chrisfarley

Deangelo Hall - FS1

Recommended Posts

Colin Cowherd Show just now: He (DH) just said that he wouldn't go into detail and mention certain names but that he knows for a fact that when you start the season with BB, he tells you there are two things you don't mention, one was the Jets (what he called "the team up there from the east"), and the other was the Colts.  Now someone please tell me there is no rivalry there.  He also said that this was before deflategate.  Look, I already knew this (that BB hates us), but New England is going to try to put up a 50 burger on us tonight, and i hope it completely backfires.  I couldn't care less that they beat us 7 in a row or whatever it is, it's on.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, MPStack said:

Translation: Patriots by 35 tonight!

Authentic Translation: BB has bugged the Colts locker room and is listening now.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol Why is BB so angry at the Colts even before deflate gate? Are the Colts in his head that much where he can't even say the word Colts? Seems pretty lame. If they are mad about deflate gate, they can blame Grigson. He's with the Seahawks now. Hopefully the Pats lose due to karma for Mc Flake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, GusFring said:

Not a rivalry when 1 team never beats the other. 

 

Try telling that to Ohio State and Michigan fans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What people don't realize is, this was a rivalry back in 1987 when we played in the AFC East. We won the Division by a game over them that season. This goes back way before Manning. Nobody on the face of the earth would say that the Packers/Bears aren't a rivalry and the Packers have owned them for 25 years.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brewski just said , moments ago,  at the close of NFL live today when asked how big is the rivalry?   It's BIG.  He said he wouldn't go into detail but he said it's even bigger than the Jets which he says is way overblown.  We are it for them. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts defense is good in sacks but teams pick apart our zone right now. Would love to see that change tonight and have another 6 sack night. I just want to see the offense get on a role and what a team to do it against. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, NannyMcafee said:

Colts defense is good in sacks but teams pick apart our zone right now. Would love to see that change tonight and have another 6 sack night. I just want to see the offense get on a role and what a team to do it against. 

This could be a perfect game for Hooker to pick a few.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pgt_rob said:

lol Why is BB so angry at the Colts even before deflate gate? Are the Colts in his head that much where he can't even say the word Colts? Seems pretty lame. If they are mad about deflate gate, they can blame Grigson. He's with the Seahawks now. Hopefully the Pats lose due to karma for Mc Flake.

BB is a perfectionist, and the Colts have made him look silly twice. The 4th and 2 game, and the 2006 AFC championship. Patriots should not have blown that lead, and should have another SB trophy

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Pacergeek said:

BB is a perfectionist, and the Colts have made him look silly twice. The 4th and 2 game, and the 2006 AFC championship. Patriots should not have blown that lead, and should have another SB trophy

Wah :Cry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Reidm said:

 

Try telling that to Ohio State and Michigan fans.

As an Ohio State fan I tell Michigan fans that it isn't really a rivalry when one team keeps beating the other one all the time... they love that, I tells ya!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, pgt_rob said:

lol Why is BB so angry at the Colts even before deflate gate? Are the Colts in his head that much where he can't even say the word Colts? Seems pretty lame. If they are mad about deflate gate, they can blame Grigson. He's with the Seahawks now. Hopefully the Pats lose due to karma for Mc Flake.

 

The Colts aren't in his head. He's just an arrogant *.

 

I think they (NE) orchestrated the McDaniels fiasco. He was never going to be the HC here. Ballard thought he was dealing in good faith...after their previous trades. He probably should have known better...but he does now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

Being so short handed we should just settle this game with trial by combat. Ballard vs. McDaniels at midfield.

I'd settle for those big q-tip things you see on american gladiator, let'em go at it.  I've got ballard either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because Belichick hates the Colts, assuming that's even true, doesn't mean this is a rivalry. On the field, there is no rivalry. We haven't come close to beating them since 2009. 

 

There's obvious beef and bad blood, but that doesn't equal a rivalry. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NannyMcafee said:

Colts defense is good in sacks but teams pick apart our zone right now. Would love to see that change tonight and have another 6 sack night. I just want to see the offense get on a role and what a team to do it against. 

 

I've been saying this for a couple days now but I really think that this could be Hooker's breakout game. In my opinion, he has been playing too far back to actually get involved in plays and be the playmaker that we all know he can be. Remember that one play where he essentially saved a touchdown by barely getting to the path of the ball and deflecting it? He still has the ability but hasn't been close enough to actually do much so far this season. 

 

Now I think that Frank Reich realizes that we probably aren't gonna win unless we get a few turnovers and make some plays on defense. Cue Malik Hooker. Bring the dude a little closer so that he can potentially mess with Gronk and/or Edelman's routes. 

 

Every game, there has been a different person on defense that is showing up to play, especially the young guys. It'll be Hooker tonight with atleast an INT and probably atleast a few pass break-ups. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Superman said:

Just because Belichick hates the Colts, assuming that's even true, doesn't mean this is a rivalry. On the field, there is no rivalry. We haven't come close to beating them since 2009. 

 

There's obvious beef and bad blood, but that doesn't equal a rivalry. 

 Did you consider the Colts and Patriots a rivalry from 2005-2009? Reason why I am asking is, we dominated them over a 5 year span in those seasons. We were 5-1 against them, won a SB by going through them and they didn't win a SB in that 5 year span. In the Luck era they are 5-0 against us and Luck has only played 4 full seasons - not much difference there. 

