Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

B/R: Worst Contract on Every NFL Team


Recommended Posts

Bleacher Report had an interesting article on the worst contracts on each team, worth a read and link below:

 

 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2804231-the-worst-contract-on-every-nfl-roster?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming-league#slide14

 

Their selection for us was Denico Autry:

 

Contract: 3 years, $17.8 million through 2020

The Indianapolis Colts don't have any horrendous contracts on their books, but the front-loaded deal for defensive tackle Denico Autry is a bit excessive. He has a $7 million cap hit this season. 

Even though Autry's salary drops to $5 million next year without dead money owed, he's clearly underperforming at his current rate. The 28-year-old missed four games with ankle and hamstring injuries, limiting his production to two sacks and 10 solo tackles. 

Autry has the team's fifth-highest cap hit, but he plays a non-premium position on the defensive line and doesn't have a track record as a primary starter over the last four years. The 6'5", 270-pounder occasionally flashes as a pass-rusher in the trenches, but he isn't worth an average of nearly $6 million given his current usage.

 

If he is the worst contract we have then we have done well!  He may have missed some games through injury but, for me, he has been excellent when he has played and his name seemed to be called almost as regularly as Leonard.  Front loading the contract seems smart to me also based on how much space we had.

 

The way Ballard has structured the contracts and the roster means I can't really think of any other options for this "award"?  

 

Interestingly, Donte Moncrief was the choice for the Jaguars and Dwayne Allen was the choice for the Patriots.  Two players I wonder if the old regime would have paid.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, The Fish said:

They had to reach to find one and it's a new contract.. 

 

Ballard sucks! Luck is done! 

Yeah. If the “worst” contract still has the Colts with $100mil in cap next off-season then they’re in pretty great shape 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DaveA1102 said:

Bleacher Report had an interesting article on the worst contracts on each team, worth a read and link below:

 

 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2804231-the-worst-contract-on-every-nfl-roster?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming-league#slide14

 

Their selection for us was Denico Autry:

 

Contract: 3 years, $17.8 million through 2020

The Indianapolis Colts don't have any horrendous contracts on their books, but the front-loaded deal for defensive tackle Denico Autry is a bit excessive. He has a $7 million cap hit this season. 

Even though Autry's salary drops to $5 million next year without dead money owed, he's clearly underperforming at his current rate. The 28-year-old missed four games with ankle and hamstring injuries, limiting his production to two sacks and 10 solo tackles. 

Autry has the team's fifth-highest cap hit, but he plays a non-premium position on the defensive line and doesn't have a track record as a primary starter over the last four years. The 6'5", 270-pounder occasionally flashes as a pass-rusher in the trenches, but he isn't worth an average of nearly $6 million given his current usage.

 

If he is the worst contract we have then we have done well!  He may have missed some games through injury but, for me, he has been excellent when he has played and his name seemed to be called almost as regularly as Leonard.  Front loading the contract seems smart to me also based on how much space we had.

 

The way Ballard has structured the contracts and the roster means I can't really think of any other options for this "award"?  

 

Interestingly, Donte Moncrief was the choice for the Jaguars and Dwayne Allen was the choice for the Patriots.  Two players I wonder if the old regime would have paid.

Not a bad contract at all.   There is risk/reward in every contract.  Unfortunately, injuries have limited his play.   Since we are so far under the cap, the risk isn't much.   He's still only 28 and has good size, so he'll be with us next year as a contributor.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't follow the cap management very closely this past offseason, but I do know teams have to spend a certain minimum amount of the cap, so perhaps this was Ballard's way of meeting that requirement.  The article does mention that Autrey's cap hit does fall next year and there is no dead money, so I see no long term negative consequences of this.  If this is the worst contract on our team, we're in really good shape

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, DaveA1102 said:

Bleacher Report had an interesting article on the worst contracts on each team, worth a read and link below:

 

 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2804231-the-worst-contract-on-every-nfl-roster?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming-league#slide14

 

Their selection for us was Denico Autry:

 

Contract: 3 years, $17.8 million through 2020

The Indianapolis Colts don't have any horrendous contracts on their books, but the front-loaded deal for defensive tackle Denico Autry is a bit excessive. He has a $7 million cap hit this season. 

Even though Autry's salary drops to $5 million next year without dead money owed, he's clearly underperforming at his current rate. The 28-year-old missed four games with ankle and hamstring injuries, limiting his production to two sacks and 10 solo tackles. 

Autry has the team's fifth-highest cap hit, but he plays a non-premium position on the defensive line and doesn't have a track record as a primary starter over the last four years. The 6'5", 270-pounder occasionally flashes as a pass-rusher in the trenches, but he isn't worth an average of nearly $6 million given his current usage.

