Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

stitches

DK Metcalf to declare for the NFL draft

Recommended Posts

https://sports.yahoo.com/ole-miss-wide-receiver-d-k-metcalf-declare-nfl-draft-201116150.html

 

Quote

 

Ole Miss wide receiver D.K. Metcalf to declare for NFL draft

df6077034f95c847ca3aac21d121a592

One of the most intriguing wide receiver prospects in the country is leaving Ole Miss for the NFL draft. Redshirt sophomore D.K. Metcalf told Yahoo Sports in a telephone interview on Friday he’s declaring for the draft.

Metcalf had generated considerable buzz as a high-end prospect before a neck injury ended his season in October. He told Yahoo Sports that he’s recovered to where he’ll be cleared to fully participate in all football activities on Jan. 22 and will fully take part in the NFL draft process and team workouts.

“I had a month to weigh my options,” Metcalf said, referring to his October injury, in a phone interview on Friday. “I prayed to God and told Him to put the right decision in me. After meeting with Coach [Matt] Luke, they did everything they could to give me the right information, and I made my choice.”

Metcalf earned All-SEC Freshman honors in 2017 after catching seven touchdowns and averaging 16.6 yards per catch. (A broken foot cut short his true freshman season after just two games in 2016). He was on pace for a monster season in 2018, as he’d caught five touchdowns in seven games, before the injury occurred in the first quarter of Ole Miss’ game at Arkansas on Oct. 13. He finished this season with 569 receiving yards and an eye-popping 21.9 average yards per catch.

Metcalf will be a fascinating prospect. He’s 6-foot-4, 230 pounds and has tantalizing athleticism. He’s been timed at 4.46 in the 40-yard dash and has a vertical jump that’s been measured at more than 37 inches. He scored Ole Miss’s lone touchdown against Alabama this season on a 75-yarder that gave the Rebels a short-lived lead.

“He’s raw, but there’s a lot of upside because he’s so big and talented,” an NFL scout told Yahoo Sports on Friday. “He’ll probably go in the second round because he’s so talented. He’s going to kill workouts, and he’s a good kid and football is important to him. I’d be shocked if the health checks out if he lasts past the second round.”

Metcalf brings elite genetics, as his father, Terrence Metcalf, played nine seasons in the NFL on the offensive line, primarily for the Chicago Bears. He started 25 games and was part of the Chicago Bears Super Bowl team in 2006. Eric Metcalf is a cousin who also had a distinguished NFL career. Terrence Metcalf is the offensive coordinator at Pearl River Community College and told Yahoo Sports he’s overjoyed that his son is continuing the family tradition.

“I was very excited,” Terrence Metcalf said. “You know any dad wants to see their kid prosper in this sport, especially if it’s a road you traveled.”

D.K. Metcalf told Yahoo Sports that he wanted to thank his mom, Tonya, who he joked is the secretary of his life and rolled off a list of Ole Miss coaches – Luke, OC Phil Longo, WR coach Jacob Peeler, co-DC Jason Jones and former DC Wesley McGriff.

“When I think of Ole Miss I think of loyalty,” he said. “Going there wasn’t a moment decision, it was a lifetime decision in my eyes, being loyal to my school and city meant a lot to me.”

D.K. Metcalf said his father began training him in sixth grade to prepare him for this moment. (D.K. plans to go to EXOS in the Phoenix to do his pre-draft work.)

“There’s no fear in D.K. as far as the neck,” Terrence Metcalf said. “Being a former NFL and college player myself, I know he’ll do what he has to do to prepare himself for the NFL evaluation process.”

D.K. Metcalf looks forward to carrying on in the family business. “It means a lot,” he said, adding with a laugh. “I’m working to be better than my dad right now. I’m about to start talking trash about it.”

 

 

 

This is the WR that is most intriguing and has the best WR1 potential in this year's draft IMO. HIs injury puts an interesting wrinkle in his draft process. I've heard a ton of different things about his injury and I have no idea what I should believe - from the injury being career threatening to it being relatively minor... I guess we will know more as the draft process unfolds, but he's definitely one of my favorite receivers in this year's draft and would love to have him on the Colts. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good!

