Jump to content
LucasOilStadium

2018 NFL Draft Thread

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, stitches said:

Okoronkwo, Crosby, Hill, Meeks, st. brown still on the board.

 

If Ballard is going to make a character concern guy, this is the time to jump on Hill IMO. 

 

Also... I would LOVE Crosby here. 

 

Character guy concerns have to go through the owner.  Some ex GM's that are on NFL radio says that if an owner finds out something nefarious about a character guy they draft and the GM has not already discussed it with him, he will be fired next day.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dallas just traded a pick (a 6) for Tavon Austin.......very good move much needed

Edited by oldunclemark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Broncos have 2 picks in the 5th round, one could be OL and one could be QB, that is my guess, and a guess it is.

 

It is a matter of time before Paxton Lynch is cut, IMO. 

You are probably right.....He's talented..Elway may not want to give up on him..But he just doesnt seem to see anything ( he doesn't see coverages) ..You cant fix that

 

\Maybe they could deal Lynch for a 2019 pick  before the end of the day

Falk threw for what 14,000 yards?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course the Bengals get the best remaining 3tech (Andrew Brown) 

 

Colts on the clock! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daurice Fontain of Northern Iowa...?

 

I don't have a bad word to say about him!

 

Andrew make a good receiver out of anybody

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We got Daurice Fountain. Never watched a game from him but he killed it at the Shrine game. Has to transition to a greater level of competition just like Darius Leonard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Luck12-to-Hilton13 said:

All know is he’s a WR....which was a need. I’m on board!

If I said I saw him play I'd be lying

If I said I've EVER seen Northern Iowa play, I'd be lying

 

If I said I knew where Northern Iowa was..I;d be lying

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know anything about Fountain but I really hope we find a way to grab Tegray Scales

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Luck12-to-Hilton13 said:

All know is he’s a WR....which was a need. I’m on board!

Another great athlete especially for his size - 6'1, 210. 4.46 40, 42 inches vertical, 134 inches broad jump. Very good ball skills, great separation at the top of the route, but doesn't run a ton of routes right now. Will have to develop but a ton of promise. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

If I said I saw him play I'd be lying

If I said I've EVER seen Northern Iowa play, I'd be lying

 

If I said I knew where Northern Iowa was..I;d be lying

 

 

 

Just South of Minneapolis, I think.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

Did NFLfan's punter just go to the Seahawks?

 

Gil Brandt had this guy as a 4th round talent.  HE just admitted it.  Talented punter he says.

 

haha I liked him but I don't mind us not drafting him. Let's see what we do with our 4 sixth round draft picks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, stitches said:

Another great athlete especially for his size - 6'1, 210. 4.46 40, 42 inches vertical, 134 inches broad jump. Very good ball skills, great separation at the top of the route, but doesn't run a ton of routes right now. Will have to develop but a ton of promise. 

I trust the coaching staff.....something I haven’t said in almost 6 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NFLfan said:

 

haha I liked him but I don't mind us not drafting him. Let's see what we do with our 4 sixth round draft picks.

 

Good luck.

 

They said that punter could flip the field.  Example: kick it to the 8, back spin it to the ten and it goes dead.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Giants are done picking. I wish the Vikes had taken that approach -- take fewer but better players. Trade some 5th to 7th round picks to move up. Now we have 4 sixth round picks. Will they make the team? With a team like the Vikes, there is just so many roster spots on the 53. Many of our picks will be cut, as there is no room on the 53.

 

Draft better players and get some UDFAs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

The Giants are done picking. I wish the Vikes had taken that approach -- take fewer but better players. Trade some 5th to 7th round picks to move up. Now we have 4 sixth round picks. Will they make the team? With a team like the Vikes, there is just so many roster spots on the 53. Many of our picks will be cut, as there is no room on the 53.

 

Draft better players and get some UDFAs.

Looks like the Vikes GM listened to you!

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SP_21 said:

Looks like the Vikes GM listened to you!

I just wrote that (see above you).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We moved up for a kicker? Anyone know this kicker from Auburn? Hope it does not turn out like Aguayo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NFLfan said:

We moved up for a kicker? Anyone know this kicker from Auburn? Hope it does not turn out like Aguayo.

