Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts Vs. Ravens Monday Night Football Preseason Game Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, ColtsBlueFL said:

That shows something... desire to run on 2nd down after getting little on first down.

 

Welp... a pick.

Michael stopped his route

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SanDiegoColt8 said:

Not a good throw.

Hated the play calling. Two runs with michael and then a bad throw. Should have run it with wilkins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't look like the receivers are getting separation.  Hard to tell from the TV, but I it doesn't look like anyone is getting separation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cynjin said:

Doesn't look like the receivers are getting separation.  Hard to tell from the TV, but I it doesn't look like anyone is getting separation.

Agreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

That int wasn't Lucks fault!

He will disagree with you on that .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

I'm a lil worried about Andrew in this one.

The Ravens are gonna be head-hunting and Costanzo and Good are out.  I hope we stick a TE on the left side the WHOLE game.

as Forest's girl  Jenny would say...: "Run Andrew Run!"

protectin from our inexperienced RBs concerns me too.

Not sure where he was going on that pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Michael stopped his route

Yep, looks like he stepped out of bounds and then stopped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

That int wasn't Lucks fault!

Luck forced it. He could of ran out of bounds or thrown it away and it cost us 3 points. Definitely his fault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

That int wasn't Lucks fault!

 

True. But it looks bad on the stat sheet.  And lack of points on scoreboard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

That int wasn't Lucks fault!

LOL, who threw it?

 

Nobody was open, he should have just threw it away. That looked like the typical dumb int he would throw at crucial times during the Pagano era

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Luck forced it. He could of ran out of bounds or thrown it away and it cost us 3 points. Definitely his fault.

The receiver stopped. I agree he forced it but the receiver gave up on the play and didn't even fight to break it up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ridgeway with a SOLID stop! He's looking good this preseason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s crazy that we go from one of the most dynamic edge rushing duos in nfl history to not being able to generate any pass rush. Thank goodness for Simon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening fellow Colts fans !!!  Hoping for a good game tonite and no more injuries.

 

GOOOO Colts !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BlackPanther said:

Simon!

Simon is a beast. Cant wait to see turay and lewis when they get healthy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

You guys have to remember TY isn't playing so he is without his best WR in that situation but it was still a bad throw.

He's suppose to be an elite qb. Gotta help the other guys raise their gm. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

The receiver stopped. I agree he forced it but the receiver gave up on the play and didn't even fight to break it up!

These decisions still affect the outcome of the game though. Lots of games are decided by 3 points. The difference between a win and loss can be 3 points, same with a loss or a tie. We can't afford to make those mistakes in the regular season when our defense is so young.

Nice catch Doyle!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Willis - the 4th round pick they traded up to get will be lucky to make the 53?  Man that is highly questionable. I’d say he is much closer to a lock to make the roster than be cut prior to opening day. 
    • Well Im back been a long haul , my wife being blind had rotator cuff surgery and been in bad turn at same time so my cups been full.  But look lol the Central is just about where I left it. 162 games tells the story . Cards Cubs Brewers all right there together.
    • Faulk was a great player, but he was never a pure grind out yards type running back. Edge was.   James is a huge part of why the offense exploded in 1999 after we traded Faulk & drafted James. The play action to Edge/ bomb over the top to Harrison was absolutely LETHAL 
    • As you have noticed,  I have taken a long time to respond.   Apologies in advance,  my response is long....   Everything you think I "overstated" I personally think I understated.     And I think all the arguments you used to make a case that the spring is more ideal than the winter is hugely overstated.   Look at the last sentence of your post...    how you describe "looking at the bigger picture and taking your time..."        Says who?      Who says an owner didn't look at the bigger picture in December as a disappointing season was coming to an end and that a decision was rushed?    That's entirely written by you as opinion based on zero known facts.    And it's your interpretation that better decisions can be made in the spring.   Huh?    When it's too late to fire the HC and his staff that gave you the disappointing previous season that got the GM fired in the first place.    Now, your new GM has to deal with a HC and staff that he didn't hire.   Now everyone in the building is walking on pins and neeedles wondering if they'll get fired or be retained.   So,  all the advantages of doing those decisions in winter of Y1 for the new GM,  now have to be done in winter of Y2.     So, if they're going to be done,  how is it better to flush a year down the drain and do it the following year?   I see lots of opinion,  and very little fact.    You've tossed out a number of interesting names that are available now....    nice names and none were in the running for a GM job 5 months ago,  and suddenly you think the next hot GM is in the pile?    I appreciate that Nick Caserio might be the exception to the Patriots rule from the BB tree....    but BB has a poor record of turning out good HC's elsewhere.   He might someday....   but not so far.    Front office is decent I think, so maybe Caserio is good?   But Don't you want to get all of this done sooner than later?    Don't you want to rip the band-aid off ASAP?   Doesn't the new GM want to hire his own guy,  his own staff, ASAP?     And if you think the answer is no,  then why don't all GM's who get hired in January,  do it your way?    Why don't they keep the staff,  the HC,  coordinators and assistants,  all the front office types and the scouts,  and do all the changes the following winter?     Why don't they do that?   They don't,  do they?   I really wish this was just a simple thought experiment.   That you were simply making a case that making a GM change in the spring is do-able and not anythig else.    Some here don't understand when it happens at all in the spring and I've made the argument several times that the spring isn't as bad as you think.    Doable under certain circumstances is perfectly OK.   But you're not doing that.     You're not arguing for doable.   Instead you're arguing for desireable.    And you think it's an easy decision.    I confess that even as your biggest admirer,  perhaps BECAUSE I'm your biggest admirer,  I find this position more than a little head scratching.....   Just saying....      
    • Middleton had a contract that was 4 years or longer and the Bucks have his bird rights. That doesn't apply for Randle and the Pelicans.
  • Members

    • IkeAramba

      IkeAramba 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TwoTonShogun

      TwoTonShogun 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bluesmith

      Bluesmith 94

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 5,178

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 1,509

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 804

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jay Kirk

      Jay Kirk 7,451

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 258

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...