Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Narcosys

Cowherd puts Luck second in MVP.

Recommended Posts

Good watch, good arguments.

 

Says Mahomes wouldn't be able to do the same with this colts team. Backhand insult to the colts by complimenting Luck working with nobodies. Name 5 players not named Luck, two best behind him are rookies in Nelson and Leonard, and don't have a true #2 WR.

 

https://www.foxsports.com/watch/the-herd-with-colin-cowherd/video/1380693571814

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  If Cowherd asked Luck, Reich, Sirianni, Ballard or Irsay if Luck only has a few players he is playing with, they’d laugh in  his face.

  If he doesn’t know the Colts well enough to name the RT, etc., then his reasoning for Luck is flawed. We know there is ALOT

of character and talent on this team now.

   I would NOT consider Reid’s play calling an upgrade over Reich’s.

   Luck can make players better but so can Breese. I just think the narrative of Luck having no one around him is as inacurate

as “they can’t protect him”.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But compared to the teams he compares Luck with, and who they got on offence, he's on point.

 

Luck don't have a superstar RB like Hunt, Gurly or Kamara.

He got TY and Ebron, and one heck of an O-line, but Marlon Mack is no Super star, he's average compared to those guys, and Mo Alli Cox, Inman and Grant ain't no Hill, Cooks, Woods or Thomas.

 

Colts have a decent team, and Luck deserves to be the nr 2 in the MVP conversation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is the lone national media member that touted Luck before we started winning.  Everyone else jumped on the bandwagon.like last week. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both KC and NO were playoff teams last season. Colts were a joke. Luck comes back, and Colts are once again formidable. If Luck were playing with KC's weapons, he would already have 50 TD's. This should be Luck's 3rd MVP. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The guys on GMFB are all on the Luck MVP trail as well.......if we win out, and Luck spots 3 more consecutive 3 x TD pass games tk beat Brady, he could get some votes. Otherwise, Brees or Mahomes will take it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, having him back has certainly made a difference in our teams performance.    I have to admit, I was beginning to have my doubts and wondering if he'd ever get back to what we knew he was once capable of.   

 

It's really exciting to see him doing so well again and  I am happy for him.  

MVP running or not,  I'm happy to have our QB back and making our games exciting again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pacergeek said:

Both KC and NO were playoff teams last season. Colts were a joke. Luck comes back, and Colts are once again formidable. If Luck were playing with KC's weapons, he would already have 50 TD's. This should be Luck's 3rd MVP. 

if we make the playoffs he will get some consideration.  the award isnt really about most valuable.  its about winning and putting up big numbers 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, coltsfeva said:

  If Cowherd asked Luck, Reich, Sirianni, Ballard or Irsay if Luck only has a few players he is playing with, they’d laugh in  his face.

  If he doesn’t know the Colts well enough to name the RT, etc., then his reasoning for Luck is flawed. We know there is ALOT

of character and talent on this team now.

   I would NOT consider Reid’s play calling an upgrade over Reich’s.

   Luck can make players better but so can Breese. I just think the narrative of Luck having no one around him is as inacurate

as “they can’t protect him”.

 

 

I agree the Colts have a few more nice players than advertised but the Chiefs and Saints have ELITE players on offense (Brees and Mahomes are widely considered 1 & 2 in the MVP race).

 

KC has the most dangerous return man in the league who is also one of the best receivers in Hill.

They have the NFL rushing champ from last year in Hunt.

They have the best TE in the game in Kelce.

KC has a top 10 ranked offensive line according to PFF.

 

With the exception of maybe a linemen or 2 there isn't an offensive player on the Colts that would start on the Chiefs (unless you count Hilton as their starting #2 WR).

 

No way Mahomes would put up those numbers on the Colts.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Pacergeek said:

Both KC and NO were playoff teams last season. Colts were a joke. Luck comes back, and Colts are once again formidable. If Luck were playing with KC's weapons, he would already have 50 TD's. This should be Luck's 3rd MVP. 

