Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Pittsburgh (-5.5) at Jacksonville (11-18-18)


oldunclemark

Recommended Posts

1 p.m. EST   Jim Nantz, Tony (are you sick of me yet?)  Romo and Tracy Wolfson on CBS

Low 70s and partly sunny in Jacksonville  ----  over-under at 46.5

 

'Big Ben' Rothlisberger  (244 of 369, 2,888 21 TDs and 7 interceptions) rolls into town with JuJu Smith Schuster (56 catches, 762 yards) and 'Downtown' Antonio Brown (57 catches, 690 yards,   10 TDs)

James (I'm not LeVeon) Conner is probable and he has 10 TDs

 

Jax QB Blake (My Mistake) Bortles (201 of 326, 2,341 (12 TDs, 8 Interceptions) has 'Case Keenum' numbers but Leonard Fournette is healthy and ready to go  (for a change).

The 'Million Dollar Defense'; has been bargain priced to $99.95 with just 19 sacks ansd 5 interceptions in nine games.   The Jaguars have allowed 143 points in the last five games, all Jax losses.

 

This is it for Jacksonville (3-6) They're 0-3 in the AFC South and the seventh overall loss will send them back the garage. The Steelers have won five in a row but they lost twice to Jacksonville last year in Pittsburgh.

 

This will be a 'spirited' game ('Sprited' is code for lots of penalties and a couple of fights)

In the first half last week, I thought Jacksonville had quit..but they did rally.

 

I like the over.....but I dont want Pittsburgh giving 6 points on the road and NBOJ (never bet on Jacksonville)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pittsburgh wins by double digits, IMO mainly because the Steelers' strength is stopping the run which is also the Jaguars' offensive strength they rely on. Unless Bortles lights it up, which I doubt happens against the Blitzburgh pressure, I expect the Steelers to get ahead and stay ahead and take the running game out as a factor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, buffalo34 said:

That final drive had vibes from that Patriots-Steelers game last year, not to mention that interception in the end zone (which got wiped out by a penalty).

 

I thought the same. It seemed like the refs wanted the Steelers to win. I thought the refs denied the Jaguars a win that they deserved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

I thought the same. It seemed like the refs wanted the Steelers to win. I thought the refs denied the Jaguars a win that they deserved. 

 

Well, in the bigger picture, the Steelers are still in the "higher seed than the Patriots and denying them HFA" hunt, so that's always nice.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To use an off season surgery as an excuse is bollocks....    He needs to step up his game and start performing. In many ways he honestly looks like one of the 5 worst QB´s in the league and again, to use a shoulder surgery as an excuse is just pure bollocks.   There simply is no development in his game, and his huge upside is what? tell me?    I don´t think one second that we will ever come close to winning anything with him as our QB.   and to make things worse read this: https://www.espn.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=2176813
    • And yet, PFF didn't grade him all that high last year.  My response to this is that the scheme is designed for the MLB and the SS to make most of the tackles.  And they do. But last year, Franklin allowed a 77% completion rate with 10.2 yards per completion, and 7.9 yards per target.  In summary, he makes a lot of tackles by scheme, but he also allows a lot of completions. I don't think of him a Great.  Or even Good.  He's Fair.   https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FranZa00.htm  
    • Probably still won’t shut people up lol. But that is interesting  We are 3 games in after a shoulder surgery. What are you talking about.
    • Every bottom feeder team has a good player or two. Are the colts a bottom feeder? At times they play like it.    the “forum GMs” as you call them, don’t dislike when a player does well. They just hate when the team sucks. There’s nothing wrong with that. And no one here says some of the Colts players aren’t good players.    the Colts stunk it up pretty bad in the first two weeks, lost game one again a stat that we have held for over a decade. In must win games, the colts perform exceptionally awful with a mind boggling level of consistency under this regime.    the good players that the Colts have tend to also not show up in those games and make any game changing plays.    ok so Franklin can tackle. So what? Yeah the forum GMs are shaking with rage because of that!   
    • The huge difference is that you could see the progress in peytons game and how he always learned and keept going. and in year two, he really took off and started to show why we picked him.   With AR, things just getting worse, game after game... I wouldn't mind if we traded him for some picks next season.
  • Members

    • Superman

      Superman 22,114

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jal8908

      jal8908 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,921

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Reboot

      Reboot 46

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyJoe

      IndyJoe 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 13,472

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 6,634

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 1,251

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 216

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ThorstenDenmark

      ThorstenDenmark 343

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...