Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Green Bay Interviewing Pagano And Caldwell For Packers Head Coaching Job

Recommended Posts

Caldwell maybe but Pagano has no chance, he is too buddy-buddy with the players. The job is for the Green Bay Packers and their fans take the game very seriously.:shout:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎12‎/‎27‎/‎2018 at 6:13 PM, coming on strong said:

chuck is gonna make history when he brings a superbowl to green bay and creates a packer dynasty its sad he wasnt given a fair chance here .

Have fun with that Green Bay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

     Chuck Pagano would be a good fit in Green Bay.

They would keep the present OC (Joe Philbin) and Pagano would help work their defense which needs help..

 

He is highly respected....It would be a good choice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, oldunclemark said:

     Chuck Pagano would be a good fit in Green Bay.

They would keep the present OC (Joe Philbin) and Pagano would help work their defense which needs help..

 

He is highly respected....It would be a good choice

The dope would probably fire Philbin and hire Mike Martz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, BOTT said:

The dope would probably fire Philbin and hire Mike Martz.

The only people who don't like Pagano are fans in Indianapolis.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, King Colt said:

Caldwell maybe but Pagano has no chance, he is too buddy-buddy with the players. The job is for the Green Bay Packers and their fans take the game very seriously.:shout:

Which city and its fans dont take the game seriously?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

The only people who don't like Pagano are fans in Indianapolis.

 

1. For good reason

 

2 not true

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

The only people who don't like Pagano are A CLUELESS AND HEARTLESS MINORITY OF fans in Indianapolis.

 

Fixed it for ya.  :thmup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Fixed it for ya.  :thmup:

Speaking of dopes.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎12‎/‎27‎/‎2018 at 6:13 PM, coming on strong said:

chuck is gonna make history when he brings a superbowl to green bay and creates a packer dynasty its sad he wasnt given a fair chance here .

Fair Chance 6 years of garbage coaching wasn't a fair chance go for it Green Bay if you never want to win another Super Bowl with Rodgers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No better man than Chuck Pagano. However, I just don't see this happening. His final two year stint as HC of the Colts was abysmal as far as in-game coaching and game planning. The Colts would play hard for him, yes, but the team could never adjust after half time; Chuck was perpetually out coached in the 4th quarter; and it really felt like the team was ill prepared nearly every week. Not to mention lousy choices in asst. coaches. 

That can't be lost on G. Bay's leadership. I suspect Chuck gets the interview opportunity because of friendships within the G. Bay staff/hierarchy, but I just can't see him getting another H.C. job...... . Now, as a defensive coordinator/asst. coach....I DO see that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hoose said:

No better man than Chuck Pagano. However, I just don't see this happening. His final two year stint as HC of the Colts was abysmal as far as in-game coaching and game planning. The Colts would play hard for him, yes, but the team could never adjust after half time; Chuck was perpetually out coached in the 4th quarter; and it really felt like the team was ill prepared nearly every week. Not to mention lousy choices in asst. coaches. 

That can't be lost on G. Bay's leadership. I suspect Chuck gets the interview opportunity because of friendships within the G. Bay staff/hierarchy, but I just can't see him getting another H.C. job...... . Now, as a defensive coordinator/asst. coach....I DO see that. 

In-game coaching is in the eye of the beholder.

I guarantee you that every NFL coach..all 32 of them..are criticized in the fan universe because of in-game decisions they make.  Go to any fan web site and you'll read about how their coach has blown certain games. Its arbitrary and hindsight-laden.

That's not ever why you'd hire and fire a head coach.

 

Pagano never had a team which didnt play hard for him.

That's coaching, to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jimmy would be the better candidate although i hope he also calls the offensive plays because hes a great play caller and he was the reason the ravens went to the Superbowl  along with Peyton manning going to the Superbowl his first year coaching...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

Which city and its fans dont take the game seriously?

Real pointless question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, oldunclemark said:

The only people who don't like Pagano are fans in Indianapolis.

 

What does liking have to do with anything? They would be better off hiring Regis Philbin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t see Chuck as a natural fit in Green Bay.    Certainly NOT while they have Aaron Rogers as their QB.

 

Pagano is a believer in the chunk play philosophy.   A believer in the 7-step drops while receivers run longer patterns.    That’s why he hired Arians and Chudzinski.   They believe in slower developing chunk plays as well.

 

That’s NOT what Green Bay believes in.  Not what they want with Rogers. 

 

Perhaps this is a courtesy interview?    We never knows who is friends with whom?   Pagano has been in the NFL for over 30 years.   I’m sure he’s made plenty of friends.  Maybe someone is doing him a solid?

 

Caldwell might be a much more interesting choice.   This will be interesting to follow...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t see Chuck as a natural fit in Green Bay.    Certainly NOT while they have Aaron Rogers as their QB.

 

Pagano is a believer in the chunk play philosophy.   A believer in the 7-step drops while receivers run longer patterns.    That’s why he hired Arians and Chudzinski.   They believe in slower developing chunk plays as well.

 

That’s NOT what Green Bay believes in.  Not what they want with Rogers. 

 

Perhaps this is a courtesy interview?    We never knows who is friends with whom?   Pagano has been in the NFL for over 30 years.   I’m sure he’s made plenty of friends.  Maybe someone is doing him a solid?

 

Caldwell might be a much more interesting choice.   This will be interesting to follow...

You are assuming Chuck learned zero from his experience? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

You are assuming Chuck learned zero from his experience? 

 

No....   but even if we assume that Chuck now embraces a different type of offense,  he has no experience with it.    No track record.     If you're Green Bay, do you want to let him prove it on your watch?     I don't think so.    They can't afford to,  not with the rest of Rogers career in the balance.

