Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

SteelCityColt

Colts @ Redskins Game Day Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, w87r said:

Seriously. I can't handle these announcers.

 

Literally just said the clock is stop to set the chains.

 

Smh

 

I watch with the sound down. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Smoke317 said:

He almost missed the first one. 

True.  I forgot about that.

Fans kinda quiet at the moment, ha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to win the 3rd quarter...………………………………… I WANT TO DOMINATE IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts looking good but they need to capitalize when they're up.  This could be very reminiscent of the Bengals game.  They have to step on the throats of these teams when they're up double digits.   

 

Overall a good first half, again. . . . . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like a good 1st half so far,, sounds like our players are making plays and the Defense came to play. Now let's keep it going !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, HOF19 said:

I don't want to win the 3rd quarter...………………………………… I WANT TO DOMINATE IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

First drive on both sides of the ball can set the tone for the entire second half.  A three and out followed by at least 3 would be major for the team's confidence.

 

let's get after it, guys!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Malakai432 said:

Colts looking good but they need to capitalize when they're up.  This could be very reminiscent of the Bengals game.  They have to step on the throats of these teams when they're up double digits.   

 

Overall a good first half, again. . . . . .

Yes....it will be interesting to see if the coaching staff can make the necessary second half adjustments to close out and win this game.  First series by both teams is important. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some fun stuff to watch with our O-Line and the overall O scheme. Big Boy stuff.
And how bout them Colts looking prepared and scrappy on D. Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!
 Some Real Deal Colts football. I am all yeehaa bout where this team is headed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, w87r said:

Seriously. I can't handle these announcers.

 

Literally just said the clock is stop to set the chains.

 

Smh

 

I don't get it. Sounds like what they said is correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:

Was Eberflus just beatboxing oh the mic?!

I saw that! Weird, but keep doing it!

We need to score a td now!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. Up until that neck injury I don’t think manning missed a snap his entire career here.
    • Andrew has had 3 maybe 4 injuries since the beginning of his career, manning only missed one season here. So no worries the bad luck was all Bob's. 
    • that guy is too short, has no wheels, and has to take a time out after every 6 attempts. will never make it.. nice jugs though
    • The facts.. a hung jury (twice) mistrial with most voters having sided for the alleged accuser/victim... both times.     She (prosecution) didn't drop the charges, the school (judge/jury) did.  She wanted round 3.  She wanted a full yes or no vote (4-1 or 5-0) either way, not we're split 3-2 so we'll just call it against the majority vote and designate as "Not Responsible" because it isn't 4 or more votes either way. - 'Case closed'.     There were questions (and other items) from the accuser that were never allowed in or asked in follow up questioning.  I think one of the changes to the Stanford Title IX hearing rules is to also allow an attorney to be not only in attendance but to also perform all duties of representation.  And an outside group determines what is admissible as questions/evidence, follow questions, etc...     At some level, it did, and many things at Stanford were changed after. At the  minimum, it was a mistrial x2, with no conclusive verdict either way. Then school (not prosecution) drops the case.   So she really needed to report this to both the school, and also the Police.  But with what evidence does she have to convince the LEO?  Guess the gals need some hidden body cam w/audio these days, like many folks do with dash cams (like me and my wife's cars...) and be their own TMZ...   Video, apparently the only way things get rectified anymore...     No worries, at least we know each others positions.  All is good.     Except to have (at some level) differing story from a another high achieving Stanford student about another high achieving Stanford student-   https://www.collegesimply.com/colleges/california/stanford-university/admission/     We don't even know for certain they ever got the FULL story, but articles I've read suggest that the Stanford Panel repressed/disallowed many/most of her interrogating questions and supplemental follow up inquiries to be asked of the accused.  Unless someone directly asks her directly, how could you answer as to whether her whole story was even heard or not?   If you are not truly interested to fully know those answers, then you don't ask.  At least, that's my perspective.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...