Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Pre preseason 53 man roster


CR91

Recommended Posts

I've updated the lineups from what we've seen from TC so far

 

QB-Luck, Brissett (2)

RB-Mack, Hines, Wilkins, Turbin (4)

WR-Hilton, Grant, Rogers, Cain, Fountain (5)

TE-Doyle, Ebron, Travis, Swoope (4)

LT- AC, Good (2)

LG-Nelson, Glowinski (2)

C-Kelly, Bond (2)

RG-Slauson, Smith (2)

RT-Howard, Haeg (2)

 

Offense-25

 

DE-Sheard, Simon (2)

DT-Autry, Lewis, Rooches (3)

DT-Woods, Stewart (2)

DE-Basham, Turay, Mccain (3)

SLB-Walker, Morrison(2)

MLB-Moore, Franklin (2)

WLB-Leonard, Goode (2)

CB- Wilson, Moore, Hairston, Desir, Milton(5)

SS- Geathers, Green (2)

FS- Hooker, Fairley (2)

 

Defense-25

 

K- Vinatieri

P-Sanchez

LS-Rhodes

 

Specialist-3

 

PS- Adams, Kaaya, Allie-Cox, Odum, Ishemel, Cooper, Jackson, Burwell, Brent, Tyrell Adams

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As good a guess as any.

 

If you get within 90% right you are doing something (or got lucky).  

 

Where I would disagree.

      1.  I think Mewhort does not make it

     2. 11 d linemen is too many

     3. I think Hines' versatility mean 1 less WR that makes it

     4. I thinl Swoope makes it and they keep 4 TE's

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jskinnz said:

As good a guess as any.

 

If you get within 90% right you are doing something (or got lucky).  

 

Where I would disagree.

      1.  I think Mewhort does not make it

     2. 11 d linemen is too many

     3. I think Hines' versatility mean 1 less WR that makes it

     4. I thinl Swoope makes it and they keep 4 TE's

 

1.Interesting you think Mewhort won't make it. Do you have an idea who will replace him then?

2.I do agree 11 is a lot, however I just don't see where to add more players on offense to balance the team. 

3. 5 is usually the norm when it comes to WRs and I don't see cain or fountain lasting very long on the PS.

4. Swoope is just injured too much imo. I don't recall him practicing during OTAs, but we'll see at TC

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

As good a guess as any.

 

If you get within 90% right you are doing something (or got lucky).  

 

Where I would disagree.

      1.  I think Mewhort does not make it

     2. 11 d linemen is too many

     3. I think Hines' versatility mean 1 less WR that makes it

     4. I thinl Swoope makes it and they keep 4 TE's

Only 4 wr?  I doubt that , especially when hilton and rogers are somewhat "slight" in size.  Who knows, but i sure hope we keep 5 on roster.  But what do i know, i'm just a caveman living in a modern world.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depending on McCain's legal situation, I could see someone like Margus Hunt or Erik Swoope make the roster in his place.  Hunt is getting older and Swoope has dealt with injuries.  Roster cuts are going to be interesting this year, though I don't think we will know the final Week 1 roster until well after initial cut-down day given Ballard's activeness with the waiver wire.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

1.Interesting you think Mewhort won't make it. Do you have an idea who will replace him then?

2.I do agree 11 is a lot, however I just don't see where to add more players on offense to balance the team. 

3. 5 is usually the norm when it comes to WRs and I don't see cain or fountain lasting very long on the PS.

4. Swoope is just injured too much imo. I don't recall him practicing during OTAs, but we'll see at TC

It sucks Swoope got hurt last year he showed promise during 2016 season before injury in TC last year ended his season before it started I hope if he don't make it here he gets another shot somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm opposite.   I don't see how Bond makes it unless Haeg really stinks up the joint. To be honest I don't think Bond will offer much position versatility.   I mean he's a 6 foot 1 center so I don't know how much I see him playing Guard and he for sure isn't playing Tackle.   The Guard position on this team right now is jam packed with competition between Nelson, Slauson, Mewhort, Braden Smith, Glowinski and maybe somebody else I forgot.   You might have a grudge against Haeg but he can play every position on the line and that's great value as a backup/reserve player.  That offers more to the team than Deshwan Bond and Glowinski.  Haegs name didn't come off the lips of Irsay for no reason.  Plus you have Slauson who can also play center.  I think they roll with Haeg and the other option of having Slauson to play center in a pinch.  Plus you can cut a guy like Bond and put him on the PS to keep him around if you need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I think Bond beats out Haag.  Burwell also makes the team.  One less defensive player.  Probably DL or CB.  Possibly Simon traded for a pick.  

