Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Narcosys

Raiders to play in London?

Recommended Posts

Not sure where the "reports" are from but some are saying the Raiders may play all their home games in London next year. Horrible for fans, the Raiders, and the 8 teams that have to travel.

 

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/from-oakland-to-tottenham-nfls-raiders-reportedly-could-play-in-london-in-2019-2018-12-30

 

Having made the trip a few times; away, home, away games for the Raiders would be brutal. Two to three days after the trip you're just getting past the jet lag. Especially when flying to London.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

That would be insane...

 

It literally would be for any team to call London home. Their MNF games have to be away after an away or back to back homes. You also couldn't have Thursday f games switch locations either. Imagine Sunday away then Thursday home? No down time and too tired to even practice. They would literally dictate the entire NFL schedule in order to not put the Raiders at a massive disadvantage.

 

I know the NFL wants it, but it just can't happen and be realistic to expect that team to perform. Their home games after away games would be just as much a hindrance for them as the team traveling. They will be worse than they already are if this happens.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

It literally would be for any team to call London home. Their MNF games have to be away after an away or back to back homes. You also couldn't have Thursday f games switch locations either. Imagine Sunday away then Thursday home? No down time and too tired to even practice. They would literally dictate the entire NFL schedule in order to not put the Raiders at a massive disadvantage.

 

I know the NFL wants it, but it just can't happen and be realistic to expect that team to perform. Their home games after away games would be just as much a hindrance for them as the team traveling. They will be worse than they already are if this happens.

 

Not to mention the disadvantage in free agency and hiring staff.

 

Good luck trying to convince a player or coach and their family to sign with a London team...

 

:loco:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Narcosys said:

 

It literally would be for any team to call London home. Their MNF games have to be away after an away or back to back homes. You also couldn't have Thursday f games switch locations either. Imagine Sunday away then Thursday home? No down time and too tired to even practice. They would literally dictate the entire NFL schedule in order to not put the Raiders at a massive disadvantage.

 

I know the NFL wants it, but it just can't happen and be realistic to expect that team to perform. Their home games after away games would be just as much a hindrance for them as the team traveling. They will be worse than they already are if this happens.

 

Some time ago there was a write up indicating that if/when a team was moved to London, they'd play all their home games in one half of their season, then away games in the second half.

 

I'd think they'd have to start in London, but what if they make the playoffs, and get a home game out of it?????

 

Still insane, but they have put SOME thought into such issues.

 

I'm really not for it, though.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and...... so the Raiders will jilt Oakland AND Las Vegas at the same time?

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, buccolts said:

Oh, and...... so the Raiders will jilt Oakland AND Las Vegas at the same time?

 

And they're going to take jobs away from America!!!


Unacceptable!  Fine them!  Tariffs!  Build walls around our stadiums to keep the Raiders out!

 

lead_720_405.jpg?mod=1533691850

 

*This post is just a joke, folks.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least the name would make sense with all the raids on England throughout history. But yeah, this would be a logistical nightmare.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Boiler_Colt said:

At least the name would make sense with all the raids on England throughout history. But yeah, this would be a logistical nightmare.

Goodness. What a stupid thing to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, braveheartcolt said:

Goodness. What a stupid thing to say.

Sorry was that offensive? England has seen their fair share of raiders from the Danes to the Normans etc. Even the piracy moniker works, so the name has historical significance and makes sense. It's not like the the LA Lakers where there are no lakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

Sorry was that offensive? England has seen their fair share of raiders from the Danes to the Normans etc. Even the piracy moniker works, so the name has historical significance and makes sense. It's not like the the LA Lakers where there are no lakes.

No, just stupid. I'm assuming you meant no offense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, braveheartcolt said:

No, just stupid. I'm assuming you meant no offense. 

Meh sorry. Guess I shouldn't bring up actual history any more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

Meh sorry. Guess I shouldn't bring up actual history any more.

On a football forum, why would you? Now, if it was funny........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, braveheartcolt said:

On a football forum, why would you? Now, if it was funny........

The answer is because im a nerd. I'll stay in my lane and post more memes and penile jokes from now on. :) No worries man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Boiler_Colt said:

The answer is because im a nerd. I'll stay in my lane and post more memes and penile jokes from now on. :) No worries man.

I got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why don't they just play a season at Sam Boyd StadiumUNLV? Seats 36,000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. Up until that neck injury I don’t think manning missed a snap his entire career here.
    • Andrew has had 3 maybe 4 injuries since the beginning of his career, manning only missed one season here. So no worries the bad luck was all Bob's. 
    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...