 

Too much of a gamble.

 

Remember,  I'm a Pagano supporter.    Just not in this particular situation.    I don't see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

No....   but even if we assume that Chuck now embraces a different type of offense,  he has no experience with it.    No track record.     If you're Green Bay, do you want to let him prove it on your watch?     I don't think so.    They can't afford to,  not with the rest of Rogers career in the balance.

 

Too much of a gamble.

 

Remember,  I'm a Pagano supporter.    Just not in this particular situation.    I don't see it.

That is why coordinators are hired.

The way I see it is Rogers would welcome an offense like Pagano/Arians ran. He is a gunslinger at heart.

The thing is in Green Bay there are so many people who have their hands in decisions made. Not having an owner to dictate what goes on can hurt as much as help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

That is why coordinators are hired.

The way I see it is Rogers would welcome an offense like Pagano/Arians ran. He is a gunslinger at heart.

The thing is in Green Bay there are so many people who have their hands in decisions made. Not having an owner to dictate what goes on can hurt as much as help.

 

I'm sorry,  but I don't understand this response...

 

In your previous post to me, you asked if I'm assuming that Chuck learned nothing from this expereince.    And now you state to me that what he ran with the Colts with Arians is what he should do in Green Bay.    So, why the question about learning something?    If he's going to do in Green Bay what he did in Indy,  what did he have to learn?   

 

Honestly,  I think the last thing in the world Aaron Rodgers would want a part of is a Bruce Arians-style chunk play offense.    It got Roethlisberger hurt,  got Luck hurt, and got Carson Palmer hurt.

 

If you think Rodgers would like that offense, then why not interview and hire Arians himself.   Maybe he'd come out of retirement for Aaron Rodgers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I'm sorry,  but I don't understand this response...

 

In your previous post to me, you asked if I'm assuming that Chuck learned nothing from this expereince.    And now you state to me that what he ran with the Colts with Arians is what he should do in Green Bay.    So, why the question about learning something?    If he's going to do in Green Bay what he did in Indy,  what did he have to learn?   

 

Honestly,  I think the last thing in the world Aaron Rodgers would want a part of is a Bruce Arians-style chunk play offense.    It got Roethlisberger hurt,  got Luck hurt, and got Carson Palmer hurt.

 

If you think Rodgers would like that offense, then why not interview and hire Arians himself.   Maybe he'd come out of retirement for Aaron Rodgers?

I was being sarcastic in my comment about Rogers because of his pendency to throw the ball all over the field.

Personally I don't think Green Bay will hire Pagano but if they did I feel pretty sure that Pagano learned from his tenure as a head coach. To assume he would do the same things there IMO is wrong.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Green Bay has always had a thing for conservative, lame duck coaches and they’ve made a ton of bad hires over the years that are overshadowed by the 3 good ones they’ve made. 3...as the oldest team in the league. Mike Sherman was the wussiest, lamest coach ever who just happened to win a playoff game ever other year because of some Favre junk. Give me McCarthy, Martyball, Mora etc over him any day.

 

I wouldn’t take a chance on Chuck. He has his qualities but if they hire him they might as well hire Josh and Jimbo as assistants and change the name of the team to the Green Bay Buddyroos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, they're looking for a yes-man who will kneel before Aaron Rodgers-sama.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ReMeDy said:

Basically, they're looking for a yes-man who will kneel before Aaron Rodgers-sama.

 

The more news I get out of the camp the more it seems like this and that...gasp...the McCarthy suspiciouns were right. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there is a plus side to this season, it's that we're not that far out from top 10 status now. Obviously a lot to be decided in these last 3 games, but as it stands now(looking at how much Buffalo gave up to make that move) Colts would probably have to give their 1st, a 3rd, and their second 2nd round pick. Atlanta, NYJ, and Arizona all seem like teams to make the move with. 
    • Luck always played good in the 4th quarter when we were down. Defenses would play prevent to stop the big play and he would pick them apart. When you are ahead in the 4h quarter defenses tighten down to get a stop. JB andColts  have had the lead Quite a bit this year. This is where we  need playmakers to get us critical 1 st downs in the 4h quarter. Either Frank thinks our running game should be able to do that or JB is not seeing open receivers that Frank dials up. IDK. 
    • This is an absolute lie, and you should know better. Tanking is a great strategy. It brought the Astros and Cubs world series, it brought the Colts Andrew Luck. The higher the pick, the more choices you have to either A.) pick a higher rated player on your board, or B.) trade down and accumulate more picks (like the Quenton Nelson trade). Top 15 picks are better than top 20 picks. Look at Ryan Kelly and Malik Hooker. The draft is not a crap shoot, it's about strategy and research, and every GM would rather have 5 extra players available to them at 15 than 20. This is not a debate, and Ballard would agree with me.
    • There is some truth to that, but odds are that you do better with the pick in the top 15.  The player you want is more likely to be there at 13 rather than 18.   Good players can be taken anywhere, but your odds improve with the better pick position.  
    • Go with Brissett against the Saints.  There is still a shot at the playoffs.   Assuming we lose that game, start Kelly the last 2 games.  There is no downside.   It gives the fans what they want.  It gives the coaches and Ballard a look at what Kelly is.  Worst case is that we lose both games and gain draft position.   It's not tanking.    If Kelly doesn't get some playing time, I think we go into next season with Jacoby as the starter and Hoyer as the back up again.  They signed Hoyer to a 3 year $12 million contract with $9 million guaranteed.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...