Jump to content
TKnight24

With the 36th & 37th pick, Indianapolis Colts select Darius Leonard & Braden Smith

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, ColtJ82 said:

You have to keep in mind, these folks have spent minutes breaking down film on Youtube. They have also thoroughly browsed the mock drafts to see where mock drafts have these guys slated. If only Colts management knew this to the point research was available, they could have saved a lot of hours and money on scouting, going to games, going to practices. If they haven't heard your name, you can't possibly be worth the pick.

People act like the Jags didn’t add Taven Bryan to an already ridiculous defensive line that features Calais Campbell, Marcell Dareus, Malik Jackson, and Ngakue. People should be jumping for joy over the picks of Nelson and Smith. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Cynjin said:

 

 

I say the same thing to you two.  Tell us everything you know about the two picks.  I have not seen Leornard play so it would be fascinating to read what people that have seen him play have to say.

U probably blindly give the Colts an A plus on the draft so far. Nelson A plus, rest a D. Our scounting stinks. 

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

People act like the Jags didn’t add Taven Bryan to an already ridiculous defensive line that features Calais Campbell, Marcell Dareus, Malik Jackson, and Ngakue. People should be jumping for joy over the picks of Nelson and Smith. 

100% agree. Interior O-Line is huge in our division.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

U probably blindly give the Colts an A plus on the draft so far. Nelson A plus, rest a D. Our scounting stinks. 

 

Wow! It seems like the "experts" think the Colts are doing a pretty good job with this draft. 

 

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000929730/article/2018-nfl-draft-quicksnap-grades-for-every-team-through-day-2

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2018-nfl-draft-grades-and-analysis-for-every-pick-in-the-second-round/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

What do they know unlike us arm chair experts? It's a joke sensitive colt fans.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, krunk said:

Smith is not a tackle

I saw him playing a lot of RT in his highlights.  I haven't read where it's said they want him to only play guard.  I like Good at guard myself.  As long as he starts I don't care.  I'm not a coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JColts72 said:

What do they know unlike us arm chair experts? It's a joke sensitive colt fans.

 

 

Well I would assume they know a whole lot more than we do because they have access to far more NFL sources than we do. 

 

I bet you thought it was foolish for the Colts to sign Unitas after he couldn't make it with the Steelers. Haha

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

U probably blindly give the Colts an A plus on the draft so far. Nelson A plus, rest a D. Our scounting stinks. 

 

I don't give them any grade for 2 or 3 years.

 

I am still waiting for your in depth analysis on the draft picks.  I'm sure it will be riveting, being that you are such an expert. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cynjin said:

 

I don't give them any grade for 2 or 3 years.

 

I am still waiting for your in depth analysis on the draft picks.  I'm sure it will be riveting, being that you are such an expert. 

That I am. U ripping the post draft talking heads too on their instant grades? Not if its too u liking?What thin skin colt fans we have here. U never last in a big city.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JColts72 said:

U probably blindly give the Colts an A plus on the draft so far. Nelson A plus, rest a D. Our scounting stinks. 

U Stink. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

 

Well I would assume they know a whole lot more than we do because they have access to far more NFL sources than we do. 

 

I bet you thought it was foolish for the Colts to sign Unitas after he couldn't make it with the Steelers. Haha

 

Oh yeah Haha, and firing shula to lead the dolphins to super bowls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ColtStrong2013 said:

U Stink. 

U 2. Lets not go there fellow happy go lucky colt fan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JColts72 said:

U cry baby. Lets not go there fellow happy go lucky colt fan

Ha. I'm just messing with you man. You want to talk about thin skinned. WOW

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:

Ha. I'm just messing with you man. You want to talk about thin skinned. WOW

Thinner skin. Im messing 2 hardy har har.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, JColts72 said:

That I am. U ripping the post draft talking heads too on their instant grades? Not if its too u liking?What thin skin colt fans we have here. U never last in a big city.

 

Draft grades during or right after a draft are an exercise in foolishness.   I'm not thin skinned,  I just find stupidity, ... well, stupid and I just hope that people like some of the posters here don't bother to vote. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Cynjin said:

 

Draft grades during or right after a draft are an exercise in foolishness.   I'm not thin skinned,  I just find stupidity, ... well, stupid and I just hope that people like some of the posters here don't bother to vote. 

Fair enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smith won O lineman awards in the SEC so I'm fine with that pick but Leanard

looks a bit timid and slow to be a linebacker. Not a big contact guy judging

by his highlight tapes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

I love reminiscing. 