 

You think Bond, who plays one position, beats out Haeg, who plays FIVE?

 

I agree, I see Simon being traded.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, krunk said:

I'm opposite.   I don't see how Bond makes it unless Haeg really stinks up the joint. To be honest I don't think Bond will offer much position versatility.   I mean he's a 6 foot 1 center so I don't know how much I see him playing Guard and he for sure isn't playing Tackle.   The Guard position on this team right now is jam packed with competition between Nelson, Slauson, Mewhort, Braden Smith, Glowinski and maybe somebody else I forgot.   You might have a grudge against Haeg but he can play every position on the line and that's great value as a backup/reserve player.  That offers more to the team than Deshwan Bond and Glowinski.  Haegs name didn't come off the lips of Irsay for no reason.  Plus you have Slauson who can also play center.  I think they roll with Haeg and the other option of having Slauson to play center in a pinch.  Plus you can cut a guy like Bond and put him on the PS to keep him around if you need to.

I thought Bond made the team last year as a backup center and then he too got hurt.  He is only a center and Kelly is only a center.   So we went with the center position last year with two players who only play one position.  I didn't realize Slauson can also play center so he also gives us the versatility we need for the interior.  To me that's more of a reason Haag doesn't make it.   Haag hasn't heldup at G or T.  Hence the additions of Nelson, Slauson, Howard and Smith.  Haag can play a number of positions but he is a liability IMO.   If he earns a backup role good for him.   But i, for one, will be holding my breath if he is out there trying to protect Andrew Luck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I thought Bond made the team last year as a backup center and then he too got hurt.  He is only a center and Kelly is only a center.   So we went with the center position last year with two players who only play one position.  I didn't realize Slauson can also play center so he also gives us the versatility we need for the interior.  To me that's more of a reason Haag doesn't make it.   Haag hasn't heldup at G or T.  Hence the additions of Nelson, Slauson, Howard and Smith.  Haag can play a number of positions but he is a liability IMO.   If he earns a backup role good for him.   But i, for one, will be holding my breath if he is out there trying to protect Andrew Luck. 

Bond plays one position only for the most part and he wasn't really lights out at that spot the more he played either.  I can't see them cutting the guy who plays 5 spots to keep the one who only plays one. Bond is only so so albeit I think it's  mostly due to being inexperienced.   I like Bond but I don't see him making it over Haeg.  If you are going to make it on this 2018 squad as a reserve you will most definitely have to be position Versatile.  You have to play more than one spot.

 

I can however see us cutting Bond and them picking him back up to be on the Practice Squad just in case we need a center due to injuries.  This is just my opinion of course!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the reserve Tackle positions I'm also questioning or at least almost certain that Clark either won't make the team  or will have a nice Hill to climb in order to make it.  And it's not because of position versatility.  I just think Good and Haeg will probably be called on in those roles.

Haeg will be like Joe Reitz sort of filling in for everyone and then Good will be the other guy unless he beats out Austin Howard for the starting spot somehow.  I have my doubts that happens but we shall see.  Maybe if Clark plays well we end up keeping an extra lineman or something.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, krunk said:

For the reserve Tackle positions I'm also questioning or at least almost certain that Clark either won't make the team  or will have a nice Hill to climb in order to make it.  And it's not because of position versatility.  I just think Good and Haeg will probably be called on in those roles.

Haeg will be like Joe Reitz sort of filling in for everyone and then Good will be the other guy unless he beats out Austin Howard for the starting spot somehow.  I have my doubts that happens but we shall see.  Maybe if Clark plays well we end up keeping an extra lineman or something.

A Switzerland Army Knife

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, krunk said:

For the reserve Tackle positions I'm also questioning or at least almost certain that Clark either won't make the team  or will have a nice Hill to climb in order to make it.  And it's not because of position versatility.  I just think Good and Haeg will probably be called on in those roles.

Haeg will be like Joe Reitz sort of filling in for everyone and then Good will be the other guy unless he beats out Austin Howard for the starting spot somehow.  I have my doubts that happens but we shall see.  Maybe if Clark plays well we end up keeping an extra lineman or something.

I liked Joe Reitz.  I was trying to think of his name earlier but I had a senior moment.  He was a perfect versatile backup who held up well when called upon.   Joe Haag has a long way to go to be another Joe Reitz IMO.  We shall see.  I wouldn't rule out Good winning the starting RT spot again.  He did it last year although I would consider Howard a better challenger.  Clark I don't see at all.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, John Hammonds said:

I would like to see Steve Ishmael make the team.  But can you logically carry 6 WR's?  And whose place does he take?  I guess it comes down to "what else can you do when you're not playing WR."

