Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Texans Game Day Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 699
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi, Colts fans!   Our Indianapolis Colts try to go above their 6-6 regular season record, as they are in Southeast Texas to play the 9-3 and AFC South leading Houston Texans,  Texans are on a nine-gam

They commented on how Luck has played so much better by stepping up in the pocket to help his tackles.  The real truth is that the interior blocking has been so much better so he actually CAN step up

Watching the Chiefs vs Ravens, the Domestic Battery Bowl.   (Rice-Ravens, Hunt-Chiefs).

1 minute ago, AllYouNeedIsLuck said:

Nah fam. We need the Dolphins to lose cause for some reason tiebreakers are conference record 1st rather than head to head. Dumb rule

If we deserve to be in the Playoffs, we'll be there.   

 

For me it's always a good day when the Pats lose, and that crazy play at the end to seal the deal, was kinda fun to watch.

 

Sorry / Not sorry.      :cheer: 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, AllYouNeedIsLuck said:

Anybody see the play with Dolphins won on? LMAO wth 

 

I sure did. It was fantastic. I jumped off the couch. I was watching on Red Zone. I did not get to see BB or Brady. Miami has their number. 

 

Great day of competitive football games. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It was a must win today and we got it against a Very Good team on the road. Ol Andy over there in KC was trying to ruin my day though, Jeez KC why give me 2 ulcers in 1 day lmao 

 

Did you see LOS's prediction? He/she wrote it after you made your prediction (3rd comment on 1st page). He/she had even more confidence in the Colts.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

The 1st Tiebreaker is head to head. We own it over Miami. I know that is 100% correct, it's always been like that.

I believe that is true if two teams are tied but not if multiple teams are tied with the same record. At least that was the explaination last week when the Colts fell behind Miami in the standings.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Boiler_Colt said:

I believe that is true if two teams are tied but not if multiple teams are tied with the same record. At least that was the explaination last week when the Colts fell behind Miami in the standings.

according to the playoff scenario it looks like they have the colts ahead of miami as of now.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

I believe that is true if two teams are tied but not if multiple teams are tied with the same record. At least that was the explaination last week when the Colts fell behind Miami in the standings.

Miami plays at Minnesota next week so they will lose that one anyone. As of now we own the tiebreaker over Miami because of head to head unless I am missing something. Ravens have it over us because of Conference Record and Common Games. Nevertheless exciting times and we got a huge win today and Baltimore loss, 2 critical things we needed. :thmup:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In Ballard I trust. He is intuitive and a consensus builder. This is a great opportunity to use this decision to refine your offensive strategy. Remember, Reich loves the RPO and what he could do with a mobile QB.
    • Ballard didn't say it was definite.   He didn't rule it out.   He just said as of this minute.    I think he's hoping to find out in April and May.      He still might end up deciding Eason is OK as the back-up.   I was only trying to impress upon those in the "Throw Jacob Eason in and see what we have" crowd that Ballard has crushed that dream for 2021.    But I wouldn't rule out 2022....  at least not yet.  
    • TY - 2Y/22M - he can still play but he’s not Tyreek Hill taking the top of defenses anymore, and with his disappearing act at the beginning of the year I’m afraid to sign him any longer or with too much guaranteed. Partly for sentimental reasons I want him to stay, but I do think he’s still got some juice.    Mack - 1Y/1M - Likable player but due to his position and injury, no way can I justify giving him much more than vet minimum.    Houston - 1Y/8M - Fell off a lot this year compared to his first year. Still our best edge player, basically by default and I’d be hoping we can get a more 2019 performance out of him at arguably our weakest position on the team.    Autry - Walk. He will price himself out with an inflated sense of value because he’s gotten decent sack numbers, but he is the definition of JAG and I’d only keep him if he agreed to a minimum contract.    Rhodes - 1Y/6M - He was a stud this year. If we could guarantee that he won’t revert back to his last two years in Minnesota I would be willing to go longer and higher. With how much he fell off after getting paid the first time, I’m not giving him a long term deal.    Walker - 1Y/2M - He was playing a very small percentage of downs at the end of the year so I’m keeping him less based on ability and more based on leadership and football savvy.    Hooker - Walk. Both sides need to just move on. I’d keep him at minimum too but I think both sides want a fresh start. Also a little miscast in the current defense so no reason to force a square peg into a round hole.    Brissett - 1Y/5M - Too big of a fan of Brissett as a man to want to see him leave. I don’t want him starting but he’s a very solid backup and compared to the 20M we gave him last year, I can live with his salary being at 1/4 of that this year.    Pascal and MAC both tendered at 2.24M. I want to bring in Kenny Golladay or Allen Robinson and Pascal is JAG so he’s not falling into my future plans much. I’m a big fan of MAC and I wouldn’t mind seeing him play the Jack Doyle role. He’s a better blocker, has better hands, and is more explosive.    I may be lowballing some guys but I’d hate to fall into the trap of overvaluing our guys and keeping them just because you want to keep your own. Unfortunately, I think the five most important positions on the team also coincide with our five weakest positions on the team; QB, WR, CB, DE, and LT. Fortunately we’ve got a good cap situation and this is the perfect year to be needing a QB. 
    • If we let Walker Walk, (and I think it’s likely) it’s not because we want an upgrade.   It’s because we simply don’t play him enough.   I think East Street has the numbers in snaps, but I think Walker is roughly playing 25-30 percent of the snaps.   That’s it.    We can't pay him enough for that.   Some other team will PLAY him more so they will PAY him more.    When Walker is off the field, we are either playing a 4-2-5 or a 4-1-6.   Leonard plays basically 100 percent of the snaps and I think Oke is about 55-60 percent.     There is a method to our madness.  
    • I'm surprised some folks want to resign Walker. Imo we definitely need an upgrade.... I'd let him walk.
  • Members

    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,031

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AustexColt

      AustexColt 110

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mackrel829

      Mackrel829 9

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 164

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 1,803

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 449

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 7,414

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JackOLantin

      JackOLantin 41

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...