coltsfeva

Can the Colts win Now ?

Recommended Posts

  Interview from NFL Network with Reggie and Shawn O’Hara.

  Who do you think is more realistic, Reggie or Shawn ?

  IMO there are so many question marks including health,  but can the team truly be assessed without knowing Luck’s health, who starts where on both sides of the ball ir even the final 53.

   The simple answer is: of course, they CAN make the playoffs (the same could probably be said for all teams) but whether they will or not is anybody’s guess. 

    I have sort of a tempered optimism about this year, not just because of Luck’s health but for the return of guys like Kelly, Mewhort, Hooker, Geathers and Swoope and the FA, draft and coaching additions/changes. 

     GO COLTS!!!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they can win now. It’s a QB driven league, and the Colts have one of the best QB’s in the NFL 

 

What bothered me seeing that video was Reggie backing down at the end when he brought up the “lack” of pass rush the Colts have. Colts had numerous pressures last season, with Sheard I believe leading the way. Just didn’t sack the QB as much. The rush is there, just have to finish

 

The new defense should fix that issue. No more Sheard running in coverage down the sideline with Delanie Walker 

 

People really just turn a blind eye to the fact the Colts lead at halftime in a lot of games. Brissett and the offense just couldn’t finish. That won’t be the case with Andrew Luck at the helm 

:coltshelmet:

:rantoff:

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our schedule really doesn't help.  It seems like the toughest one we've had in years.  I love the optimism, but every year fans think they have the best roster in the league, and that their team made all the right moves.  I love the new OL, and the possibility of a healthy Luck, but I think we need to concentrate on beating the Jags. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Coltscrazy said:

Our schedule really doesn't help.  It seems like the toughest one we've had in years.  I love the optimism, but every year fans think they have the best roster in the league, and that their team made all the right moves.  I love the new OL, and the possibility of a healthy Luck, but I think we need to concentrate on beating the Jags. 

I don’t think the schedule is tough. Aside from the NFC East and the Patriots game that the Colts have never beaten since drafting Andrew Luck and have made themselves infamous for one of the worst playcalls in NFL history against the Patriots 

 

Other than that, schedule is pretty solid. Luck has never lost to Tennessee btw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watched Andrew Luck win a lot of games basically all on his own. He actually has talent around him, a great GM, and a coach that knows what the hell he's doing.

 

Yes, the Colts can win now.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Coltscrazy said:

Our schedule really doesn't help.  It seems like the toughest one we've had in years.  I love the optimism, but every year fans think they have the best roster in the league, and that their team made all the right moves.  I love the new OL, and the possibility of a healthy Luck, but I think we need to concentrate on beating the Jags. 

I thought it was rated the 6th easiest schedule?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The talent on the team currently is no more or less talented then the three playoff teams Luck put on his back so I don't see why not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Luck put this team on his back and took them to the playoffs. The division was a joke back then now it’s one of the best. If we are better than 8-8 this year I consider that a win. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CR91 said:

The talent on the team currently is no more or less talented then the three playoff teams Luck put on his back so I don't see why not

 

People keep saying that...   over and over...    we are more talented than the 2012 team...

 

But here’s the problem with that...

 

Yes, this team has more raw talent, but it’s so young and so inexperienced....  these kids are going to make lots of mistakes that the veterans didn’t.   That’s what young kids do in game conditions.   They make mistakes under pressure. 

 

Just saying the Colts are more talented is an over-simplification.   Because when push comes to shove our kids will make mistakes.   That’s what they do...

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, coltsfeva said:

  Interview from NFL Network with Reggie and Shawn O’Hara.

  Who do you think is more realistic, Reggie or Shawn ?

  IMO there are so many question marks including health,  but can the team truly be assessed without knowing Luck’s health, who starts where on both sides of the ball ir even the final 53.

   The simple answer is: of course, they CAN make the playoffs (the same could probably be said for all teams) but whether they will or not is anybody’s guess. 

    I have sort of a tempered optimism about this year, not just because of Luck’s health but for the return of guys like Kelly, Mewhort, Hooker, Geathers and Swoope and the FA, draft and coaching additions/changes. 

     GO COLTS!!!

