Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum
Enter To Win 2 Tickets to Titans @ Colts Sun 12/22 | 1:00 PM EDT

What If Nothing Happens On March 8?

oldunclemark

By oldunclemark
in Colts Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
Posted

What if March 8 come and goes with nothing from Manning and nothing but

esoteric tweets from Irsay....

...would the next deal be the start of the 2012 NFL year...(March 13?)

or the draft (April 26?)

It has been pointed out to me that the March 8 date is an arbitrary agreement between two parties and

what if they both simply ignore it??

oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The sky would fall, the sun would go supernova and someone would be able to divide by zero.......

In other words, just another day.

..and we would go on debating the future in a vacuum..

Please no. :stats:

Peyton and Eli fan Walk On

Peyton and Eli fan

Posted
Posted

My understanding is if the Colts don't pay the $28 million on March 8th, Manning is a free agent and can sign with other teams. So, something has to happen. It's arbitrary in that they could both agree to push it back, but if they did that, then that would be something happening on March 8th.

FireJimCaldwell Walk On

FireJimCaldwell

Posted
Posted

What if March 8 come and goes with nothing from Manning and nothing but

esoteric tweets from Irsay....

...would the next deal be the start of the 2012 NFL year...(March 13?)

or the draft (April 26?)

It has been pointed out to me that the March 8 date is an arbitrary agreement between two parties and

what if they both simply ignore it??

Then Manning is a free agent and we get hit with a 28 million dollar "non-exercise fee" So they simply won't/can't ignore it!

"Non-exercise fee

Were the Colts to not exercise the $28 million option by March 8th, there is a non-exercise fee of that same $28 million due two days before the 2012 League Year, March 11th.

Translation: the Colts cannot simply let the option date pass without action; to do so would put them on the hook for the same amount and not have Manning. They will have to take the affirmative step of, yes, releasing Peyton Manning."

It might help if you reviewed these:

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Peyton-Predicament-Part-1.html

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Peyton-Predicament-Part-2.html

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Peyton-Predicament-Part-3.html

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Peyton-Predicament-Part-4.html

oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

My understanding is if the Colts don't pay the $28 million on March 8th, Manning is a free agent and can sign with other teams. So, something has to happen. It's arbitrary in that they could both agree to push it back, but if they did that, then that would be something happening on March 8th.

I guess what I'm asking is that since its a contract between two parties..

...what if March 9 comes with no announcement of any kind other that Irsay tweeting about the price of gas?

what if there's dead silence..?

oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I guess what I'm asking is that since its a contract between two parties..

...what if March 9 comes with no announcement of any kind other that Irsay tweeting about the price of gas?

what if there's dead silence..?

How would we know what happened?

Phil J Walk On

Phil J

Posted
Posted

yeah a decision is being made on the 8th either way. either he is cut, he is retained and given the bonus, he is retained but renegotiates the bonus, or they agree to delay the date.

4 possible options, but something is happening on that day (or before), no question.

jemack Active Roster

jemack

Posted
Posted

Are you asking what if something happens, but they don't tell us? We're going to know one way or another through the transaction page in the sports section. Unfortunately for me, the sports editor for my paper is Rob Lowe

UndecidedFrog Walk On

UndecidedFrog

Posted
Posted

What if March 8 come and goes with nothing from Manning and nothing but

esoteric tweets from Irsay....

...would the next deal be the start of the 2012 NFL year...(March 13?)

or the draft (April 26?)

It has been pointed out to me that the March 8 date is an arbitrary agreement between two parties and

what if they both simply ignore it??

The Colts cannot ignore it, as FJC has shown, the non-exercise of the option carries a fee of $28MM that the Colts would be obligated to pay, and receive nada.

The Colts must actively release Manning on or before March 8 to escape the liability of paying $28MM to PM.

Ignoring it would be worse than financial mismanagement. It would be beyond stupid.

Phil J Walk On

Phil J

Posted
Posted

...what if March 9 comes with no announcement of any kind other that Irsay tweeting about the price of gas?

everyone is telling you this is not going to happen.

2 more weeks and then you can sleep at night. with your new #12 jersey.

jemack Active Roster

jemack

Posted
Posted

2 more weeks and then you can sleep at night. with your new #12 jersey.

