Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

BleedBlue4Shoe86

Bell to the Colts? (Article/Rumour)

Recommended Posts

Conceivably we could trade for Mack.  Then trade Brissett and then sign Bell in FA next year.    I think we would probably have the space to get both done.   Wouldn't that be a hoot!  LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best back in the league! I dont wanna spend that much for a back but if Ballard did I'd be happy to have him he is one of my favorite players in the NFL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the wear and tear on his body that alot of people are seeing. He's only 26 years old but the key stat is he only has 1229 carries in his 5 year career. That is only 246 a season. It's not like he is running the ball 300+ every season. He did have 321 carries last season - that was most in his career but he showed durability and played in 15 games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I don't see the wear and tear on his body that alot of people are seeing. He's only 26 years old but the key stat is he only has 1229 carries in his 5 year career. That is only 246 a season. It's not like he is running the ball 300+ every season. He did have 321 carries last season - that was most in his career but he showed durability and played in 15 games.

He's had 312 receptions also. Keep this in mind.  that more than 60 /season.  so over 300+ touches/season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I don't see the wear and tear on his body that alot of people are seeing. He's only 26 years old but the key stat is he only has 1229 carries in his 5 year career. That is only 246 a season. It's not like he is running the ball 300+ every season. He did have 321 carries last season - that was most in his career but he showed durability and played in 15 games.

 

If he gets over 300 carries and around or over 100 receptions, then I fell his tank went toward E really quick these last 2 seasons.  Let’s see if Pitt gives him 400+ touches this year and puts him away wet...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BleedBlue4Shoe86 said:

 

I'd put the odds of Ballard and Irsay trying to sign LeVeon Bell next off-season at roughly,  5 percent.    A punches long shot chance.

 

But that's it.

 

Ballard might someday sign someone who will command a large contract,  but I doubt it will be Bell who will be wanting 5/75 and 45 Mill guaranteed.     I don't see our front office doing that.

 

Sorry,   but I think it's a long shot at best....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fall for RB's is QUICK, that's what's scary. When they slow down, they're toast quick.

 

I still believe Polian was right when he said 2,000 carries is the expiration date for an effective running back. He's right if you look at guys stats over the years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A 26 year old entering the prime of his career. "Too many miles." You know what Adrian Peterson did at age 27 after having "too many miles"? If we can sign him to around a  4 year contract, I'm on board. Its a lot of money but elite RBs are going to start commanding that much money. Look at Gurley. And to any doubt of Bell's talent, that's just ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

If he gets over 300 carries and around or over 100 receptions, then I fell his tank went toward E really quick these last 2 seasons.  Let’s see if Pitt gives him 400+ touches this year and puts him away wet...

Yeah I was going to bring up that Pitt does use him alot as a Receiver so maybe alot of people are looking at that + his Carries as being too much. Receiving is easier on his body though as many of those Catches are on the outside where he gets out of of bounds or is being tackled by 1 person. Unlike a RB who may get 325-350 Carries every season and running into piles of guys that much. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Luck 4 president said:

If our defense and OL exceed expectations while our running game keeps us from really competing then I say we sign him on a short deal. If we are still a ways away then pass 

 

Bell doesn't want a short deal.     He just turned down a 5 year, 70 Mill dollar deal with about 33 Mill guaranteed from Pittsburgh.      And Gurley just re-set the market with his deal of 4/60 with 45 Mill guaranteed.

 

This is Gurley's last chance to get a big contract.    He doesn't want a short deal.    He wants a big deal with BIG guaranteed dollars.     He's not coming to Indy for a deal he can get in Pittsburgh.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@NewColtsFan I agree with you, the % is low we sign Bell. You have it at 5%, I would put it at probably 20% but that is still extremely low. Not a typical Ballard signing but sometimes Irsay loves to make an unexpected huge splash. Bell seems to have an interest in the Colts as well going by his Twitter. I am with you though, I doubt it happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good player but I don’t see how he fits Ballard’s philosophy with the miles on his tyres.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Bell doesn't want a short deal.     He just turned down a 5 year, 70 Mill dollar deal with about 33 Mill guaranteed from Pittsburgh.      And Gurley just re-set the market with his deal of 4/60 with 45 Mill guaranteed.