 

 

I agree!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Savage said:

I watched Andrew Luck win a lot of games basically all on his own. He actually has talent around him, a great GM, and a coach that knows what the hell he's doing.

 

Yes, the Colts can win now.

I could not agree more. Thank you I've been saying the same thing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TKnight24 said:

Yes, they can win now. It’s a QB driven league, and the Colts have one of the best QB’s in the NFL 

 

What bothered me seeing that video was Reggie backing down at the end when he brought up the “lack” of pass rush the Colts have. Colts had numerous pressures last season, with Sheard I believe leading the way. Just didn’t sack the QB as much. The rush is there, just have to finish

 

The new defense should fix that issue. No more Sheard running in coverage down the sideline with Delanie Walker 

 

People really just turn a blind eye to the fact the Colts lead at halftime in a lot of games. Brissett and the offense just couldn’t finish. That won’t be the case with Andrew Luck at the helm 

:coltshelmet:

:rantoff:

Yes and a much better o-line and a much better offensive scheme. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I look back at what the Eagles did after Chip Kelly gutted the team, when he showed

up at Philly, I never thought the Eagles would recover as quickly as they did. To me it shows that it can be done. Maybe sometimes it is darkest before the dawn of a new era. Hopefully we can restart building our swagger this year and add more pieces to the puzzle next year.  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

People kerp saying that...   over and over...    we are more talented than the 2012 team...

 

But here’s the problem with that...

 

Yes, this team has more raw talent, but it’s so young and so inexperienced....  these kids are going to make lots of mistakes that the veterans didn’t.   That’s what young kids do in game conditions.   They make mistakes under pressure. 

 

Just saying the Colts are more talented is an over-simplification.   Because when push comes to shove our kids will make mistakes.   That’s what they do...

 

 

Of course, but the 2012 team was basically rookies starting everywhere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

People kerp saying that...   over and over...    we are more talented than the 2012 team...

 

But here’s the problem with that...

 

Yes, this team has more raw talent, but it’s so young and so inexperienced....  these kids are going to make lots of mistakes that the veterans didn’t.   That’s what young kids do in game conditions.   They make mistakes under pressure. 

 

Just saying the Colts are more talented is an over-simplification.   Because when push comes to shove our kids will make mistakes.   That’s what they do...

 

Rookie Mistakes > Veterans just flat out stinking up the joint 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It really just comes down to Andrew Luck's health whether or not we can win now. The Defense will be better (it can't be worse than last year) because it was real Bad last year so that will even be a boost. On paper the O.Line looks better as well.  Yeah there is more to a team than just a QB as Nick Foles proved last year but in our case Luck covers up so many deficiency's we have overall. Last season we were 4-12 but had leads in 6 of our losses in the 2nd Half. Brissett is a Good backup but lets face it he isn't Luck and isn't the finisher Luck is. We may have won all 6 of those games we lost and we had Luck healthy? At least 4 or 5 anyway as he has finished so many close games in his career. 9-7 is doable with a Wildcard spot if Luck is 100%. I will stick to that prediction for now. Luck is worth 5 wins or so IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

Of course, but the 2012 team was basically rookies starting everywhere

 

On offense.

 

Not on defense.  That side of ball was all veterans.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, TKnight24 said:

Rookie Mistakes > Veterans just flat out stinking up the joint 

 

The veterans in 2017?    Sure.

 

But not in 12 or 13 or 14.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think with a 100% healthy Luck we are as good or better than the Bills, Titans and Chiefs, the 4, 5, 6 seeds in last season AFC playoffs. If we make it to the playoffs than anything can happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It really just comes down to Andrew Luck's health whether or not we can win now. The Defense will be better (it can't be worse than last year) because it was real Bad last year so that will even be a boost. On paper the O.Line looks better as well.  Yeah there is more to a team than just a QB as Nick Foles proved last year but in our case Luck covers up so many deficiency's we have overall. Last season we were 4-12 but had leads in 6 of our losses in the 2nd Half. Brissett is a Good backup but lets face it he isn't Luck and isn't the finisher Luck is. We may have won all 6 of those games we lost and we had Luck healthy? At least 4 or 5 anyway as he has finished so many close games in his career. 9-7 is doable with a Wildcard spot if Luck is 100%. I will stick to that prediction for now. Luck is worth 5 wins or so IMO.

