Jump to content
TKnight24

With the 36th & 37th pick, Indianapolis Colts select Darius Leonard & Braden Smith

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, ColtJ82 said:

You have to keep in mind, these folks have spent minutes breaking down film on Youtube. They have also thoroughly browsed the mock drafts to see where mock drafts have these guys slated. If only Colts management knew this to the point research was available, they could have saved a lot of hours and money on scouting, going to games, going to practices. If they haven't heard your name, you can't possibly be worth the pick.

People act like the Jags didn’t add Taven Bryan to an already ridiculous defensive line that features Calais Campbell, Marcell Dareus, Malik Jackson, and Ngakue. People should be jumping for joy over the picks of Nelson and Smith. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Cynjin said:

 

 

I say the same thing to you two.  Tell us everything you know about the two picks.  I have not seen Leornard play so it would be fascinating to read what people that have seen him play have to say.

U probably blindly give the Colts an A plus on the draft so far. Nelson A plus, rest a D. Our scounting stinks. 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

People act like the Jags didn’t add Taven Bryan to an already ridiculous defensive line that features Calais Campbell, Marcell Dareus, Malik Jackson, and Ngakue. People should be jumping for joy over the picks of Nelson and Smith. 

100% agree. Interior O-Line is huge in our division.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

U probably blindly give the Colts an A plus on the draft so far. Nelson A plus, rest a D. Our scounting stinks. 

 

Wow! It seems like the "experts" think the Colts are doing a pretty good job with this draft. 

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000929730/article/2018-nfl-draft-quicksnap-grades-for-every-team-through-day-2

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2018-nfl-draft-grades-and-analysis-for-every-pick-in-the-second-round/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

What do they know unlike us arm chair experts? It's a joke sensitive colt fans.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, krunk said:

Smith is not a tackle

I saw him playing a lot of RT in his highlights.  I haven't read where it's said they want him to only play guard.  I like Good at guard myself.  As long as he starts I don't care.  I'm not a coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JColts72 said:

What do they know unlike us arm chair experts? It's a joke sensitive colt fans.

 

 

Well I would assume they know a whole lot more than we do because they have access to far more NFL sources than we do. 

 

I bet you thought it was foolish for the Colts to sign Unitas after he couldn't make it with the Steelers. Haha

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

U probably blindly give the Colts an A plus on the draft so far. Nelson A plus, rest a D. Our scounting stinks. 

 

I don't give them any grade for 2 or 3 years.

 

I am still waiting for your in depth analysis on the draft picks.  I'm sure it will be riveting, being that you are such an expert. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cynjin said:

 

I don't give them any grade for 2 or 3 years.

 

I am still waiting for your in depth analysis on the draft picks.  I'm sure it will be riveting, being that you are such an expert. 

That I am. U ripping the post draft talking heads too on their instant grades? Not if its too u liking?What thin skin colt fans we have here. U never last in a big city.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JColts72 said:

U probably blindly give the Colts an A plus on the draft so far. Nelson A plus, rest a D. Our scounting stinks. 

U Stink. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

 

Well I would assume they know a whole lot more than we do because they have access to far more NFL sources than we do. 

 

I bet you thought it was foolish for the Colts to sign Unitas after he couldn't make it with the Steelers. Haha

 

Oh yeah Haha, and firing shula to lead the dolphins to super bowls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ColtStrong2013 said:

U Stink. 

U 2. Lets not go there fellow happy go lucky colt fan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JColts72 said:

U cry baby. Lets not go there fellow happy go lucky colt fan

Ha. I'm just messing with you man. You want to talk about thin skinned. WOW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:

Ha. I'm just messing with you man. You want to talk about thin skinned. WOW

Thinner skin. Im messing 2 hardy har har.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

That I am. U ripping the post draft talking heads too on their instant grades? Not if its too u liking?What thin skin colt fans we have here. U never last in a big city.

 

Draft grades during or right after a draft are an exercise in foolishness.   I'm not thin skinned,  I just find stupidity, ... well, stupid and I just hope that people like some of the posters here don't bother to vote. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Cynjin said:

 

Draft grades during or right after a draft are an exercise in foolishness.   I'm not thin skinned,  I just find stupidity, ... well, stupid and I just hope that people like some of the posters here don't bother to vote. 