 

This is Gurley's last chance to get a big contract.    He doesn't want a short deal.    He wants a big deal with BIG guaranteed dollars.     He's not coming to Indy for a deal he can get in Pittsburgh.

 

I think you meant Bell's. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, stitches said:

Oh, I am not particularly enthralled by the idea of giving 15M for a RB either, but if we are to go for elite RB, I'd much rather it be in FA than in the top 10 of a draft... something a ton of people around here were advocating for. 

 

I think both are examples of bad allocation of resources. One more so. 

If Ballard's mindset is to get a better (maybe elite) RB it would be with a draft. Rookie contracts are a very nice deal for a good RB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, strt182 said:

I think you meant Bell's. 

 

Yes,  thanks.

 

Yes, I did!      My bad.     I did mean Bell....

 

Much appreciated....

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ReMeDy said:

 

Well I hope he likes corn, cause he will get plenty of it here.

And shrimp cocktail

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Superman said:

As per Le'Veon Bell's agent...

Yeah, that's what I more or less suspected. Bell's agent throwing landing spots out at random.

 

I like his running style. He doesn't fire thru creases. He stutter steps & waits & then makes his move. He catches the ball well & has good hands. He wants too much money. He will probably end up in Detroit or a team that is an afterthought. A place that will overpay him because they are no playoff contender.

 

I like our backs. No need to bring Bell in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

He just turned down a 5 year, 70 Mill dollar deal with about 33 Mill guaranteed from Pittsburgh.  

That deal sounds nice on the surface, but when you look at the fine print, it was extremely misleading on what was actually guaranteed money in Bell's pocket had he signed on the dotted line. The last I heard the deal was closer to 10 million guaranteed.

 

I haven't seen NFL Network today. Perhaps, this offer is new to me. I'm not doubting your information NCF. I just don't trust Pittsburgh because they are kind of a frugal franchise who doesn't reward playmakers outside of their QB, WR, & LT normally. They are just ticked off at Bell for refusing to sign his franchise tag & get into camp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Fluke_33 said:

get a premium pass rusher first.  RBs can be found.

Well said F33. That does seem to be the consensus in today's game I agree 100%

 

Not every back can catch the ball like a TE or be superb on blitz pickup for Big Ben though. INDY won't make a play for him. I just think Bell isn't appreciated like he should be that's all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, IinD said:

The fall for RB's is QUICK, that's what's scary. When they slow down, they're toast quick.

 

I still believe Polian was right when he said 2,000 carries is the expiration date for an effective running back. He's right if you look at guys stats over the years.

That's where I feel bad for backs though. They take so much contact & their careers only last 4-6 yrs on average. LBs can usually play 8-12 yrs. QBs close to 15 yrs in many cases. While a RB gets a tiny window with a rookie slotted bracket & only 1 lucrative contract if you're lucky.

 

Look at Adrian Peterson. The man in Minnesota for awhile who had a short stint in Louisiana who is seeing if the Redskins wanna take a flyer on him now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only reason I can see bringing Bell in is for locker room leadership to mentor the younger guys, but what can he teach them that Frank Gore didn't already do when he was a member of the Colts? Nothing. Therefore, turn the page & move on in my book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

No matter what state is legal or not legal it is not legal for a NFL to use it.  The NFL is just like some jobs in Colorado, it is still not legal or acceptable.  Any property owned or subsidized by the federal government it is not legal to use or possess weed.

ok. W.e. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, southwest1 said:

That deal sounds nice on the surface, but when you look at the fine print, it was extremely misleading on what was actually guaranteed money in Bell's pocket had he signed on the dotted line. The last I heard the deal was closer to 10 million guaranteed.

 

I haven't seen NFL Network today. Perhaps, this offer is new to me. I'm not doubting your information NCF. I just don't trust Pittsburgh because they are kind of a frugal franchise who doesn't reward playmakers outside of their QB, WR, & LT normally. They are just ticked off at Bell for refusing to sign his franchise tag & get into camp.

Guaranteeing big money long term for Bell IMO is not the smartest investment the Steelers should make.  Pittsburgh is not the only team who are not crazy about paying a RB a large guaranteed contract when their position is one of the shortest career on average. 

