Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

How will Josh McDaniels help the progress of Brissett


zvich

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Tsarquise said:

Yeah, let's hope Brissetts development doesn't matter. 

 

I hope I never have to see him start for the Colts again. 

Would you rather Tolzien have started the entire season? At least Brissett made things interesting and made us competitive in most of the games this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Indyfan4life said:

Would you rather Tolzien have started the entire season? At least Brissett made things interesting and made us competitive in most of the games this season. 

They both suck. 

 

I would rather Luck have started the whole season. 

 

And to me, he made the games pretty unwatchable. Only watched a few games this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Indyfan4life said:

Would you rather Tolzien have started the entire season? At least Brissett made things interesting and made us competitive in most of the games this season. 

This season was hard to watch, but that would have been worse then the Painter/Kerry Collins stint.

 

Tolzien would have been brutal to watch for 16 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, zvich said:

This will be the third season Brissett is with MD during training camp. How will this help him?

 

There's a saying in horse racing. "You can't win the Kentucky Derby with a plow-horse".

Now I'm not knocking Brisset. He looks like he will be a decent backup qb and maybe progress to a lower rated starter.

Maybe JM can help him with that.

 

But he's not our guy to lead us to SB Championships. And that's what we as fans and the Colts organization should be trying to achieve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember, Brissett was a 3rd round pick of NE. Belicheck probably thought very highly of his skill set as a QB. 

 

Best case scenario, he'll develop nicely under McDaniels and the new QB coaches tutelage, and balls out in preseason (and maybe 1 late regular season game if the colts are good enough to rest starters). Then you can maybe trade him to a QB hungry team for like an early 2nd or even late first (if he super balls out a la Jimmy G). That might take a year or 2, and with Lucks health, I certainly want to keep brissett at least for one more year. Who knows, maybe Ballard finds a trade partner interested in JB and something happens down the line. We'll see.

 

Thinking WAY down the line here, but wouldn't it be something if the team Indy potentially traded Brissett to is...NE? If Tommy boy retires in a year or two and Jacoby shows enough to generate interest from others teams, I bet there'll be rumours cooking up of a possible return to Foxborough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, NorthernBlue said:

Remember, Brissett was a 3rd round pick of NE. Belicheck probably thought very highly of his skill set as a QB. 

 

Best case scenario, he'll develop nicely under McDaniels and the new QB coaches tutelage, and balls out in preseason (and maybe 1 late regular season game if the colts are good enough to rest starters). Then you can maybe trade him to a QB hungry team for like an early 2nd or even late first (if he super balls out a la Jimmy G). That might take a year or 2, and with Lucks health, I certainly want to keep brissett at least for one more year. Who knows, maybe Ballard finds a trade partner interested in JB and something happens down the line. We'll see.

 

Thinking WAY down the line here, but wouldn't it be something if the team Indy potentially traded Brissett to is...NE? If Tommy boy retires in a year or two and Jacoby shows enough to generate interest from others teams, I bet there'll be rumours cooking up of a possible return to Foxborough.

I like the way you’re thinking.  Excellent post.  

 

And that scenario would definitely cement Ballard as one heckuva GM who’s gotten the best of Belichick...  You’d have the Allen & Dorsett trades.  Followed by stealing his most prized assistant and then trading Brissett back to him...  The possibilities are tantalizing. :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, Tsarquise said:

They both suck. 

 

I would rather Luck have started the whole season. 

 

And to me, he made the games pretty unwatchable. Only watched a few games this season. 

Our coaching staff didn't know how to use Brissett that why he probably seem unwatchable. Hell our coaching staff didn't know how to use the majority of the players we had which made the colts hard to watch this past year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tsarquise said:

They both suck. 

 

I would rather Luck have started the whole season. 

 

And to me, he made the games pretty unwatchable. Only watched a few games this season. 

Well duh.

So I think anyone who follows the Colts would have liked to see Luck play last season but he didn't now did he?

Brissett was thrown into an unwinnable situation but you say he sucked. It don't matter that he had no camp or practice with the team before being ask to be the starter. But you seem to like to throw out the work suck no matter if it applies or not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, zvich said:

This will be the third season Brissett is with MD during training camp. How will this help him?

Brissett was behind Brady and Garoppolo.  Now just how much work do you think Brissett got to work with McDaniels as a 3rd string QB?  Most 3rd string QBs don't even work with the starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

Well duh.

So I think anyone who follows the Colts would have liked to see Luck play last season but he didn't now did he?

Brissett was thrown into an unwinnable situation but you say he sucked. It don't matter that he had no camp or practice with the team before being ask to be the starter. But you seem to like to throw out the work suck no matter if it applies or not.

 

The point is that Brissett's development is not important. 

 

And, yes, Brissett is not a very good starting QB; decent backup, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tsarquise said:

The point is that Brissett's development is not important. 

 

And, yes, Brissett is not a very good starting QB; decent backup, though. 

Brissett's development is not important?  :facepalm:    Had he been more developed he would have been more prepared to play better. Basic football 101.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Brissett was one if deciding factors into Josh Mcdaniels coming to Indy. If Luck is healthy he has a potential top 5 QB and if something goes wrong then he has Brissett waiting in the wings, who he already knows and has worked with before. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Lucky1 said:

I think Brissett was one if deciding factors into Josh Mcdaniels coming to Indy. If Luck is healthy he has a potential top 5 QB and if something goes wrong then he has Brissett waiting in the wings, who he already knows and has worked with before. 

