Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Could the Colts Parlay a 2nd rounder for Irving?


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, krunk said:

Athletically speaking I agree and I want the kid based on that. However second round picks which is what Dallas is asking need to have somewhat clean off the field profiles. I have some concern over his decision making. The PED suspension, someone mention a prior domestic abuse case somewhere. Along with that is missing games due to injury. That is going to give Ballard some pause. Hopefully they feel comfortable because he looks like a game changer to me. It gives me concern that Dallas had concern over giving him a long term deal mostly over injuries.

Here’s the article I read that mentions the domestic violence (point 8) and the school incident is point 7. He definitely has the tools and CB should be familiar with him from KC. Our DC should know him a bit more to hopefully fill them in all.

 

https://sportsday.dallasnews.com/dallas-cowboys/cowboys/2018/03/04/10-things-know-cowboys-dl-david-irving-including-tumultuous-past-dikembe-mutombo-comparison

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Struggled to get to the QB?

 

7 sacks last year.      Struggled?

 

In 8 games and 7 sacks !   He missed last 4 with a concussion.  Dallas fans and writers were surprised they didn't put a 1st. rd. tender on him which certainly would have kept him there.  But a 2nd?  They are very worried right now.  Especially with our release of Hankins.   We can easily acquire him and Dallas can't match.  And we have the Eberflus connection again and Irving is only 24.  I think there is a very high probability we sign him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't doubt if we trade down again and add another 2nd.

 

If you have the cap space and extra picks, why not?  Take a chance.  It's pretty clear we're having trouble attracting free agents, so you have to be creative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

In 8 games and 7 sacks !   He missed last 4 with a concussion.  Dallas fans and writers were surprised they didn't put a 1st. rd. tender on him which certainly would have kept him there.  But a 2nd?  They are very worried right now.  Especially with our release of Hankins.   We can easily acquire him and Dallas can't match.  And we have the Eberflus connection again and Irving is only 24.  I think there is a very high probability we sign him. 

 

I'm a little confused...

 

Is the tender on Irving, does that give the Cowboys our second round pick?   Pick 36?     

 

Ir or is it simply a matter of the right to match which they either will or they won't depending on the dollar figure?

 

If it's match or not match, then....   ok.

 

But if it's pick 36 for this guy?   Well...  then I'm not so sure....?    He's not clean.   He's got baggage.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I'm a little confused...

 

Is the tender on Irving, does that give the Cowboys our second round pick?   Pick 36?     

 

Ir or is it simply a matter of the right to match which they either will or they won't depending on the dollar figure?

 

If it's match or not match, then....   ok.

 

But if it's pick 36 for this guy?   Well...  then I'm not so sure....?    He's not clean.   He's got baggage.

 

 

It's the right to match and if they don't match they get our pick. What I don't get is whether we can choose which of the second rounders we should give them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

I'm a little confused...

 

Is the tender on Irving, does that give the Cowboys our second round pick?   Pick 36?     

 

Ir or is it simply a matter of the right to match which they either will or they won't depending on the dollar figure?

 

If it's match or not match, then....   ok.

 

But if it's pick 36 for this guy?   Well...  then I'm not so sure....?    He's not clean.   He's got baggage.

 

 

If they don't match they get our original 2nd. pick. Pick 36.  Don't worry we won't do it unless they think he is worth it and the money.  I trust Ballard and Eberflus here. I think he could be a future star.  Many experts thought he should have received a 1st. rd. tender and Dallas gambled with a 2nd.  Now they're sweating!  Remember Lawrence didn't get going right away and now look at him with a franchise tag.  And we still have pick 37 etc.  I would be surprised if we are not looking into this especially with the quick departure of Hankins right after the trade.  Ballard has a plan right?  We can only guess what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

If they don't match they get our original 2nd. pick. Pick 36.  Don't worry we won't do it unless they think he is worth it and the money.  I trust Ballard and Eberflus here. I think he could be a future star.  Many experts thought he should have received a 1st. rd. tender and Dallas gambled with a 2nd.  Now they're sweating!  Remember Lawrence didn't get going right away and now look at him with a franchise tag.  And we still have pick 37 etc.  I would be surprised if we are not looking into this especially with the quick departure of Hankins right after the trade.  Ballard has a plan right?  We can only guess what it is. 

Are we sure that they get our original pick or can we choose which one? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

Unfortunately I read they get our original.  It would be nice if the article was wrong but the author seemed to know what he was talking about.  