I think he's the first kicker drafted, so ... you practically had the pick of the litter. Congrats... I guess? :P 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NFLfan said:

We moved up for a kicker? Anyone know this kicker from Auburn? Hope it does not turn out like Aguayo.

He's an amazing kicker. Had some long kicks under pressure. I like him

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

Character guy concerns have to go through the owner.  Some ex GM's that are on NFL radio says that if an owner finds out something nefarious about a character guy they draft and the GM has not already discussed it with him, he will be fired next day.

I've heard  that, too....CBF

 

If your skills are limited to the ability of your one hand, that's up to the GM

If your skills are limited to the ability of your one handgun, that's up to the owner.

Edited by oldunclemark
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SP_21 said:

He's an amazing kicker. Had some long kicks under pressure. I like him

 

Okay, sounds good. Our kicker is up there in age; so I don't mind. 

Just now, stitches said:

Damnit! Jamarco Jones gone... 

 

Colts on the clock! 

Who is left among your best players? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got a weird message that I never got here before. It said that my comment above, which was two separate posts, was merged. 

 

How does that happen?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

Okay, sounds good. Our kicker is up there in age; so I don't mind. 

Who is left among your best players? 

I'm sorry. I stopped keeping track. St Brown is still available i think... Duke Ejiofor(if i haven't missed him), Shaun Dion Hamilton(he has injury concerns), Deshon Elliot, Trenton Thompson. Oh and Holton Hill... but he probably is not getting drafted ... with those 9(NINE!!!!) failed drug tests and all... 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NFLfan said:

I just got a weird message that I never got here before. It said that my comment above, which was two separate posts, was merged. 

 

How does that happen?

That's happening to me,. too...I don't understand how or why.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about this one. How many RBs do you need? Would much rather draft a LB, CB, WR or if you want to go RB I'd go with a big guy like Bo Scarborough

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jordan Wilkins is a good sleeper pick. I had him as a 4th round talent. I like his agility and vision.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

I just got a weird message that I never got here before. It said that my comment above, which was two separate posts, was merged. 

 

How does that happen?

It's happened to me too. I wouldn't worry about it. I think the Site upgraded things and added things/did updates is my guess.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, esmort said:

wow anderson to jets for 7th

 

