Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ColtsBlitz

“Don’t pick a WR round 1, no matter what.”

Recommended Posts

Dorsett is on here, actually middle-of-the-pack. But this chart shows why taking a WR round 1 should never happen. It’s almost like running backs where they can be good, but plenty can be found later in the draft. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a little iffy.  Last year was all over the place, but of the league's leaders in receiving in 2016, 3 of the top 4 were first round picks (Mike Evans, Julio Jones, Odell Beckham).  In 2015, the top 8 WRs in receiving yards were Antonio Brown, Julio Jones, DeAndre Hopkins, Jarvis Landry, Larry Fitzgerald, Brandon Marshall, Demaryius Thomas, and Odell Beckham.  That's 5 first round picks and a 2nd round pick.  RBs don't replicate these trends, as far as I've seen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recency bias, among other issues. Go back another three years and this looks significantly different. It's also premature to judge a lot of these players, especially from the 2017 class. There are other factors that affect WR performance as well.

 

But if the argument is that drafting a receiver in the first round isn't producing like it used to, that's obvious. But I don't think that argument equals 'don't draft a receiver in the first round.' 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The WR class is deep every year. It’s all about scheme and player development. I wouldn’t say never draft a WR in the first though. There’s Julio, Odell, and Green. But if they don’t have that type of potential then pass. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

This is a little iffy.  Last year was all over the place, but of the league's leaders in receiving in 2016, 3 of the top 4 were first round picks (Mike Evans, Julio Jones, Odell Beckham).  In 2015, the top 8 WRs in receiving yards were Antonio Brown, Julio Jones, DeAndre Hopkins, Jarvis Landry, Larry Fitzgerald, Brandon Marshall, Demaryius Thomas, and Odell Beckham.  That's 5 first round picks and a 2nd round pick.  RBs don't replicate these trends, as far as I've seen.

This is all true. I just figured I would throw this info out there. Really every draft is different and could bring about different talents at different positions. I just thought this trend was interesting and posted it to show we could get talent in the later rounds at WR. This year round 3 seems like a good spot for us to take one should the right player fall. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, everyone drafted is a gamble. 

But remember we drafted Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne in the first rounds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you trust your scouting this shouldn't stop you from drafting a WR in the first if you think he's a game changer. This is a very small sample and as others have said the last year's draft is still too fresh for any conclusions about it. WR is actually still among the most valued positions in the league thus their positional value shouldn't be stopping you from drafting one in the first either. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is an ugly list but about half dozen guys have had their careers hurt/ruined by injuries. 2007-2014 had about as many busts as the last 3 years look to have. Still not 100% convinced it's a trend but I do believe it makes more sense to invest in WRs via FA than the draft with high picks, unless you really, really like the guy. It usually takes an year or two until they really hit their stride and FA busts when it comes to WRs is more rare than it is with other positions.

 

WR market exploding (if Adams contract is the new norm for about 1000 yard receivers) might change my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any sentence that claims something is always or never is typically going to be wrong.  This one is no different. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chubb doesnt have freakish athletic prowess but has great, refined techniques.  It's got to be him or Barkley IMO.   Not likely we go any other direction unless we are offered something stupid good in return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Other than QB, I'm not big on taking skill position players in the first round.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By the way....   for those worried about this signing....     why?   We’ve got next to nothing invested in him.   Likely NFL minimum with little to no up front money.   If he acts up we cut him straight away and it costs us nothing.       Nothing.   What’s the downside?   If he makes the team he’d replace Walker as the PS quarterback.   He’s not a likely candidate for the 53 on 2019.   Maybe in 2020.   Ballard has said he thinks he can save troubled players.   I think this is his first attempt with the Colts.   I support his effort.   It he succeeds the Colts might someday come out of this with a backup QB.   I’m happy to take that. 
    • This is awesome, lol....wonder if McDonald’s will have a new sponsor!?!     https://mobile.twitter.com/NBCSCubs/status/1130968691070443521?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1130968691070443521&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cubshq.com%2Fupdate%2FWATCH-Rizzo-If-eating-McDonalds-is-embarrassing-you-might-not-be-American-26480
    • I don’t think I would. I really like Twitter for what it was meant to be...instant information. I think if you use it as such...you can avoid the downside. 
    • NB;   I came into the series thinking Toronto is the better team but the results haven't show that until Tuesday. Brooke Lopez and Niko Mirotic ..George Hill? We love Hill in Indy but he's never done what he's doing for the Bucks.   Marc Gasol is a great player..I dont know why he was so shy and hesitant in the first two games. Player for player..Toronto should be winning
    • And here is the actual NFL draft profile that was alluded to,  but NOT linked.    I'm linking it.   And, Kelly had a solid draftable grade and was called a possible low-level starter.    So, clearly he might also be considered a decent back-up, which is all anyone is talking about here.   Kelly's profile.   Not a first rounder,  but not a camp body either.   Possible Brissett replacement in 2020 if he leaves.   http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profiles/chad-kelly?id=2557869
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...