Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Conventional rb screens ... Why does Frank hate them


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, GusFring said:

That oass rush was ferocious yesterday. He calls screens, but it's usually when the rb is lined up as a wr or something. That was a gm that needed more screens. Then it hit me, how few rb screens are actually called. Why is that?

Because it's not Madden and screens against a team with very good and very fast Lbers usually do not do much.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

Because it's not Madden and screens against a team with very good and very fast Lbers usually do not do much.

i never got the hang of RB screens in madden.  the back always  seemed to make an awkward catch and have trouble turning upfield 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You also need your players to play the part.  It’s an act/fake so the players must do their part.  Many of my better coaches said you must block one of the outside opponents either the OLB or the DE.  Example and depending on your scheme, say the screen is on the right your RT must either block or push his man inside.  If not the DE/OLB will have a free run to the QB or will be able to block the pass (pass usually a lob with no arch).  Again not a play you run at the playground level but also timing.  Also there’s not much time for QB check down so timing and QB decision is off essence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Colts get worked by more screens and RB dump passes than any team I've ever seen. 

 

How many 1st downs did the Jags convert on those passes yesterday (they converted a 3rd & 13 on their second FG drive to name one)? Send everyone on +10 yard routes, wait for our LBers to sink into their zones and dump it off to the RB for a 5-15 yard gain. Rinse and repeat over and over and over and over - game after game after game.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Mitch Connors said:

The Colts get worked by more screens and RB dump passes than any team I've ever seen. 

 

How many 1st downs did the Jags convert on those passes yesterday (they converted a 3rd & 13 on their second FG drive to name one)? Send everyone on +10 yard routes, wait for our LBers to sink into their zones and dump it off to the RB for a 5-15 yard gain. Rinse and repeat over and over and over and over - game after game after game.

 

That’s what you get in a don’t give up the big play down the field defense

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Mitch Connors said:

The Colts get worked by more screens and RB dump passes than any team I've ever seen. 

 

How many 1st downs did the Jags convert on those passes yesterday (they converted a 3rd & 13 on their second FG drive to name one)?

 

That wasn't and RB screen. That was a pass concept, checked down to the RB (behind the los).

 

Anyway, RB screens need a lightning fast turn and release from the QB to be effective. Luck has a quite quick release, but he has a big body, and altough his straight line speed is decent, he's not particularly agile. It takes a bit more time for him to turn his body 90 percent, than for a more agile QB. Maybe this is also amongst the reasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I assume aggressive means 5 or more coming across the LOS consistently, which Jax was not doing.

Aggressive means in constant pass rush mode. Wasn't a whole lot of blitzing to me. Some, but they were getting pressure with their line. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Peterk2011 said:

 

That wasn't and RB screen. That was a pass concept, checked down to the RB (behind the los).

 

Anyway, RB screens need a lightning fast turn and release from the QB to be effective. Luck has a quite quick release, but he has a big body, and altough his straight line speed is decent, he's not particularly agile. It takes a bit more time for him to turn his body 90 percent, than for a more agile QB. Maybe this is also amongst the reasons.

 

That was a designed pass to the RB and it wasnt behind the LOS. Thats the RB dump pass Im talking about. They waited 2 seconds for our LBs to sink into their zone (already 10 yards off the ball) and dump it off to the RB underneath. Given the fact that theyre at the fringe of FG range should have been reason enough to limit any yardage gained but we gave them at least 10 free yards which makes a 56-57 yard FG a 46-47 even if they dont convert the down. Thats why it happens week after week.

 

image.png.5dafc1d296f88adbd2ec5580d46bc00f.png

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same formation and same play from the first Jags game with a different result. The Red Zone didnt/couldnt allow the Colts to play so far off the ball which left the defenders much closer to the tackle for a 5 yard gain. These are not check downs due to coverage, these are designed plays that we've shown we cannot reliably defend.

image.thumb.png.5c01841a014fb3803360463595ef1f70.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GusFring said:

Aggressive means in constant pass rush mode. Wasn't a whole lot of blitzing to me. Some, but they were getting pressure with their line. 

Exactly, so how is a screen pass supposed to work when there are 7 defenders on on the defensive side of the ball?

 

A team screens to break the blitz, if the defensive is not blitzing then a screen play is not going to do much.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to see more 2 rb sets with Doyle out. Hilton, Inman, Ebron, Mack and Himes. Old pro set but with 2 rbs and not rb and fb. We need Ebron especially now to block his butt off he can't come off the field anymore. Mack can't lose snaps to Wilkins and Himes but Himes needs to be on the field. So thats why more 2 rb sets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Colts did last year...except Rivers/JB wasn’t exactly Mahomes level on the field.   But if this team had Mahomes...that would be wonderful. Would much rather spend $40M on an elite QB than $25M on a dice roll.   PFF did an analysis of WAR above expectation for players drafted from 2017-current. In 4-year projections for Mahomes, he had a WAR of 11...while Q was at 1.6. So by this measure, Mahomes is ~7x more valuable (in WAR) than Q. Which means right now...with Mahomes at $40M AAV and Q at $6M AAV...they are basically equal value.   Obviously that will change when Q gets his contract. I am just illustrating how valuable a QB is. Mahomes is still a bargain compared to other positions on their second contracts.   (And to be clear...I am not picking on Q or saying they shouldn’t sign him. They  just happened to include his WAR in the article so I could use it for a comparison.)  
    • The rookie deal amount isn’t relevant...but it’s meant to show the jump...which is definitely relevant.    We aren’t talking about one player...it’s (3) players. And when you are suddenly paying x times more for the same handful of players...it has an impact on the cap and roster construction (things like efficiency, positional spending and surplus value). And for a forward-thinking GM like Ballard, I imagine those are important aspects.    But I actually said I was not “eager” to trade anyone. I am just open to it if helps balance out cap and roster construction, along with providing premium draft capital that can help the team replace those players or address other areas.    I would guess the number of GMs that actually trade players heading into their second contracts have a much more specific analysis (GMs like Lynch, Grier, Douglas and BB...to name a few).    In my (admittedly novice) opinion, it just seems like having 5 players (out of 51) take up more than half of the cap space is a potentially untenable situation over time.     
    • nothing his offensive line can't fix. He needs to be very careful what he say's , said, and does.  Best attitude adjustment ever.                                                                                 
    • I remember during the draft when Watson came out and Chicago traded up to get the #2 pick, I was like I called it even saying that in here, laughing. Thinking I called it, this was too easy. Then I heard this - with the 2nd pick of the 2017 draft, the Chicago Bears select Mitchell Trubisky. I was like 
    • Imagine this forum if we had a QB of Mahomes level making 40 + million
  • Members

    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 121

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 2,829

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 9,820

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,304

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,096

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 4,171

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 07dleigh

      07dleigh 64

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BluesGirl

      BluesGirl 161

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chrisaaron1023

      Chrisaaron1023 1,908

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 7,386

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...