Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Possible trades for Day 2


Recommended Posts

I have 2 I can see happening:

 

1st: Colts trade number 37 to the Broncos for pick 40 and pick 99. At 37 Broncos Select Guice

 

2nd: Colts trade number 49 to the Buccaneers for pick 53 and a 4/5 round pick and they select Guice (this is going off Zierlein's mock day 2 Bucs want to jump in front of the Lions to select there future RB in Guice)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Finball said:

3rd rounder to move up 3 spots in the 2nd is pretty unprecented (even though it's comp pick). Teams paid relatively less to move up in the 1st round just yesterday.

Yes.  The first rounders were for sale due to the lack of normal 1st round talented players in this draft, supposedly.  We'll see if the player value tightens up as we get into the better-valued part of the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's very rare that a team takes back to back picks anywhere in the draft...much less this early. Typically they have one target...and then a small list of guys that they like at that pick. Once they get their target then you feel good and then trading back and still getting one of the other multiple guys makes sense. Not saying we couldn't take both picks...but I think we move back between 37-49 with that 37th pick because someone will want to move up and we will already have our guy and will then be able to fall back on a list of other guys. Splitting the difference between all 3 picks make a lot of sense and could land us say a late 4th rd pick possibly where I think we will be targeting some WR depth. Nobody truly knows but I bet Ballard has been getting lots of calls all morning for 37. 35 with Cleveland and 37 with us I think will be prime targets for other teams to move up. Can't wait. I feel really good that with 36 a starter will be there for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, dgambill said:

It's very rare that a team takes back to back picks anywhere in the draft...much less this early. Typically they have one target...and then a small list of guys that they like at that pick. Once they get their target then you feel good and then trading back and still getting one of the other multiple guys makes sense. Not saying we couldn't take both picks...but I think we move back between 37-49 with that 37th pick because someone will want to move up and we will already have our guy and will then be able to fall back on a list of other guys. Splitting the difference between all 3 picks make a lot of sense and could land us say a late 4th rd pick possibly where I think we will be targeting some WR depth. Nobody truly knows but I bet Ballard has been getting lots of calls all morning for 37. 35 with Cleveland and 37 with us I think will be prime targets for other teams to move up. Can't wait. I feel really good that with 36 a starter will be there for us.

i actually hope we keep both back to back picks cause we need all the high talent we can get ASAP:banana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Shadow_Creek said:

i actually hope we keep both back to back picks cause we need all the high talent we can get ASAP:banana:

Agreed...nobody would say we don't need the highest quality talent...but the question becomes with the second pick is will there still be very high quality talent back to the mid 40 range and we get an additional pick tomorrow that we can develop. I think there will be some nice running backs in the 4th round and maybe having an extra 4th would be nice to nab one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Was that the only good receiver taken in that draft? And did they give up multiple picks?
    • Yeah, I have no beef with MHJ as a prospect (I think some are pumping him up a little too much, and there's some name recognition probably influencing the way he's talked about). It would be awesome to have him on the Colts. But just like every other draft prospect in history, the possibility exists that he will not live up to the pre-draft expectations.    But during the pre-draft process, fans and media start falling in love with players. Terms like "generational talent," "future superstar," etc., start getting thrown around. And now we're talking about a prospect as if he's a lock for the HOF before he's even played a game in the NFL. That's fine, it's fun, we all do it. But that's different from actually scouting, setting a board, and making decisions for the team.   Each of us can point to a previous prospect that we loved and raved about and had them fitted for a gold jacket, but who bounced out of the league within 3-4 years. And the same is probably true for NFL scouts and decision makers. Which is why Ballard's comment today -- there is no such thing as a perfect prospect -- is so important to remember. I'm not against the team identifying a guy they really want and going up to get him, but I hope they're not just doing it with stars in their eyes.
    • Would Cincy have made the SB without taking Chase at #5. I got the answer, and it is easy, it is a FAT NO. They would have never got by KC as great as Burrow is. Giving up next years 1st round pick isn't the end of the world to land a generational WR. We still have picks in rounds 2-7 if we did that. 
    • Definitely was, but essentially all of them received the same punishment initially.     Just thought it was curious, especially right before the draft. Has to put the CB spot for the Eagles in limbo.     Been wondering if Jontay Porter's NBA lifetime ban had any play in the decision.   Rodgers did bet on his own team.
    • sure hope he does we need a game changing pass catcher
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...