Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Quincy Wilson = Bust


Pacergeek

Recommended Posts

He is good at playing man-to-man on a receiver, and is physical with ball-carriers, as we saw last night, but we already knew that.

 

We also already knew he has some work to do playing in zone.

 

So considering he started, and even though he allowed a few catches in zone coverage, he quickly tackled the receiver (which is vital for zone corners), I'd say he did about how we expected.  He was solid.  Didn't make any big plays, but didn't allow any either.  :dunno:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Limiting the big plays and tackling the receiver to not allow YAC are expectations of a zone corner.  I'm not sure how much sticky coverage and ball contesting is expected, relative to a man-corner, who can get burned big for YAC or big yardage.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Limiting the big plays and tackling the receiver to not allow YAC are expectations of a zone corner.  I'm not sure how much sticky coverage and ball contesting is expected, relative to a man-corner, who can get burned big for YAC or big yardage.

Ideally you want the CB to react quickly enough to get the the receiver when the ball gets there to either make a play on the ball or hit the receiver and hopefully jar the ball loose.  But secondarily yes and long as he gets there and stops the yac then it's not a bad defensive play.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As he gets more and more comfortable, he will start breaking on the ball faster. Maybe, the return of Geathers and Hooker should help with him playing the ball more than just the receiver, knowing he can trust the safeties to not let things get by if he does break early or make a mistake, assuming he communicates with them well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

He is good at playing man-to-man on a receiver, and is physical with ball-carriers, as we saw last night, but we already knew that.

 

We also already knew he has some work to do playing in zone.

 

So considering he started, and even though he allowed a few catches in zone coverage, he quickly tackled the receiver (which is vital for zone corners), I'd say he did about how we expected.  He was solid.  Didn't make any big plays, but didn't allow any either.  :dunno:

If the standards for your second round pick are to not screw anything up, not give up any big plays, and to not make any individual plays, than Q will be just fine in our defense. I just expect a lot more out of a second round pick. Maybe he isn't a bust, just a let down from his draft selection. Maybe like Rob Morris. All things considered, Morris was a decent player for the Colts, just didn't live up to the 1st round expectations

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2018 at 8:27 AM, SteelCityColt said:

 

Don’t be deliberately obtuse, people were not high on the Wayne pick after his first season, that’s the relevance. The point wasn’t Wilson will be a HOF player more that it’s too soon to write a draftee off after a season. 

 

You ignore any form of evidenced challenge to your view point and continue to just post diatribec opinion. 

 

If you really think he’s a bust, break down his play from last year (yes he saw the field) and show us the X and Os reasoning, or compare his stats to other 1st CBs who saw limited time and look at their career trajectories for comparison.

Strong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, shastamasta said:

Not all that high on Wilson, but it's way too early to make any judgements on him in this defense. I think there were definitely better zone CBs in this past draft...possibly even some that didn't even get drafted.

Something I don't understand.  Did Ballard draft Wilson knowing he was going to switch to Tampa style zone defense, or were the expectations that Wilson was going to be a man corner like Vontae (VD didn't play zone scheme all that well).

 

Some have suggested that Ballard has been drafting for the switch all along, but the Wilson pick would seem to not support that theory.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Something I don't understand.  Did Ballard draft Wilson knowing he was going to switch to Tampa style zone defense, or were the expectations that Wilson was going to be a man corner like Vontae (VD didn't play zone scheme all that well).

 

Some have suggested that Ballard has been drafting for the switch all along, but the Wilson pick would seem to not support that theory.

 

I haven't researched Wilson strength/weaknesses.  Sometimes i just read what people here post about players (other times I research).  I can say with relatively high certainty, Eberflus will not just run a 4-3 Cover 2 zone all the time.  There will be Nickel, Big Nickel, Dime etc... sometimes with man, other times zone, and maybe even combo man/zone combo concepts.  You will not see this too much in the pre-season, or before guys learn their responsibilities in them, though. Keeping it simple (no thinking, reading) is foremost, so players can just react and play fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2018 at 8:19 AM, DougDew said:

Something I don't understand.  Did Ballard draft Wilson knowing he was going to switch to Tampa style zone defense, or were the expectations that Wilson was going to be a man corner like Vontae (VD didn't play zone scheme all that well).

 

Some have suggested that Ballard has been drafting for the switch all along, but the Wilson pick would seem to not support that theory.

 

I think Ballard thought Wilson would fit either scheme. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2018 at 5:19 AM, DougDew said:

Something I don't understand.  Did Ballard draft Wilson knowing he was going to switch to Tampa style zone defense, or were the expectations that Wilson was going to be a man corner like Vontae (VD didn't play zone scheme all that well).

 

Some have suggested that Ballard has been drafting for the switch all along, but the Wilson pick would seem to not support that theory.

 

Ballard drafted Wilson with an eye on the future.

 

You don't have to take my word on it.     Here is ESPN.com's player profile and you can see clearly in the writing,  that Wilson has excelled in press coverage AND zone.

 

http://insider.espn.com/nfl/draft/player/_/id/52097

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What MHJ does or doesn't do isn't really relevant to my point.
    • When Marvin has 90-100 catches next season and over 1000 yards as a rookie + turns Murray's career around, I want you to remember this post assuming the Cards do take Marvin. 
    • It depends on how good AR will be, if he is good we can win 11 with the help of another great player, we won 9 with Minshew, should have been 10. 
    • Gotta have a trade partner.Big ? Is would Arizona trade back that far knowing they’re gonna miss out on one of those top 3 Wr’s.I would also call New England and Los Angeles too.I don’t see MHJ getting past the 4th pick unless a Minnesota or Denver trades up for one of those top QB’s.I also don’t see the Giants if they stay put at 6 not taking Nabors I think that’s who they got they’re eyes on with that pick.
    • I think this probably isn't an objective viewpoint. I think you want fireworks, and you're an eternal optimist. Nothing wrong with that, but I think a more practical viewpoint is to acknowledge that taking huge chances isn't exactly a recipe for success. (You're going to point to examples that worked out; I'm going to counter with twice as many that failed.)   The bolded especially. First, it seems like you chose 11 games because you feel like that's the target to keep up with the Texans. Second, I don't think the Colts are one player away from keeping up with the top tier of the AFC. I think a lot has to go right for the Colts to be in the mix with the Chiefs, etc. I said at the beginning of the offseason, I think we're still one draft class away from being in those discussions.   But if you can talk yourself into one guy being the answer, just one playmaker holds the key for the Colts to be in contention, then yeah, identify your favorite prospect and bang the table for the Colts to do whatever they have to to get that player. That would be awesome for us. But I think the reason Ballard doesn't do that is because it's flawed team building (historically speaking), not because he's afraid.. You can promise steak dinners based on your hunches, but that's not exactly how I want the GM to make decisions.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...