Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

We talk about position flex and this guy isn't involved enough. Maybe with his speed and cover ability it might not be bad to put him as corner on 4-3 and nickel situations and move back to safety on Dime. Farley and Geathers are still top safeties and gets Farley more snaps.

Thoughts...

Link to post
Share on other sites

teams do avoid him, but im not sure if he would be best  suited for cb.  it might work in a cover 2

 

he does take away part of the field, but i dont think we are getting great value out of that.  they just throw it to the other side of the field when they want to go deep 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

pff has him as the 11th ranked safety.  the problem is geathers and farley have been bad, so teams are targeting their side of the field a lot more

 

hooker would probably be a better fit in a cover 3 tbh, that way it would be much harder for offenses to avoid him 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, aaron11 said:

pff has him as the 11th ranked safety.  the problem is geathers and farley have been bad, so teams are targeting their side of the field a lot more

 

hooker would probably be a better fit in a cover 3 tbh, that way it would be much harder for offenses to avoid him 

Where does that put him on the field on a cover 3? Single high?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's a good player no doubt.  But he came in with the reputation of being a playmaker and with a reputation for getting interceptions like he did last year before the injury.  So far I don't remember him getting close to one.  Still plenty of time to get going.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Maybe even a hard tackle, once in a while, would be nice.

Not hard tackles..... just tackles.

he's smart, he usually goes for legs.  He's not built to be an enforcer type hitter.  I'd rather keep him on the field.  Let our LBs do the hard hitting.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Seems like Malik has been taking some criticism on twitter over his play, and he's not happy:

 

 

 

I wish players wouldnt pay so much attention to what us fans think/say regarding things like this.

  He's right, but he should ignore it and not speak about it.

It's always a losing battle for these guys when they start jawing with fans on social media.

  He's a professional at the top of his profession.  Why worry about the opinions of "joe shmoes" who have no real experience in his profession?  Just ignore it and keep doing what you are doing.  If his teammates and coaches think he's doing his job,  then he is.  No matter what any of us think really.

  He's doing just fine imo.  I expect us to see some big plays from him before the season is over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a zone defense. We arent forcing mistakes unless we disguise the coverage or have great pass rush into a bad throw/read. With the way they deploy Hooker and the types of QBs we've played (safe with the ball) I am not surprised Hooker isn't making splash plays. To be honest, I would be worried if they WERE constantly calling his name.

 

His picks will come but he can't force QBs to start lugging deep bombs every other pass. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Davvon2590 said:

This is a zone defense. We arent forcing mistakes unless we disguise the coverage or have great pass rush into a bad throw/read. With the way they deploy Hooker and the types of QBs we've played (safe with the ball) I am not surprised Hooker isn't making splash plays. To be honest, I would be worried if they WERE constantly calling his name.

 

His picks will come but he can't force QBs to start lugging deep bombs every other pass. 

Carson Palmer found out the hard way that you don't go deep on hooker or you'll get picked same with Russell 

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, LockeDown said:

Wow, I hope he doesn’t throw a teammate under the bus in his anger. .  He’s one of my favorite players and I don’t want to see that happen. 

I get what you're saying, and agree, i think hes really getting at people not understanding what is actual job is. Some people are probably like "well he isnt getting 15 tackles and 2 sacks a game so he's a bust lololol" without actually knowing what his job is.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jaredfor3 said:

Hooker is not the problem. For starters, we lead the league in dropped passes. 

And yet the marketing team decided to email out "Crucial Catch collection" items at the pro shop.  

 

Bad timing.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, aaron11 said:

pff has him as the 11th ranked safety.  the problem is geathers and farley have been bad, so teams are targeting their side of the field a lot more

 

hooker would probably be a better fit in a cover 3 tbh, that way it would be much harder for offenses to avoid him 

 

Yeah, it seems the Colts need to add in another safety via the draft or FA somehow next year.  CG still can't seem to stay healthy still and Farley definitely is not the answer.  Boy it would've been nice to go after Tyrann Mathieu. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its simply hilarious to read some comments saying that QBs are scared to throw his way because of 4 games he played as an unknown rookie, who also now coming off an ACL.

 

That type of validation is as bad as blaming Grigson for the current bad roster.  LOL.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Only point in this, is we have 3 safeties that is our top 3 players in the 2ndary. I would like to see all 3 take the most snaps in the 2ndary and since he is better at coverage maybe in our base 4-3 he can play corner. Would also help run support and maybe stop the outside run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So much wrong in this topic. You guys have no idea what the responsibilities of a player are. Y’all just look for highlight reel plays and stats. Teams aren’t throwing deep down field on the Colts. There’s a reason for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, richard pallo said:

He's a good player no doubt.  But he came in with the reputation of being a playmaker and with a reputation for getting interceptions like he did last year before the injury.  So far I don't remember him getting close to one.  Still plenty of time to get going.  