 

I have difficulty gaging where we take a WR in the upcoming draft

 

Another weapon for Luck at WR seems to be a good pickup

 

I wonder if this kid slides into the second round...... I would be tempted

 

But

 

I do believe we have some gaping holes on the defense that we need to consider

 

We need at least 2 DL, a SS, a CB before we get a WR

 

Maybe we fill some of these spots in FA, and we get the luxury of a WR

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d say he can go in the 1st round if he’s able to compete at the combine. The good news is that pushes all the other WRs down, meaning you can get good value in the other rounds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

I’d say he can go in the 1st round if he’s able to compete at the combine. The good news is that pushes all the other WRs down, meaning you can get good value in the other rounds.

I kind of ... want him rather than the other WRs... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, stitches said:

https://sports.yahoo.com/ole-miss-wide-receiver-d-k-metcalf-declare-nfl-draft-201116150.html

 

 

 

This is the WR that is most intriguing and has the best WR1 potential in this year's draft IMO. HIs injury puts an interesting wrinkle in his draft process. I've heard a ton of different things about his injury and I have no idea what I should believe - from the injury being career threatening to it being relatively minor... I guess we will know more as the draft process unfolds, but he's definitely one of my favorite receivers in this year's draft and would love to have him on the Colts. 

 

 

 

He is a very good looking WR, I also like his teammate Brown.  I am not sure if Brown is coming out though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Cynjin said:

 

He is a very good looking WR, I also like his teammate Brown.  I am not sure if Brown is coming out though.

He probably is coming out. All 3 of their receivers are round 1-round 2 level talent. And they have a talented  TE too. 

 

AJ Brown

 

 

Demarkus Lodge 

 

 

 

AJ Brown is great contested catch, big receiver and he has some YAC ability... better than his size/lack of good wiggle would indicate.  Lodge is the best route runner of them all, but he has inconsistent hands. He has some insane catches, but he also drops some easy ones. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deandre Hopkins is definitly a game changer......

 

A game changer at WR, (like Deandre) would make this offense a cut above

 

I just dont know if I want this defense to go without a DL pickup in round one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/24/2018 at 5:07 PM, MikeCurtis said:

Deandre Hopkins is definitly a game changer......

 

A game changer at WR, (like Deandre) would make this offense a cut above

 

I just dont know if I want this defense to go without a DL pickup in round one

DL is definitely more important we need to get consistent pressure from the interior of the DL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know he injured his neck and that's never good, but being a WR and hearing the positive vibes I think he will be just fine. I'm praying he slides to us in the second round and Ballard grabs him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hasn't played long and had two season ending injuries.....meh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/29/2018 at 6:46 AM, Savage56 said:

6'4" 225 and runs around a 4.4

Please bring him to Indianapolis.

He’s a projected 1st rounder just so you know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

He’s a projected 1st rounder just so you know.

It depends on how his medicals check out and how he works out. From what I've heard on the random draft podcasts I listen to he's an impressive young man in his interactions with media/teammates/fans so he probably will win the interview process... 

 

Just an example:

 

Thoughtful responses, engaged... deflects and dishes out credit and praise to teammates and coaches every chance he gets, while still projecting confidence in himself. Overall carries himself with maturity and gravitas that's not typical for most young stars entering the league. 

 

If we draft around the 20s... and his medicals are OK... and he's still there at the place we pick... I'd be more than happy to have him on the Colts.. .even if it takes a 1st round pick. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stitches said:

It depends on how his medicals check out and how he works out. From what I've heard on the random draft podcasts I listen to he's an impressive young man in his interactions with media/teammates/fans so he probably will win the interview process... 

 

Just an example:

 

Thoughtful responses, engaged... deflects and dishes out credit and praise to teammates and coaches every chance he gets, while still projecting confidence in himself. Overall carries himself with maturity and gravitas that's not typical for most young stars entering the league. 

 

If we draft around the 20s... and his medicals are OK... and he's still there at the place we pick... I'd be more than happy to have him on the Colts.. .even if it takes a 1st round pick. 

