roster determinations.

 

Us basically having nothing, but one o'clock games didn't help leonard either

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Pelt said:

Niiiiice for the Maniac and QHOP.

 

I tend to think this is more of an honor than the pointless pro bowl.

Farr more of an honor.  I mean it is basically one player per position.  Absolutely amazing accomplishment.  

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheMarine said:

Fan vote was not the reason he didnt make the pro bowl

 

no there are other factors, however the fans not seeing Leonard play mostly because we had no prime games expect the pats game which he didn't play in, really hurt his chances.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheMarine said:

Fan vote was not the reason he didnt make the pro bowl

 

Casual media that look at prime time or marquee games and do not do their due diligence can be culprits too. They started taking the Colts seriously only since the Cowboys game, IMO.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Casual media that look at prime time or marquee games and do not do their due diligence can be culprits too. They started taking the Colts seriously only since the Cowboys game, IMO.

Let's put this to bed,  the number one factor was having leanord grouped with Edge rushers. NFL needs to separate these categories. It makes people strictly look at sacks and that's not fair as they play completely different positions in all but name.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

no there are other factors, however the fans not seeing Leonard play mostly because we had no prime games expect the pats game which he didn't play in, really hurt his chances.

 

1 minute ago, chad72 said:

 

Casual media that look at prime time or marquee games and do not do their due diligence can be culprits too. They started taking the Colts seriously only since the Cowboys game, IMO.

 

Latest I can see is Darius finished 5th in the Fan vote as an Outside Linebacker. People knew who he was. It was the Coaches and Players who didn't vote for him

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Lucky Colts Fan said:

I see a lot of awards, trophies, and banners in the Colts' future.

 

We're gonna need a bigger boat...

 

YBh2zIW.gif

There was also a terrible spinoff of Jaws that came out last year called "santa jaws". An absolutely hilarious, but terrible movie.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ballard deserves GM of the year. Pick your story. 

 

Hires Frank Reich after Josh McDbag bails. Handled with grace and looks like a great hire. We are going to the playoffs.

 

Traded back in the first round and picked up TWO rookie all-pros. (Not even taking into consideration all of the other picks that have contributed, B. Smith, N. Hines, etc.) 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TheMarine said:

 

 

Latest I can see is Darius finished 5th in the Fan vote as an Outside Linebacker. People knew who he was. It was the Coaches and Players who didn't vote for him

 

Very interesting. I did not know that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CamMo said:

Ballard deserves GM of the year. Pick your story. 

 

Hires Frank Reich after Josh McDbag bails. Handled with grace and looks like a great hire. We are going to the playoffs.

 

Traded back in the first round and picked up TWO rookie all-pros. (Not even taking into consideration all of the other picks that have contributed, B. Smith, N. Hines, etc.) 

 

 

It'll be between Ballard and Pace for that award. I wouldn't be surprised to see it go either way tbh.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Leonard an All Pro but not voted as a pro bowler.   

 

Just shows why using the # of Pro Bowls a player has been selected for as a metric to evaluate players is flawed. 

 

The whole thing is broken from selection to game right now IMO.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

I don't know the exact process, but I'm pretty sure the coaches and players votes (I said media earlier, it's actually the players themselves) are factored into the initial roster determinations.

 

My challenge to the process is how many players/coaches actually make selections and why do we assume they have better knowledge of players off their radar (e.g. if they're not opponents that season). 

 

Given it's split into thirds, in theory a very small sample of players could have as much say as thousands of public voters. 

 

That's before we even get into the whole selection depth chart not relating to the modern game in some ways. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

Just shows why using the # of Pro Bowls a player has been selected for as a metric to evaluate players is flawed. 

 

The whole thing is broken from selection to game right now IMO.

It's flawed because of the fan vote. Fans are naturally biased, and 80-90% of them either will vote for their team's players because of that, or for the more casual ones, because they don't know a lot of the other choices. It causes the more active fanbases to get their players more votes, and the players that get more attention from the media throughout the year will also benefit. It's the same problem for the MLB all-star game.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:

 

My challenge to the process is how many players/coaches actually make selections and why do we assume they have better knowledge of players off their radar (e.g. if they're not opponents that season). 

 

Given it's split into thirds, in theory a very small sample of players could have as much say as thousands of public voters. 

 

That's before we even get into the whole selection depth chart not relating to the modern game in some ways. 

 

I think players and coaches know at least as much about the rest of the league as fans, so I don't object to that at all. And fans are going to vote every day and tweet as many times as they can for their favorite players, deserving or not, whereas I assume players and coaches get one chance to vote.

 

End of the day, we all know it's a popularity contest, not a true measure of how good a player is. It's an All Star game, and should be viewed as such.

 

Your last point is spot on, though. No reason FBs should get voted into the Pro Bowl over more deserving players at other positions. They could easily call it a flex position, and balance the rosters out later.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:

The whole thing is broken from selection to game right now IMO.

