Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Two of division rivals lose


Recommended Posts

I admire your optimism good sir!

 

Some aspects of this team have me encouraged, but others are much worse than I imagined.

 

If this team wins more than 6 games, I will be shocked.

 

The good:

 

- Luck is way better than virtually everyone (including me) thought he would be.

- Leonard is the real deal.

- Turay is showing development.

- Nelson is performing as expected.

- Hines is becoming a match-up nightmare when lined up as a WR.

- T.Y. Hilton continues to ball out.

 

The bad:

 

- WR corps is one of the worst in the NFL.  Not the worst.  But one of the worst.

- Safety play is much worse than I imagined it would be.  Farley deserves a look back there.

- The pass rush disappeared in NE.

- This team does not have high-quality, or even "above average" starters at OT when AC is out.

- Related to the point about the OT position, this team is missing critical depth at key positions like CB and LB.

 

 

The ugly:

 

- Injuries.

- Injuries.

- Injuries.

- The Colts' strength and conditioning program is underwhelming.  When I see several guys go out with the same types of injuries (e.g., hamstrings), that starts to raise the red flags for me.

 

The technology and methodology exists in the S&C world to analyze different players' biological/physiological weaknesses and to customize training programs that will strengthen these weak areas (for not only performance gains but for injury prevention purposes).

 

There's almost nothing you can do to avoid contact-related injuries, but muscle strains and pulls are an entirely different story.  The amount of muscle strains and pulls is truly unacceptable for an NFL franchise.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

And after the dust settles from week 5, the colts are amung the worst teams in the NFL. After watching the bills, and browns squeek out wins against better competition. I'm sitting here bitter... And yet we're on the road again. To face the Jets who somehow did what they did today. I mean Geezuz. Sam Darnold had 10 freaking completions and they completely knocked the pants off the Broncos

 

I'm sorry all. Feel free to slape out ofy funk..

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

And after the dust settles from week 5, the colts are amung the worst teams in the NFL. After watching the bills, and browns squeek out wins against better competition. I'm sitting here bitter... And yet we're on the road again. To face the Jets who somehow did what they did today. I mean Geezuz. Sam Darnold had 10 freaking completions and they completely knocked the pants off the Broncos

 

I'm sorry all. Feel free to slape out ofy funk..

Maybe we can shock the world and squeek out a win over the Jets :thmup:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, krunk said:

We will beat the Jets. Im confident of that. Should have all our missing offensive pieces available.

if we lose to the jets. We will prob pick in the top five. Cards will prob pick first

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

45 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Maybe we can shock the world and squeek out a win over the Jets :thmup:

 

As long as Crowell doesn't have 200 yards rushing.  With all the injures the Colts have it wouldn't shock me if he ran amok.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Stephen said:

if we lose to the jets. We will prob pick in the top five. Cards will prob pick first

Or the Giants. Even when they’re good they loose. But the Jets are the swing game this year. They look like a middle of the pack team. If we beat them we’re a 7-9 team. If we lose then we are definitely picking top 10 in the draft and aren’t making the playoffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Defjamz26 said:

Or the Giants. Even when they’re good they loose. But the Jets are the swing game this year. They look like a middle of the pack team. If we beat them we’re a 7-9 team. If we lose then we are definitely picking top 10 in the draft and aren’t making the playoffs.

the next three games honestly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Happy if we win , not too upset if we lose. 

This season was about Luck's return to form, getting our young players experience, and establishing a new culture with a totally different coaching staff. 

Overall, despite our record , I'm really pleased.



 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, krunk said:

We will beat the Jets. Im confident of that. Should have all our missing offensive pieces available.

I was sitting here today thinking that. 10 days before the next game, someone HAS to be healthy right?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

Or the Giants. Even when they’re good they loose. But the Jets are the swing game this year. They look like a middle of the pack team. If we beat them we’re a 7-9 team. If we lose then we are definitely picking top 10 in the draft and aren’t making the playoffs.

Actually I’d say the 49ers will be destined for the top pick. They lost their star QB, and also lost one of their running backs. They are about to lose to the Cardinals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Call me am optimist but I c a better future for the Colts than the Ttians and Jags.  I think Mariota is wat t he is and Bortles is not a starting qb. God he isn't even a good back up. I beleive this is Mariotas year to show if he is a legit qb.  I was never high on   him .  Watson is still learning but I am not a great fan of him and thought he was over drafted.  I could b wrong on all 3 but I will stick with my evaluations. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Call me am optimist but I c a better future for the Colts than the Ttians and Jags.  I think Mariota is wat t he is and Bortles is not a starting qb. God he isn't even a good back up. I beleive this is Mariotas year to show if he is a legit qb.  I was never high on   him .  Watson is still learning but I am not a great fan of him and thought he was over drafted.  I could b wrong on all 3 but I will stick with my evaluations. 