 

So I see you also like watching interviews with potential prospects. I do as well. Like to get a feel of who a guy is. But I agree about taking him in the 1st. I know everyone is scared off of the idea since Dorsett, but that was just a Grigson blunder. Metcalf with Luck would be deadly. It would free up Hilton too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the current draft order, even if he were to fall out the 1st, it’d be hard for us to grab him without trading up. Even with the Jets pick in the 2nd, the teams ahead of us are the Raiders, Cardinals, and 49ers. All teams  who could use a big outside receiver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Looking at the current draft order, even if he were to fall out the 1st, it’d be hard for us to grab him without trading up. Even with the Jets pick in the 2nd, the teams ahead of us are the Raiders, Cardinals, and 49ers. All teams  who could use a big outside receiver.

Not that I don't like Metcalf but I'd much rather have Lodge later in the draft. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

Not that I don't like Metcalf but I'd much rather have Lodge later in the draft. 

Lodge has questionable hands which we already have enough of on this team. Plus we need a “special” receiver. Someone the opposing D has to account for. I think that’s Metcalf more than Lodge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

Lodge has questionable hands which we already have enough of on this team. Plus we need a “special” receiver. Someone the opposing D has to account for. I think that’s Metcalf more than Lodge.

I think Lodge might be "special". If you watched the LSU tape (easily his worst game) maybe you could say he has "questionable hands" But I don't think that's the case with Lodge at all. I think he can pluck the ball with the best of them in this class. He has excellent body control, ball skills, and I love his play in traffic. If he develops like I think he can, opposing defenses will be game planning for him week in week out in the league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/4/2018 at 9:51 AM, Defjamz26 said:

So I see you also like watching interviews with potential prospects. I do as well. Like to get a feel of who a guy is. But I agree about taking him in the 1st. I know everyone is scared off of the idea since Dorsett, but that was just a Grigson blunder. Metcalf with Luck would be deadly. It would free up Hilton too.

I'm never that high on drafting a WR in the first, especially in the top 15ish, but 6'4 230 > 5'10 185.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Metcalf has been fully medically cleared to play football by his doctors. 

 

This sounds good. I hope he kills the combine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

He is hands down the best WR in this draft, and if he has a good combine, will likely be long gone before we pick. Wouldn't wanna spend our first couple on a WR either way.

He wasnt even the best WR on his team... A.J Brown is better than he is. He just has great measurables.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, twfish said:

He wasnt even the best WR on his team... A.J Brown is better than he is. He just has great measurables.

 

Well, that's like your opinion and stuff man. 

 

No, but seriously if he doesn't get injured this year he has a better season. AJ Brown is my 1B option so I'm not gonna argue with you. I'd even be happy with DeMarkus Lodge in the middle rounds. However you feel about the various "A-level" WRs, they shouldn't draft one until their 2nd round picks, imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, twfish said:

He wasnt even the best WR on his team... A.J Brown is better than he is. He just has great measurables.

AJ Brown played almost exclusively at the slot. Metcalf was lining up as their X-receiver. IMO if he had stayed healthy he would have been clearcut Ole Miss' best receiver by the end of the season. I admit Metcalf is more of a projection but IMO he's a better prospect than AJ Brown. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stitches said:

AJ Brown played almost exclusively at the slot. Metcalf was lining up as their X-receiver. IMO if he had stayed healthy he would have been clearcut Ole Miss' best receiver by the end of the season. I admit Metcalf is more of a projection but IMO he's a better prospect than AJ Brown. 

That is a complete and total misconception that Brown is a exclusive slot player. As soon as Metcalf goes down Brown goes out side. In the same game stretch D.K had 569 yards and 5 touch downs 26 receptions. A.J had 650 yards and 4 TDs and 50 receptions.Then in the final 5 games where he was playing majority X he went for 650 yards, and had 35 yards. A.J led the SEC in yards and 2nd in receptions as well as back to back 1,200+ yard seasons where as Metcalf in his 2 years has 1,200. 6'1 220 with speed is absolutely nothing to scoff at and he easily gets more seperation than Metcalf, which is why is receptions is so high. Metcalf is your prototypical X with is size. Stats dont tell you everything but if you take a couple inches of metcalfs height i dont think we are talking first round for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, twfish said:

That is a complete and total misconception that Brown is a exclusive slot player. As soon as Metcalf goes down Brown goes out side. 

