Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Legend of Luck

Andrew Luck missing 2017 could be a blessing in disguise

Recommended Posts

Last year was... difficult. We all know that. But for how painful it was watching 4th-quarter lead after 4th-quarter disappear, losing all hope of seeing Andrew hit the field, losing Hooker for the year, etc, I think we will look back on that year and be thankful that Andrew never played.

 

I love Chuck Pagano as a person, but we all know the coaching staff needed to be changed. If Andrew would have played last year, there's a very real chance we could have gone 9-7 or 11-5, maybe even made the playoffs. If we would have had a productive year, there's a very real possibility that Andrew could have saved Chuck's job for another year.

 

Instead, the coaching staffs warts became abundantly clear, and now we appear to be in a much better situation.

 

Not to mention getting the 3rd overall pick.

 

I think this is what ultimately needed to happen. It's a shame HOW it happened, but the end result seems to have us set up better for success.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Legend of Luck said:

Last year was... difficult. We all know that. But for how painful it was watching 4th-quarter lead after 4th-quarter disappear, losing all hope of seeing Andrew hit the field, losing Hooker for the year, etc, I think we will look back on that year and be thankful that Andrew never played.

 

I love Chuck Pagano as a person, but we all know the coaching staff needed to be changed. If Andrew would have played last year, there's a very real chance we could have gone 9-7 or 11-5, maybe even made the playoffs. If we would have had a productive year, there's a very real possibility that Andrew could have saved Chuck's job for another year.

 

Instead, the coaching staffs warts became abundantly clear, and now we appear to be in a much better situation.

 

Not to mention getting the 3rd overall pick.

 

I think this is what ultimately needed to happen. It's a shame HOW it happened, but the end result seems to have us set up better for success.

I agree, Luck will now comeback better than ever with a better O.Line and IMO a better Coaching Staff. TY is still TY so it's all good!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The key to everything was the firing of Grigson and the hiring of Ballard. The team was bereft of talent, which was definitely masked by Luck. Yes, Luck being gone likely saved his arm and career and doomed Pagano. But there wasn’t going to be an 11-5 record last year. This team was spiraling downhill and even Luck couldn’t have saved it. Ballard has rebuilt this team on the fly and done a heckuva job. Now, with competent coaching and Luck back, 11-5 is a real possibility. And it all starts with Ballard. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look at the past analytically, The year before Luck terrible, Why? No franchise QB, meaning Manning, We were a bad team. Next season ,Why the turn around? New Franchise QB -Luck Carried the obviously aging group of a past generation, that was showing it's age. Instead of rebuilding properly. Most teams that are lucky enough to get  a true franchise QB build the team around him, with a new generation of talent. We failed to do that. We wanted instant success to wipe that bad season without Peyton and we have payed the price for that fleeting few years. This is a rebuild that should have been done years ago.    

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, horseshoecrabs said:

If you look at the past analytically, The year before Luck terrible, Why? No franchise QB, meaning Manning, We were a bad team. Next season ,Why the turn around? New Franchise QB -Luck Carried the obviously aging group of a past generation, that was showing it's age. Instead of rebuilding properly. Most teams that are lucky enough to get  a true franchise QB build the team around him, with a new generation of talent. We failed to do that. We wanted instant success to wipe that bad season without Peyton and we have payed the price for that fleeting few years. This is a rebuild that should have been done years ago.    

 

I agree with the conclusion: Have to build a team properly around a franchise QB, which the Colts failed to do in Luck's early years.

 

I disagree with the idea that they failed to build properly because they wanted instant success. They failed to build properly because a) they drafted poorly, b) they signed free agents that didn't play well (for various reasons, injury being a major one), and c) the coaching staff's vision was flawed, IMO. 

 

The first couple of seasons, the Colts had a young roster, with the exception of a handful of guys. Grigson purged a lot of the older guys right away, and the few that remained were producers, not players that Luck had to carry -- Reggie Wayne, Robert Mathis, Adam Vinatieri, etc. 

 

And even though the Colts missed out on drafting high every year, like most bad teams do, they still had chances to add difference makers, but made bad picks. Werner over Rhodes is the best example, but there are plenty others. 

 

And evidently, the coaching staff didn't value speed and athleticism, particularly in the middle of the defense, which was a huge problem in most of the team's biggest losses over the years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

I agree with the conclusion: Have to build a team properly around a franchise QB, which the Colts failed to do in Luck's early years.