 

If he is the worst contract we have then we have done well!  He may have missed some games through injury but, for me, he has been excellent when he has played and his name seemed to be called almost as regularly as Leonard.  Front loading the contract seems smart to me also based on how much space we had.

 

The way Ballard has structured the contracts and the roster means I can't really think of any other options for this "award"?  

 

Interestingly, Donte Moncrief was the choice for the Jaguars and Dwayne Allen was the choice for the Patriots.  Two players I wonder if the old regime would have paid.

Didn't read the article to specify the date of the D Allen contract, but he was traded to the Pats so I assume his contract is the one still signed with the Colts.  Which was probably the worst contract the previous regime ever inked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Stephen Holder doesn’t expect anything soon either. As a lot of people predicted, this was a ‘see how the rehab is going’ type visit.    
    • The study actually had a 'matched control' group.   ** Abstract Background: Achilles tendon injuries are common in sports, including football. The purpose of this study was to determine (1) return-to-sport rate in National Football League (NFL) players following Achilles tendon repair, (2) postoperative career length and games per season, (3) pre- and postoperative performance, and (4) postoperative performance compared with control players matched by position, age, years of experience, and performance.   Methods: Publicly available records were used to identify NFL players who underwent Achilles tendon repair and matched controls were identified. Ninety-five players (98 surgeries) were analyzed (mean age 28.2 ± 2.8 years; mean 5.5 ± 2 .8 years in NFL at time of surgery). Demographic and performance data were collected. Comparisons between case and control groups and preoperative and postoperative time points were made using paired-samples Student t tests. **   @SteelCityColt could explain the statistical portion much better than I can.     There's really only two surgical methods used to stitch the tendon back together, I pointed them out above. Any (likely team) orthopedic surgeon or foot/ankle specialist can do it.  Players pick special doctors, but people (everyday Joe and Jane's) can and do get non-surgical or operative Achilles repair as indicated by skilled surgeons in their own town.     Feel free to read it, and critique the methods, data, and results if you wish.   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318691345_Performance_and_Return_to_Sport_After_Achilles_Tendon_Repair_in_National_Football_League_Players     The study is above, I think you should read it in its entirety then comment  Here's another performed from 2009-2014 that paints an even more grim picture.                  v v v https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6415485/   "80 NFL players were identified as having primary Achilles tendon tears between the 2009 and 2014 seasons. RTP (return to play) was defined as playing in a regular season or postseason game following injury. Probability of RTP was modeled as a function of time after injury in Kaplan-Meier analysis with demographic variables assessed via generalized linear models. Twelve players (15%) experienced a subsequent Achilles tendon tear during or after the study period and were included in the overall RTP rate but were excluded from performance analyses owing to the confounding effects of an ipsilateral retear or contralateral tear."   ** Conclusion: Rate of RTP (return to play) following primary Achilles tendon tears may be lower than previously published. (not reflected in the above study though). However, for those able to return, performance only in the season immediately following injury appears to be affected; players return to preinjury levels if given the opportunity to play >1 season after injury. **   The interesting take from them is in bold/italics.     I've mentioned this before- I feel the patient/athletes biological makeup and their dedication to rehab have a much bigger influence in RTP than the typical skill of a properly executed surgical repair.     They do what they can.  
    • The Colts have $22M in cap space for 2021 but any extension they hand out won’t apply against 2021 cap. They have $90M in projected 2022 cap space. Braden and Maniac will cost about $35M combined. They have $22M in 2021 to spend on LT plus $55M in 2022 with the Quarterback, Defensive Line, Linebacker and Offensive Line basically set. This doesn't include rollover money.    Marvell is coming back after sitting out the season due to Covid and I'm not ready to give up on Rock yet. Potentially, Ballard won't be in a position to draft Stingley or Elam because he might not have a 1st round pick next year and the CB draft class in 2022 not really deep. My question is, will Ballard be in a position to sign someone like Conley's Ohio State teammate Marshon Lattimore if the Saints let him walk? There has been talk about Lattimore coming to the Colts on this forum before. 
    • Soooo Ballard once again told us exactly what he was going to do or not do and why but people ignored it because it’s not what they wanted?
    • https://theathletic.com/2572409/2021/05/07/justin-fields-better-than-zach-wilson-micah-parsons-potential-with-cowboys-execs-unfiltered-on-nfl-draft/ Mike Sando interviewed NFL execs after the draft to see what they think about the draft of other teams and here's what some of them said about the Colts:   In the part about the Bills:  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...