Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts Vs. Ravens Monday Night Football Preseason Game Thread

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Malakai432 said:

 

It appears that way lol.  

 

Though, I am speaking more about Grant, don't think he's that good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I be concerned that Brissett looks better than Luck and Wilkins looks better than all of our RBs except maybe Mack?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

Didn’t see there was a problem with them but that the implementation is clumsy

 

They'll relax some in season, competition committee will tweak it over time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BlackPanther said:

 

Though, I am speaking more about Grant, don't think he's that good.

 

It's early, not going to panic yet but yeah he's been 100% invisible.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Catloaf said:

Should I be concerned that Brissett looks better than Luck and Wilkins looks better than all of our RBs except maybe Mack?

We just need to temper expectations for Luck early on. Rust is a real thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Catloaf said:

Should I be concerned that Brissett looks better than Luck and Wilkins looks better than all of our RBs except maybe Mack?

Wilkins is argubly the second best rb between him and turbin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just waiting for all the trade Luck threads that will be started after tonight haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Stephen said:

Wilkins is argubly the second best rb between him and turbin.


I can't argue that from what I've seen tonight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Stephen said:

Wilkins is argubly the second best rb between him and turbin.

Wilkins looks good. Just gotta hold on to that ball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, csmopar said:

Wilkins looks good. Just gotta hold on to that ball

Think it was his first fumble. Reminds me of hunt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Boiler_Colt said:

We just need to temper expectations for Luck early on. Rust is a real thing.

Indeed it is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

If it s helmet to helmet, D will get flag because RB is determined to be going into protect mode. D never is in defenseless position, thus never ion protect mode.  They are in strike mode.

 

If a offensive player lowers his head and goes forward they are in strict mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ridgeway. Simon. Leonard. Geathers. Hooker. We’ve got some potential out there. And I didn’t mention Autry or Sheard. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Cynjin said:

 

If a offensive player lowers his head and goes forward they are in strict mode.

 

Not in QB sneak mode, or if defender lowers as well.  It's like baseball, tie goes to the runner,  helmet to helmet goes to the offense (D gets penalty).  It has to be offense with head into defender (but not his helmet) to get offensive flag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, krunk said:

I tried to tell y'all Ridgeway would ball in this scheme

 

I think Superman liked him as 3 tech too...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, krunk said:

I tried to tell y'all Ridgeway would ball in this scheme

I think a guy like TY McGill would have too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Smoke317 said:

I think a guy like TY McGill would have too. 

Yep. He was more of a penetrating 3 tech, not a 2 gap kind of guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

Not in QB sneak mode, or if defender lowers as well.  It's like baseball, tie goes to the runner,  helmet to helmet goes to the offense (D gets penalty).  It has to be offense with head into defender (but not his helmet) to get offensive flag.

 

You can say that all you want, but I have seen multiple instances this season where the offensive player lowers their head first, makes contact with their helmet and nothing is called.  The rule is ridiculously biased against the defense.  That's why many coaches are calling for adjustments to be made.  The rule is not realistic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only week 2 of preseason. However, Im starting to like the potential of the defense and dislike the offense.

 

O needs help at WR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bravo4460 said:

Only week 2 of preseason. However, Im starting to like the potential of the defense and dislike the offense.

 

O needs help at WR.

 

With the Colts that could go back to being reversed in the regular season.  I think the offense could be ok once Luck knocks the rust off him but whoa that #2 WR position could be ugly.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

It is impossible to lower your shoulders to make a hit without lowering your head.

Basically, the league wants players to make tackles with their pelvis first.

 

Joking...kinda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

It is impossible to lower your shoulders to make a hit without lowering your head.

One reason I only played and coached the O

1 minute ago, Flash7 said:

Basically, the league wants players to make tackles with their pelvis first.

 

Joking...kinda.

Flags anyone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, bravo4460 said:

Only week 2 of preseason. However, Im starting to like the potential of the defense and dislike the offense.

 

O needs help at WR.