 

Also Krishawn Hogan. 

 

A good problem to have I guess in terms of trying to fit guys we want into the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, richard pallo said:

I thought Bond made the team last year as a backup center and then he too got hurt.  He is only a center and Kelly is only a center.   So we went with the center position last year with two players who only play one position.  I didn't realize Slauson can also play center so he also gives us the versatility we need for the interior.  To me that's more of a reason Haag doesn't make it.   Haag hasn't heldup at G or T.  Hence the additions of Nelson, Slauson, Howard and Smith.  Haag can play a number of positions but he is a liability IMO.   If he earns a backup role good for him.   But i, for one, will be holding my breath if he is out there trying to protect Andrew Luck. 

i think kelly could play guard at an nfl level 

 

hes 6-4 313

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

You want to take our best center and move him to a position hes never played?

I don't think he wants to.  I think he's just saying he has that type of size and ability if ever needed. Or a situation somehow called for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, krunk said:

I don't think he wants to.  I think he's just saying he has that type of size and ability if ever needed. Or a situation somehow called for it.

 

I get that, but I don't see the point of it just to have bond on the team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

I get that, but I don't see the point of it just to have bond on the team

Here’s a question.  Next years draft we are faced with the best center in 20 years and it’s our pick. He’s the best player on the board.  Would you take him and move Kelly to guard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LockeDown said:

Here’s a question.  Next years draft we are faced with the best center in 20 years and it’s our pick. He’s the best player on the board.  Would you take him and move Kelly to guard?

 

is that really a serious question?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

You want to take our best center and move him to a position hes never played?

nope, just saying he could do it in response to kelly being a center only

 

he hasnt been asked to, and probably wont unless its an emergency 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hoose said:

One less DT and one more OL----Might Le'Raven actually step up and become the backup RT? We'll see. Get rid of McCain on the DL and you have a pretty good looking team. 

 

I haven't heard anything positive about Clark and the fact that hes playing with the 3s tell me he has a very steep hill to climb to stay on the team

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎6‎/‎14‎/‎2018 at 6:57 PM, krunk said:

Bond plays one position only for the most part and he wasn't really lights out at that spot the more he played either.  I can't see them cutting the guy who plays 5 spots to keep the one who only plays one. Bond is only so so albeit I think it's  mostly due to being inexperienced.   I like Bond but I don't see him making it over Haeg.  If you are going to make it on this 2018 squad as a reserve you will most definitely have to be position Versatile.  You have to play more than one spot.

 

I can however see us cutting Bond and them picking him back up to be on the Practice Squad just in case we need a center due to injuries.  This is just my opinion of course!

If this scenario comes to fruition and it's between Haeg and Bond for a roster spot, you're probably right with the Colts keeping Haeg because of his versatility. If Bond ends up on the practice squad, I don't think he'll be there long. Some team with a need for interior line depth or even a spot starter will scoop him in a heartbeat. I thought he played his tail off in his four game cameo last year. He was very active and his quickness and hand pop were very nice. I would really hate to see him go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

If this scenario comes to fruition and it's between Haeg and Bond for a roster spot, you're probably right with the Colts keeping Haeg because of his versatility. If Bond ends up on the practice squad, I don't think he'll be there long. Some team with a need for interior line depth or even a spot starter will scoop him in a heartbeat. I thought he played his tail off in his four game cameo last year. He was very active and his quickness and hand pop were very nice. I would really hate to see him go. 

I think you may be a little high on Bond. He is going to have a tough time making the roster from where I sit. He's a pure pivot and he's currently the 3rd C on the team behind Kelly and Slauson.  I'm sure you are fimilar with Kelly. Slauson played C very well when called on in Chicago and SD. He's a very good G too and a solid free agent signing. 

 

Haeg is seeing an increased work load at C so far this year. That doesn't help Bond's cause. I thought Bond filled in admirably last year for an UDFA pushed into duty. I like him but his lack of position flex is going to make it tough. We have 2 starting level C's already on the roster. I think best case scenario for Bond maybe the PS even that'll be tough as a pure pivot. 

 

I'm not sure why some are down on Haeg. Joe is only 25 years old entering year 3 in the league with starting experience at G and T. He's currently showing the ability to cover at C too. That's the kind of versatility teams look for in O linemen but is difficult to find. He may never become an above average starter on the OL but reserves who can play all 5 spots are very valuable 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, akcolt said:

I think you may be a little high on Bond. He is going to have a tough time making the roster from where I sit. He's a pure pivot and he's currently the 3rd C on the team behind Kelly and Slauson.  I'm sure you are fimilar with Kelly. Slauson played C very well when called on in Chicago and SD. He's a very good G too and a solid free agent signing. 