 

I disagree with the idea that they failed to build properly because they wanted instant success. They failed to build properly because a) they drafted poorly, b) they signed free agents that didn't play well (for various reasons, injury being a major one), and c) the coaching staff's vision was flawed, IMO. 

 

The first couple of seasons, the Colts had a young roster, with the exception of a handful of guys. Grigson purged a lot of the older guys right away, and the few that remained were producers, not players that Luck had to carry -- Reggie Wayne, Robert Mathis, Adam Vinatieri, etc. 

 

And even though the Colts missed out on drafting high every year, like most bad teams do, they still had chances to add difference makers, but made bad picks. Werner over Rhodes is the best example, but there are plenty others. 

 

And evidently, the coaching staff didn't value speed and athleticism, particularly in the middle of the defense, which was a huge problem in most of the team's biggest losses over the years. 

My point is if Peyton would have been healthy we would not have had the season we had the year before Luck, We would of had a certain amount of success , but  definitely a team who needed to start thinking about the next generation of players . I agree that the draft picks were not good and the coaching suspect. But then again, if we didn't have that bad season there would not have been Andrew Luck in our future. So let's hope Andrew has a successful comeback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mentioned this about a month ago. Andrew playing last year would've meant a few more wins but in return he would've took a beating. So a year or being terrible got us a new head coach, a top prospect for our oline, two extra 2nd round picks- all which was needed. So while many will argue I will say we probally got better by Andrew taking his time to get healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, horseshoecrabs said:

My point is if Peyton would have been healthy we would not have had the season we had the year before Luck, We would of had a certain amount of success , but  definitely a team who needed to start thinking about the next generation of players . I agree that the draft picks were not good and the coaching suspect. But then again, if we didn't have that bad season there would not have been Andrew Luck in our future. So let's hope Andrew has a successful comeback.

 

I didn't get that from the first post, but yeah, without that bad season we don't have Luck. I think Ballard has the patience to build it the right way now, but hopefully he has the eye for talent to match. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see anything saying Pagano has been hired. I read he wants to coach but no takers so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, King Colt said:

I don't see anything saying Pagano has been hired. I read he wants to coach but no takers so far.

 

He said he wants to coach...in the future.  I read that as he wants to take a year off.

 

Rumor was he was asked to join the Ravens but turned them down.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is still coaching in Pagono's future. Just not at the head coach level. Take Don Capers, an a slew of other offensive , defensive, and other level of coaching guys, They can be a major help for a team in different areas, but just not at the  Head coaching  position. Just know your limitations and what you excel at. It's not a knock, just reality.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it was painful. But each fan's pain may be different. Losing...even losing big time, no longer causes me pain. What hurts, is seeing the team remain heading in the wrong direction. Too often, fans want a single answer to point at when administering blame. There were many. GM hire turned out to be a bad choice, punctuated by control issues, some bad drafting, and some really bad FA choices. Coaching turned out to be a choice that didn't work for many reasons. I personally site coordinator choices and stubbornness in game day starters and over-loyalty to players as Chucks undoing over his X's and O's reputation. 

 

Yet all of this points to things remaining too long...and that points directly at ownership. Yet, I actually applaud Mr. Irsay for staying the course, and trying his best to make it work. I have zero doubt that Ballard was looking for ownership that is solid, and not knee jerk. Despite Jim's mistake in his hires of the last GM and coach, he suffered a ton of fan displeasure, stayed the course, and showed all position fillers that the Colts "dance with those who brung ya". 

 

If I was to say there was a silver lining in Mr. Luck missing the season, it would be that he has had the opportunity to gain two very rare things, a year to watch the game as a spectator in the middle of his career (as much of a study geek, you know he is going to be bad butt at reading defenses), and a chance to build himself even stronger that before...both mentally and physically.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, horseshoecrabs said:

I think there is still coaching in Pagono's future. Just not at the head coach level. Take Don Capers, an a slew of other offensive , defensive, and other level of coaching guys, They can be a major help for a team in different areas, but just not at the  Head coaching  position. Just know your limitations and what you excel at. It's not a knock, just reality.

 

There have been plenty of other head coaches get other head coaching jobs with a lot worse records than Chuck had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a bad enough season to get Pargano out the door.

 

It netted us pick #3 and in turn, landed us 3 extra second round picks and a guy who will be on our offensive line for years and years, hopefully.

