Miami hopefuly is not a trap game.

[VaAllDay757 298]

14 minutes ago, Luck 4 president said:

@VaAllDay757 now we have a winning record. Go colts!

Above .500 now

[Shafty138 1,432]

2 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

 We miss Kelly.

true, was good to here Kelly himself describe it as day-to-day

 

2 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Above .500 now

that's what a winning record means, yes....lol

[VaAllDay757 298]

1 minute ago, Shafty138 said:

true, was good to here Kelly himself describe it as day-to-day

 

that's what a winning record means, yes....lol

No at .500 and above is winning

[jvan1973 5,473]

1 minute ago, VaAllDay757 said:

No at .500 and above is winning

No,   no it isn't.   It's .500

[VaAllDay757 298]

9 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

No,   no it isn't.   It's .500

Ok if you think so

[Shafty138 1,432]

4 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Ok if you think so

 

Wait..... you seriously question whether a 50% ratio is, or is not winning?  lmao......  yeah, it's statistically neither

[Shafty138 1,432]

Schrodinger's Win!

[BOTT 1,314]

7 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Ok if you think so

He and everyone else on the planet thinks that.

[krunk 4,271]

I'm glad Chester Rogers actually caught the football when it mattered. LOL!

[jvan1973 5,473]

14 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Ok if you think so

 Me,  and everyone who isn't you knows that. 

[gregr507 56]

20 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Ok if you think so

 

Trust me, he's not the only one

 

On 11/22/2018 at 10:25 PM, VaAllDay757 said:

.500 is even and that's not on the negative side soooooo if it's not negative then it's positive

.500 is not negative....so again we're on the plus side

 

Do you not see how this makes no sense? If you believe this, you could just as easily make the argument that ".500 is even and that's not on the positive side sooooo if it's not positive then it's negative"

 

Maybe you should quit this one while you're... well, way, way behind.

 

Anyway that was a really ugly win, but I'll take it. This team is simultaneously both frustrating and encouraging. It's not so much that we sometimes play poorly that is frustrating, it's how we play poorly that is. You can tell that this team has a lot of potential when you watch them, so it's hard to watch them play poorly due to sloppiness and lack of discipline. However, this is also encouraging, because these issues should hopefully be fixable. I don't think we're too far off from being a dangerous team and legit competitor

 

[Luck 4 president 857]

33 minutes ago, Shafty138 said:

 

Wait..... you seriously question whether a 50% ratio is, or is not winning?  lmao......  yeah, it's statistically neither

Go read this whole thread  it’s hysterical. Trying to explain something to @VaAllDay757 is like talking to a wall

[VaAllDay757 298]

46 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

 Me,  and everyone who isn't you knows that. 

Ok whatever makes your day

[VaAllDay757 298]

24 minutes ago, Luck 4 president said:

Go read this whole thread  it’s hysterical. Trying to explain something to @VaAllDay757 is like talking to a wall

All I seen is opinions nothing concrete to back up ya'll arguement

[horseshoecrabs 608]

50% just means, that if you want to play with best you better improve your game. under means

it's time to draft high for next year.

[Luck 4 president 857]

1 hour ago, VaAllDay757 said:

All I seen is opinions nothing concrete to back up ya'll arguement

They’re not opinions lol. Yours is an opinion. What everyone else is saying is a fact. It should be common sense but apparently it’s not. 

[Lucky Colts Fan 5,591]

1 hour ago, VaAllDay757 said:

All I seen is opinions nothing concrete to back up ya'll arguement

 

It's called "math"

 

But apparently trying to convince you is like trying to divide by zero.

 

Can't be done.

[horseshoecrabs 608]

There is negative, meaning -minus, then there is positive, meaning +above ,  there is in between,  drum roll meaning in this case  , a team that has equal wins vs losses.