 

Haeg is seeing an increased work load at C so far this year. That doesn't help Bond's cause. I thought Bond filled in admirably last year for an UDFA pushed into duty. I like him but his lack of position flex is going to make it tough. We have 2 starting level C's already on the roster. I think best case scenario for Bond maybe the PS even that'll be tough as a pure pivot. 

 

I'm not sure why some are down on Haeg. Joe is only 25 years old entering year 3 in the league with starting experience at G and T. He's currently showing the ability to cover at C too. That's the kind of versatility teams look for in O linemen but is difficult to find. He may never become an above average starter on the OL but reserves who can play all 5 spots are very valuable 

Wasn't Haegs main issue his strength?  He's solid technically and football IQ, but can be pushed around a bit.  I always thought the weight room would fix that issue eventually. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, LockeDown said:

Wasn't Haegs main issue his strength?  He's solid technically and football IQ, but can be pushed around a bit.  I always thought the weight room would fix that issue eventually. 

I think strength is a major issue for Haag.  I thought the weight room and a year of NFL strengthening would help him out but that was not the case last year.   Versatility is all fine and good but if you are a liability on the field it means nothing.  I would feel better if we found a backup like Joe Reitz at cutdown time.  But Joe has all of the  preseason to make his case so we shall see. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Two_pound said:

One thing I don't understand on this forum is all the hate thrown at Haeg. Joe Haeg is better than Howard and Burwell. Bond makes the team if he is fully recovered from his injury.

Joe Haag is not better than Howard.  Burwell could beat him out as well.  I agree that if Bond is fully recovered he will make the team which does not bode well for Haag.   This year Haag will have to fight his way onto the roster unlike the last couple of years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Any chance we take a OT with the 1st pick?
    • FWIW:   Today I listened to a guy from The Athletic interviewed on ESPN.   (Darren Lee). He said interviewing GMs at the combine, almost all view DeJean as a safety except two teams.  He thinks the Colts and Jags view DeJean as a corner.     I don’t know this reporter, never seen him before, so I can’t speak to his credibility.  But it sounds like he did a lot of homework.     And I appreciate your view on pro day times being reliable or not.   I’m always skeptical on pro days.  But I thought DeJean helped himself on his testing.  
    • I could care less what he does. Been too long ago.
    • I’m with ya..     I'm not sure we’re going WR at 15 either.  I think we could go DE, and it’s possible we could go CB as well.   Gosh,  I love Mitchell and really like Arnold as well.  And if we trade back I would be fine with McKinstry or a DE on defense or one of the 2nd tier of WRs that could be there in the 20’s.  So many options.   I keep reminding myself, every pick could produce a surprise, because I think Ballard will have so many options to choose from.      Im also not sure Ballard will use all 7 rounds.   He finished in 5 rounds in his first draft 2017,  and he finished in 6 rounds in 2019.   Maybe he uses all 7 rounds, but I’m not confident we will.     One week from tonight.   
    • My Final Mock Draft   15. Brock Bowers, TE,  6’4 245 Lbs, Georgia - Blue Chip Prospect.  Rare combination of acceleration, speed and body control. Hands-catcher operating with good coordination and technique. With Pittman on the outside Bowers will control the middle of the field and seams. AR Will develop much quicker into a top 10 QB with Bowers as his TE.  46. TJ Tampa, CB, 6’1, 190 Lbs, Iowa State - Elite physical traits. Plays with good positioning throughout routes. Very good in press Coverage and Zone. Expect him to compete in training camp and be named a starter.      82. Calen Bullock, S, 6’2 190 lbs, USC - Elite physical traits. He has the range to play single-high safety, the athleticism to line up over the slot and the ball skills to chalk up impressive on-ball production. Expect him to compete in training camp for the starting S position.    117. Tez Walker,  WR,  6’2 195 Lbs, UNC - Elite speed with very good body control. Career average of 30.7 yards on touchdown receptions. Gives us very good depth and competition with Pierce.    151. Grayson Murphy, DE, 6’3 260 Lbs, UCLA - Shows impressive quickness and change of direction to help turn speed to power as a rusher. Good depth.    191.  Keaton Bills, G, 6’5 320 Lbs, Utah - Cerebral player, quick to react to twists and stunts up front. Very good depth. 
  • Members

    • coltsleafs

      coltsleafs 106

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 1,234

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Robert Johnson

      Robert Johnson 206

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,089

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Goatface Killah

      Goatface Killah 2,000

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 2,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,126

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SC-Coltsfan

      SC-Coltsfan 109

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 1,744

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...