He didn't have just any injury, it was extensive.  Grade 3 ACL tear (where it tears into two separate pieces), and MCL tear.  Also, he had a torn labrum in his hip coming out of OSU and prior had a double inguinal hernia surgery.  I think it will just take him some time to get all of those reflexes and smaller twitch muscles and nerve endings to compensate for the operation and the other tendons that have to be transplanted from other areas of the body.  I would say he will do nothing but get better as all of his injuries and subsequent surgeries are accepted by his body.  He's young, so I feel he will get back to about 95 of what he was.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/6/2018 at 12:01 PM, aaron11 said:

pff has him as the 11th ranked safety.  the problem is geathers and farley have been bad, so teams are targeting their side of the field a lot more

 

hooker would probably be a better fit in a cover 3 tbh, that way it would be much harder for offenses to avoid him 

Geathers has been bad in zone it’s not Farley.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I watched him at Ohio State.....  I watched last year

 

He is making plays, but not at the same level as last year or at Ohio State

 

I think he needs a bit of time to get his speed back.

 

Some players need longer time........

 

I havent given up, but to say he is at the EXACT high level as last year, pre injury isnt accurate IMHO

 

 

We need to have patience......  Hopefully he gets up and running sooner than later

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/6/2018 at 4:31 PM, DougDew said:

Its simply hilarious to read some comments saying that QBs are scared to throw his way because of 4 games he played as an unknown rookie, who also now coming off an ACL.

 

That type of validation is as bad as blaming Grigson for the current bad roster.  LOL.

That's EXACTLY what we're saying.  Opponents take the easy road not the hard one.  EVERYONE knows Malik has elite range and ball skills.  Watson sure knows.  Challenging him like Palmer did last year is dumb.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Malik has a very good point.  How many of our sacks have been coverage sacks?  The QB had plenty of time, but nobody was open, and the rush eventually got to him.  This doesn't show up in the stat line for every player involved.  It doesn't say, "Player A did his job in coverage so Player B could get the sack."  It just records Player B's sack.  But there are 11 guys out there, all playing together.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, John Hammonds said:

Malik has a very good point.  How many of our sacks have been coverage sacks?  The QB had plenty of time, but nobody was open, and the rush eventually got to him.  This doesn't show up in the stat line for every player involved.  It doesn't say, "Player A did his job in coverage so Player B could get the sack."  It just records Player B's sack.  But there are 11 guys out there, all playing together.

This is why I don’t like PFF. They don’t know assignments or play designs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It never ceases to amaze me when "fans" complain about a players shoddy play when they just look at the stats....

 

Hooker is doing what he's asked to do.....cover his half of the field and with the exception of one blown coverage in the first game he's done just that.

 

Would we like to see splash plays, yes, but his job is to keep everything in front of him or double the deep route both of which are to keep the deep plays in check.

 

If you notice who the top three tacklers are Leonard (WILL), Walker (MIKE) and Geathers (SS/LB) that means Hooker is making the QBs throw underneath him...

 

Much like the oline, the less you hear his name the likelyhood he had a good game and is playing his role within the defense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I doubt we grab Ertz if he is even cut (not looking likely). Plus why so many think Doyle gets cut for this move makes little sense. The coaches and Ballard love him. He gets the first down catches when we need him but more importantly he blocks better than majority of TE’s in the game. We are run heavy team so his value comes a lot more than just catches and yards. If for some reason they grab Ertz if cut then you pair him with Doyle to create a strong group not cut one and create a weakness.    I will say I doubt we grab a TE that will want 8mil per year. Even a 1 year deal doesn’t make sense for us here. After signing Fisher we have roughly 13 mil for the season. Ballard doesn’t like being strapped during the season. 
    • I think it could still happen   Doyle would be the casualty though    
    • Man I really like this signing!  If he can come back 80% as good as he has played I would say we def upgraded our offensive line and that’s no knock on AC I just think this guy can be much better (if healthy). I would put our offensive line up against anyone else’s.  With that said Murphy’s law keeps coming into my mind because we have soo many ifs and question marks for this team that we can literally be 6-10 bad or super bowl bound. I can’t think of any colts team with this many “if” question marks.   If wentZ can prove last year was a fluke and go back to being one of the best up and coming qb in the game than we are sitting pretty. If he plays like he did last year things will be very very ugly.    Then you got this guy. If fisher can come back healthy we can have one of the best lines in football. If he doesn’t play or is diminished we have a huge hole at one of the most important positions.      I don’t know why but I just have this feeling with so many question marks on this team, that the season could go either way. I do fear that  some of These question marks  aren’t going to go our way and we will be hurting. Btw  Some of these other question marks Include , Will Mack be back to his old self?   Was last year a fluke for our new stud RB? Will ty  hilton plAy any better, or will he continue to decline? Was last year a fluke for Xavier Rhodes? Will Paris cambell stay healthy and actually contribute?  How will our rookie DEs play?  Then you have  the question mark that every team has  which is who will stay healthy?  
    • The risk is of opportunity cost, not of losing that money. The risk is that we have now made our bet with the LT position and we are missing on more safe options, so if he doesn't recover or recovers and is not the same, we are very likely left with sub-par performance at LT for the year...     
    • He should have been like "...and my source said ... and I quote 'Look...'"  
  • Members

    • TheBlueAndWhite

      TheBlueAndWhite 75

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 3,283

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • superrep1967

      superrep1967 586

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PRnum1

      PRnum1 340

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 6,745

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • J@son

      J@son 918

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 67

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 2,500

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indykmj

      indykmj 86

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...