[Trueman 641]

1 hour ago, VaAllDay757 said:

All I seen is opinions nothing concrete to back up ya'll arguement

[2006Coltsbestever 22,276]

1 minute ago, Trueman said:

I guess those darn Jags will be a trap game with the mighty Blake Bortles 

[horseshoecrabs 608]

13 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I guess those darn Jags will be a trap game with the mighty Blake Bortles 

You never know, facing a team with a better record is always good motivation to help you snap out of your spiraling team's play this season. Not to mention dashing that team's hope for a better record at their expense. Of course there is always the chance that they are ready to tank the rest of the season for a higher draft choice. If the latter is the case, then it should be an easy win. 

[2006Coltsbestever 22,276]

Just now, horseshoecrabs said:

You never know, facing a team with a better record is always good motivation to help you snap out of you spiraling team's play this season. Not to mention dashing that team's hope for a better record at their expense. Of course there is always the chance that they are ready to tank the rest of the season for a higher draft choice. If the latter is the case, then it should be an easy win. 

Yeah I am just having fun now with this season because really hardly anyone thought we would be good. We are 6-5 which is respectable, they are a Divisional rival and Ramsey is always out to prove something. We just have to stay focused.

[horseshoecrabs 608]

1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Yeah I am just having fun now with this season because really hardly anyone thought we would be good. We are 6-5 which is respectable, they are a Divisional rival and Ramsey is always out to prove something. We just have to stay focused.

When I think how we went into this season, and all of the unknowns from Luck, coaching, roster, etc...  I am relieved on how we have done so far. The rest of the season can be just icing on the cake for progressing this year. 

[Lucky Colts Fan 5,591]

22 minutes ago, Trueman said:

 

OMG   

 

I'm calling 911.

 

"Yes, I've just witnessed a murder on the internet."

[2006Coltsbestever 22,276]

1 minute ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

OMG   

 

I'm calling 911.

 

"Yes, I've just witnessed a murder on the internet."

Yeah the Dolphins team just called a hearse to get out of town 

[AZColt11 1,271]

May have been a trap game after all but they escaped the trap...…..this time.

[GoColts8818 4,688]

4 hours ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Ok if you think so

This isn’t an opinion thing it’s a fact.  Being .500 is neither winning or losing.  It’s in the middle.  

[GoColts8818 4,688]

3 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

May have been a trap game after all but they escaped the trap...…..this time.

Again I don’t think this was a trap game.  This was a team who entered today with the same record as the Colts coming off a bye getting their starting QB back.  It was what it should have been, a close hard fought football game.  

 

The Colts didn’t play well for three quarters but they hung around and were the better team in the fourth.  That is so refreshing of the past year and a half of it being the reverse.  

 

Next week is a trap game.  Coming off a three game home stand, ridding a five game winning streak playing a floundering Jags team on the road the week before they go to the divison leader.  

[John Waylon 1,824]

On 11/22/2018 at 2:56 PM, VaAllDay757 said:

5-5 is a winning a record.....anything .500 and above is winning

 

On 11/22/2018 at 3:45 PM, VaAllDay757 said:

Anything on the positive side is winning so how is being at .500 not winning??? Anything below .500 is losing

 

On 11/22/2018 at 10:25 PM, VaAllDay757 said:

.500 is even and that's not on the negative side soooooo if it's not negative then it's positive

.500 is not negative....so again we're on the plus side

 

On 11/22/2018 at 10:27 PM, VaAllDay757 said:

5-5 is not losing tho....it's either winning or losing there's no in between

 

On 11/23/2018 at 2:36 PM, VaAllDay757 said:

It's not losing....anything is better than losing so .500 is on the plus side

 

8 hours ago, VaAllDay757 said:

It's not a losing record....there is no tied record it's either a winning record or losing record

 

5 hours ago, VaAllDay757 said:

No at .500 and above is winning

 

4 hours ago, VaAllDay757 said:

All I seen is opinions nothing concrete to back up ya'll arguement

 

 

Stifle yourself there would ya?

[VaAllDay757 298]

8 hours ago, Trueman said:

you feeling proud now?

6 hours ago, John Waylon said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stifle yourself there would ya?

Weak

[VaAllDay757 298]

6 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

This isn’t an opinion thing it’s a fact.  Being .500 is neither winning or losing.  It’s in the middle.  