 

I don't view it as broken, because it's just an All Star game. 

 

To me, the Pro Bowl was always about an exhibition for good players, but mostly a chance for them to go to Hawaii and celebrate a good season. It was better after the SB, when the champs could kind of thump their chest around their peers from other teams (I'll never forget after the Giants beat the Pats in SB42 how they were shown basically running the town). 

 

The league trying to make the Pro Bowl into more than what it is is kind of what's ruined it for me.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Superman said:

 

I think players and coaches know at least as much about the rest of the league as fans, so I don't object to that at all. And fans are going to vote every day and tweet as many times as they can for their favorite players, deserving or not, whereas I assume players and coaches get one chance to vote.

 

End of the day, we all know it's a popularity contest, not a true measure of how good a player is. It's an All Star game, and should be viewed as such.

 

Your last point is spot on, though. No reason FBs should get voted into the Pro Bowl over more deserving players at other positions. They could easily call it a flex position, and balance the rosters out later.

 

I think the assumption they know at least as much as a generic fan is more than fair, but to assume they necessarily know more might not always be the case. You make a good point though that (we assume) they only get one bite of the cherry. How many do you think just pick all their team mates.. or more likely ask an assistant to do it for them. 

 

As you say it's a popularity contest, and that's fine, if it's recognised and treated as such. Forget the game, focus on the skills comps and the personalities and make it an end season Hard Knocks type deal. But don't use it as a way of saying player A is better than player B. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, DrLuck said:

Let's put this to bed,  the number one factor was having leanord grouped with Edge rushers. NFL needs to separate these categories. It makes people strictly look at sacks and that's not fair as they play completely different positions in all but name.

Ya that’s what I’ve always said. All-Pro has it right. They have a distinct separation between LBs and Edge rushers. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, CamMo said:

Ballard deserves GM of the year. Pick your story. 

 

Hires Frank Reich after Josh McDbag bails. Handled with grace and looks like a great hire. We are going to the playoffs.

 

Traded back in the first round and picked up TWO rookie all-pros. (Not even taking into consideration all of the other picks that have contributed, B. Smith, N. Hines, etc.) 

 

 

I have been saying this in another topic and was getting crap for it. Now this happens. Crown that man!!!!! 2 rookie All-pro players? Come on now. It’s a lock. This has to be one of the best offseasons in Colts (dare I say league?) history.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, the fans deserved a season like this after what we went through from 2015-2017. That was a terrible rough 3 year stretch. Now we have arguably the best GM in Football, Andrew Luck is back and 100% healthy with his 39 TD's, Reich is a Good Coach, we got lucky McDaniels backed out, we have players like Nelson and Leonard now, and went 10-6 to make the Playoffs by winning 9 out of 10. Finally some karma rolled our way for a change. What a fun season. Even if we lose tomorrow, I will still say this has been one of the funnest seasons I have ever seen. We are no longer a laughing stock and people have to take us serious again heading into the future. We proved the media and alot of others wrong this season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jags have more cap space than Steelers, any thought given to get Villanueva?  
    • I wouldn't mind that (except for the QB part). I think entering the season with Eason as the presumptive starter is a no-starter for Ballard and he won't allow that to happen. Dak is tied to the Cowboys and if we want him we will have to pay for him. Jameis is... an interesting shot to take at a reclamation project, but if we are doing that I would also like for us to get a QB in the draft too.    So here's the question you didn't address - what do you do with LT? 
    • The only problem is WRs and TEs are not going to come here to die with an unknown with uncertainty at the QB position. You get the trigger man before you get the skill position guys, period, not the other way. Otherwise, you would have to overpay to convince someone to come in here with 2 unknowns at QB, not going to happen with Ballard. That is where I fundamentally disagree.    The window of a dominant OL is not going to last forever, I would say we have 2-3 years at the highest level with this OL as a SB contender, and a few improvements on D to make noise. It does not preclude us from drafting a QB of the future but if that draft capital had to be directed at moving up for a QB OR getting an established one, I think Irsay with his statement has made it clear that it is going to be an established one. Heck, we thought the legion of Boom is going to enjoy a run and it lasted 2-3 good years, I would have to say in its prime at the highest level.   If we were drafting at say No.10-12 after having Rivers as QB, it would be different and we might hit the re-set button for a couple of years. That is not the case here.
    • I think one of the reasons they are actively going after Stafford is because there are no guarantees any of the top 4 QBs fall to 21.   They could miss out on Stafford then top 4 QBs go before 21 then be totally unprepared. I would think from that standpoint Ballard would be aggressive and trade up.   I like Mac Jones who could easily be had in trade down scenario but who knows if Ballard even likes him.   I just don't want to roll out with JB again. I am fine with JB as a backup though.    I would even throw a player in the deal to get Stafford. Even Leonard if that eliminated the threat of losing pick 21.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...