Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Collts @ Seahawks Preseason Game Night Thread


LucasOilStadium

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, BlueShoe said:

 

I can understand having a bad day, but this crew is batting about .500 in preseason games. 

 

It's terrible. They should be ashamed of their work. Venturi is a good analyst and deserves to be on a team with a better technical crew.  

 

On the bright side, their commercials are coming through crystal clear....

Still better than listening to Don Fisher butcher everyones names.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I like what I see. Our D will be bad at times but we are in rebuild mode. It will be better than last year. With Luck back I can see 9-7 or so.

I think that’s a reasonable expectation. I can see anywhere between 7-9 wins this year depending on how the ball bounces for us.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Half time Stats 

 

Luck 6/9 64 Yards 

Brissett 5/7 32 Yards 

 

 

Turbin 6 Carries 27 Yards 

Michael 2 Carries 13 Yards 

Mack 4 Carries 9 Yards 

A. Luck 1 Carry 1 Yard 

 

Mack 2 Rec 23 Yards

Turbin 2 Rec 18 Yards

Brent 2 Rec 18 Yards 

Rogers 2 Rec 16 Yards 

Doyle 1 Rec 9 Yards 

Hilton 1 Rec 8 Yards 

Cain 1 Rec 4 Yards 

 

Vinatieri 3/3 FG 

Sanchez 1 Punt for 47 Yards Inside the 20 

 

Skai Moore and Leonard with 4 tackles 

Simon with 1.5 Sacks 

Autry with 0.5 Sacks 

Hairston with 1 INT 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Caleb3502 said:

Half time Stats 

 

Luck 6/9 64 Yards 

Brissett 5/7 32 Yards 

 

 

Turbin 6 Carries 27 Yards 

Michael 2 Carries 13 Yards 

Mack 4 Carries 9 Yards 

A. Luck 1 Carry 1 Yard 

 

Mack 2 Rec 23 Yards

Turbin 2 Rec 18 Yards

Brent 2 Rec 18 Yards 

Rogers 2 Rec 16 Yards 

Doyle 1 Rec 9 Yards 

Hilton 1 Rec 8 Yards 

Cain 1 Rec 4 Yards 

 

Vinatieri 3/3 FG 

Sanchez 1 Punt for 47 Yards Inside the 20 

 

Skai Moore and Leonard with 4 tackles 

Simon with 1.5 Sacks 

Autry with 0.5 Sacks 

Hairston with 1 INT 

Great stuff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

simon and sheard seem to play well together, the Dline was looking pretty good for a min there

 

 

The Vets did show some nice get off didn’t they?  Wasn’t against RW though...  But still was quick pressure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
  • Members

    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rob220

      rob220 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...