Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Who do you think will have the better career?

If your team needed a QB this draft....  

37 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you prefer?

    • Mayfield
    • Allen

Recommended Posts

Personally, I really like Mayfield and see nothing in Josh Allen to make me think he’s anything more than a massive bust. I believe Baker will have the best career out of all the QBs in the draft and would absolutely build a franchise around him. I know he’s got more of a Johnny Manziel personality type rather than an Andrew Luck, face of the franchise type of personality, but the dude is just sooooo much better than Manziel, and I don’t think he’s going to fall into the traps that Manziel did. 


Obviously, with both guys you’re going to need to get them in the right environment, and I hope they do. If Allen is number one off the board to Cleveland, they better sit him for the entire year and get him a new coach for 2019, otherwise he will go the way of many a Cleveland QB before him. I think he has the intangibles you want in a QB, but not the arm talent. He can throw a million yards but that doesn’t do you much good if you can’t hit your guy ten yards downfield. He needs a great QB coach to help him home his craft. 


Mayfield on on the other hand, has all the natural ability you want, but will need a strong locker room to keep him from doing stupid crap and being out of the league in three years. I would say Denver is a great spot for him to land, sit behind Keenum for a year or two, and take over the reigns. 


I’m not including the other three QBs in this poll because I wanted to make it solely for the two most contentious QBs that will be drafted early. I think Rosen will be better than Darnold, but they both have middling careers, never reaching elite status, and Jackson is too hard to project for me. He’s going to have to live by the Russ Wilson/Aaron Rodgers method of mobile QBs rather than the RG3 method. 


Bottom line is, Baker Mayfield is going to be a nasty QB for a while. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not buying in on a vote of confidence for Mayfield but a complete lack of confidence in Allen.


I see so many things wrong with his resume that I can't believe that teams are gonna take a chance on him in the first.


Bad accuracy - If a QB hasn't learned to throw an accurate football after college then I just don't see them suddenly learning this skill.


Bad play against better teams - Great/good QB's should stand out when faced with tough opposition, taking the team on their shoulders.  Allen shriveled up.  When playing FBS teams his stats are horrible.  I watched him play against Iowa as an Iowa fan.  If you would have told me he was a first round draft pick QB I would have laughed.  Iowa's defense is pretty good for the college ranks but not elite.  It's certainly not nearly as good as an NFL defense.  Yet Allen struggled to complete a pass.  


Needs ALOT of development: They said he's less QB and more "skill set"  That tells me that Allen is going to need more development then any other QB drafted recently.  This guy is probably a 2 or 3 year project, at any point all of it could go south.


I'll be surprised if 5 years from now Allen even has a backup job in the NFL.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Allen is two fold for me.  Under the right system he can easily excel.  He went to the Senior Bowl and had to learn basics of a new system and he showed that he can do very well under some good direction.  Also, his footwork and some basic mechanics have been looked at as key issues with accuracy.  He has worked with Jordan Palmer and at his pro day everyone was saying he looked better.  I get it, it's a pro day, but improvement is what you are looking for from the time they leave the combine. 


Now the other side of Allen is the possibility of him being the next Blake Bortles.  Strong arm but little accuracy.  Now Bortles went to a system that allowed him to just float by with mediocrity and now he is getting under the lime light since the team has become strong, but he is in a very important spot.  So, Allen should hope for the Giants in all honesty.  They have a good person in place to help, and other than them, Elway probably sees he can mold Allen as well.


Mayfield to me will be a solid Russ Wilson type player who like many others, needs to go to the right scheme.  This being said, the whole Jonny Manziel stuff is far overblown imo.  He is cocky, but yet as a GM I would want my QB to come in with a little of that.  As far as the locker room, every teammate of his while at OK loved being around him.  The coach was not a huge fan from rumors but he is young and dealing with the big head QB.  Bottom line is both of these guys fit the typical mold of QB's that come out each year....they need the right scheme.  The wrong team or scheme drafts a QB and that hurts the career projectory for sure. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

90% of people hate on Baker Mayfield because of his height and think he played in a weak conference. He has all the tools and seems to have a good head on his shoulders. I'll be rooting for Baker as long as he doesn't end up in the AFC South or on the Pats.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, jchandler7 said:

 Whichever one does NOT go to the Browns!

My answer would be similar. TOTALLY depends on where these guys go.


