Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Minnesota (+2.5) at Bears (11-18-18)


oldunclemark

Recommended Posts

8:20 EST ...Al Michaels, Cris Collinsworth and Michele Tafoya on NBC

Low 30s and cold on the lakefront in Chicago ...over-under at 44.5

 

'Captain' Kirk Cousins (259 of 3673, 2,685, 17 TDs, 5 INTs) has between rolling through the air with Adam Theilen (78 catches,. 947 yards, 7 TDs)  and Stefon Diggs (958 catches, 587 yards) but he takes the 'New Monsters of the Midway' led by OLB Kahlil Mack (7 sacks)  and a secondary that has 16 pass interceptions.

 

Bears QB 'My Man Mitch' Trubisky is 190 of 290 for 2,304 yards with 19 TDs and seven interceptions and he runs the 'Kansas City East' offense with five recovers who have at least 20 catches and 300 yards. .  But he faces Minnesota DE Danielle Hunter (11.5 sacks).

The Vikings have 31 QB sacks.

 

This is the first of two meetings between the Bears and Vikings and the Bears have to win because they have four road games left and home games with the Rams and Green Bay.  

This is a feature game.....Big loud crowd and a lot on the line.

I like the over but I'd stay away from this all together and just watch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a Tarik Cohen type of game where the Vikings' LBs weaknesses vs covering RBs like Cohen, Kamara etc. get exposed. If I am the Vikings, I focus on Cohen and play man coverage on their WRs and force Trubisky to thread the needle. The Bears, if they run the ball traditionally well, will actually surprise the Vikings and give Trubisky the leeway he needs in the passing game. Vikings force a lot of FGs - hence the Bears need to stay patient and take the points when they can and play defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I picked the Vikings to go to the SB before the season started and this is where it starts IMO. Vikings will go into Chicago and win this game 24-20.

 

Whoever loses this game can forget it imo. The Vikings haven't won against anybody good. You could argue that the Bears haven't either since the Seahawks started so poorly, but they did beat them and they didn't get obliterated against good teams like the Saints. Anyway it seems like this whole division is a race to see who can blow it first so...it's perfect for SNF lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BloodyChamp said:

 

Whoever loses this game can forget it imo. The Vikings haven't won against anybody good. You could argue that the Bears haven't either since the Seahawks started so poorly, but they did beat them and they didn't get obliterated against good teams like the Saints. Anyway it seems like this whole division is a race to see who can blow it first so...it's perfect for SNF lol!

Right now it looks like the Saints or Rams will go to the SB so I will probably be wrong but if the Vikes win this game and their Division, they still have a shot :thmup:

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like the *Vikings (1 of which was against the Saints lol). I sure don't think anybody should quit though. Winning streak teams always get an early date with destiny, even the undefeated Pats. The Rams finally lost 1 which is good to keep their heads straight but they have also caught some breaks lately when they could have lost other games. That luck might run out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a better game than stats might indicate. It's fun to see some old school successful running of the ball by design (not like we usually see it when there's a bad OL, trust issues with the QB etc). The Bears are gashing them even though the Vikings are doing everything right. The plays are there on offense too they're just being tipped, missed throws by a step etc. This could build towards an epic 2nd half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BloodyChamp said:

This is a better game than stats might indicate. It's fun to see some old school successful running of the ball by design (not like we usually see it when there's a bad OL, trust issues with the QB etc). The Bears are gashing them even though the Vikings are doing everything right. The plays are there on offense too they're just being tipped, missed throws by a step etc. This could build towards an epic 2nd half.

Vikes Offense looks lousy so far. Still only 11-0 though, 1 TD gets Minny back in it obviously. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I do not like the play calling for Minnesota, Reich's play calling makes the Minny's play calling look like crap.  

 

I agree. The Bears are clearly better and they are more aggressive. Our defense is playing poorly.

 

I loved the play calling for the Colts today. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I do not like the play calling for Minnesota, Reich's play calling makes the Minny's play calling look like crap.  

I can see a lot of this style of offense coming in..

Motion,,,,,lateral movement in opposite directions....to neutralize pass rush teams

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much favors the offense......Hard tackles..are penalties..

Hitting the QB wrong is a penalty.....Hitting the receiver wrong is a penalty

 

small fast guys are becoming more valuable than tall WRs and 240 pound runners..

Defenses might have to play 3 DBs, 3 safeties...one LB and 4 linemen as a base defense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Minnesota has the better QB and the better team IMO but for some reason are getting outplayed. Bears are Good though.

 

I don't believe we the Vikes have the better QB. I think Trubisky is underrated. 

 

The Bears have outplayed us in every phase of the game. The Vikings historically have not played well in Chicago. Also, I heard on NFLN this morning that Cousins was 4-11 in prime time. He isn't doing any better today. Lol.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely crap playcalling by Minnesota, whose offense is a bad attempt at copying modern offenses by a coach whose strength is old defenses. Zimmer used to have a stare that could burn a whole through you. Now he looks an old man lost in Wal-Mart. He's clueless. Cousins is getting blamed but it's either throw it or take the sack, so he throws it 10 yards because that's the deepest route on the play and it's INT'd. 

 

The Bears should have iced this though. They've tried to give it away here at the end. Put them against the Packers or better and they blow it imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think if the Colts get a WR in the top-50 picks, or so,  I think the Colts would agree with you. 
    • welp, after another week of developments, rumors, and predictions…here is where I stand:   1.  My personal top 5 for our first has not changed.  Mitchell, Arnold, Turner, BTJ, Bowers are still who id be ok with picking at 15.  I’ve said it before, but this is one of the most “it can go any way for us” drafts I’ve witnessed for us in a long time, if not ever.     2.  With the rumors of us looking to trade up, I AM ALL FOR IT.  It’s ok to play it safe and build your team, but that gets mediocrity.  We need to go out and get a guy.  A player we KNOW that will be elite or very good.  Not one that we hope can do that.  I think MHJ is definitely going to the Cards (if they don’t trade out) so that means either Nabers or Odunze who we’re probably trading for if they fall to 8 or 9.  Id prefer Nabers over Odunze.  Nabers is that blazing separator we desperately need, Odunze is possessive beast, but I feel we already have that with MPJ.  I don’t think trading up for bowers would be worth it.     3.  Trading back is an absolute no for me.  As said above, we have to start getting bonafide players and studs.  If we have a chance to get a bonafide stud, then we shouldn’t give it up.  Trading back and giving up the chance to get someone is lowering the talent level of our first pick.  Let’s get aggressive for once and get OUR guy.  If we can’t, let’s stay put and draft a player who will be VERY good.  
    • FYI Castro went back to college at Iowa this upcoming season.  Look for Sebastian in the 2025 NFL Draft.
    • Like most QBs they need a safety blanket to throw to and that can be a TE.  Draft rumor-mill already in full circulation with news that the Colts want to trade up on Day 1.  Still think it's a long shot to draft a legacy in MHJ reaching P4 with the Cardinals.  A trade up to P8 with Atlanta is probably the most realistic scenario and TE Bowers would be the call-in.  Not sold on most of this year's draftable QBs and doubt 4 or more will be drafted within the top-8 picks.  See the draft play out like every other year where teams can stay and get a serviceable QB. 
    • This could very well be the rare year we do trade up on Day 1.  Really shocked if we go after a legacy and the cost might be too rich for the short-term versus draft immediate draft needs.  Now a trade up to say P8 swap with Atlanta has a higher percentage of happening I do feel.  No way going to trade within our division with the Titans at P7.  At P8 should still have one of the top-3 WRs or even better option of drafting a generational TE in Bowers. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...