Bill Troup wore #12.... Not good with colts kharma. Harhaugh stunk wearing #12 until he switched to #4.

Just my 1/2 cent.

Phil J Walk On

Phil J

Posted
Posted

Bill Troup wore #12.... Not good with colts kharma. Harhaugh stunk wearing #12 until he switched to #4.

Just my 1/2 cent.

what number you think luck will get?

ruksak Walk On

ruksak

Posted
Posted

Then Manning is a free agent and we get hit with a 28 million dollar "non-exercise fee" So they simply won't/can't ignore it!

"Non-exercise fee

Were the Colts to not exercise the $28 million option by March 8th, there is a non-exercise fee of that same $28 million due two days before the 2012 League Year, March 11th.

Translation: the Colts cannot simply let the option date pass without action; to do so would put them on the hook for the same amount and not have Manning. They will have to take the affirmative step of, yes, releasing Peyton Manning."

It might help if you reviewed these:

http://www.nationalf...ent-Part-1.html

http://www.nationalf...ent-Part-2.html

http://www.nationalf...ent-Part-3.html

http://www.nationalf...ent-Part-4.html

You are a boss, FJC!

atapcl Active Roster

atapcl

Posted
Posted

Something has to happen. The Colts have to pay the bonus or not. The only other option is that both parties have to agree to move the time for bonus payment to after a time when the Colts can evaluate Peyton's health.

UndecidedFrog Walk On

UndecidedFrog

Posted
Posted

Something has to happen. The Colts have to pay the bonus or not. The only other option is that both parties have to agree to move the time for bonus payment to after a time when the Colts can evaluate Peyton's health.

According to the current contract, if the Colts do not actively release PM before March 8, or pay PM the option bonus of $28MM on March 8, the Colts would be subject to a non-exercise penalty payment due to PM on March 11 of $28MM, and in return, the Colts get nothing, while PM moves on as a FA, and $28MM richer.

atapcl Active Roster

atapcl

Posted
Posted

Jim Irsay has to be decisive. He must determine if we reload and start Peyton now or if he must rebuild and move on without Peyton. Andrew Luck and or RGIII are capable enough prospects that they should compete for a starting job now. All starters whether it be Peyton or anybody should prove every year that he is better than his competition. I have felt in the past that Peyton always did what was best for the team. Until Peyton clarifies the truth about his health issues it will seem he has moved to selfishness. A lot of people dislike Irsay but he has a right to know that Peyton is healthy before he pays him the bonus.

jemack Active Roster

jemack

Posted
Posted

I still don't understand how somebody named Luck doesn't take #7. It just begs to be done. Either that, or #13 for irony.

If he wears #7 he'll either never win a playoff game or he'll just flat out stink. I think #13 is a safe choice.
chad72 Ring of Honor

chad72

Posted
Posted

If he wears #7 he'll either never win a playoff game or he'll just flat out stink. I think #13 is a safe choice.

Why? Big Ben won 2 SBs with jersey #7. John Elway went to 5 SBs, and won his last 2 with jersey #7.

Bradshaw, Brady, Rodgers all have rings wearing #12.

#13 is Dan Marino's number and I hope Luck stays away from that :).

FireJimCaldwell Walk On

FireJimCaldwell

Posted
Posted

Why? Big Ben won 2 SBs with jersey #7. John Elway went to 5 SBs, and won his last 2 with jersey #7.

Bradshaw, Brady, Rodgers all have rings wearing #12.

#13 is Dan Marino's number and I hope Luck stays away from that :).

Why? Luck should be hopeful if he's anywhere near the quarterback Marino was.

I hope he wears anything but 12 just to spite those that have already purchased the jersey.

jemack Active Roster

jemack

Posted
Posted

Why? Big Ben won 2 SBs with jersey #7. John Elway went to 5 SBs, and won his last 2 with jersey #7.

Bradshaw, Brady, Rodgers all have rings wearing #12.

#13 is Dan Marino's number and I hope Luck stays away from that :).

Each team is bound by their own kharma. Bradshaw wore #12, but his success has nothing to do with a Colt Qb wearing that number and being successful. That would be limited to a Steelers Qb wearing that number.

#7 would be the likes of Jones, Hogaboom who've never won a playoff game and Painter...........

