Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

CR91

As much as it pains me to say it........we need to root for the pats

Recommended Posts

Just now, Smoke317 said:

I was gonna post the same thing.  Except in a way that would have required some censorship...  Now we need the Saints to do us a solid.

And that's just as terrible . Lol

 

NO will always be on 'the list' for beating us way back when..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, ricker182 said:

Can't believe we got pummeled by this average patriots team. 

That was then.  Our O Line is playing much different. And Gronk & Edelman look like they’ve aged in dog years since then. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IinD said:

And that's just as terrible . Lol

 

NO will always be on 'the list' for beating us way back when..

Exactly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would have been nice to see that horseshoe next to that #6 seed even though we've still got chances to get in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, NorthernBlue said:

DANGIT PATS WHY.

 

Saints and Chargers better not blow it next week

Me I am just concentrating on beating the Giants...….. Try not to scoreboard watch too much .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Root for the Chargers and Saints playing at home, easier to root for than the Patriots.

 

First time, in a while, the Patriots will be having the 3rd seed. Texans were the biggest winners this weekend.

 

The Jaguars game will continue to haunt us. Those guys have bumbled one game after the other with Cody Kessler and we had to lay an egg against them, of all teams, that will be the most regrettable moment this season for me by far. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WoolMagnet said:

I guess its true.

NE throwin the game cuz they're scared of us.

It would stink for them to lose to us in the playoffs.  That would mean their "master plan" of the old McDaniels switcheroo didnt pan out properly.  Oh, the horror.

 

The Cheaters didn't lose because they are afraid of us.

They lost to keep the Steelers still in line for the playoffs. Remember, the steelers are also a league favorite.  Pats didn't have to have this game for playoffs. Steelers needed it a lot more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

The Cheaters didn't lose because they are afraid of us.

They lost to keep the Steelers still in line for the playoffs. Remember, the steelers are also a league favorite.  Pats didn't have to have this game for playoffs. Steelers needed it a lot more.

 

New England lost this game so that they can draw us in a #3 vs #6 match up. There is the other way to spin this. :)

 

I cannot remember the last time the Patriots had 12 penalties, or even half that number, yikes!!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, chad72 said:

 

New England lost this game so that they can draw us in a #3 vs #6 match up. There is the other way to spin this. :)

 

Maybe so, but more importantly it keeps the Steelers in division lead instead of ranked #8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

Maybe so, but more importantly it keeps the Steelers in division lead instead of ranked #8.

 

Now, if the Chargers win, we get ahead of Baltimore, right? Then we just have to win out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

New England lost this game so that they can draw us in a #3 vs #6 match up. There is the other way to spin this. :)

 

I cannot remember the last time the Patriots had 12 penalties, or even half that number, yikes!!! 

 

I think announcer said they had only 4 OL holding calls all season. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Now, if the Chargers win, we get ahead of Baltimore, right? Then we just have to win out. 

Yep.....and it's on Saturday. We get to watch it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

I think announcer said they had only 4 OL holding calls all season. Lol

Which is incredibly suspicious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s going to be a tough game in TN. Titans aren’t losing to the browns next week. If we get that six spot next week it is all going to come down to that TN game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Pats havn't looked good..

 

Maybe they'll lose the remainder of their games.  

 

We, on the other hand have really started to click.  I'm going to choose to focus on that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course the Pats find a way to screw us, and if we do make it, we'll likely be off to Foxboro.

 

We have three chances remaining:

 

Chargers/Ravens 

Steelers/Saints

Browns/Ravens

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In what bizarro land am I in where I've gone from rooting for NE to now the Chargers and Saints??

 

Somebody's * with me...

