Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jskinnz

Marlon Mack / Le'Veon Bell

Recommended Posts

Can we please put the Le'Veon Bell to Indy rumor's out of their misery?  That dog don't hunt and frankly never did.

 

Mack looks to have the makings of a feature back and is complemented very nicely by Hines and Wilkins.  

 

200+ yards in two straight games by a younger and far cheaper group.  Why would they ever consider giving up the asset or dollars required to get Bell?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, before Mack broke out Bell was still enticing. That was just 2 weeks ago. I agree though. With the way Mack is playing, we don't need Bell or any other RB for that matter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jskinnz said:

Can we please put the Le'Veon Bell to Indy rumor's out of their misery?  That dog don't hunt and frankly never did.

 

Mack looks to have the makings of a feature back and is complemented very nicely by Hines and Wilkins.  

 

200+ yards in two straight games by a younger and far cheaper group.  Why would they ever consider giving up the asset or dollars required to get Bell?  

and you're not counting the week prior..3 weeks in a row Mack has shown up.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way this O-line is playing?  It's a free-for-all for everyone.  Hines and Wilkins - 7.0 plus.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bell wasn't even tempting before Mack played up to potential.  Why pay draft picks for an overrated headache and huge salary when you can get it for free next year's free agency...  Which hopefully we pay him to stay away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Alot of ya'll said mack wasn't a true RB1.....eat this crow immediately

 

Ahhhh.....   uhhhhh.....

 

I’d slow that roll a bit...

 

Maybe you’re right.   But Mack has been hit fir three weeks.   That’s it.

 

Can he do it the rest of the season?   Maybe.

 

Can he do it again in 2019?   Maybe.

 

That was the issue for many if us with Mack.    Can he do it year after year.   It’s a little too early to know....

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bell is a great receiver too, and mack kind of sucks at it

 

 

 

29 minutes ago, Trueman said:

Because people still don't understand OL's are more important than RB's. 

 

5 players vs one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're paying Mack, Hines, Wilkins and Turbin a total of $11m. Total. That's their entire contracts, for the life of their contracts, combined.

 

Bell wants at least $15m/year. 

 

This has always been a nonstarter for me. The fact that our backs are playing so well is just icing on the cake. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, VaAllDay757 said:

Alot of ya'll said mack wasn't a true RB1.....eat this crow immediately

not yet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

bell is a great receiver too, and mack kind of sucks at it

 

Nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dont get me wrong, he was great today and last week, but i dont like how he catches and maybe they should stop throwing to him 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

5 players vs one


If that's what you're taking away from my comment , then god love ya. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Superman said:

 

No he isn't.

i have to disagree, hes had several drops and wiffs in both seasons 

 

he catches like a running back, not very well 

Just now, Trueman said:


If that's what you're taking away from my comment , then god love ya. 

 

there are 5 players on the oline of course they are more important than the running back combined 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Superman said:

We're paying Mack, Hines, Wilkins and Turbin a total of $11m. Total. That's their entire contracts, for the life of their contracts, combined.

 

Bell wants at least $15m/year. 

 

This has always been a nonstarter for me. The fact that our backs are playing so well is just icing on the cake. 

Totally agree with you.  I am not sure what Bell's end game is.  He has been replaced by a 4th rounder who is tearing it up.  He lost millions this year and I don't believe teams will offer him big money next year.  Conner and Pittsburgh have proved that he is replaceable.  You don't pay replaceable players 18 mill a year. Dumb move by him...but I mayb proven wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

dont get me wrong, he was great today and last week, but i dont like how he catches and maybe they should stop throwing to him 

 

He has like 7 targets in the last three weeks. They aren't making him a big part of the passing game. He did score a 29 yard receiving TD last week. I don't see why they should stop targeting him when he's open, not if he's doing that kind of damage. 

 

He has a couple of high profile drops in two seasons. You're acting like he can't catch, and that's false. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Totally agree with you.  I am not sure what Bell's end game is.  He has been replaced by a 4th rounder who is tearing it up.  He lost millions this year and I don't believe teams will offer him big money next year.  Conner and Pittsburgh have proved that he is replaceable.  You don't pay replaceable players 18 mill a year. Dumb move by him...but I mayb proven wrong.

 

Yup. I don't agree with the way the Steelers have handled it, either. The tag should be for players you actually want to pay, not just to force players to take a weak offer at the deadline.

 

But I definitely think Bell got some bad advice, and I highly doubt he gets the kind of offer he wants. He probably doesn't even get an offer as good as what the Steelers reportedly made at the deadline. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Superman said:

We're paying Mack, Hines, Wilkins and Turbin a total of $11m. Total. That's their entire contracts, for the life of their contracts, combined.

 

Bell wants at least $15m/year. 

 

This has always been a nonstarter for me. The fact that our backs are playing so well is just icing on the cake. 

Thank you thank you thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Superman said:

 

He has like 7 targets in the last three weeks. They aren't making him a big part of the passing game.

well thats not very many, and he still has those drops.  i guess they do realize it, but still want to get him involved some what

 

one drop or tip is enough to cost us a game though, the margin for error is razor thin here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mack almost didn't play today.  Remember he was questionable after last weeks game with yet another injury.  He has shown it the last two weeks for sure.  But can he stay healthy and take the pounding?  His longest run today would have been a touchdown for Bell.  And last weeks as well.  Behind this line Bell would go off.   Bell is a far superior pass catcher too and a threat to go the distance with every touch.   Mack has shown he's a nice back for two games.   But can he do it every week?  A question that has yet to be answered. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Yup. I don't agree with the way the Steelers have handled it, either. The tag should be for players you actually want to pay, not just to force players to take a weak offer at the deadline.