There is no middle you either winning or losing

[VaAllDay757 298]

8 hours ago, Luck 4 president said:

They’re not opinions lol. Yours is an opinion. What everyone else is saying is a fact. It should be common sense but apparently it’s not. 

No it's really not and again nothing has been shown differently so keep talking about nothing then

[CoachLite 415]

.500 is considered winning only if you believe in the statement "I have the same as you, and you don't".

[John Waylon 1,824]

Just now, VaAllDay757 said:

No it's really not and again nothing has been shown differently so keep talking about nothing then

 

Ok, so since you want evidence to prove you wrong, where is the evidence to prove you right? 

 

Surely there’s a scientific formula out there in this crazy old mixed up world that will prove your theory at least valid. I think we’d all like to take a peek at it. 

 

Or we’ll make it even easier than that. Just find us someone of significance that will echo your drivel. Surely there’s a well respected coach, player, or analyst out there who will have said the same thing. 

 

This is 2018. If you’re as right as you claim you are certainly you won’t be the only one out there making this claim, so back it up.  

[VaAllDay757 298]

8 minutes ago, John Waylon said:

 

Ok, so since you want evidence to prove you wrong, where is the evidence to prove you right? 

 

Surely there’s a scientific formula out there in this crazy old mixed up world that will prove your theory at least valid. I think we’d all like to take a peek at it. 

 

Or we’ll make it even easier than that. Just find us someone of significance that will echo your drivel. Surely there’s a well respected coach, player, or analyst out there who will have said the same thing. 

 

This is 2018. If you’re as right as you claim you are certainly you won’t be the only one out there making this claim, so back it up.  

Show me where they even mentioned anything about having a "tied" team record?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winning_percentage

You either have a winning record or losing record

[John Waylon 1,824]

59 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Show me where they even mentioned anything about having a "tied" team record?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winning_percentage

You either have a winning record or losing record

 

Oh boy. 

 

Wikipedia as a reference? 

 

 

Wikipedia falls squarely between the homeless guy who told Jimmy Haslam to draft Johnny Manziel, and a book from 1812 in terms of reliability on any subject. 

 

Of course in this case that’s actually neither here nor there because you referenced an article about how winning percentages are calculated. 

 

There was precisely 0 about a .500 record being considered winning. 

 

I find it frightening that in a world where everyone refers to a .500 record as... well, a .500 record that there is one lone nut in the forest claiming it’s a winning record. And yet somehow despite being the only one to claim such he actually believes that everyone else is wrong and he is right. 

 

Curious to say the very least. 

[GoColts8818 4,688]

2 hours ago, VaAllDay757 said:

There is no middle you either winning or losing

In terms of record there is.  It’s called being .500.  Even a game it can end in a tie which is not a win or a loss.  So no you aren’t always winning or losing.

[krunk 4,271]

Oh God yall are still talking back and forth about this .500 record stuff!

[gspdx 616]

27 minutes ago, krunk said:

Oh God yall are still talking back and forth about this .500 record stuff!

 

I guess it's because some people won't listen to logic.

Just now, gspdx said:

 

I guess it's because some people won't listen to logic.

 

Or maybe I should say one person won't listen to logic.

[VaAllDay757 298]

2 hours ago, John Waylon said:

 

Oh boy. 

 

Wikipedia as a reference? 

 

 

Wikipedia falls squarely between the homeless guy who told Jimmy Haslam to draft Johnny Manziel, and a book from 1812 in terms of reliability on any subject. 

 

Of course in this case that’s actually neither here nor there because you referenced an article about how winning percentages are calculated. 

 

There was precisely 0 about a .500 record being considered winning. 

 

I find it frightening that in a world where everyone refers to a .500 record as... well, a .500 record that there is one lone nut in the forest claiming it’s a winning record. And yet somehow despite being the only one to claim such he actually believes that everyone else is wrong and he is right. 

 

Curious to say the very least. 

It's better than nothing you asked for it and I gave it to you so nothing I said changes anyway