Wow I didn't see that coming either I knew we had a lot of DEs but I really liked Anderson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IMO this is the wrong way to look at it. IMO the reason they drop 7-8 is not because they don't fear the run game - it's because they fear the pass game much more than they fear the run game. This is especially true when you have a combination of 1. Exceptional QB with great receivers and 2. bad running game. In general the level of fear that teams should show is:   1. Fear of great passing attack 2. Fear of bad passing attack 3. Fear of great running attack 4. Fear of bad running attack.    And the distance between 1 and 4 should be light years! And when you get on your team both great passing attack and horrible running attack this forces opponents to send more help to cover.    It is not a coincidence that teams with great running backs like KC(before Hunt got banished) and the Saints(Kamara) and the Rams(Gurley) faced the least amount of stacked boxes ... this goes directly against what you would assume teams would do in a situation where they face elite running backs. The reason is - they just feared those teams passing games MUCH MORE! The passing game dictates how many people you send to cover much more than the running game.    And at the same time teams like Dallas, TEN, JAX had most stacked boxes - it's because the opponents didn't fear their passing game. I'm using just anecdotes here but the data overall supports that. The passing game strength overall dictates coverage vs run support much more than the quality of the run game. The weaker your pass game is the more stacked boxes you will see almost regardless of how good your RB/running game is.    I said 'almost' above because I can see a situation where you need to have some base level of a threat from the run. You need to at least be a threat to run it.   The short answer is ... weak passing game. Notice that this is all relative. No team will 100% leave 8 in the box and not team will 100% leave 8 in coverage. We are talking about percentages. The weaker the passing game, the more attention your run game will get from the defense pre-snap. This is alignment based... now once the snap is made the defenders have to read run and pass keys in order to know whether they should choose optimal strategy for run defense or pass-defense. In general the reason play-action(and RPO) works is because of the THREAT of the run, not the success of the run(it doesn't matter if you run it for 4.2yards a run(where we were last year) or 4.7yard a run(where Reich wants us to be). So ... my point is not that you have to completely ignore the run. You don't ignore it. You still have to keep the threat that you will run it(by running it often enough) in order to make the defenders still read the keys and give you the extra second or so that running the play action gives you while the defenders are reading the run key you are giving(faking to) them. You just don't generally care much if you run for 4.7 or 4.2 when it comes to your passing game or your play-action game. Teams react the same way to 4.7y teams as they do to 4.2y teams when it comes to play action as long as you keep the threat that you will run high enough to make defenders still read their run keys. (now this is another thing I have not seen yet, but expect at some point in the future- some defensive coordinator will say - just screw it - play the pass 100% and don't read the run keys... play the run on your way to the passer and I don't know what will happen then)      Well, that quote is a bit of an exaggeration to bring the point across. You won't really wait for the old timers to die out. Just... the more young blood comes in(Shanahan, McVey, etc.) and tries the new stuff and succeeds with it against the old strategies the more the old timers that are unable to adjust will lose their jobs to the new kids and so on. This pretty much already happened in the NBA. It's a new league now compared to just 5-10 years ago. It didn't happen because the old timers died out, it happened because the new strategies proved better and more efficient and even some of the old timers borrowed from them and incorporated them into their game plans. IMO similar things are happening and will continue to happen in the NFL. It probably will take longer because in general the NFL seems more conservative of a league but IMO it will happen sooner or later.    In 20-30 years I think we will be laughing at things like "establish the run" or "first we need to stop the run", just like we would be laughing at statements like "what this team really needs is more post ups for their center" or "this guy should have just taken one dribble into the 2p range and taken the shorter 20 feet jumper instead of the 24 feet open 3" in the NBA-context right now. 
    • Thats a bummer.  She is talented and her and Matt Taylor worked well together. 
    • "But really what is going to set the tone for us is going to be how we run the football. That is not going to change. We have to run the football. Our goal is going to be a top-five rushing football team. That will set up our play-action pass. That will set up all the big chunk plays. To me that will get us where we want to go.” https://www.colts.com/news/top-takeaways-frank-reich-on-otas-day-1     Just as Reich has stated above I do believe a good ground game opens up more favorable passing opportunities because teams have to committ more personnel than they would like to run defense. That in itself sets up more opportunities for you to get one on one coverage down the field.  I think you get less of those opportunities if you can't run.   If I want more one on one coverage down field I'd like to know how I'm supposed to do that if I don't need to run? I guess maybe you'd say screens or something?  I'm sure he's saying this based off what he's experienced during games and what he's seen on film.
    • One of my issues and I belive Princeton Tiger brought it up also was when your running game is not very effective.  For example in Peytons last years in Indy our run game was abysmal and teams literally ignored all of our play action fakes. Or you can even look at some of our seasons under Pagano.  They dropped 8 and rushed three a large majority of the time because they had little fear that we could do anything on the ground.  Do you think that happens to us with a successful rushing attack? I personally don't believe so.   I think when you are able to run it forces the defense to leave less defenders in coverage.   I don't want to turn this into a long drawn out debate but I believe your contention was it isnt the amount of times you run but more of the effect of the play action itself.  So when the defense is ignoring the play action then what is it that would cause them to honor it again? I believe you would have get some kind of success from your running game which enhances those play action fakes.  It's not just the play action fakes themselves.  I don't really think you need any type of data during a game to tell you that if the defense is committing 8 men or more in the box you've got a better chance of completing passes on the defense.  What causes the defense to committ 8 to 9 men in the box?  A successful running game gets them to do that more often than not.  I think it creates more opportunities for you to face lighter numbers of defenders when you want to pass the ball.   I got to be honest here and say I can't go toe to toe with you on all that stat crunching, but there's just a few things I will just never buy about that data.   And if you're waiting for bodies(us old school thinkers) to die it's going to be a long, long, long time before that happens in the game of football.........
    • He could "beast", and still be a bad addition to the locker room in the long run. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...