 

First,  the issue isn’t Lucks health.   I’m assuming Luck will be 100 percent healthy.

 

The issue — and it’s big — is that Luck has no experience in this offense.   No practice time with his teammates.  What he’s doing now barely scratches the surface of what Luck needs.   Practice is important and Luck is not going to get enough of it by early September.

 

And once camp opens, Luck has already said he’s going to be on a limited pitch count.   He’s going to be so rusty, it’s going to impact him considerably.    Limited practice time and limited throws should be a red flag warning not to expect too much this season.

 

I expect Luck and the team to start slowly and to get better as the season progresses.   But all this talk of Luck leading us to the playoffs because he did it before is misguided optimism.

 

If Ballard thought he had a playoff caliber team, or even close, don’t you think he’d be signing veterans to help make it happen?   That’s why he’s talking about using free agency a year or two from now and building with the draft.   The tea leaves aren’t hard to read if you know what to look for.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

On offense.

 

Not on defense.  That side of ball was all veterans.

 

 

that defense didnt exactly have a lot of talent. you had freeney and mathis playing LB for the first time in their career, the dline consist of moala and antiono johnson, davis was hurt and/or inconsistent and powers was meh not to mention justin king and cassius vaughn werent any better, and lets not forget the great tom zibowski ugh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Fir ne the issue isn’t Lucks health.   I’m assuming Luck will be 100 percent healthy.

 

The issue — and it’s big — is that Luck has no experience in this offense.   No practice time with his teammates.  What he’s doing nice barely scratches the surface of what Luck needs.   Practice is important and Kuck is not going to get enough if it by early September.

 

And once camp opens, Luck has already said he’s going to be on a limited pitch count.   He’s going to be so rusty, it’s going to impact him considerably.    Limited practice time and limited throws should be a red flag warning not to expect too much this season.

 

I expect Luck and the team to start slowly and to get better as the season progresses.   But all this talk of Luck leading us to the playoffs because he did it before is misguided optimism.

 

If Ballard thought he had a playoff caliber team, or even close, don’t you think he’d be signing veterans to help make it happen?   That’s why he’s talking about using free agency a year or two from now and building with the draft.   The tea leaves aren’t hard to read if you know what to look for.

I still don't think 9 wins is far fetched. We were in alot of games last year and the team was weaker on paper. I know what you are saying though regarding Reps in a new Offense and Team Chemistry. They are very important for a QB and his WR's. Great thing is Luck and TY should have great chemistry anyway because they have played together for a long time (I know it will be a different Offense but still). This season will be interesting to say the least. Predicting a record is really tough to do because we could be a team that still makes alot of mistakes and loses the close games that goes 6-10 or a team that wins the close games, Luck gets rid of rust and we go 10-6. It is just a matter of what someone may think will happen. I lean toward 9-7/8-8 at worse. I just think the Luck factor will be huge and I also think our Defense and O.Line will better as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, superrep1967 said:

Yes and a much better o-line and a much better offensive scheme. 

 

This is the key I think. If the o-line plays well and we can run the ball, that fixes a lot of flaws. It protects Andrew, and it keeps our D off the field. Last season the D just didn't have enough depth and when the offense kept going three and out, they just wore down by the end of the game. 9-7 is not out of the question. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The simple answer is yes they can.   The tougher question is will they?  This team has a lot of unknowns, starting with the QB.  To me this team is a roll of the dice.  If they are what many analysts think they are then they could thud and finish similar to last season.  If many things go right, they could find themselves back in the playoffs.  My bet would be somewhere in the middle.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

The simple answer is yes they can.   The tougher question is will they?  This team has a lot of unknowns, starting with the QB.  To me this team is a roll of the dice.  If they are what many analysts think they are then they could thud and finish similar to last season.  If many things go right, they could find themselves back in the playoffs.  My bet would be somewhere in the middle.