I said this just last week in a topic. If Luck had any of the playmakers these guys did at any point in his career and had this current type of protection , he’d be on his 2nd or 3rd MVP already. Let’s not forget he lead the league in TDs with 40 a few short years ago, and that was with no protection, run game, or help at receiver or TE outside Hilton.

 

He might not win over Brees, but he should be in the running. In addition to Comeback POY, he should possibly win offensive player of the year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, coltsfeva said:

  If Cowherd asked Luck, Reich, Sirianni, Ballard or Irsay if Luck only has a few players he is playing with, they’d laugh in  his face.

  If he doesn’t know the Colts well enough to name the RT, etc., then his reasoning for Luck is flawed. We know there is ALOT

of character and talent on this team now.

   I would NOT consider Reid’s play calling an upgrade over Reich’s.

   Luck can make players better but so can Breese. I just think the narrative of Luck having no one around him is as inacurate

as “they can’t protect him”.

 

This is true to us but not at all true to the greater nfl fanbase.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, coltsfeva said:

  If Cowherd asked Luck, Reich, Sirianni, Ballard or Irsay if Luck only has a few players he is playing with, they’d laugh in  his face.

  If he doesn’t know the Colts well enough to name the RT, etc., then his reasoning for Luck is flawed. We know there is ALOT

of character and talent on this team now.

   I would NOT consider Reid’s play calling an upgrade over Reich’s.

   Luck can make players better but so can Breese. I just think the narrative of Luck having no one around him is as inacurate

as “they can’t protect him”.

 

I heard Michael Grady this morning say that our defense has no playmakers. That bothered me because I would expect more from him being he's local. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, superrep1967 said:

I heard Michael Grady this morning say that our defense has no playmakers. That bothered me because I would expect more from him being he's local. 

  I don’t understand this kind of thinking.  I see playmakers on offense, defense and special teams. At points in time, I’ve seen plays made (open field tackles, ints, great catches, blocks, throws and catches), by just about everyone on the team.

  That’s not to say there isn’t room for improvement.

   “Playmakers” are considered as such when they do the little things right, consistently and as a result, come up with game-changing plays.

   Is that talent or the result of hard work, experience and good coaching and scheme? Maybe a combination of all of these. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew Luck is literally having an MVP calibre season right now. Unfortunately for him, it's happening whilst Drew Brees is having a historical campaign. 

 

This is what Luck is projected to finish this season at

4526 Yards, 46 TDs, 16 ints. Currently with a rating of 102.7 and a 68.4 % Completion Percentage.

 

Compared to the last few MVPs

Tom Brady: 4577 Yards, 32 TDs,  8 ints, 66.3% completion 102.8 Rating

Matt Ryan: 4944 Yards, 38 TDs, 7 Ints, 69% completion 117 Rating

Cam Newton: 3837 Yards, 35 TDs, 10 Ints, 59.8% completion, 99.4 Rating (rushed for 10 more)

Aaron Rodgers: 4381 Yards, 38 TDs, 5 ints, 65% completion, 112 Rating

 

Luck is throwing for just as many or more yards as all these guys, completing more passes than everyone besides Matt Ryan, and has a rating around the level of 2015 Cam and 2017 Brady.  The ints are what is holding him back. Lucky would have to virtually throw no more picks the rest of the year to have a shot at the  MVP. But it's Brees to lose.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question or request for any number crunchers we have on the forum.  How many of Luck's 11 interceptions can be directly attributed to drops by his receivers?  I'm not talking miscommunication or just being on the wrong page with receivers.  I'm talking straight through receivers hands & to the defender? I know 3 for sure.  The Alie-Cox, Mack, & Pascal interceptions are undeniably not his fault.  Are there any others?  Now, once we remove those interceptions, what would Luck's rating be?  It's currently at 102.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎11‎/‎27‎/‎2018 at 6:46 AM, coltsfeva said:

  If Cowherd asked Luck, Reich, Sirianni, Ballard or Irsay if Luck only has a few players he is playing with, they’d laugh in  his face.

  If he doesn’t know the Colts well enough to name the RT, etc., then his reasoning for Luck is flawed. We know there is ALOT

of character and talent on this team now.