JCPatriot Walk On

JCPatriot

Posted
Posted

Does he wear #12 for a reason, or is that just what he ended up with at Stanford? I was watching some old Manning videos today and didn't realize before now that he wore #16 at Tennessee.

UndecidedFrog Walk On

UndecidedFrog

Posted
Posted

Does he wear #12 for a reason, or is that just what he ended up with at Stanford? I was watching some old Manning videos today and didn't realize before now that he wore #16 at Tennessee.

Luck wore #12 in HS. His dad Oliver wore #12 with the Houston Oilers.

oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Are you asking what if something happens, but they don't tell us? We're going to know one way or another through the transaction page in the sports section. Unfortunately for me, the sports editor for my paper is Rob Lowe

exactly right J-Mack..

That's what I'm saying..

oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That would actually be quite an event if that happened.

Could they simply not do anything until the new NFL calendar year begins..which I believe is March 13.

The March 8 date is an agreement between two men. It is what they say it is, right/?

Peyton and Eli fan Walk On

Peyton and Eli fan

Posted
Posted

Does he wear #12 for a reason, or is that just what he ended up with at Stanford? I was watching some old Manning videos today and didn't realize before now that he wore #16 at Tennessee.

I believe 18 was already taken at Tennessee. Peyton wore 16 in high school as well while Cooper had 18.

jemack Active Roster

jemack

Posted
Posted

Could they simply not do anything until the new NFL calendar year begins..which I believe is March 13.

The March 8 date is an agreement between two men. It is what they say it is, right/?

That would be cruel... And I would laugh my butt off.
GoColts8818 Ring of Honor

GoColts8818

Posted
Posted

What if March 8 come and goes with nothing from Manning and nothing but

esoteric tweets from Irsay....

...would the next deal be the start of the 2012 NFL year...(March 13?)

or the draft (April 26?)

It has been pointed out to me that the March 8 date is an arbitrary agreement between two parties and

what if they both simply ignore it??

That would mean we picked up the option and we are locked into the contract...

The Colts really can't just simply not do anything and this is a story they aren't going to be hide from people.

oldunclemark Walk On

oldunclemark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

That would mean we picked up the option and we are locked into the contract...

The Colts really can't just simply not do anything and this is a story they aren't going to be hide from people.

They an agree to extend the deadline and not tell us because they dont want the public to be doing the doomsday countdown we've been doing.......

..again..how will we know..?

//

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ProblChld32
      Kylen Granson has only scored 1 TD in 4 years.

      By ProblChld32 · Posted

      Njoku although better has a BAD case of the drops this season also.
    • compuls1v3
      How about flus for DC

      By compuls1v3 · Posted

      It feels like most of blitzes don't him home for this reason under Bradley.
    • ProblChld32
      Kylen Granson has only scored 1 TD in 4 years.

      By ProblChld32 · Posted

      Regardless if you think they have a “Guy” or not they should commit to employing one single player unless they’re in multiple TE sets. Every other franchise besides a few others have a clear player who is designated as the Starter. Our starter is supposedly MAC but you have Granson and Ogletree who I believe see more snaps than MAC. It’s hard to gain chemistry with someone when you’re rotating different guys in and out. Not everyone runs routes the same has the same physical makeup or has the same catch radius. It differs per player, a ball that you could throw up and or high ball to MAC you couldn’t do for Granson. You’re never going to have a “blue chip” player at every position. Look at a Cade Otten for Tampa, I don’t think he’s a world beater by ANY chance but he’s created so much chemistry with Baker that he flourishes and he’s very clearly TE1.
    • crazycolt1
      Fire Bradley Now

      By crazycolt1 · Posted

      This bend but don't break mindset of Bradley doesn't work when it is obviously breaking more than bending.   Changing the DC at this time probably wouldn't change much but this problem has to be addressed at seasons end.   
    • Defjamz26
      Kylen Granson has only scored 1 TD in 4 years.

      By Defjamz26 · Posted

      He’s one of those guys like Ben Banogu where you really wonder how and why he stayed on the roster for as long as he did. He’s too small to block too so if he’s not catching passes, then he’s not much use.   Again, Anthony Richardson was benched for a combination of poor play and some behind the scenes stuff. Players like Granson also need to be held accountable. 

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...