Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts Vs. Ravens Monday Night Football Preseason Game Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, ColtsBlueFL said:

That shows something... desire to run on 2nd down after getting little on first down.

 

Welp... a pick.

Michael stopped his route

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SanDiegoColt8 said:

Not a good throw.

Hated the play calling. Two runs with michael and then a bad throw. Should have run it with wilkins

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't look like the receivers are getting separation.  Hard to tell from the TV, but I it doesn't look like anyone is getting separation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cynjin said:

Doesn't look like the receivers are getting separation.  Hard to tell from the TV, but I it doesn't look like anyone is getting separation.

Agreed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

That int wasn't Lucks fault!

He will disagree with you on that .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, WoolMagnet said:

I'm a lil worried about Andrew in this one.

The Ravens are gonna be head-hunting and Costanzo and Good are out.  I hope we stick a TE on the left side the WHOLE game.

as Forest's girl  Jenny would say...: "Run Andrew Run!"

protectin from our inexperienced RBs concerns me too.

Not sure where he was going on that pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Michael stopped his route

Yep, looks like he stepped out of bounds and then stopped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

That int wasn't Lucks fault!

Luck forced it. He could of ran out of bounds or thrown it away and it cost us 3 points. Definitely his fault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

That int wasn't Lucks fault!

 

True. But it looks bad on the stat sheet.  And lack of points on scoreboard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

That int wasn't Lucks fault!

LOL, who threw it?

 

Nobody was open, he should have just threw it away. That looked like the typical dumb int he would throw at crucial times during the Pagano era

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Luck forced it. He could of ran out of bounds or thrown it away and it cost us 3 points. Definitely his fault.

The receiver stopped. I agree he forced it but the receiver gave up on the play and didn't even fight to break it up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ridgeway with a SOLID stop! He's looking good this preseason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s crazy that we go from one of the most dynamic edge rushing duos in nfl history to not being able to generate any pass rush. Thank goodness for Simon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening fellow Colts fans !!!  Hoping for a good game tonite and no more injuries.

 

GOOOO Colts !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BlackPanther said:

Simon!

Simon is a beast. Cant wait to see turay and lewis when they get healthy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

You guys have to remember TY isn't playing so he is without his best WR in that situation but it was still a bad throw.

He's suppose to be an elite qb. Gotta help the other guys raise their gm. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheGreatManning18Fan said:

The receiver stopped. I agree he forced it but the receiver gave up on the play and didn't even fight to break it up!

These decisions still affect the outcome of the game though. Lots of games are decided by 3 points. The difference between a win and loss can be 3 points, same with a loss or a tie. We can't afford to make those mistakes in the regular season when our defense is so young.

Nice catch Doyle!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wouldn't consider #10 a diss..... but I have a bit of an issue with the Cowpies ranked #2 at the same time.   We not only shut them out last season, we out manned, out-muscled and intimidated them in a way that none of us have seen a Colts team do to any team in a long, long time.   You could say "well its only one game".... and that's true.   But that was a statement game, and I just don't see how Brandt can justify a #2 ranking for Dallas given each team's additions this off-season....not to mention all those other teams he has them ranked ahead of.   As for the Colts...on our own merits.... I would have us closer to the middle of the pack on this list, around 7th and certainly ahead of Dallas.
    • His mom sounds awesome.  
    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
  • Members

    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SVFD Colts Fan

      SVFD Colts Fan 37

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,322

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Old Colt

      Old Colt 292

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pacolts56

      pacolts56 3,035

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gnet550

      gnet550 219

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 7,668

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rackeen305

      Rackeen305 209

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 110

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • deadman

      deadman 198

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...