   I would NOT consider Reid’s play calling an upgrade over Reich’s.

   Luck can make players better but so can Breese. I just think the narrative of Luck having no one around him is as inacurate

as “they can’t protect him”.

 

I would put him behind Brees and Gurley.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Smoke317 said:

I have a question or request for any number crunchers we have on the forum.  How many of Luck's 11 interceptions can be directly attributed to drops by his receivers?  I'm not talking miscommunication or just being on the wrong page with receivers.  I'm talking straight through receivers hands & to the defender? I know 3 for sure.  The Alie-Cox, Mack, & Pascal interceptions are undeniably not his fault.  Are there any others?  Now, once we remove those interceptions, what would Luck's rating be?  It's currently at 102.

About half of those 11 picks I say not his fault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎11‎/‎27‎/‎2018 at 9:15 AM, braveheartcolt said:

The guys on GMFB are all on the Luck MVP trail as well.......if we win out, and Luck spots 3 more consecutive 3 x TD pass games tk beat Brady, he could get some votes. Otherwise, Brees or Mahomes will take it. 

Brees is gonna get it if he keeps playing at the level he is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/27/2018 at 8:24 PM, NorthernBlue said:

This is what Luck is projected to finish this season at

4526 Yards, 46 TDs, 16 ints. Currently with a rating of 102.7 and a 68.4 % Completion Percentage.

 

In addition to Brees,  Philip Rivers is having an incredible season too-

 

a projection for 4536 yds,   38 TD  9 INT  115.7 rating and 69.5% completion

 