Yeah... I don't think I'd do that. I think I would rather have Hurst or Bryan at the top of the second than Irving. This is having in mind salary considerations and the stage of development of the roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he stays healthy and out of trouble, he's worth the #36.  Boom potential.  The guy could have had 12-14 sacks last year.  If Buffalo or Miami call, I'm trading down again, so I would have no problem spending a #2.  It's worth the risk, and you certainly have the cap space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I have said before Irving has so much upside it's too much to ignore. As we know there have been plenty busts in the draft and in every round.  He has shown he can play . If it were me I would give him a very good contract to assure his signing but protections built in in case he messes up again with a suspension.  Players mature at different times and seeing a lucrative contract out there that could be entirely jeopardized by one stupid mistake is one huge motivator.  It would be for me anyway.  Eberflus should know him and his potential very well.  I have to trust Ballard and Eberflus here.  If satisfied they know how to put a contract together and his agent should be expecting some protections.  I think there is a deadline to tender an offer.  Something like April 20th. I believe.  If they feel good about where he is I would do it.  It's going to be very interesting to see how this plays out either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Indy Fan said:

He does have character concerns like a domestic violence charge and theft/destruction of property when playing at Iowa. Hopefully a talent like Jaire Alexander, Vander Esche, or Billy Price is selected with the pick instead.

yup he does and I am not discounting that, but I am taking a Marcus Peters approach.....he was on KC when ballard was there he was on Dallas when (insert correct spelling of our DC here)  was there, the FO and coaching staff should know if he is a thumbs up or down.......they don't share their take with me, so as a fan I just say "hey what about fill in the blank" lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, VaAllDay757 said:

We don't need to give up a pick to get him just give an offer sheet and see if the cowboys can match it

a second round tender on a RFA means well....you have to give up a second rounder if the boys don't match your offer.....its been a loooooooong time since we had good players so its easy to forgive the oversite lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would have to be the Colts 2nd round pick.

 

However, it has been done in the past where a team trades the player for less than the tender. 

 

So theoretically, we could engage in trade discussions and offer them say our 2nd round pick in the 40's.

 

The Patriots did that with Wes Welker, they were going to offer poison pill deal, but instead called and offered a trade.

 

http://archive.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/10/17/patriots_pounced_fast_to_grab_welker/

 

 

Happened a few other times. Just saying there are other options for us to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Struggled to get to the QB?

 

7 sacks last year.      Struggled?

 

 

You knew that stat OR did you do do a quick web search? 

I'm guessing the latter. In fact in your first response in this thread you never heard of Irving. Now your insulting James for saying he struggled to get to the qb..... Lol

 

You really enjoy the internet and going to Stat sites, don't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

You knew that stat OR did you do do a quick web search? 

I'm guessing the latter. In fact in your first response in this thread you never heard of Irving. Now your insulting James for saying he struggled to get to the qb..... Lol

 

You really enjoy the internet and going to Stat sites.

He is  a player that would be unknown to most to be fair but I subsequently posted some follow up info based on the general lack of knowledge to bring everyone up to speed.......he had an injury at the end of the year, and a PED suspension at the start of the year so he only played 8 games, but had 7 sacks in the 8 games.....as bonus fun if you watch the video I posted made former Colts RT look like he shouldn't be in the NFL (sound familiar lol) again this is me looking for a way to connect the dots in FA............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, w87r said:

It would have to be the Colts 2nd round pick.

 

However, it has been done in the past where a team trades the player for less than the tender. 

 

So theoretically, we could engage in trade discussions and offer them say our 2nd round pick in the 40's.

 

The Patriots did that with Wes Welker, they were going to offer poison pill deal, but instead called and offered a trade.

 

http://archive.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/10/17/patriots_pounced_fast_to_grab_welker/

 

 

Happened a few other times. Just saying there are other options for us to take

1 hour ago, w87r said:

It would have to be the Colts 2nd round pick.

 

However, it has been done in the past where a team trades the player for less than the tender. 

 

So theoretically, we could engage in trade discussions and offer them say our 2nd round pick in the 40's.

 

The Patriots did that with Wes Welker, they were going to offer poison pill deal, but instead called and offered a trade.

 

http://archive.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/10/17/patriots_pounced_fast_to_grab_welker/

 

 

Happened a few other times. Just saying there are other options for us to take.

I suppose anything is possible but the most common scenario is for a player to sign an offer sheet and the team makes it decision.  It sounds like the only reason for the trade was to avoid bad blood and not have to use the poison pill.  That was a decade ago.  I think the league has changed a lot since then.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

 

Yeah, I agree completely(how rfa tenders more often than not work). I'm just saying there is other potential options. There has been other instances since then, that was what just popped in my head immediately.

 

The Pats, in that scenario actually gave up more compensation than the tender. They gave up an extra 7th round pick, I think they did that was because they thought the Dolphins might match.