To be fair ravens pass d is elite

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here's where I think Kelly 'fans' are distressed. To your point we don't know Kelly...fair.  So what do we know.  We know he can run, dude's fast.  We know he has a strong arm, like that.  We know he'll throw downfield and into tight windows, good!  We know he will stand in the pocket, check. We know he has the stuff to go into Alabama with an Ole Miss team and beat em, that no small thing. We also know he has off-field issues maybe he's grown up, don't know but we hear good things from Frank.  So to someone like me, I like what I see and like what I hear...Rally confused.   Here's what we know about Hoyer, he has none of those physical attributes but he's good in the QB room.  Ok, well, I'm good in QB room but you wouldn't want me under center.  There's an obvious hesitation here on the part of Frank and/or Chris to make Kelly a part of the permanent roster, they will likely cut him again and hope he clears waivers over Hoyer, that to me is absolutely stunning.  Either, Kelly is an off the field nightmare we shouldn't be investing in OR he should be at worst QB2. Hoyer is simply not good, we can get his level of performance literally anywhere, he's the prototypical failed backup and those are readily available on the cheap. I wouldn't understand keeping him over a contract when he weakens the team relative to someone like Kelly on game day.  So to a previous posters comment, why is Kelly here?  If he is such an integrity issue it's not our job to make a man out of him while he occupies a spot.  If he's is good enough physically, which he is, and he's on this roster, which he is, he should stay up and get some first team reps, as all back ups should and see how matures.  It starting to feel like some ego at play here.  All in all, our leadership was ill-prepared to deal with Brissett going down and choked this week in prep.  It's my hope we dump Hoyer who is useless and keep Kelly at QB2, I don't think that will happen.  My 2+ cents.
    • Willis ran in the low 4.5s in both his pro day and combine. No offense, but the articles on Colts.com are always very kind to the guys we draft. Like I said, love Willis, I just think he's more of a box guy. And low 4.5s is fast enough. He's field fast in the short space, which is great. 
    • Ok, read the following, and let me know specifically what you disagree with...   On Parcells.... https://nypost.com/2019/09/08/why-jacoby-brissett-has-a-big-backer-in-bill-parcells/   I love BP. Old school dude. Keep in mind he was a "defensive" coach. Do you remember the Bruner/Simms fiasco when he was in NY (not sure how old you are). Even BP admits he made the wrong QB decisions. At NE, he drafted Drew B with the first pick his first year, and then he bolted for NYJ after a few years. He didn't last long there either. When he was at Dallas, they were all over the place with QB.   I give him props for the two SBs in NYG, but he's also had some bad years and a lot of first round and WC losses. I don't think of him as a QB genius at all. It's pretty clear BP is more sold on JB's character than talent. And that's fine too. But his endorsement doesn't weigh heavily from a talent perspective given the entire context.    As far as Belichick is concerned, he's a genius on many things. And he's also a D guy. Aside from Brady, what is his track record for QBs? His HC gig with the Browns was a real mixed bag. At NE, since Brady, he's drafted 10 QBs. The majority of them never amounted to anything. Aside from Cassell (who had more downs than ups) and Jimmy G, the rest were bombs.    And JB was third on their depth chart, and IIRC they were shopping JB after the deflate gate and injury time was done. Not saying BB isn't a genius, or a great at evaluating .........  but the other 8 QBs did nothing, and what does that say about him? Love to hear the explanation.      
    • Yea that’s what his combine profile states but when the scouts took him through position drills and had him run his 40 at pro day their numbers tell a different story. And anyone can tell you a 40 yard dash is all about technique. Track speed doesn’t necessarily translate to “On the Field Speed” but I found the article and verbatim this is what the scouts said on Willis. If you’re curious to read the entire article it’s on Colts.com and titled “Through the Scouts Eye”   “So, you see him not only playing in the box, but I mean, he's played free safety. He plays nickel. He's played on the slot and he did a pretty good job with that. I think he's faster than a lot of people and a lot of people give him credit for it and he tested pretty well that way. I think he ran in the 4.4s, and he's a very well-rounded player. I was always taught a long time ago slow safety usually get your beat, dumb safeties always get your beat. He's the polar opposite of both. So, we're really excited about him.”
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...