 

-My point is these 2 teams were a rivalry back in the 80's when they both were in the AFC East. I remember in 1987 the hate these 2 teams had toward one another when we played them and won the Division. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

 Did you consider the Colts and Patriots a rivalry from 2005-2009? Reason why I am asking is, we dominated them over a 5 year span in those seasons. We were 5-1 against them, won a SB by going through them and they didn't win a SB in that 5 year span. In the Luck era they are 5-0 against us and Luck has only played 4 full seasons - not much difference there. 

 

-My point is these 2 teams were a rivalry back in the 80's when they both were in the AFC East. I remember in 1987 the hate these 2 teams had toward one another when we played them and won the Division. 

 

We didn't dominate them on the field. We beat them four out of five (by my count, not five out of six), but the majority of those games were close (I think there was one two score win in 2005, the rest were nail biters). 

 

In the Luck era, the Pats have beat us 59-24, 43-22, 42-20, 45-7, and 34-27. And that last game was 34-21 until the Colts scored with 1:19 left on the clock. They haven't just beat us every time we've played, they've dominated us. They've been the far superior team, and that was true even in the AFCCG in 2014. 

 

The other difference is that the early 2000s Patriots had a history of beating the Colts over and over again. I considered that a rivalry because most of those games were close, and two of them were playoff games. We were two of the best -- if not the two very best -- teams in the AFC. We knew they'd be waiting for us in the playoffs, and they knew the same about us. Then, the Colts finally gained the upper hand in 2005, but there was already a recent history of a legitimate battle, along with the obvious Manning/Brady connection. 

 

This is not the AFC East rivalry, nor is it the Manning/Brady rivalry. This is sustained domination by one team over another. Neither team or fan base likes each other, and while bad blood is usually a fundamental element to a rivalry, it doesn't in itself make a rivalry. There has to at least be some contest between the two teams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

We didn't dominate them on the field. We beat them four out of five (by my count, not five out of six), but the majority of those games were close (I think there was one two score win in 2005, the rest were nail biters). 

 

In the Luck era, the Pats have beat us 59-24, 43-22, 42-20, 45-7, and 34-27. And that last game was 34-21 until the Colts scored with 1:19 left on the clock. They haven't just beat us every time we've played, they've dominated us. They've been the far superior team, and that was true even in the AFCCG in 2014. 

 

The other difference is that the early 2000s Patriots had a history of beating the Colts over and over again. I considered that a rivalry because most of those games were close, and two of them were playoff games. We were two of the best -- if not the two very best -- teams in the AFC. We knew they'd be waiting for us in the playoffs, and they knew the same about us. Then, the Colts finally gained the upper hand in 2005, but there was already a recent history of a legitimate battle, along with the obvious Manning/Brady connection. 

 

This is not the AFC East rivalry, nor is it the Manning/Brady rivalry. This is sustained domination by one team over another. Neither team or fan base likes each other, and while bad blood is usually a fundamental element to a rivalry, it doesn't in itself make a rivalry. There has to at least be some contest between the two teams.

Including the Playoffs, we beat them 5 out 6.

-In 2005 40-21 at NE, that was a blowout.

-In 2006 27-20 at NE

-In the 2006 AFC Title Game 38-34

-In 2007 they did beat us here 24-20, we were up 20-10

-In 2008 we win again 18-15

-In 2009 we win again 35-34 

 

-The games were close for the most part but to me that is one sided over 5 years regarding wins/losses. Not trying to debate your earlier comment but I was curious to here your opinion on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Including the Playoffs, we beat them 5 out 6.

-In 2005 40-21 at NE, that was a blowout.

-In 2006 27-20 at NE

-In the 2006 AFC Title Game 38-34

-In 2007 they did beat us here 24-20, we were up 20-10

-In 2008 we win again 18-15

-In 2009 we win again 35-34 

 

-The games were close for the most part but to me that one sided over 5 years regarding wins/losses. Not trying to debate your earlier comment but I was curious to here your opinion on it.

 

I missed the 2006 regular season game. Good call. 

 

Still, over those six games, we outscored them by a total of 30 points. They beat us in the 2014 playoff game by 38 points. See what I'm getting at?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

I missed the 2006 regular season game. Good call. 

 

Still, over those six games, we outscored them by a total of 30 points. They beat us in the 2014 playoff game by 38 points. See what I'm getting at?

Yeah I get it, it would be nice to see a competitive game for a change. Tired of these blowouts. Without Hilton tonight this may be really rough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Yeah I get it, it would be nice to see a competitive game for a change. Tired of these blowouts. Without Hilton tonight this may be really rough.

 

Yeah, I don't think today is our day. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t believe there is a hard and fast rule defining a rivalry.  If the fans and owners hate each due to their history, it can be a rivalry.  Manning beat the Pats with Denver but that’s not a rivalry by anyone’s estimation. We have Pats fans on our message boards STILL who live just to pester us. That’s a rivalry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh it’s a rivalry for sure! Colts use to be in that division years ago until the expansion. This is a must win tonight!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 I expect a few late hit fouls on the Colts. Make them pay. Go Colts!  

 

I would welcome it, particularly if they can knock Brady around and bang him up.  Then we could listen to all the Pats fans cry about how dirty the Colts are.  Wouldn't that be fresh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, chrisfarley said:

Authentic Translation: BB has bugged the Colts locker room and is listening now.

I know Peyton and the Colts always worried about that I wouldn't put it past him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.