 

But I definitely think Bell got some bad advice, and I highly doubt he gets the kind of offer he wants. He probably doesn't even get an offer as good as what the Steelers reportedly made at the deadline. 

If I recall, I believe his agent wanted him to sign a favourable contract last year.  Bell said no and he wanted 18 Million this year.  I think the bad advice he  is getting is from him when he stands in front of the mirror and tells himself how great he is.  I do also agree that Pitttsburgh handled it wrong. Should have traded him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Mack almost didn't play today.  Remember he was questionable after last weeks game with yet another injury.  He has shown it the last two weeks for sure.  But can he stay healthy and take the pounding?  His longest run today would have been a touchdown for Bell.  And last weeks as well.  Behind this line Bell would go off.   Bell is a far superior pass catcher too and a threat to go the distance with every touch.   Mack has shown he's a nice back for two games.   But can he do it every week?  A question that has yet to be answered. 

 

How's that? Mack is faster than Bell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

well thats not very many, and he still has those drops.  i guess they do realize it, but still want to get him involved some what

 

one drop or tip is enough to cost us a game though, the margin for error is razor thin here

 

This is haterism. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marlon Mack definitely has talent, Finally,  a good hit in a non profile running back, but to say it was proven by finally having an  offense line and you don't need a high profile running back is ridiculous. His talent at running back is like, Addai & Roads, Now his durability, is what in the future will define him.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Mack almost didn't play today.  Remember he was questionable after last weeks game with yet another injury.  He has shown it the last two weeks for sure.  But can he stay healthy and take the pounding?  His longest run today would have been a touchdown for Bell.  And last weeks as well.  Behind this line Bell would go off.   Bell is a far superior pass catcher too and a threat to go the distance with every touch.   Mack has shown he's a nice back for two games.   But can he do it every week?  A question that has yet to be answered. 

Try he's done it 3 weeks in a row.  3 weeks ago he was 12 carries 89 yards...i'd count that all day. so 3 weeks in a row=Proven.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Superman said:

 

This is haterism. 

 i like mack, just not as a receiver 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

well thats not very many, and he still has those drops.  i guess they do realize it, but still want to get him involved some what

 

one drop or tip is enough to cost us a game though, the margin for error is razor thin here

 

Mack's hands are fine, his drops have been largely concentration issues.

 

Mack has the ability to take every catch he makes for a TD, so... no, don't stop throwing to him. That would be stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ColtsLegacy said:

 

Mack's hands are fine, his drops have been largely concentration issues.

you could say this about any drop

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Mack almost didn't play today.  Remember he was questionable after last weeks game with yet another injury.  He has shown it the last two weeks for sure.  But can he stay healthy and take the pounding?  His longest run today would have been a touchdown for Bell.  And last weeks as well.  Behind this line Bell would go off.   Bell is a far superior pass catcher too and a threat to go the distance with every touch.   Mack has shown he's a nice back for two games.   But can he do it every week?  A question that has yet to be answered. 

 

To the bolded, Bell hasn't had a play longer than 44 yards since 2014. This idea that he's a big play RB isn't based in reality. Mack has way more top end than Bell now. 

 

The questions about Mack's durability are legitimate. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Mack almost didn't play today.  Remember he was questionable after last weeks game with yet another injury.  He has shown it the last two weeks for sure.  But can he stay healthy and take the pounding?  His longest run today would have been a touchdown for Bell.  And last weeks as well.  Behind this line Bell would go off.   Bell is a far superior pass catcher too and a threat to go the distance with every touch.   Mack has shown he's a nice back for two games.   But can he do it every week?  A question that has yet to be answered. 

giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51a5bd657286168587241

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Mack almost didn't play today.  Remember he was questionable after last weeks game with yet another injury.  He has shown it the last two weeks for sure.  But can he stay healthy and take the pounding?  His longest run today would have been a touchdown for Bell.  And last weeks as well.  Behind this line Bell would go off.   Bell is a far superior pass catcher too and a threat to go the distance with every touch.   Mack has shown he's a nice back for two games.   But can he do it every week?  A question that has yet to be answered. 

 

There is much nonsense in your post.  The bolded is the the worst of the lot - that is wrong on top of wrong.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seems odd in general that it took so long.  Outside of the guy in SD, we rarely hear why someone holds out this long on a mundane contract with so little to quibble over. 
    • One thing I’ll say about Bob though, his small size & Wolverine (comic book character) mentality made him a terror against the run.  With him already being short, when he went submarine on a RB, they really risked their careers if their feet were planted when the Colonel was coming for them.  He turned so many guys into tip toe bandits or sent them helicoptering into the air.  No wonder our run defense was so stout.  Usually only took 1 “meeting” with Bob in the hole, to put fear in the RB’s head the rest of the game...  You had to know where he was at all times or kiss your knees goodbye.
    • I have to disagree with the last sentence. I think Sean Taylor (The former Hurricane & Redskin safety) was and would have statistically been better than all 3 had he not been murdered.  That dude was what you’d get if you created a cyborg safety. Big. Fast. Physical. And immaculate receiver level ball skills...  I still love the other 3, especially the Colonel, but Taylor was on another level.  A combination of all 3.
    • This is a big compliment for KM.    
    • No, if he wants to go be a gm somewhere who are we to hold him back from that.
  • Members

    • coltskane

      coltskane 886

      Senior Members
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • el duderino

      el duderino 61

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts_Fan12

      Colts_Fan12 4,911

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShakerColt

      ShakerColt 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Surge89

      Surge89 964

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IkeAramba

      IkeAramba 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JPFolks

      JPFolks 863

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ScotColt

      ScotColt 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...