Sackless Streak Over

[strt182]

10 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

He knew better to do that against Luck because his reputation as a dirty player would've went over the top. It was funny because he wanted to cream Luck and then held up with his arms out . He knew not to cross that line 

Well I think he knows who would be the first player to greet him, you know that rookie that picks up his teammates every play. 

[Superman]

3 hours ago, Luck12-to-Hilton13 said:

I'm a little superstitious

 

 

 

 

 

[Superman]

1 hour ago, Barry Sears said:

Okay, I'm confused on how that was ruled a sack when Luck never hit the ground?  The ball was knocked out of his hand as he was standing upright, so how is that a sack???

 

In my mind, the streak is still alive.

 

Strip sacks are still sacks. If you knock the ball out of the QB's hand while he's still a passer, it's a sack. 

 

Robert Mathis had 47 of these. 

[Barry Sears]

5 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Strip sacks are still sacks. If you knock the ball out of the QB's hand while he's still a passer, it's a sack. 

 

Robert Mathis had 47 of these. 

 

That's what I figured, but to me it's just a forced fumble since the QB never hit the ground.  Whatever, in my mind he wasn't sacked in the sense of getting put on the ground.