Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

How I predict the AFC playoffs will go


CR91

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Myles said:

Same with the Texans though.  

At the time, the Colts needed that win against the Jags to stay in the playoff hunt.   Turns out it wasn't the case.  

I'm just saying that I think teams play up to their potential when it is do or die.   Or they at least do not play in a lethargic manner.  

 

Again, we'll have to see. I just don't see this game as a cake walk for the texans like a lot of others are.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Again, we'll have to see. I just don't see this game as a cake walk for the texans like a lot of others are.

I agree with you on this point.  To be honest, the Texans have a lot to play for, and the Jags don't.  The funny thing is, even if the Texans win, I'm not sure homefield is to their advantage when they play the Colts, if Luck and TY are heatlthy! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, compuls1v3 said:

I agree with you on this point.  To be honest, the Texans have a lot to play for, and the Jags don't.  The funny thing is, even if the Texans win, I'm not sure homefield is to their advantage when they play the Colts, if Luck and TY are heatlthy! 

 

haha they do love houston

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

They also gave up 22 points to sam darnold. Honestly I think their defense is overrated.

How many points did the celebrated Colts defense give up to Sam Darnold? 

 

And if you watched the last game you would’ve seen how many in-game injuries to the defense (and that particularly nasty one on offense) the Texans suffered. I’m not saying the Jacksonville game will be a gimme either but come on...Blake Bortles is starting. :pokerface:

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Qwiz said:

How many points did the celebrated Colts defense give up to Sam Darnold? 

 

And if you watched the last game you would’ve seen how many in-game injuries to the defense (and that particularly nasty one on offense) the Texans suffered. I’m not saying the Jacksonville game will be a gimme either but come on...Blake Bortles is starting. :pokerface:

 

The colts are not celebrated as a top defense like the texans are and your secondary was a problem way before any injuries happened. As for Bortles, I already said this will be a defensive game. I just think the Jags defense is better especially with all the injuries you guys have to your wrs and rbs. Also Watson has been getting killed by your line.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

The colts are not celebrated as a top defense like the texans are and your secondary was a problem way before any injuries happened. 

But surely you realize how hypocritical you sound considering we beat the Jets and the Colts gave up way more points to them, right? 

And no. The secondary has not been a problem. Kareem Jackson has had a career year, Reid has balled out as a rookie and Tyrann Mathieu is Tyrann Mathieu.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Qwiz said:

But surely you realize how hypocritical you sound considering we beat the Jets and the Colts gave up way more points to them, right? 

And no. The secondary has not been a problem. Kareem Jackson has had a career year, Reid has balled out as a rookie and Tyrann Mathieu is Tyrann Mathieu.

 

and yet you guys are almost dead last in passing defense. Again Im saying this will be a defensive game. All im saying is the Jags defense is better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

and yet you guys are almost dead last in passing defense. Again Im saying this will be a defensive game. All im saying is the Jags defense is better.

Meh. Considering the hell the secondary has been through at times this season I’m not surprised. We beat them pretty handily the first time we played. Yes things have changed but I would trust Watson vs their D more than I would Bortles against ours.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Qwiz said:

Meh. Considering the hell the secondary has been through at times this season I’m not surprised. We beat them pretty handily the first time we played too, and yeah things have changed but I would trust Watson vs their D more than I would Bortles against ours.

 

Even though you're down to basically Hopkins on offense? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Even though you're down to basically Hopkins on offense? 

Coutee and Miller will be back this week. DeAndre Carter is playing. Watson can elevate guys on offense and last week was another good example of that. Our defense just couldn’t hold up on their end. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Qwiz said:

Coutee and Miller will be back this week. DeAndre Carter is playing. Watson can elevate guys on offense and last week was another good example of that. Our defense just couldn’t hold up on their end. 

 

Hasn't Coutee missed like 10 games this year?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Luck is Good said:

Colts are a better team than the Jaguars

 

Thats not the point and the texans are plagued with injuries on offense while the jags defense is basically healthy

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Hasn't Coutee missed like 10 games this year?

It’s football. Guys get hurt. But if he does come back his speed and route running will be a factor as it has in the past. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Myles said:

I think Watson trumps the defense comparison.   He's really been quite good.   26 TD's to 9 INT's.   68% completion.  104 rating.  500 yards rushing.  