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Remember,  we are not debating whether Spring is doable.   I've stated from the beginning that I agree.    It's not as bad as some here think it is.    It's doable,   No question.   We are debating whether Spring is preferable, or desireable.    So, when you write,  that you don't think you have to say more about an issue,  any issue,  I'm sorry,   but NO!     You DO have to say more.  A heckuva lot more.    Because YOU have the burden of proof.    My position is the Industry Standard.   Your's has, by comparison,  a handful of examples.   Some are recent.   That's great.   But I view that as a nod to the position that it's doable.    You view it as a possibility that it might soon become the norm.   I'm happy to wait until that actually happens.   As to your primary argument.....    that all the prep work has been done,  and if you make the changes in winter,  that the GM is not up to speed on what the current scouts and player personnel people have done.    Except there is this......   Your argument that you yourself use to others here who complain that changing in the spring is bad.   To quote you....   it's just one draft.    One free agency period.    And there will soon be another,  and then another....   and another.   One season is nothing in the grand scheme of things.   That is what you wrote (roughly) to posters who think making the GM change in the spring is outright terrible and stupid.    Which I strongly disagree with their positin.   Your argument makes my argument for me.    I want the new GM in the building ASAP.    So he can sooner evaluate his players.    His front office.    His scouts.    The entire program.   Waiting until May or June just delays that.    I want it to begin ASAP.   I'd expect that he can and would be able to make some level of difference in his first free agency and draft.    Plus,  I think you way, way over-dramatize the handicap the new GM has arriving in January.   He's the GM.    He's already got a ton of information in his head,  and in his notebooks, his binders.    He's not in as much of a bind as you like to portray.     So, with your desired scenario, this draft could be used for a system that the new GM doesn't even want to run.    Like Chuck running a 3-4,  when Ballard wants to run a 4-3.    Like Chuck wanted to run a power running game and a deep pattern passing game.    While Ballard favors a zone running game and a get rid of the ball quick, move the chains offense.     In your preferred scenario,  you're the one who is burning the first year the GM has,  not me.     I see little of the benefits and mostly an approach that screams....   "Gee,  I hope this works out."   By the way,  I didn't want this post to end without addressing one of your main points.   Your paragraph that starts with this:   My Point:  There are always good candidates...   same is true for head coaches and coordinators.    I'm sorry,  but I'm going to STRONGLY disagree with that argument.  And I think you'll retract that.    Every so often you'll see an article about how did the class of GM's from a previous year turn out?   Or head coach hires?    I used to tell posters here who hated Pagano that the class of head coaches that included Chuck,  that all of the other coaches got fired before Chuck.    That Chuck was the best of his class.   And that happens with GM's too.   A class gets hired,  and quite often most of them, sometimes all of them don't work out.   I believe my position has far more facts to back that up.    There isn't always a Sean McVey.  There isn't always a Kyle Shannahan.   There isn't always a Josh McDaniels.   There aren't 32 good GM's, or 32 good head coaches,  or 32 good offensive or defensive coordinators.   That's why so many teams struggle for years to get those spots right.   So, no, I absolutely reject the idea that there are always good candidates.    Sorry.   I know you believe what you're writing.   But honestly, this feels like one big thought experiment. Like you're trying to make a case for something you really don't believe,  but you're trying to see if you can make a good argument anyway.   And yet I know that's NOT the case.    That you really, honestly do believe this.    That's what I find so astonishing.    There's lots of opinion,  and not a lot of evidence to back this up.    As I've said from the get-go....   I think this is doable.    I just don't think it's desireable or preferable.  
    • To your last paragraph....   yes,  I agree that if a GM,  any GM, inherits a bad roster,  then no matter how OK his draft picks may be,   they will likely stick on the roster.   But if you're a GM inheriting a poor team,  and you draft players that are only somewhat better than what you originally had,  then the improvement in the team will only be so good.   Again,  from 4 wis,  to perhaps 6-7.    That wouldn't be bad.    That would be reasonable.   But when you suddenly pop to 10 wins,  including 9 of the last 10 in the regular season,  and you win on the road in the playoffs,   then there's got to be something more there than just the GM's new guys.    Those guys have got to be good.    You can't do that well simply because they're better than the previous guys.    They're much better.    Yes, the coaching staff is better and the systems the team is running are better,  but so are the players.    They have to execute.    And we did.   Better than we thought possible.    Certainly better than when we were 1-5 and looked like a candidate for a top-10 or even a top-5 draft pick.    The players are good.   They may not be great yet,  but they're really good and much better than what we had.    The results are all the proof you need.   Again,  thanks for the exchange....  
    • I missed the first couple innings, was keeping track on phone, didn’t realize things got chippy with the benches clearing after the Contreras HR! Seems the Cubs were playing with a little extra edge tonight, I love it!!! 
    • and then NE goes into KC and throws for 350 and Sony runs for 100+ on them. our O, and O game plan just sucked.   i get KC was good, but our O just sucked.
  • Members

    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 420

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 44

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franklin County

      Franklin County 452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,668

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 9,354

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaveA1102

      DaveA1102 1,864

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...