That is why the easy/safe answer to a prediction is 8-8. Nobody really knows how good we will be? I am more optimistic than most so I will say 9-7. Although I have seen a few on here say 11-5. I am not that bold. My 9-7 may change after Pre-Season but for now 9-7 is possible. After Pre-Season is over we should have a better feel for how we may be.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

misguided optimism.

 

Optimism, sir, no matter how unrealistic, is never misguided.

 

Will the Browns win the Super Bowl this year?  No.  But should Browns fans still be optimistic that they can and WILL win the Super Bowl THIS YEAR?  Yes.  A thousand times, yes.

 

Can the Colts win the Super Bowl this year?  Sure.  Should Colts fans be optimistic about 2018 since a less-experienced Luck got an arguably less talented 2012 team into the playoffs his rookie year?  Yes.  A Million Times, Yes.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Optimism, sir, no matter how unrealistic, is never misguided.

 

Will the Browns win the Super Bowl this year?  No.  But should Browns fans still be optimistic that they can and WILL win the Super Bowl THIS YEAR?  Yes.  A thousand times, yes.

 

Can the Colts win the Super Bowl this year?  Sure.  Should Colts fans be optimistic about 2018 since a less-experienced Luck got an arguably less talented 2012 team into the playoffs his rookie year?  Yes.  A Million Times, Yes.

This I agree with. I just don't think we are as Bad as people think coming into this season. I don't think we can win the SB this year but I agree with your point. We could go from 4-12 to 9-7 with our Star QB back and a better Defense. That isn't even a huge jump like we had in 2012 when we went 11-5 from 2-14.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, TKnight24 said:

Aside from the NFC East and the Patriots game that the Colts have never beaten since drafting Andrew Luck and have made themselves infamous for one of the worst playcalls in NFL history against the Patriots 

Personally, I dont feel it wasn't one of the worst play calls in NFL history. It may have been one of the worst executed play calls, but even that is a stretch. Perhaps you dont know of a time when a player ran the wrong direction into the end zone?

 

However, it may have been one of the worst calls in your era....

7 hours ago, Douzer said:

If they can win at the LOS, yes!

Lucas Oil Stadium? :D

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A healthy Luck gives you a chance to win a lot of games. A healthy Luck probably doesn't give you a chance against the best of the best if the rest of the team in not up to par. If we are bottom 5 defense again, it's hard to imagine this team being a serious contender, even if we think they can be great on offense(which I do - I think both the O-Line and the offense as a whole can easily be top 10 units in the league). 

 

I'm relatively optimistic for this season compared to national media, but I am not as optimistic as most fans. I think a season between 7 and 9 wins is most likely and I would consider this a good step forward with this young team and a good stepping stone for next year, adding another batch of draft picks and hopefully Ballard will consider the team ready to add some higher end talent in FA, too..

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

that defense didnt exactly have a lot of talent. you had freeney and mathis playing LB for the first time in their career, the dline consist of moala and antiono johnson, davis was hurt and/or inconsistent and powers was meh not to mention justin king and cassius vaughn werent any better, and lets not forget the great tom zibowski ugh

 

I don't know if you realize this,  but you're making MY argument,  not yours.

 

Those 3 playoff teams had Vonte, and Robert and Redding and not much else.    But they were OK veterans.    So, how'd they do OK?     Because decent veterans make fewer mistakes than a boat load of rookies.     Rookies make mistakes.   Lots of them.    That why NFL executives tell you that the biggest jump a young player makes is from Year 1 to Year 2.    Thoes guys are no longer rookies and they have training by fire.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Optimism, sir, no matter how unrealistic, is never misguided.

 

Will the Browns win the Super Bowl this year?  No.  But should Browns fans still be optimistic that they can and WILL win the Super Bowl THIS YEAR?  Yes.  A thousand times, yes.

 

Can the Colts win the Super Bowl this year?  Sure.  Should Colts fans be optimistic about 2018 since a less-experienced Luck got an arguably less talented 2012 team into the playoffs his rookie year?  Yes.  A Million Times, Yes.

 

I don't mind optimism.    But within reason.

 

I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade,  all I'm looking for is some level of reality.

 

People like to play ths game.....     "Well anything can happen!    It's possible."