 

 

Im not saying watson has been bad. Im just saying the lack of weapons and a leaky oline will cause him and the offense to struggle

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Luck is Good said:

I’m more concerned about the Colts winning their game. I’d love to see the Texans lose. But I’ll believe it when I see it

That’s my only concern as well. I only care about four team. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Myles said:

I would very much like to see your scenario play out.   Unfortunately I don't think Houston will lose.   It's a home game for the division title.   They will be playing much more motivated ball than the Jags.   They are an all around better team too.   That said, Go Jags!!

 

But never discount that Jacksonville defense

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's the common denominator of our two big injuries this week? (Malik Hooker and Parris Campbell)   Every time we draft a Buckeye, they're cursed from day one.   Just sayin.
    • Indianapolis Colts versus the New York Colts.   Indy wins.
    • I am also glad we didn't run Hines between the tackles too much.  I, too, was surprised he wasn't used in the passing game more... but the O became very predictable when he was in the game week 1 (IMO).  What I like about the first 2 weeks is they make it more difficult to plan against us -- even though we may have seemed a bit predictable each week.  We threw for ~350 week 1 and then ran for ~150 week 2.  I'd like to see a bit more balance and in-game adjustments moving forward, but  I wouldn't necessarily want to be a D-coordinator planning for this team as we've clearly shown we can be effective in multiple ways.  I thought Rivers made good decisions all day yesterday (the INT wasn't really his fault and it was the right read), whereas I thought both his INTs week 1 were avoidable mistakes where he shouldn't have thrown the ball.   I agree, I'd like the O to slowly evolve throughout the season and don't really mind if our gameplan changes quite a bit from week to week.  Yesterday, they moved the ball effectively and made few mistakes in any phase of the game.  Reich said after game 1 that he was a bit disappointed in himself for basically abandoning the run after Mack went down.  I think yesterday showed we can still be a solid run offense with Taylor/Wilkins/Hines.       Afterall, the motto of our team since last year has been 'run the d*mn ball.'  We almost doubled their time of possession, we won the turnover battle and we dominated them in pretty much every phase of the game.  I am not complaining at all.     We should have had one deep ball (TY dropped it), but I think you're correct, we didn't need a knockout punch yesterday.  After we took the lead, the Vikings really showed no threat to be able to win that game.  I tend to like what Reich and Sirianni did yesterday, we didn't really show much on offense in terms of little wrinkles or deep plays (though Rivers on that throw to TY showed he can still fling it).  I'm sure there will be times during the season where we will need to open the playbook a bit more than we did yesterday (or week 1 for that matter), but we were so effective yesterday I didn't think we need to show any other team anything more than we did.  Afterall, this is a weird season -- nobody has preseason tape on anybody else and aside from being able to go back to previous years' tape or week-to-week tape, teams don't have much to go by to plan for upcoming opponents, especially if coaching or players changed.... we have a brand new QB, two promising rookies (jury is out on Patmon) on O, we're utilizing Mo Alie Cox more, etc... so sure, teams can go back to previous offenses run by Reich/Sirianni, but they have quite a bit of new pieces on this offense that other teams don't have much to go by yet... so I'm fine with just showing other teams that we're capable of pounding it down their throat with Taylor/Wilkins or throwing for ~350 yards for now... as we get into more difficult games and later in the season (hopefully the playoffs eventually), it'd be nice to still be able to use some new tricks.
    • I think the offseason needs are similar to what I thought back in May, just after the 2020 draft.   DE, TE, CB, and WR are Indy's biggest needs in my view. (QB may get pushed back a year if they continue to see progress from Eason and Rivers plays well enough this season to bring him back for another year)   Got to find a longterm great DE to play alongside Buckner. Turay still has to stay healthy to be that player. I for one would love seeing a San Fran type DL from last year in Indy.    Indy needs to also find their longterm mismatch TE. Doyle is a great #2 possession TE who is also great at blocking. I don't like him longterm as our TE #1 though.   WR wouldn't be a huge need if Hilton didn't show any decline and Campbell could stay healthy. Unfortunately that doesn't look to be the case. Hilton could rebound surely, but I fear Campbell may be injury prone since entering the NFL. I hope I'm wrong there.   Finally, CB is another big need going into next offseason. Ya-Sin still has work to do to become a top corner, and Moore is best suited for the slot. Got to find a long term CB on the outside opposite Rock. And you can never had too many quality CBs.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...