Fair enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smith won O lineman awards in the SEC so I'm fine with that pick but Leanard

looks a bit timid and slow to be a linebacker. Not a big contact guy judging

by his highlight tapes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

I love reminiscing. 

 

I don't, not when it comes to draft picks which are an inexact science anyways. Like Polian said "if you listen to the fans, you will be sitting with them". I wonder how many words of mine could be regurgitated back to me from when I was loose with my mouth in my youth. We all say dumb and uninformed things in our lives, no different on a forum.  That is all I can say. :) 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

Can you go back to '98 when some people wanted Leaf over Manning?

haha

Thank heavens we didn't take Leaf. We would've been the NFL version of the Blazers passing on Michael Jordan back in the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I love reminiscing. 

 

After one NFL game? Smith wasn't even average yesterday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Braden Smith isn't a tackle imo.   They need to leave that man at guard.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, IinD said:

Thank heavens we didn't take Leaf. We would've been the NFL version of the Blazers passing on Michael Jordan back in the day.

Safe to say there would be no "we"...

 

"We" would be the LA Colts by now.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

Can you go back to '98 when some people wanted Leaf over Manning?

haha

 

Or go back to the '98 draft & look at how awful every single pick is outside of Manning. If not for the Manning pick, that's an all-time horrible draft class.

57 minutes ago, krunk said:

Braden Smith isn't a tackle imo.   They need to leave that man at guard.

 

He gave me a migraine yesterday when he was in at left tackle.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, shastamasta said:

 

After one NFL game? Smith wasn't even average yesterday.

Just having fun. But in retrospect, isn't judging after one game....just as silly as judging before a guy has played?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

I'm embarrassed with my post about Leanard. I was wrong 

and eating crow because the guy is looking real good.

 

We've all been guilty of it, but yeah, that was a pretty bad take LOL.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

I'm embarrassed with my post about Leanard. I was wrong 

and eating crow because the guy is looking real good.

It's all good, man.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dodsworth said:

I'm embarrassed with my post about Leanard. I was wrong 

and eating crow because the guy is looking real good.

Kudos to you!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, IinD said:

Thank heavens we didn't take Leaf. We would've been the NFL version of the Blazers passing on Michael Jordan back in the day.

 

At least we would have a good defense 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

Or go back to the '98 draft & look at how awful every single pick is outside of Manning. If not for the Manning pick, that's an all-time horrible draft class.

 

He gave me a migraine yesterday when he was in at left tackle.

 

Wasn't he in as an eligible receiver ? I thought he was going deep on a post route ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Alex22 said:

 

Wasn't he in as an eligible receiver ? I thought he was going deep on a post route ....

Yes, technically lined up as the tight end. Poor play design to ask him to block Dunlap 1 on 1 on the edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

We've all been guilty of it, but yeah, that was a pretty bad take LOL.

The earlier videos someone posted didn't do him any justice, but later

vids he looked pretty good. I would bet a few GM's are kicking themselves

by not taking him in the 1st rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Four2itus said:

Just having fun. But in retrospect, isn't judging after one game....just as silly as judging before a guy has played?

 

Of course it is.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Four2itus said:

Just having fun. But in retrospect, isn't judging after one game....just as silly as judging before a guy has played?

 