Going to a terrible organization can ruin any player, especially a QB.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I refuse to vote. Both have some awesome attributes and some big red flags to me. It's all about fit (right situation that will help these guys succeed). I can't say which will do better because I don't know where they will end up. The situation is everything....especially with these two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This kid could make things really interesting and turn that flat-butt 4-3 into something really special with corners who can press. The scheme could be really sneaky good with that personnel. 
    • I don't know who else we really need to have a bounce back year, especially on D.  Along our DL, we either need to bring back Houston and Autry or figure out how to replace them - but both had pretty solid years.  Lewis was better than he had been his first couple years.  Buckner was a stud and Stewart was solid.  Having Turay come back healthy and seeing Banogu improve would be helpful, but they both played so little last year and hadn't done enough previously to indicate last year was a 'down year'.  At LB, Leonard was a first-team all pro again and very solid.  Walker was solid but saw his snap count decrease and Oke had his ups and downs while seeing his snap count dramatically increase (as @EastStreet pointed out,  not only did his snaps go way up compared to his rookie year but the way he was used was different).  I doubt we see Walker back, so it'd be nice to see Oke improve for sure.  Then in the secondary we had solid play from Rhodes, Carrie, Willis and Moore for the most part.  Blackmon was solid (especially early on, but he seemed to digress as the year went on - IMO, to be expected as he was raw coming in and was coming off a knee injury, I don't think he was supposed to get near the snaps he did last year, but we know what happened with Hooker and sort of forced Blackmon into the fire).  RYS had a down year, but I don't see why he can't bounce back - he's got the physical traits - I tend to think he battled some mental demons after some P-Int penalties, and hopefully he can refine his technique some and come back strong.     In all, on the D, I think we're in good shape.  Keep in mind, it seemed like 'Flus called the D a bit differently last year than he had in earlier years here.  We are, overall (aside from Houston, Autry, Rhodes) very young on D.  We had a very weird off-season last year, which (IMO) is critical for younger guys.  I can't help but think it didn't help the likes of guys like RYS and Oke who saw their roles increase and change (IMO, OKe's change was more than a 'slight' change) between their rookie year and year 2.     On O, ideally we'll see solid QB play from Wentz (I won't go as far as to saying he needs a 'bounce back' year as he hasn't been in Indy before and it sounds like there was a lot of toxicity in Philly, hopefully all he needs in a change of scenery and a reunion with Reich).  Our OL was solid, so as long as we can replace AC at LT I think we'll be OK there.  We had pretty consistent play from Hines and Wilkins throughout the year and JT got dramatically better as the season wore on -- I think if those guys can start up where they left off, we're more than fine at RB.  TY didn't have his best year, but he's be declining for about 3 years now, so if we bring him back, all we can do is hope he stays healthy and I think we'll be in OK shape.  Pittman missed some time with his leg compartment syndrome, but was solid down the stretch, so I don't think we need him to 'bounce back', just continue on his trajectory and he's gonna be solid.  Pascal was solid and I think we've pretty much seen his ceiling, so he just needs to stay solid.  It would be sweet to see Campbell and/or Patmon to emerge, but don't think we need them to 'bounce back' as we've never gotten high level results from them to begin with.     Then on STs, we were pretty solid all around.  Would like to see Blankenship add a bit more umphf to his kicks, but he was solid and Sanchez was solid punting.  The coverage and return units were solid overall.   So really, I think we need a comeback or bounce back year from RYS and maybe Oke... but overall, I don't think we need a 'bunch of them.'       I agree, pretty much  have to temper expectations on Speed being from a small school.  He did really improve on STs last year and he got his praise any time Ballard or any coaches spoke about him.  I get the feeling Ballard and staff are willing to use patience with project players (Ballard states that fairly regularly).  With Oke, Walker, Leonard and then Franklin who has more playing experience at LB - I don't think there was really much need to rush Speed into an LB role last year.  He got plenty of ST snaps and did well there, hopefully boosting his confidence that he can play at NFL level while still refining his LB technique in practices and the film room.     While I would rather see guys like Adams and Glasgow on STs - I don't think it is terrible to have them on the roster primarily as STers but being our 5th and 6th ranked LBs on the depth chart as well.  Meaning, if we went into the season with Leonard, Oke, Speed and Franklin as our top 4 with Adams and Glasgow as STers but listed as 5 and 6 on depth chart, I don't think it'd be the worst thing (especially considering we predominantly play with only 2 LBers on the field).  So, sure it'd be nice to bring in a mid-late round draft pick or sign a decent FA for fairly cheap, but I'd rather see us dishing out money to bring in a solid LT, a playmaker at TE (and maybe WR), retain Rhodes, ensure the DL was solid (either by bringing back Houston and Autry or by getting a guy like Bud Dupree/JJ Watt/etc.), and add OL depth.  In otherwords, regardless of if we bring Walker back or not, I don't think LB is a top 5 position of concern right now.   I don't think Walker is going to command a ton, but he was 15th in the NFL in tackles in 2018 (124), tied for 28th (105) in 2019 and in the top 50 in 2020 (92).  He's a pretty productive player and a solid one - so he's going to demand significantly more than he was getting as a 5th round pick on his rookie contract.  And yes, he definitely wants to play more and I think his biggest issue here is his lack of athleticism.  You're right, he'll probably play more in a 3-4 D and he will likely be offered more money by a team where he'll play a lot than what Ballard will offer him.    See the last line from Ballard in this article:  https://www.colts.com/news/chris-ballard-philip-rivers-ty-hilton-xavier-rhodes-2020-season-press-conference (Ballard on Linebacker Anthony Walker: "I have a special relationship with Anthony Walker. Selfless. Team guy. Rare leader. I hope he gets into coaching one day or scouting. Mark my words on this: if Anthony Walker gets into coaching, he will be a head football coach in the National Football League. And if he gets into scouting, he'll be a general manager. He's brilliant — absolutely brilliant, and he's made of the right stuff. I know Anthony wants to play more. We value Anthony. We'll see how it works out. I want good for Anthony."   My guess is Walker is gone.  
    • It's basically just monitoring one thread (general thread), then updating the big board and pick thread with every pick. So 32ish real time updates per night. Not hard, just tedious.
  • Members

  • Create New...