(11 games  69.5 % 3,119  yds  26 TD  6 INT  115.7 rating)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brees is the hands-down MVP right now and it isn't even close.  Doesn't really matter who's 2nd or 3rd, etc.  He'd have to completely tank not to get it at this point.  What also helps him is he's never won one, so he will be the sentimental favorite as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It sounds like Collins was trying to surround himself with better support prior to joining Indy, but yes, it's great that we've got enough high-character guys on this team who can help keep him clean.  https://www.colts.com/news/jalen-collins-grateful-for-the-opportunity-with-colts   I tend to agree with you regarding who Ballard considers 'bad apples.'  Kelly was dismissed from Clemson because he snapped at coaches after being benched as a sophomore in a Spring Game (and then got in a 'minor fender-bender' in the team's parking lot, which did not lead to any police report -- sounds like he was heated when he left and probably drove a little recklessly).  Prior to joining Clemson, Kelly did send a few tweets or social media messages suggesting he was going to come in and win the starting position right away.  He was ~17-19 years old when these incidents occurred.  Sure, they're not great, but I imagine being a very highly-touted prospect and the nephew of a HOF QB comes with quite a bit of stress, especially at that age.  Not that those were great incidents, but it doesn't necessarily make him a bad person (kind of like you eluded to, these incidents are nowhere near as serious as domestic violence or endangering a child, etc.).    When he was 21, Kelly got in a scuffle with some bouncers at a nightclub in his home town.  Again, not a great incident, but keep in mind he was 21 and was probably going through some hard times as he was being scrutinized nationally for recently being kicked off Clemson and probably had a bit too much to drink with some of his hometown friends.  Not that getting in a scuffle in a nightclub is a good thing, but there are a LOT of 21 year olds who get in scuffles when they've had too much to drink and no big deal is made of it because they're 'normal' kids, not highly touted football players with a celebrity uncle.  Of course,  being a 'star' comes with responsibility and you'd like to think kids know enough to keep themselves under the radar, but I don't think it's an incident which makes him an evil person.   Then, when he was 23-24 he left a Halloween party at Von Miller's house and stumbled into the wrong house.  He didn't steal anything from the house or attempt to injure anyone in the house, from all accounts I've read... he simply had too much to drink and went in and sat on a couch, got chased out by the husband in the house and then went and slept in his SUV.  Again, not a great incident, but I don't think it's something which makes him a terrible person.  Sounds like the kid needs to understand his limits in terms of partying a bit better, but if he wasn't an NFL football player, that charge would be a pretty common thing to read in a police blotter in a large city like that.  He needs to understand, he's going to get more scrutiny as an NFL athlete and due to his past and his ties to Jim Kelly... and it sounds as though he's gotten some counseling and is doing his best to stay away from situations like that in the future.     Ballard and his staff always seem to do their due diligence before bringing players into this team.  The fact that Reich and J. Kelly were teammates for just under a decade probably also helped Chad Kelly in this situation.  I imagine Reich has known Chad for a long time (probably since he was a toddler) and had some conversations with Jim to get assurance that Chad is trying to clean up his act.  While not all of his actions were the greatest, he doesn't seem to have done anything that would be a huge deal and make him a terrible human being if he was just an average Joe.   Jalen Collins' suspensions it sounds like were 2x for smoking weed and 2x for PEDs.  Not great decisions, but again, those aren't things that make him a terrible person.  And as @Scott Pennock said, it's easy, if he slips up again, we release him and move on (well, if he slips up for PEDs again, we won't have to deal with him, the NFL will suspend him for 2 years and by that time, he'll probably be too old to come back and compete for an NFL roster spot).  To be honest, I am more concerned with the PED use than the weed from a young man in the NFL... but I don't know all the circumstances (e.g., did he just not do his research and took a supplement on the banned list by accident (this seems to happen a lot, and in other sports you are starting to see guys winning cases by proving they accidentally took a tainted substance)? was he battling a nagging injury and took something to try to help recover faster (this also happens, e.g., Andy Pettite admitted he took PEDs several times in his career, but moreso for recovery than to enhance his performance, like being put on the 10 day -DL instead of the 60 day-DL)?  Or did he actually knowingly try to cheat by taking substances to give him a major advantage over other players (all these guys take supplements, but there are supplements which are more advantageous than others)?).  I would be more worried if this guy is actually a major cheater who felt he didn't have enough raw ability to play in this league to the point he had to take banned substances... but he already is well aware, if he screws up again, his NFL days are over.   In terms of Okerere, Ballard and others have already said numerous times that they did their due diligence about his alleged incident and talked to his coaches and others around him and found no reason not to bring the guy to Indy.     If allegations turn out to be true, I doubt Ballard would bring in a guy like Tyreek Hill.  Maybe it's just my opinion, but assaulting your spouse or your child are way more serious issues about someone's character than smoking weed, pulling a McAfee and falling into a canal, or having too much to drink and accidentally stumbling into the wrong place (especially without attacking anyone or vandalizing the place).  I, for one, am happy Ballard isn't against giving guys who have not done anything very seriously wrong another chance.  Like Ballard says "Kids make mistakes."      
    • Addai was great in pass pro, but as an overall RB give me MJD anyday.    Mack is a little low, but overall hes still in the 15-20 range IMO. If healthy he definitely moves up though. 
    • I loved the "with the next pick" series. Watched it multiple times. I'll look at the site again and see if it changes my opinion. Maybe the video series on Cain will spark my interest.
    • it was just an ugly ugly ugly game.   to me, our O was the issue. you can't punt your first four possessions and then miss a FG to end the half. then you punt your first two possessions of the 2nd, fumble on your 3rd, and punt again on your 4th. When special teams is your only score for 3Qs, it's your offense lol....   our D actually held them under their average so i can't blame them too much. we actually had more sacks and QB hits they them.   Biggest issues 1. they doubled a hobbled TY, and the rest of our WR group were mediocre to begin with 2. O play calling sucked. horrible game plan from Reich, and good one from Andy. 3. our LB's played bad...  4. we abandoned the run too early (only 14 rushes the entire game). Our YPC was pretty good. 5. weather/field
    • They had the better team and were at home. KC winning doesn't surprise me at all. This upcoming season is a different story. If you ask 99% of Houston fans were they surprised we beat them in the playoffs, they would probably say yes. I wasn't, because we had the better QB. Mahomes and Luck are pretty even regarding KC and they were at home.
  • Members

    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 1,790

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tweezy32

      tweezy32 368

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 4,048

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 21,064

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blindside

      Blindside 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 110

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 2,246

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ar7

      ar7 347

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...