Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Quenton Nelson is the highest rookie.....


TKnight24

Recommended Posts

Not that Madden ratings mean anything...but that seems a bit weak. Rated relative to other Gs...you would think would have him rated higher than 83...especially considering he is the best G prospect in a very long time. For reference, Warmack had an 84 OVR and Cooper had an 83 OVR in Madden 25 (though I am not sure if that was launch ratings or final updated ratings after the season).

 

I would just think that Nelson would be the outlier for rookie ratings at his position...like RG3 was at QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2018 at 6:32 PM, Jared Cisneros said:

83 is generally the highest you'll get from a player in a normal draft on Madden, so that's a good compliment getting an 83. Nelson will definitely be a force for years to come!

 

Barkley should be higher. . . 

 

I say that due to the position.  I'm not really a Madden player but the thing is for RB's there isn't a huge ton of learning involved in playing the position.  The biggest issue is probably picking up the blitz when assigned to block.  Maybe for a pass catching back route running can use some work as well.

 

But generally speaking RB's hit their prime quicker then anyone else.  And that may start in their rookie year.  

 

There is a bit more learning for OL.  

 

QB's shouldn't be very high at all as rookies honestly.  Mayfield is 81. . . but I think Luck was rated at a 79 as a rookie.  And Luck was a much much higher rated prospect.

 

But the thing is that QB is the hardest position to learn.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Barkley should be higher. . . 

 

I say that due to the position.  I'm not really a Madden player but the thing is for RB's there isn't a huge ton of learning involved in playing the position.  The biggest issue is probably picking up the blitz when assigned to block.  Maybe for a pass catching back route running can use some work as well.

 

But generally speaking RB's hit their prime quicker then anyone else.  And that may start in their rookie year.  

 

There is a bit more learning for OL.  

 

QB's shouldn't be very high at all as rookies honestly.  Mayfield is 81. . . but I think Luck was rated at a 79 as a rookie.  And Luck was a much much higher rated prospect.

 

But the thing is that QB is the hardest position to learn.  

I agree with that. RB's are generally very easy to find as 80s-83s in Madden drafts, more than other positions. Although I do think Barkley will be a bust, he should be ranked higher for Madden purposes. I shouldn't be able to find a 3rd round RB after my 1st season of play that is a better rookie than Barkley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

Barkley should be higher. . . 

 

I say that due to the position.  I'm not really a Madden player but the thing is for RB's there isn't a huge ton of learning involved in playing the position.  The biggest issue is probably picking up the blitz when assigned to block.  Maybe for a pass catching back route running can use some work as well.

 

But generally speaking RB's hit their prime quicker then anyone else.  And that may start in their rookie year.  

 

There is a bit more learning for OL.  

 

QB's shouldn't be very high at all as rookies honestly.  Mayfield is 81. . . but I think Luck was rated at a 79 as a rookie.  And Luck was a much much higher rated prospect.

 

But the thing is that QB is the hardest position to learn.  

 

13 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I agree with that. RB's are generally very easy to find as 80s-83s in Madden drafts, more than other positions. Although I do think Barkley will be a bust, he should be ranked higher for Madden purposes. I shouldn't be able to find a 3rd round RB after my 1st season of play that is a better rookie than Barkley.

 

I don't know.  I think RB is the most volatile of positional ratings for Madden.

 

When a guy like Alvin Kamara (a 3rd round pick) or Kareem Hunt (another 3rd round pick) can become one of the best RBs in the league after his rookie season, while a guy like Trent Richardson (3rd overall pick) can become one of the biggest busts in NFL history after his rookie season...

 

How do you accurately rate RBs?  Let's be honest, Barkley could struggle in NY because of the system/injuries, while Nyheim Hines could lead rookies/the league in touches/yards/TDs. (Not likely, I'm just saying...)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Barkley should be higher. . . 

 

I say that due to the position.  I'm not really a Madden player but the thing is for RB's there isn't a huge ton of learning involved in playing the position.  The biggest issue is probably picking up the blitz when assigned to block.  Maybe for a pass catching back route running can use some work as well.

 

But generally speaking RB's hit their prime quicker then anyone else.  And that may start in their rookie year.  

 

There is a bit more learning for OL.  

 

QB's shouldn't be very high at all as rookies honestly.  Mayfield is 81. . . but I think Luck was rated at a 79 as a rookie.  And Luck was a much much higher rated prospect.

 

But the thing is that QB is the hardest position to learn.  

the problem with luck and madden ratings is its the intangibles that make him special.  im not knocking his arm or anything either, its just most QBs have that

 

they even have a stat for intangibles in madden, but i dont think it does much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

 I shouldn't be able to find a 3rd round RB after my 1st season of play that is a better rookie than Barkley.

you can do that to pretty much any of the top RBs, not just barkley.  the overall rating doesnt matter much

 

the thing is only a couple of stats actually matter for RBs, at least for how i play.  i use a one cut and run system, any back with high speed and acceleration and at least 60 or so ball carry can be among the top rushers 

 

barkley would be a good fit for me, but any back is replaceable in madden 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He doesn't need to prove anything to you or anyone else. 
    • I think Zach Hicks said it best, well, he could've clean it up a little bit       
    • Of course the speed is real unique in terms of him always being a top level separator. What I also like for him to be such a big dude is his feet. He's actually pretty nimble after the catch in small spaces.  I thought he just played on the outside but I've seen LSU play him from the inside as well. Also see them throw him quick hitter, screen type passes that he makes extra yards out of. I think he has very good hands and he is good with his routes. I didn't dwell much on attacking the football because that can be taught if it's an issue. I've seen some say he doesn't always go all out every time but no prospect is perfect in college. If I had things to fix I don't see big holes in his game. Just few things I like but not exhaustive
    • What do you mean back with a bang?  PFF rated Hooker 77.3 and Blackmon 68.3 in 2023.   Not a huge difference for a pick 15 and a pick 78? who had "injuries limiting their once all pro careers".  LOL.  But they did not play exactly the same roles.  Hooker was ranked poorly in terms of most stats, while Blackmon pretty average.   Example: Hooker was targeted only 10 times while allowing 8 receptions (ranked 90th).  Blackmon was targeted 44 times allowing 31 receptions (ranked 18th)  There are nuances with the stats though.  Hooker had only 31 tackles for a 75th ranking while Blackmon had 72 tackles for a 17th ranking.  Obviously, Hooker was asked to play FS like a goal keeper on a soccer team, which is about all he could ever do, while Blackmon probably had more different responsibilities.  JMO.   DeJean at 22 or later plus a 3rd round pick would give us probably a better all around FS/SS than either while picking up another player from a trade down.  Not that I'm advocating it.  Just one plausible event in a sea of fantasy drafting.   Brian Thomas or Chop Robinson at 22 would be nice too, IMO. Or even a RT.
    • Maybe his mannerisms, speech, and occasional (apparent) emotional public interjections (Saturday, comments about Daniel Snyder, etc.) play a part in public perception.   A truly recovering addict would admit his contribution to public perception and would not lay it off onto bigots, as he is indirectly doing.   He's probably not truly recovered and I would take anything he says about his issue as being a flat out lie until proven otherwise.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...