 

I don't, not when it comes to draft picks which are an inexact science anyways. Like Polian said "if you listen to the fans, you will be sitting with them". I wonder how many words of mine could be regurgitated back to me from when I was loose with my mouth in my youth. We all say dumb and uninformed things in our lives, no different on a forum.  That is all I can say. :) 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

Can you go back to '98 when some people wanted Leaf over Manning?

haha

Thank heavens we didn't take Leaf. We would've been the NFL version of the Blazers passing on Michael Jordan back in the day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I love reminiscing. 

 

After one NFL game? Smith wasn't even average yesterday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Braden Smith isn't a tackle imo.   They need to leave that man at guard.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, IinD said:

Thank heavens we didn't take Leaf. We would've been the NFL version of the Blazers passing on Michael Jordan back in the day.

Safe to say there would be no "we"...

 

"We" would be the LA Colts by now.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

Can you go back to '98 when some people wanted Leaf over Manning?

haha

 

Or go back to the '98 draft & look at how awful every single pick is outside of Manning. If not for the Manning pick, that's an all-time horrible draft class.

57 minutes ago, krunk said:

Braden Smith isn't a tackle imo.   They need to leave that man at guard.

 

He gave me a migraine yesterday when he was in at left tackle.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, shastamasta said:

 

After one NFL game? Smith wasn't even average yesterday.

Just having fun. But in retrospect, isn't judging after one game....just as silly as judging before a guy has played?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

I'm embarrassed with my post about Leanard. I was wrong 

and eating crow because the guy is looking real good.

 

We've all been guilty of it, but yeah, that was a pretty bad take LOL.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, dodsworth said:

I'm embarrassed with my post about Leanard. I was wrong 

and eating crow because the guy is looking real good.

It's all good, man.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dodsworth said:

I'm embarrassed with my post about Leanard. I was wrong 

and eating crow because the guy is looking real good.

Kudos to you!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, IinD said:

Thank heavens we didn't take Leaf. We would've been the NFL version of the Blazers passing on Michael Jordan back in the day.

 

At least we would have a good defense 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

Or go back to the '98 draft & look at how awful every single pick is outside of Manning. If not for the Manning pick, that's an all-time horrible draft class.

 

He gave me a migraine yesterday when he was in at left tackle.

 

Wasn't he in as an eligible receiver ? I thought he was going deep on a post route ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Alex22 said:

 

Wasn't he in as an eligible receiver ? I thought he was going deep on a post route ....

Yes, technically lined up as the tight end. Poor play design to ask him to block Dunlap 1 on 1 on the edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

We've all been guilty of it, but yeah, that was a pretty bad take LOL.

The earlier videos someone posted didn't do him any justice, but later

vids he looked pretty good. I would bet a few GM's are kicking themselves

by not taking him in the 1st rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Four2itus said:

Just having fun. But in retrospect, isn't judging after one game....just as silly as judging before a guy has played?

 

Of course it is.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Four2itus said:

Just having fun. But in retrospect, isn't judging after one game....just as silly as judging before a guy has played?

 