 

I was about to show you evidence that Brown continued playing the slot, because I remembered him playing the slot after Metcalf went down, but I kind of lost interest in Ole Miss after Metcalf went down. So I got the first game after Metcalf's injury(vs Auburn) and Brown played grand total of ONE snap at X receiver. Everything else was slot and trick plays(in motion or screens). I was feeling pretty good about my statement above and went on to the next game I found(Texas A&M) and to my surprise Brown was indeed playing outside. Now sure, it wasn't always X, there were plenty of Z reps, but nonetheless very useful reps for scouting purposes to see how he plays on the outside. And then I went to the next one(Vanterbilt) and again he was playing outside. 

 

So yeah. I have to thank you for pointing those games out. By draft time I will go through them and update my view on Brown's ability to play outside. 

 

Quote

 

Worth pointing out that Metcalf got injured early in his last game.

 

 

 

Quote

Then in the final 5 games where he was playing majority X he went for 650 yards, and had 35 yards. A.J led the SEC in yards and 2nd in receptions as well as back to back 1,200+ yard seasons where as Metcalf in his 2 years has 1,200. 6'1 220 with speed is absolutely nothing to scoff at and he easily gets more seperation than Metcalf, which is why is receptions is so high. Metcalf is your prototypical X with is size. Stats dont tell you everything but if you take a couple inches of metcalfs height i dont think we are talking first round for him.

 

I mean, I don't think that's a fair way to evaluate prospects. You evaluate what the player has, not what he would be if he wasn't what he is. That's meaningless and useless. If Metcalf wasn't 6'4" explosive athlete he will not be what he is. If Brown didn't run routes well or have good hands, what would he be? And what does it matter what he would be? We are not evaluating AJ Brown with bad hands and we are not evaluating 6'0" Metcalf. 

 

Also I wanted to point out that it's difficult to compare the stats of different players at the same position when they are accumulated against different opponents AND with different teammates on the field. When you have 2 potential high pick talents they will more or less split the load. When one of those two gets injured and gets replaced by less talented players, it's only normal for more of the load to get redirected to the other one. Still... Brown's stats in those games are impressive so I will go through those games and evaluate him as an outside receiver too. So yah... again, thanks for point that out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard to say AJ Brown is better, because Metcalf went down and Brown got showcased. Before the season, the trajectories of both guys were that Metcalf was the man, and he was the better WR, then he got injured. Had Brown gotten injured, and Metcalf been featured, we'd probably undoubtedly be talking about him as a Top 10 selection in the upcoming draft.

 

His measurables are ridiculous, 11'01" broad jump, 37.5 vert jump, power cleans 350, and benches 330 while running a 4.4 40 and top speed of 22.6 mph (would be among the fastest in the league...and he's a 6'4 230 lb monster. It's not like he's Courtland Sutton or other big sluggish dudes either, the kid is insanely fast and quick with a catch radius that is reminiscent of Julio and Nuk Hopkins. At that height/weight you wouldn't expect him to be a great YAC guy, but he is. He's not only a guy that can win basically every time downfield, but can also take a slant 75 yds to the house.

 

All of this is kinda for not, because after he destroys it at the combine, he's gonna be the first WR off the board. That was the only thing holding him back, that he was injured and may not have been able to workout for teams...that is no longer an issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/26/2019 at 1:10 PM, stitches said:

I was about to show you evidence that Brown continued playing the slot, because I remembered him playing the slot after Metcalf went down, but I kind of lost interest in Ole Miss after Metcalf went down. So I got the first game after Metcalf's injury(vs Auburn) and Brown played grand total of ONE snap at X receiver. Everything else was slot and trick plays(in motion or screens). I was feeling pretty good about my statement above and went on to the next game I found(Texas A&M) and to my surprise Brown was indeed playing outside. Now sure, it wasn't always X, there were plenty of Z reps, but nonetheless very useful reps for scouting purposes to see how he plays on the outside. And then I went to the next one(Vanterbilt) and again he was playing outside. 

 

So yeah. I have to thank you for pointing those games out. By draft time I will go through them and update my view on Brown's ability to play outside. 

 

Worth pointing out that Metcalf got injured early in his last game.

 

 

 

 

I mean, I don't think that's a fair way to evaluate prospects. You evaluate what the player has, not what he would be if he wasn't what he is. That's meaningless and useless. If Metcalf wasn't 6'4" explosive athlete he will not be what he is. If Brown didn't run routes well or have good hands, what would he be? And what does it matter what he would be? We are not evaluating AJ Brown with bad hands and we are not evaluating 6'0" Metcalf. 