 

It got a good amount of time into Jacoby, despite it not being the most ideal playing environment (coach, offensive line)

 

If #12 comes back and doesn't miss a beat then it probably was a "blessing"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Making it work through athleticism is an incorrect statement and does a huge disservice to Smith.  Smith is making it work at tackle by working hard and becoming a tackle.  I'm not sure what makes a "true tackle" but to me a guy that plays tackle and plays it very well is as much of a true tackle as anyone else. As far as AC (or AT if you prefer  ) aging... yup, every player on the team is aging so that is not a shock.  But he is still just 30 and tackles often play into their mid to late 30s so that is not much of a concern.  Not to say they won't draft a tackle in the next couple of drafts, but I doubt they will try to find a starting tackle in the next couple of drafts.
    • I didn't watch him much in college, I typically watch Big 10 football but I have watched him closely in the NFL and if the "experts" think he would make a better guard then yes I disagree with them.  While he would be a good guard in a zone blocking scheme like the Colts use, his lack of lower body strength and quick hand punch off the snap would hamper him going against NFL DTs.  Additionally, Smith does better when he has a bit of space to work with before engaging and that would not happen often at RG. Again what "most" people on this board or in general think has no relevance on anything.  It's not unheard of for a tackle to move spots but it is uncommon, it's happening a bit more in the past few years as the skillsets for RT and LT are becoming closer because it's not just the LT that is dealing with the speed rushers, but it's still not preferred among oline coaches and teams.  that is why guys like Haeg are considered valuable assets to a team, he's not a great lineman but he is good and he can switch sides seamlessly and that is rare.
    • Or maybe it's because he didnt claim Brissett "panicked" or act like he knows how good his vision is, and he isnt commenting on his read progressions.....you know things he couldnt possibly know anything about and dont show up on the film anyways.    
    • That was my thoughts.  If he was looking to Pascal first (and I'm sure he was), they had high / low bracket coverage, with low guy moving to Pascal but ready to reverse and cover Mack in the flat if he checks down. Big Q has his guy locked up right in the throwing lane to T.Y. but in position to bat down a pass. JB7 pulls it back here. He looks right (that extra 1/2 second) and both receivers are locked up (and actually one falling down in the end zone).   https://imgur.com/AYob5ov   Then decides to escape.     I think he waited a 1/2 second too long to leave.  He would have caused major issues to the defender covering the under receiver had JB7 escaped first and looked at the his options down field second.  Ryan Kelly just couldn't keep Chris Jones engaged long enough and thus he was on JB7 quickly forcing the throwaway once JB7 escaped the tackle box.   https://imgur.com/eXTWsJG   Maybe Glow is also inhibiting JB7's escape route too.   https://imgur.com/5Zk7Ttw     That was my feeling. I'd rather try again on 3rd down, or end up with 3 points (the end result), rather than turn over the ball and momentum by forcing it to Pascal there and getting a pick.  I'm not debating other times or other items he has to improve (but I'd like to see them on video before I join the criticism), just saw this one differently is all.   I think Reich has to devise and disguise the plays downfield better. And the young WR guys have to learn the plays and improve running the route tree.
    • Draft   23: R1P23 DL JAVON KINLAW SOUTH CAROLINA   35: R2P3 QB JORDAN LOVE UTAH STATE   55: R2P23 OT CALVIN THROCKMORTON OREGON   87: R3P23 LB TROY DYE OREGON   129: R4P23 S J.R. REED GEORGIA   166: R5P22 G NICK HARRIS WASHINGTON   201: R6P23 CB ESSANG BASSEY WAKE FOREST   203: R6P25 WR MICHAEL PITTMAN JR. USC   236: R7P23 CB KINDLE VILDOR GEORGIA SOUTHERN   As far as FA is concerned with our own players -TE: I'm not signing both Ebron and Doyle to big contracts. I'd pick one. Even with Ebron's drops, he still has more yards and TDs with the same amount of targets as Doyle. I'd probably resign Ebron and MAC, and let Doyle go unless he's will to sign a very friendly contract.   -WR: We'll have a decision to make with Funch depending on how well he does when he comes back. Both Pascal and Rogers are FAs, and I'd definitely try to upgrade at least one. Position wise, I think Rogers is more flexible, so I'd likely keep him if any. Really hoping Fountain comes back strong. Love what we were seeing from him.   -DE: Sheard? I just don't know. We need an upgrade at DE. Stinks that Turay is losing time due to injury. Regardless, I think I'd resign Sheard if it's a team friendly deal.   
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...