Jump to content
LucasOilStadium

Colts Vs. Texans Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, needanoline63 said:

This teams done for the year. What a joke. Defense a joke, offense a joke,coach a joke,Ballard a joke. Absolutely pathetic 

 

Welcome back. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys wear me out. 

 

Content with playing for a tie? When a tie doesn't get us to the playoffs? Get out of here. I love it. Play to win or don't play at all. Pagano would have punted the hell out of the ball and smiled. We played to win. Get over it. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bluefire4 said:

Don't blame the call right there. I'd rather play for the win than take a tie. Win or loss. But it didn't work for us there.

I'd have taken the tie..after being 18 down

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bluefire4 said:

Don't blame the call right there. I'd rather play for the win than take a tie. Win or loss. But it didn't work for us there.

The play was bad. Tight and low throw. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:

You guys wear me out. 

 

Content with playing for a tie? When a tie doesn't get us to the playoffs? Get out of here. I love it. Play to win or don't play at all. Pagano would have punted the hell out of the ball and smiled. We played to win. Get over it. 

But we lost, so what you getting at? We’re 1-3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:

You guys wear me out. 

 

Content with playing for a tie? When a tie doesn't get us to the playoffs? Get out of here. I love it. Play to win or don't play at all. Pagano would have punted the hell out of the ball and smiled. We played to win. Get over it. 

Agreed. Play to win. Most of this forum have been screaming about being too soft and not aggressive enough. I have no problem with the call, but the D got gashed. That shouldn't have happened. Should have triple teamed Hopkins

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You gotta dial up something better then that going for it in that situation..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can certainly say two CFR decisions (first 2 pt conv attempt and that ridiculous ot play) were responsible for this loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, needanoline63 said:

Live with what? Lol we’re 1-3 

Can still go 13-3 then...

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright so the season comes down to Thursday night in Foxborough in my opinion. I only expected 6-7 wins anyway but our luck has been horrible this year in the 3 losses. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im ok with this. This team isn't winning the SB this year, much less their division. Try to win what you can, and if you lose oh well

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Aluckiswolverine said:

No...you kick the ball away. You don’t go for it. 

ehh people that are okay with that will but winners will risk everything for the taste of victory i loved it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not only did we give the win to Houston , but we gave them the tie breaker. 

1-3 each , and Houston is on top. 

......well , at least Luck looked good. If Johnson catches the ball , on the 1st possession of OT , we win this game. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The chance was their. Luck had Rogers, just a low pass and he just couldn’t hold on. I’m upset, sure, but we had the chance, we almost won because of that call. Everyone is mad at a potentially game clinching call just because it didn’t go right. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Real NBA pundits, coaches and execs were parroting "Jump shooting teams cannot win in the NBA" and "You need low post presence to win" just like... 5-10 years ago. Data and analysis about the value of the 3 has been available for close to 20 years. You underestimate just how married people are to their old ways and how hard it is to teach the old dog new tricks, especially when this is all they've known for their whole lives and now you are telling them what they've been taught for 20-30-50 years is wrong. Some will adapt and flourish, most won't...    My favorite quote that encapsulates perfectly the situation comes from a field that is MUCH more open to new ideas than football - science. And even there, there is a long history of resistance to new ideas. Physicist Max Planck once said "Science advances one funeral at a time". What he meant was that science doesn't advance by convincing the old guard that the new ideas are correct, but by the old timers just dying out and the new generation unburdened by emotional attachments to the old stuff being allowed to just follow where the evidence points to.    BTW I do NOT think the run game is meaningless or that it doesn't have a role to play in today's game. It is extremely important in situational football, in end of game situations, in goalline and 3d and 4th and short situations, etc. I just do not think it serves anyone any good perpetuating myths about its importance for things that have been repeatedly shown to not correlate to run-game success.     
    • For those that wanted Suh, hes off the board.   https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/05/21/ndamukong-suh-expected-to-sign-with-buccaneers/
    • The problem is the secondary is really hard to watch from the angles we are getting on TV and the fans general population doesn't dissect in detail what's happening ... they just see the big plays - the interceptions, the big pass-breakups, or a big missed tackle etc... they don't see when the QB doesn't even throw the ball because of perfect coverage or threat of playmaking by players like Hooker. The real insane stat here is 1 reception per 130 snaps... that's like ... once every 2.5 games or thereabout... there is a value to what Hooker provides both as a playmaker and as a deterrent for opposing QB's even thinking about throwing deep. 
    • My gripe with Stitches view is these coaches have access to this same data that you're quoting. They have all kinds of stat men in the building with them.  I don't think they are oblivious to any of this stuff.  Then you've got actual football coaches in this forum like Coffedrinker and Princeton Tiger and very few of them really down play the importance of running the football and what it does for your passing game.  I just can't buy that all of them are just merely being stubborn and ignoring the data for age long myths.  I think there's a better reason why coaches still keep that mantra.
    • he got off to a slow start last year, but everyone had to notice his interception on eli and his solid play overall by the end of the year   fans just go by what they see, and that can change a lot week to week. 
  • Members

    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 5,321

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Beizy317

      Beizy317 18

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 805

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • William3112

      William3112 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 381

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 10,987

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,777

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 5,223

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • That Guy

      That Guy 798

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Scott Pennock

      Scott Pennock 1,494

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...