 

Also I wanted to point out that it's difficult to compare the stats of different players at the same position when they are accumulated against different opponents AND with different teammates on the field. When you have 2 potential high pick talents they will more or less split the load. When one of those two gets injured and gets replaced by less talented players, it's only normal for more of the load to get redirected to the other one. Still... Brown's stats in those games are impressive so I will go through those games and evaluate him as an outside receiver too. So yah... again, thanks for point that out. 

He had I believe 80 yards on the game he got injured. So I don't think that is much of a factor in the info I posted. I get what you're saying but it happens with a lot of prospects, people fall in love with intangibles and what i wrote may not have as much to do with the post it was just more of a subtle rant on my end that brought no useful aspect to the post. To the last part of your post I believe it is 100% fair to compare 2 players who are playing the same position at the same time against the same opponent with the same QB. The stats I posted where all from the same games so there really inst a better way to compare IMO. At the end of the day props to Ole Miss on their WR's. Having potential first rounders and Lodge isn't bad either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I rewatched the game as I thought this would be pretty strange as well.  He did not play in the fourth except for his usual special teams slot.     I was confused as well by those who say he had a bad game.  He gave up one completion where he got turned around.  Other than that he was glued to his man as usual.    I think he's still having trouble living down his reputation from his rookie year. 
    • depth wise, S, OL, and iDL are my biggest concerns. if folks were grading positions ( starters and depth), i'd be surprised if many graded safety in the top half.  outside of Hooker, lots of questions, at least to me. i definitely don't agree with Venturi. ESPN doesn't either. Hopefully the starters stay healthy, and Willis grows into a stud.
    • lol... you wrote a novel. while i didn't read it all, i did skim. the mock draft stuff, it wasn't a poll. it was a well defined systemic grading. if you're mom can do well on the 1st round, why didn't your favorite guys? lol. on the wide receiver study, it was laughable. no defined parameters, no comparative cross position stats, etc.. not even Busch league stuff.  like i said, legend in your own mind.   in terms of who can dish it out, but can't take it, look at your reaction above to a "sad".... what a rant/tantrum.....  self awareness is obviously not your strongest trait. feel free to "crush" me anytime... gives me a good laugh.
    • very astute observations!!
    • You live your life like the Coyote chasing the Road Runner....    and you keep running into the mountain side,  or running off the cliff....     OK....    you're not going to change....   So, I'll take apart your nonsense --- again.    This will be the longest post I've ever made,  trying to answer all your nonsense.    Doubt you'll read it.    But here it comes....     Of course we know if Luck's injury, whatever it is,  ISN'T minor.   What minor injury do you know lasts four months?    He barely participated in any off-season program.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    The Colts have NEVER, EVER called it minor.   Not once.  The only thing they've said is he hopes to be back by certain deadlines,  and he's missed almost every one.    Does that sound like a minor injury?    This paragraph may confuse you.   It's full of common sense and logic.   I don't know how you got the nerve to try to argue that no one knows.   Unbelieveable!   Nope.   No Tantrum from me.   Just pointing ot what should be obvious,  but apparently the obvious isn't obvious to you.     By the way,  while you were giving me a sad on my post to my friend CBE,   do you know who was giving me a "like"?    CBE.    I criticized his post and he still gave me a like.    He know while we may not agree,  he knows I'm not trying to pound him.   I'm  trying to be as honest and factual as I can.    No wonder you can't see for yourself.   What triggered me, was your latest attempt to sound like you know what you're talking about.   You judged Willis on half of the first pre-season game.    That's all you've got.    That's it.   Doesn't even occur to you that that is.....   NOTHING!    Hello?    And you present it like it should be taken seriously,  when it should be laughed at.    Goodness gracious, you want to go back to the media draft comparison?    I was hoping for your sake that you wouldn't.    But since you insist.     Did you ever really look at that poll?   Seriously,  did you look at the four category breakdown?    Did you see what was actually involved?    If you did,  you shouldn't have been crowing about it.    First,  what I care about from guys like Kiper and McShay and Jeremiah and others isn't just the first round.   My  momma can do a decent job on the first round, and she's been dead for nearly 30 years!    I care about their view on ALL ROUNDS.   And your survey was only about the first round.   That's it.   There were four categories.    In three of them,  the leader got no more than 50%.   That's it.   The best person in three of the four categories scored no more than 50 percent.   