 

Sure.   I get it.    Anything can happen.    And it sometimes does.    Anything is possible.    It's why we all love sports.

 

But it it probable?     Is it likely?     Is it realistic?      No, it's not.

 

I want everyone here to enjoy the season even if we finish under 500.     I want people to enjoy the return of Luck.   The improvement of the rookies and other young players.   The growth of the team from September to December.    I want us all to have fun!    There was far too little of that last year.    I just want people to be reasonable and fair.   Success is hard to come by.   I'm expecting us to have a fair amout of success,  but perhaps not a lot,  and not as much as some might believe.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I don't mind optimism.    But within reason.

 

I'm not trying to rain on anyone's parade,  all I'm looking for is some level of reality.

 

People like to play ths game.....     "Well anything can happen!    It's possible."

 

Sure.   I get it.    Anything can happen.    And it sometimes does.    Anything is possible.    It's why we all love sports.

 

But it it probable?     Is it likely?     Is it realistic?      No, it's not.

 

I want everyone here to enjoy the season even if we finish under 500.     I want people to enjoy the return of Luck.   The improvement of the rookies and other young players.   The growth of the team from September to December.    I want us all to have fun!    There was far too little of that last year.    I just want people to be reasonable and fair.   Success is hard to come by.   I'm expecting us to have a fair amout of success,  but perhaps not a lot,  and not as much as some might believe.

 

Let me ask you this, what is within reason in your opinion? I think 9 wins is within reason if Luck is healthy and us possibly squeezing into the Playoffs. If someone said we are winning the SB or going 13-3, that is obviously not LOL. Just asking, I liked your Post as it has fair points but do you think 9-7 is a huge stretch? To me 11-5 is a huge stretch but not 9-7. Even if we go 8-8 but Luck looks like old Luck, I would be ok with it as a I understand we aren't a SB contender right now. That would look really solid going into 2019. Ballard will probably go all out in Free Agency in 2019 if Luck is 100%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I don't know if you realize this,  but you're making MY argument,  not yours.

 

Those 3 playoff teams had Vonte, and Robert and Redding and not much else.    But they were OK veterans.    So, how'd they do OK?     Because decent veterans make fewer mistakes than a boat load of rookies.     Rookies make mistakes.   Lots of them.    That why NFL executives tell you that the biggest jump a young player makes is from Year 1 to Year 2.    Thoes guys are no longer rookies and they have training by fire.

 

 

Not exactly. This team actually has a good mix of young players and vets. Nelson and kelly have AC slauson and howard. Basham and Turay have sheard and Simon. LBers and secondary are young yes, but overall this team compared to the other teams are rather the same talent wise. Just more younger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Let me ask you this, what is within reason in your opinion? I think 9 wins is within reason if Luck is healthy and us possibly squeezing into the Playoffs. If someone said we are winning the SB or going 13-3, that is obviously not LOL. Just asking, I liked your Post as it has fair points but do you think 9-7 is a huge stretch? To me 11-5 is a huge stretch but not 9-7. Even if we go 8-8 but Luck looks like old Luck, I would be ok with it as a I understand we aren't a SB contender right now. That would look really solid going into 2019. Ballard will probably go all out in Free Agency in 2019 if Luck is 100%.

 

Fair question....

 

I think 9-7 is possible,   I just don't think it's likely.

 

But I think 9-7 AND making the playoffs is extremely unlikely.    Some teams go 10-6 and don't make the playoffs,  so I'm not expecting any team to go 9-7 and sneak into the post-season.

 

I wouldn't dog someone whose prediction is 9-7.    My own is 8-8,  just one fewer win.    I think it would be ridiculous to split hairs over one win.    It's clearly possible.    

 

But the playoffs are another animal.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Not exactly. This team actually has a good mix of young players and vets. Nelson and kelly have AC slauson and howard. Basham and Turay have sheard and Simon. LBers and secondary are young yes, but overall this team compared to the other teams are rather the same talent wise. Just more younger

 

I was talking about the 2012 team which you were noting had very little talent.

 

And I agreed.    But they made the playoffs because those vets who weren't very good played hard and made fewer mistakes.