You make a good point. I’d say the main difference is that we’ve seen him in real deal NFL action now, he looked solid, & it’s probably safe to assume that he’ll only get better moving forward. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ill eat crow about Leonard. He has looked really good. Dude flies around the field. However, I still think the rest of the 2nd round picks were reaches and we could have drafted more impactful players. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That might always be the case, but when it's a DII guy who wasn't at the Combine, it's hard to imagine there was a ton of interest in him. Of course, all it takes is one team being in love with him. I'm sure there was another team expecting him to be a UDFA, mad because the Colts took him in the fifth. Get your guy, that's the most important thing.
    • Good point.  I think this has serious merit 
    • My take   1. We overachieved last season. Period 2. We played at KC 3. TY limited the offense because he was so injured.  4. We played a very very good coach with time to prepare and his guys got some rest too and time to scout the team. Remember, Reich is well known to Reid as well by now.  5. Not having Hooker really mattered 6. Play calling was a bit blah 7. How does Vinny automatic miss those kicks? 8. A strip sack for us turns into a strip sack for them a few plays later, that hurt.  9. A young team who wasn’t supposed to be in the playoffs, let alone a second game in the playoffs had some factor here.  10. KC had a pretty good team   my concern from that game would be how poorly our run game was going forward. Kelly better play better than he did this season or I don’t see a 15 million/yr contract coming his way in Indy. I think with a healthy TY, the additions of DF and Cain and Paris and others should really boost that offense. An offense with TY, Paris, Doyle, EE and Mack, now that’s gonna be a tough group to match up with and defend. Run or pass, heck coach, idk what they are doing lol.    Gonna be fun to see this team evolve and have better back ups coming off the bench. I just hope we have enough beef in the middle to stop the run and I just hope that Kelly was hobbled in that KC game because it was one of his worst games that year. 
    • This again boils down to you hanging on to 'this is how it's always been done.' And you don't get that I don't care about that rationale. I think it can be done better. Which is why, in my first post in this thread, I said "to me, it's a no brainer." To me. It should be obvious that this is my stated preference, not me saying that teams that don't do it this way are stupid.   There should be nothing more that I have to say about that, except you continue to rely on that appeal to authority, and I'm telling you that 'how it's always been done' isn't legitimate reason for not examining potential alternatives. Not just in this area, but in everything.      You're missing an important detail, and I think it's because you've put my argument in a box and are unwilling to actually examine it on its merits.   As I said initially, and have said since, my argument is to make this change six months sooner, not six months later. "Imagine if we had fired Grigson in June 2016 instead of January 2017." Did you miss that part, again? What about "if the Texans had waited until January 2020 to fire Gaine..."?    I want him in asap. You want him asap, but not until January.   My statement about it being just one draft is referencing the worst case scenario, which is 'we just blew a draft cycle by letting a lame duck GM stay,' to which I say 'get over it, I'm okay with that if that's what it takes to get the guy I want in the building, with the staff he wants.' And that's where my argument about it potentially being easier to interview candidates in the down season after the draft is critical. The Jets wanted Joe Douglas; he evidently didn't want to entertain a move during draft season, but jumped at it in May/June. (There's the matter of moving his family during the school year, etc.) In theory, this approach could make it easier to interview good candidates. Whether you agree with that or not, whether it's important to you or not, this is mostly an aside. As I said, this was my response to the alarmist reaction of 'they just blew a draft!' Which I think is overstated, especially in the Texans' case.     Not at all. Again, if Ballard started in June 2016, he theoretically could have changed coaches a year sooner.      This is a hindsight fallacy. Go back to the Texans wanting to hire Caserio. I'm not arguing that he's going to be a great GM, I'm arguing that he's the guy they want to hire, and he's available in June. Same for the Jets and Douglas. The Chiefs and Veach.    We know that every person hired doesn't succeed. I never argued that they do. That's true of whoever you rush to hire in January. The point is that there is always a pool of qualified candidates from which to choose. I won't be retracting that, I firmly believe it, and I said it when the Colts were interviewing coaches in 2012, when they interviewed GMs in 2017, and when they interviewed coaches in 2018. You choosing to reject that is pretty ridiculous, to be honest. There are always qualified candidates. Choosing the right one is a different story.   And again, if there's one guy you really, desperately want, why wait until January to get him?     You could give me the benefit of the doubt and assume that if I'm saying it, I mean it. Especially this far into the discussion...    And going back to what I said earlier, this is and always has been my opinion. I'm not offering studies and conclusive evidence to support this opinion because it's a personal preference, it's what I think would be best (although I have offered evidence and rationale to support my opinion, you've just chosen to reject, for reasons I don't agree with).    I'm okay with the disagreement. What I find personally off-putting is the insistence that, because you don't understand my angle, it means I either haven't actually thought it through, or I don't actually believe it. As I said earlier, I understand that general consensus disagrees with my viewpoint, but that doesn't mean I'm just going to conform. The fact that I'm presenting an argument in earnest should be enough.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...