 

Bad blood? I'm not sure that's something the Pats care about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My sleepers: (meaning, the kind of players coaches would like to have, more than what consensus big board gives credit to them. Some of them might need couple of years to attain their high potential, if drafted into suitable coaching environment, so a lot depends on that. Some of them have injury concerns too).   Most of them are high IQ players or high-effort, high-motor players - two traits I look for from the Drafted players, list is long but I like these guys.. gonna be interesting to see where they land and how it works out for them in long run.    Payton Wilson, LB, NC State Caelen Carson, CB, Wake Forest Kiran Amegadjie, OT, Yale Maason Smith, IDL, LSU Christian Mahogany, OG, Boston College Max Melton, CB, Rutgers Zak Zinter, OG, Michigan Bucky Irving, RB, Oregon Khyree Jackson, CB Oregon Dylan McMahon, C, NC State (good fit for Browns)  Tykee Smith, SAF, Georgia Ainias Smith, WR, Texas A&M Cam Hart, CB, Notre Dame Michael Barrett, LB Michigan Malachi Corley, WR, Western Kentucky Beaux Limmer, IOL, Arkansas   Kamren Kinchens, S, Miami McKinnley Jackson, IDL, Texas A&M Kalen King, CB, Penn State Justin Eboigbe, IDL, Alabama    Jacob Cowing, WR, Arizona Beau Brade, SAF, Maryland Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville Jalyx Hunt, EDGE, Houston Christian (I'm hoping for day 3 Vikings pickup, as Flores could work wonders with him)  Jaheim Bell, TE, Florida State Brennan Jackson, EDGE, Washington State  Delmar Glaze, OT, Maryland Myles Cole, EDGE, Texas Tech Kristian Boyd, DT, Northern Iowa Javontae Jean-Baptiste, DL, Notre Dame Jordan Magee, LB, Temple Myles Harden, CB, South Dakota Jalen Green, EDGE, James Madison (UDFA Target prospect)  Trey Taylor, S, Air Force (UDFA prospect) Eyabi Okie-Anoma, EDGE, Charlotte Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto  Sundiata Anderson, EDGE, Grambling State  Daequan Hardy, CB, Penn State (Special Teams, Returner)  Emani Bailey, RB, TCU   As for Vikings, I don't wanna rush to draft QB if the team isn't confident in the guys they could move up in draft range, and I'd like to just draft impact players that build the roster at this point.   Build the team, draft a franchise QB at right time, don't rush and ruin years trying to make someone work out in the NFL. 
    • If you are relying upon history, does accuracy matter?  I think the reason Smith ended up at RT is because the coaches tried him there out of necessity and he played well, and stayed there due to the coaches wishes.  I don't think that FO guys had much to say about it, because Smith was in fact drafted to be a G, not the RT.  Ballard's own words after day 2 of that draft was that they drafted Smith a bit higher than they had him ranked, because he was the "last remaining starting caliber G on the board".   So it does fit that Smith was not drafted by Ballard or the FO to be a RT...in part because of the measurables and arm length.   Also directing this response to @Matthew Gilbert
    • Same. And that's because over time that level of depth eventually decays. 
    • I don't think players like Davis (and especially Bryan, who I don't think will make the final 53) should impact our draft strategy at all. Not even a little bit. If we like Byron Murphy, figure out what to do with those other guys later. The other versatile guys you mention don't scratch the itch the way Murphy would be expected to -- he should be looked at as a disruptive 3T who plays there every down, not a matchup guy or passing downs guy.    If anything, maybe it's the other way around. The Colts already had a feel for the DTs in draft class and knew they wouldn't get what they want in the draft, so they addressed the position in free agency. And after this weekend, that might help people better understand the strategy at DB and WR...    The bolded really gets at the heart of it. I like Murphy, but I'm not offering him as a great player that you just have to take a chance on. But when it comes to draft strategy, I think taking the best players is the way to go. I'm directly opposed to needs-based drafting, and to passing on a really good prospect because you have backup level veterans already on the roster. 
    • I suppose Murphy being the next Donald is possible, but I wouldn’t think it’s likely.     As for Smith playing right tackle, I believe I was simply echoing Ballard’s initial viewpoint.  That Smith’s short arms made him an unlikely RT.  And that he had to be talked into it by Morocco Brown and Ed Dodds.   I don’t think I was stating MY personal view.    As for skillset vs measurements.  I think it’s been an issue for all of us because Ballard has such specific requirements for each position.  So we factor that into our judgements. 
  • Members

    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,756

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 153

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boo2202

      boo2202 672

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • VikingsFanInChennai

      VikingsFanInChennai 2,990

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hark

      Hark 978

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 4,928

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ShuteAt168

      ShuteAt168 961

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 311

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,313

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C0LT5

      C0LT5 86

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...