You make a good point. I’d say the main difference is that we’ve seen him in real deal NFL action now, he looked solid, & it’s probably safe to assume that he’ll only get better moving forward. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ill eat crow about Leonard. He has looked really good. Dude flies around the field. However, I still think the rest of the 2nd round picks were reaches and we could have drafted more impactful players. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It sounds like Collins was trying to surround himself with better support prior to joining Indy, but yes, it's great that we've got enough high-character guys on this team who can help keep him clean.  https://www.colts.com/news/jalen-collins-grateful-for-the-opportunity-with-colts   I tend to agree with you regarding who Ballard considers 'bad apples.'  Kelly was dismissed from Clemson because he snapped at coaches after being benched as a sophomore in a Spring Game (and then got in a 'minor fender-bender' in the team's parking lot, which did not lead to any police report -- sounds like he was heated when he left and probably drove a little recklessly).  Prior to joining Clemson, Kelly did send a few tweets or social media messages suggesting he was going to come in and win the starting position right away.  He was ~17-19 years old when these incidents occurred.  Sure, they're not great, but I imagine being a very highly-touted prospect and the nephew of a HOF QB comes with quite a bit of stress, especially at that age.  Not that those were great incidents, but it doesn't necessarily make him a bad person (kind of like you eluded to, these incidents are nowhere near as serious as domestic violence or endangering a child, etc.).    When he was 21, Kelly got in a scuffle with some bouncers at a nightclub in his home town.  Again, not a great incident, but keep in mind he was 21 and was probably going through some hard times as he was being scrutinized nationally for recently being kicked off Clemson and probably had a bit too much to drink with some of his hometown friends.  Not that getting in a scuffle in a nightclub is a good thing, but there are a LOT of 21 year olds who get in scuffles when they've had too much to drink and no big deal is made of it because they're 'normal' kids, not highly touted football players with a celebrity uncle.  Of course,  being a 'star' comes with responsibility and you'd like to think kids know enough to keep themselves under the radar, but I don't think it's an incident which makes him an evil person.   Then, when he was 23-24 he left a Halloween party at Von Miller's house and stumbled into the wrong house.  He didn't steal anything from the house or attempt to injure anyone in the house, from all accounts I've read... he simply had too much to drink and went in and sat on a couch, got chased out by the husband in the house and then went and slept in his SUV.  Again, not a great incident, but I don't think it's something which makes him a terrible person.  Sounds like the kid needs to understand his limits in terms of partying a bit better, but if he wasn't an NFL football player, that charge would be a pretty common thing to read in a police blotter in a large city like that.  He needs to understand, he's going to get more scrutiny as an NFL athlete and due to his past and his ties to Jim Kelly... and it sounds as though he's gotten some counseling and is doing his best to stay away from situations like that in the future.     Ballard and his staff always seem to do their due diligence before bringing players into this team.  The fact that Reich and J. Kelly were teammates for just under a decade probably also helped Chad Kelly in this situation.  I imagine Reich has known Chad for a long time (probably since he was a toddler) and had some conversations with Jim to get assurance that Chad is trying to clean up his act.  While not all of his actions were the greatest, he doesn't seem to have done anything that would be a huge deal and make him a terrible human being if he was just an average Joe.   Jalen Collins' suspensions it sounds like were 2x for smoking weed and 2x for PEDs.  Not great decisions, but again, those aren't things that make him a terrible person.  And as @Scott Pennock said, it's easy, if he slips up again, we release him and move on (well, if he slips up for PEDs again, we won't have to deal with him, the NFL will suspend him for 2 years and by that time, he'll probably be too old to come back and compete for an NFL roster spot).  To be honest, I am more concerned with the PED use than the weed from a young man in the NFL... but I don't know all the circumstances (e.g., did he just not do his research and took a supplement on the banned list by accident (this seems to happen a lot, and in other sports you are starting to see guys winning cases by proving they accidentally took a tainted substance)? was he battling a nagging injury and took something to try to help recover faster (this also happens, e.g., Andy Pettite admitted he took PEDs several times in his career, but moreso for recovery than to enhance his performance, like being put on the 10 day -DL instead of the 60 day-DL)?  Or did he actually knowingly try to cheat by taking substances to give him a major advantage over other players (all these guys take supplements, but there are supplements which are more advantageous than others)?).  I would be more worried if this guy is actually a major cheater who felt he didn't have enough raw ability to play in this league to the point he had to take banned substances... but he already is well aware, if he screws up again, his NFL days are over.   In terms of Okerere, Ballard and others have already said numerous times that they did their due diligence about his alleged incident and talked to his coaches and others around him and found no reason not to bring the guy to Indy.     If allegations turn out to be true, I doubt Ballard would bring in a guy like Tyreek Hill.  Maybe it's just my opinion, but assaulting your spouse or your child are way more serious issues about someone's character than smoking weed, pulling a McAfee and falling into a canal, or having too much to drink and accidentally stumbling into the wrong place (especially without attacking anyone or vandalizing the place).  I, for one, am happy Ballard isn't against giving guys who have not done anything very seriously wrong another chance.  Like Ballard says "Kids make mistakes."      
    • Addai was great in pass pro, but as an overall RB give me MJD anyday.    Mack is a little low, but overall hes still in the 15-20 range IMO. If healthy he definitely moves up though. 
    • I loved the "with the next pick" series. Watched it multiple times. I'll look at the site again and see if it changes my opinion. Maybe the video series on Cain will spark my interest.
    • it was just an ugly ugly ugly game.   to me, our O was the issue. you can't punt your first four possessions and then miss a FG to end the half. then you punt your first two possessions of the 2nd, fumble on your 3rd, and punt again on your 4th. When special teams is your only score for 3Qs, it's your offense lol....   our D actually held them under their average so i can't blame them too much. we actually had more sacks and QB hits they them.   Biggest issues 1. they doubled a hobbled TY, and the rest of our WR group were mediocre to begin with 2. O play calling sucked. horrible game plan from Reich, and good one from Andy. 3. our LB's played bad...  4. we abandoned the run too early (only 14 rushes the entire game). Our YPC was pretty good. 5. weather/field
    • They had the better team and were at home. KC winning doesn't surprise me at all. This upcoming season is a different story. If you ask 99% of Houston fans were they surprised we beat them in the playoffs, they would probably say yes. I wasn't, because we had the better QB. Mahomes and Luck are pretty even regarding KC and they were at home.
  • Members

    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 1,790

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tweezy32

      tweezy32 368

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jcrane

      Jcrane 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 4,048

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 21,064

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Blindside

      Blindside 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 110

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,321

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Flash7

      Flash7 2,246

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ar7

      ar7 347

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...