When the top guy is scoring no more than 50 percent and everyone else is close behind,  then no one really knows anything.    And the one category that the winner did well in --- one category --- he scored in the 90's.   And everyone else was right behind him.    So, most everyone did well in ONE OUT OF THE FOUR categories.   Big stinking deal.    I tried to tell you this silly survey didn't support what you believed but you wouldn't listen.   No surprise there.  All you cared about the results.   The fatal flaw.     Finally,  without a single fact,  you offered this opinion in that post.    I remember it like it was yesterday,  that your new age guys were doing a better job than the more traditional scouts.   Based on one poll.   One poll of one round.    And you said the older guys like Kiper and company were resting on their laurels and not working as hard.   Nope, the old guys were covering all seven rounds.    Most of your guys,  covering one round.   You have no facts to support that, but that's your view.    When logic and common sense would tell you that the guys I prefer make a ton more money and have their reputation at stake.    They have more to lose.    There's no way they're resting on anything.    But you'll say ANYTHING to try and prove a point.   There's no argument you won't twist to try to win an argument, no matter how foolish the argument is.   I've told you publicly and privately,  you're not interested in honest debate.   You're the least honest poster here.  You're only interested in winning and you'll do anything, say anything to do that.      As to the WR study.    You got crushed.   I'm talking about a bank safe fell on you and your response was to talk about cherry picking stats.    Either English is a second language or you don't know the meaning of the words.     I made two links for you.    One was almost identical to yours.    Yours covered 25 years dating back to a time when passing rules were dramatically different so comparing a receiver from 1990 to one from 2018 was silly.   We're playig a different game now.    My first link covered 20 years from 1995 to 2014 .   There was great over-lap in the two studies.  But the conclusions were entirely different.   The only reason I used it was your post said roughly 60% percent of 1st Round WR's were successes.    Mine said roughly 40%.   Guess which one you preferred?    Surprise!   Then the second link was one of my own making.    I listed every 1st round WR since Luck came into the league in 2012.  That's 7 years.   The last 7 years.   I put into bold each 1st Round WR who was clearly a success.   It came to 41%.   It also showed how few WR's have been taken in the last few drafts.   That's the NFL talking, in case you weren't paying attention.    You didn't dispute one WR.    Not one.   But you called it cherry picking.   Clearly you don't know how to use that expression correctly.    And now you throw out a list of criteria as if you're making the rules here.   Here's another free tip.   You're not.   Never have.   I'm not surprised you don't recognize the facts I put into posts.   You don't use them.   You're all about the opinion.   Most posters here are.   Because that means every single poster can simply say.....    "I'm entitled to my opinion."    Yes, they are.   Everyone is,  even you, who has no need for facts.    But what you're not entitled to is your own facts.    Just like you stated Funchess was a terrible signing based on your facts,  and it never even occured to you that Ballard and Reich had other facts that showed DF could be useful to us.    You actually thought you knew more than they did?!?    Again, unbelieveable.   You had no facts to support your nonsense about Reich being a poor play caller.   You had one game.   And I called you on it.   You've been doing a very bad back-peddle ever since,  but that's your view, with no facts to support it.   In fact all the facts support the exact opposite view.   Yet, you still try to claim victory.   It's so intellectually dishonest that it's nauseating.   And so I observed,  that with almost nothing to base it on,  you thought Willis has inconsistancies.    Thanks, Capt. Obvious.    Tomorrow will likely be sunny during the day,  turning to widely scattered darkness at night.    Anymore obvious insights?   Funny, how you now publicly call for me to ignore your posts,  when a few days ago,  in a thread I was barely even in,  you took a completely uncalled for shot at me.    Or does the phrase "legend in his own mind" not mean anything to you?      Bottom line....    you can dish it out,  especially when you think no one is looking.....   but you can't take it.   Glass ego.   I call a fraud a fraud.   
  • Members

    • yankeeclipper

      yankeeclipper 22

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,181

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,435

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HoosierHero

      HoosierHero 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 1,265

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Cynjin

      Cynjin 2,841

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • COLTS7

      COLTS7 283

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 837

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ManningGM

      ManningGM 515

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,795

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...