With that said does the team or the player pay for the insurance to cover a guaranteed contract in case of a career ending injury?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

Guaranteeing big money long term for Bell IMO is not the smartest investment the Steelers should make.  Pittsburgh is not the only team who are not crazy about paying a RB a large guaranteed contract when their position is one of the shortest career on average. 

With that said does the team or the player pay for the insurance to cover a guaranteed contract in case of a career ending injury?

True, the running back position has lost some of it's leverage now because of the back by committee approach & a workhorse franchise back on the field for all 3 downs is not as commonplace as it once was say back in the Barry Sanders era for example.

 

Regarding your question, I'm assuming the team not the player would pick up the tab on a career ending injury that happened during a game or team practice. Good question CC1. To be honest with ya, I'm not really sure how Pittsburgh as an organization handled the Ryan Shazier injury regarding medical bills etc. etc. In the NBA, I do recall hearing that league insurance stepped in to pay at least his salary not the Miami Heat during his blood clot dilemma when it was uncertain as to whether Bosh would ever play again.

 

I know the game has changed now making it harder for backs, safeties, & pass rushers to get serious guaranteed money anymore in large part to analytics & loosening penalties on offensive players while imposing more rules on guys on defense now. I'm not thrilled about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts don't need a "weed-lovin' ", "late arrivin' ", "where's my car" poster boy on their team.  Keep moving, nothing to see here...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Savage21 said:

The fact that people on here actually think Ballard would sign this guy are delusional.

 

I don’t. Well not for the money Bell wants. It’s just interesting to see a player constantly hinting at wanting to play somewhere. (For the money obviously)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, bravo4460 said:
Bell sure is keeping an eye on the Colts.

 

I've got my eye on Gal Gadot, doesnt mean I have a shot. Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bravo4460 said:

 

Bell sure is keeping an eye on the Colts.

looks like there is at least one player who wants Bell to be a Colt.  I bet he's not alone. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Farns01 said:

Don't want him, has attitude problem.  Doesn't show up for training camp and not just this year.  

Didn't Reggie hold out once?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't underestimate Irsay and his dream of another set of triplets.  If Irsay feels Bell really wants to play for the Colts I can see him being all over that.   Any owner would love it if a superstar player would actually throw out hints that he wants to play for your team and Bell is doing just that.  Flattery can go a long way.   Right now it looks like it's a long shot just like the Raiders would never trade Mack was.  Things have a way of changing pretty quickly in the NFL.  Even removing the tag is a possibility.  It's not like it hasn't happened before.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do feel for Bell. He’s given Pittsburgh everything he has every year he’s played. How can you blame him for not wanting a big payday? But nobody is giving him the $ he wants. Not long term. 

You wonder if he’d take a 3 year deal. 3 years. $45 mill. $30 m guaranteed. Essentially 2 years & $30m. Right now that has to look good rather than losing all those $ holding out. And he’s worth it short term. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Boiler_Colt said:

 

I've got my eye on Gal Gadot, doesnt mean I have a shot. Lol

Haha. She's my girlfriend, she just doesn't know it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
    • you and me both. the period between basketball and football sucks (base) balls. the only thing i'm enjoying now is the women's WC.   i'm still leaning towards thinking we'll keep 6 WRs this season given all the puts and takes. DF it TE-lite, Cain coming back from injury, PC a rook, TY coming off being banged up, Fountain improving, Roger's reliability and cross training..... and sheet might happen like Cain being pup'd and I think Fountain can spend another year on the PS.
    • and very hard to watch the D for all those games without him.... truly epic player with truly epic injury issues...   i know all teams go through injuries, but seems like we've been especially cursed with Sanders, Manning, and Luck. That's 3 of my five favorite Colts lol.
    • Ugh Hendricks sent to the IL, prospect Adbert Alzolay might be called up. Currently down 1-0 in the 7th. 
  • Members

    • HoosierHero

      HoosierHero 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,029

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • William3112

      William3112 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LockeDown

      LockeDown 2,072

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 414

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Irish YJ

      Irish YJ 693

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 5,374

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • twfish

      twfish 1,513

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • GoColts8818

      GoColts8818 8,421

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...