 

That's how a less talented team made the post-season.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would probably say as of now, this fits each category for someone's prediction:

 

6-10 = People think we will suck again. Luck may even get injured again or be rusty most of the season. Our Defense will be Bad again. Reich won't do a Good job, etc..

 

7-9 = People thinking we are still Bad and wont win the close games but will show improvement. 

 

8-8 = Reasonable and a safe way of thinking, it is probable this happens.

 

9-7 = Reasonable but just being more optimistic and thinking Luck will play all 16 games and be 100% + the Defense and O.Line will be better. The new system under Reich will benefit the team.

 

10-6 = A Stretch, alot of things will have to go our way like I mentioned in the 9-7 category. We need more breaks to win 10 though, not as many to go 9-7.

 

11-5 = A huge stretch and everything right has to go our way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Fair question....

 

I think 9-7 is possible,   I just don't think it's likely.

 

But I think 9-7 AND making the playoffs is extremely unlikely.    Some teams go 10-6 and don't make the playoffs,  so I'm not expecting any team to go 9-7 and sneak into the post-season.

 

I wouldn't dog someone whose prediction is 9-7.    My own is 8-8,  just one fewer win.    I think it would be ridiculous to split hairs over one win.    It's clearly possible.    

 

But the playoffs are another animal.

 

 

Yeah making the Playoffs at 9-7 is a 50/50 thing. Some teams do, some teams don't. Usually 10-6 gets you in but that doesn't always either. 8-8 is very fair on your part as you at least don't think we will be Bad.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Yeah making the Playoffs at 9-7 is a 50/50 thing. Some teams do, some teams don't. Usually 10-6 gets you in but that doesn't always either. 8-8 is very fair on your part as you at least don't think we will be Bad.

There’s no part of me that thinks we will be bad.    Seriously.    But I think there’s a better than 50/50 chance that we might get schooled once or twice  this season.   

 

New inexperienced coaching staff (which I like at this point) plus young inexperienced players is a recipe for a few games getting out of hand.   We might get spanked once or twice.   But I hope we all feel good by the end of the season.    

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't beat PT's list but I've been to some.    Baseball Mets -- many times since 1992; one year I went to over 20 games, but I go to one or two a year now.   Spring Training-- Mets, in southern Florida   I have also been to a few Yankees games but it has been a while.   Minor league baseball: Mets in Binghamton, NY in 1992   NFL -- Vikings in MN, DC, Atlanta in last 3 years; Giants, at least one game a year since 2014; Jets, about 7 games since 1996   NBA basketball -- about 3 or 4 Knicks games   Hockey -- 1 game (I am not a hockey fan)   College Basketball -- in college and later at Madison Square Garden (saw Indiana, Temple, and some other teams)   Tennis -- I used to go to the US Open but it has been a while since I was last there.      I'd like to attend a round of a golf tournament.
    • I think you're reading WAY too much into this.     This is only the first projection of the first round by one guy.     We've run maybe a 1/2 mile out of a marathon.      And I didn't even list all 32 guys.      And it's not even clear we would take a DE with our first round pick.    We might take a DT.    I don't know which.    But as long as it's one of them,  I'm good with this.   I think the chances of the Colts taking a OT or a WR in the first round are very small.    An OT would make FOUR lineman taken in the first round.     I don't see that happening.   And as I've written about extensively now,  even yesterday in another thread,   there is almost no value in a first round WR.   Six of the last 7 drafts,  the vast majority of WR's taken in the first round are mostly below average to busts.    This is league-wide,  not just a Colts thing.   The only draft that is the exception is the 2014 draft with Beckham for starters.   It's an eye popping first round.     All the rest of the drafts, are somewhere between Meh on the high side,  to bust on the low side.   Don't see us going offense in the first round.    And if I had my wish, we wouldn't go offense until Day 3.    But, I'm putting the cart before the horse....     All I'm saying is that's it's very early in the process...     this is just a conversation starter...    
    • This guy looks good.  
    • you kind sir, seem to be in the minority of what the majority of Lions fans are saying, and what a lot of Colts fans are thinking and seeing here.....move along.
    • I am going to say all three. The first thing any team has to do is win and take care of their own division.  
  • Members