I think we win the division

Link to post
Share on other sites

We shall c if we win the division. It would b great  if we won but  I am thinking more long term.  I know I should  not say this but........!  I hope we play tough all year, but not to finish with a great record.   A draft like last year and high picks next year,can set us up for years  to come.  I think that is what hurt Luck in the first years.  We finished with a lots of wins.  However, we were a bad team and didn't stock our shelves with high picks. We instead went with aged free agents because we thought we could win the super bowl on  Luck's rookie  contract.  If we ride on  Luck's coat tails again this  year, I fear we draft late and don't have a chance to get those impact players that we need.  Hope I am making sense!?!?!?! And yes Grigson and Pagano sucked. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That #1 D in Jacksonville looked like a fraud. 

Mariotta isn't reliable in terms of consistency.

Watson the jury is still out on.

 

Would be funny if we win the division.

 

Still early in the season, we don't know who will fall off yet.

 

I thought Ramsey getting absolutely abused by Hill was great. Watched a couple drives where he was giving 15 yards of old school Colts cushion and still couldn't cover that guy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watson has never came close to throwing 40 TD's in a season, he had 33 this past season which was his best by far. Luck had 40 in 2014 and 39 in 2018. Not that the TD stat is everything but just pointing that out. Also Luck went into Houston during the 2018 playoffs when Watson had a fully loaded team and Luck spanked them on his hometurf. Luck was better so we will have to agree to disagree 
    • Mugabi was very solid, hit so hard and won a Silver medal at 1980 Olympics  (Lost to Aldama from Cuba who Sugar Ray beat for gold 4 years earlier). His bout vs Hagler was first fight shown on Showtime. He had a good career after that fight and won a world title though didnt hold it long.   Mustafa Hamsho was another whom brawled and banged with Hagler. Wilfred Benitez was another one I enjoyed during that time, turned pro at 15 and won world title at 17..
    • Nah. In Watson's 4 years, he had 3 years of better QBR ratings than Luck ever had. Same with Passer Rating. Watson has a higher TD% and lower INT%. Better AVG and ANY/A too. And Watson's rushing TD avg/game is almost twice that of Luck's.    Luck was good. Watson was just easily better.
    • I know you believe it is accurate.   You wouldn’t have posted it otherwise.   I’d explain the other point of view but someone would come along accusing me of trying to get everyone to think as I do.   Nothing could be further from the truth, a difference of opinion is what makes the world go around.    I’d simply say this...  our difference of opinion is the gap of the Grand Canyon.    It’s not a small difference, it’s a gigantic difference.   So I’m fine with you believing what you do.  There are others here who share the same opinion as you, so you’re not alone.    So keep being Brash and Bold.  You do you.   Good luck!     
    • Brandon Graham is another good comp. Good all around player who gets a lot of pressures, but doesn't have the finishing ability of a great pass rusher. He's never had a double digit sack season, and even in the years when he's close, he still has an average PRP.    I used Trey Flowers as a comp because of his three cone (Graham 7.01; Flowers 7.34; Lawson 7.46). And because he was the hot commodity when he was a free agent a couple years ago, and there was talk of his being able to produce more sacks in a different situation, and that hasn't been the case. I wanted Flowers, but I wouldn't sign a player with this profile for big money. Lawson might be the best edge on the roster, but that's more a reflection of the lack of good edges on the roster. He'd be a 7-8 sack guy.   Just coming back to pressures/disruption, I think it's very dangerous to not account for the wide range of outcomes on plays where the QB is pressured. In general, QB performance drops when the QB is pressured, but the results are very scattered. Some games, the QB is under a lot of pressure, but is still very productive and makes a lot of plays.    Look at all the plays Watson made against our defense, and his biggest plays came when he was pressured. We got a ton of pressure on him, and actually converted a good percentage into sacks, but in two games there were 30 plays on which he was pressured, but wasn't sacked. He completed 64% of his pressured attempts for 12 yards per, and passer rating of 89. Watson is a special playmaker, but it illustrates the point that not all pressures are negative plays for the offense. In fact, a pressure that doesn't get finished can easily hurt the defense.   On the other hand, a player who has a lot of sacks but a relatively low amount of pressures is probably a fluke. No one is going to convert 40% of their pressures into sacks over an extended period of time, so if a guy has 25 pressures and 12 sacks, that's probably an outlier. Justin Houston and Denico Autry don't get enough pressures to expect them to be 8-9 sack players every year.    If you could provide context on all 64 of Lawson's pressures in 2020, you'll probably see a good half of them were hits right after the QB released the ball, or he got a step on the blocker and maybe a hand on the QB, but the QB moved and Lawson couldn't bend/change direction enough to finish the play. Probably five are unblocked reps.    And in general, when you have a guy with a lot of pressures, but low sacks, it's because he can't finish consistently. And that guy doesn't become a good finisher in Year 5. Maybe there's an outlier 10 or 11 sack season here or there -- Erik Walden had an 11 sack season at one point -- but he's not going to transform into a really dangerous pass rusher out of the blue. If you pay big money for that guy, you're going to be disappointed.
  • Members

    • NelsonLeonard

      NelsonLeonard 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • funktacious2

      funktacious2 405

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 3,114

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jeddy88

      Jeddy88 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 110

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DeathByEagle

      DeathByEagle 51

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 417

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PrincetonTiger

      PrincetonTiger 8,239

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gyworks

      Gyworks 13

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts824

      colts824 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...