I disagree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should say how will he help Luck. If we're counting on Brissett then that means Luck is done. I really have no clue what they do if Luck doesn't come back. Draft a qb if there's one worth developing? Develops Brissett? Rely more on a running game, defense and controls g the ball? No Luck changes the whole team as we watched last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lucky1 said:

So you don't think he took Lucks health into consideration when he took this job? Then i guess ill just have to disagree with your line of thinking. 

For one thing Ballard said up front he would not hire a head coach who wants to come to the Colts because of Luck. I believe him. No matter if Luck will be ready to go are not the Colts have the #3 pick to get a QB if needed. I think by draft day the Colts will have a good idea if Luck will be ready to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

For one thing Ballard said up front he would not hire a head coach who wants to come to the Colts because of Luck. I believe him. No matter if Luck will be ready to go are not the Colts have the #3 pick to get a QB if needed. I think by draft day the Colts will have a good idea if Luck will be ready to go.

 

I can appreciate Ballards statement  but IMO McDaniels took the job because he is confident Andrew Luck will be back at 100%  & that he can bring out the real Andrew Luck his early seasons were better than Peyton Mannings the foundation is there .

 

McDaniels has had a front row seat to NFL History & is being given a second chance at being a HC  & he IMO sees the Colts as his Golden Ticket with 2 capable QB's on the roster no other QB's needed .

 

Worst case scenario he is reunited with his former pupil 1 year removed from a full season as a starter able to work him & educate him for the off season .

 

I hope our first round pick is a pass rusher not a QB .

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NewEra said:

Should say how will he help Luck. If we're counting on Brissett then that means Luck is done. I really have no clue what they do if Luck doesn't come back. Draft a qb if there's one worth developing? Develops Brissett? Rely more on a running game, defense and controls g the ball? No Luck changes the whole team as we watched last year.

This year's draft has been one that has been looked forward to for the QB class, so yes there are quarterbacks worth drafting.  Hopefully it doesn't come down to that, but if it does then it needs to be known by the draft and the Colts are in a great position with this year's draft.  

 

As far as Brissett, it could be one of two things.  One would be to help Luck with McDaniels system, the other would be to help a young developing QB with the same.  Possibly both.  If Luck isn't starting, then it will most likely be Brissett, but I don't see him as a long term option either way.  Although I feel McDaniels would get much more out of him than the staff last year and he would have a full preseason to prepare with the team.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, chrisfarley said:

last week Dakich said he's hearing luck is done.  of course, Dakich says a lot of things.  I just wish we would hear some definitive things to the positive, SOON!

I just cant make myself believe anything that comes out of Dakich's mouth. He gives me a headache.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

I just cant make myself believe anything that comes out of Dakich's mouth. He gives me a headache.

Dakich also tries to say that Luck's surgery is the same as his and his wife's and they were able to throw a football 5 months later.  Dakich is a * and is all about stroking his ego.  He knows little to nothing about anything other than basketball.  And I still hold anything he says with that, with a small grain of sand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DaColts85 said:

Dakich also tries to say that Luck's surgery is the same as his and his wife's and they were able to throw a football 5 months later.  Dakich is a * and is all about stroking his ego.  He knows little to nothing about anything other than basketball.  And I still hold anything he says with that, with a small grain of sand.

The only reason he even has a show is he played for Bobby Knight and was an assistant coach at IU. It's sure not that he has any broadcasting background.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chrisfarley said:

last week Dakich said he's hearing luck is done.  of course, Dakich says a lot of things.  I just wish we would hear some definitive things to the positive, SOON!

 

He looked pretty ripped in his most recent presser.  Looked like a linebacker paired with him practicing with those throwing coaches out West hopefully we do hear good news soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Idk?   I think Ballard has a lot more control on how this is disseminated than you are giving him. I'm sure he has final approval, this isn't like the in season NFL hard knock thing.(Which we still controlled what was put out there) This is a team made draft video to get fans hyped.     It did the job for me     I do agree that, that was just a random comment about a guy(being there at #15) they were actually generally talking about in natural conversations and the sound bite was used there. I don't think it was just a comment made to place at the end intentionally. Whether that guy might be there, or is someone who should no doubt be there is the question, and what should we take from it ending that way    And it might not of even been his idea to put that at the end, but when presented how to end it, agreed this is the best way to get the fans talking about it.     Either way it was a great cliff hanger. Like I said it brought about some conversation, so I think it did it's part.
    • I watched the semi final game between Washington and Texas last night and Odunze and Polk just destroyed Texas. Penix had around 400 yards. 
    • I’ll have to search for Hicks’ break-down.  I hadn’t seen much tape of Bowers until a couple of weeks ago when I watched a highlight reel, and that was very impressive.  I’m just nervous about how hard it seems to be to predict TE success…
    • I was thinking a bit about what Ballard said in that clip from "Behind the Colts", about "he's not going to get much bigger". No idea if he was talking about Worthy... but if he is... he's right. Whether Worthy ends up playing at 165 or 176... this is still extremely small and light. Whether he's in the 1st percentile or 5th percentile of athlete's in weight in the league, this doesn't change the type of player and type of worries you would have about him with any significance. So... in a way, I kind of find that conversation a bit pointless. IMO the question should be - okay. he is small... and he will always be small. Can we work with that? And can we live with the risk of injury for that small of a player? And the answer can be no here... I'm not saying we necessarily need to take that risk. 
    • You think the Ed Dodds you see in edited clips here is the same as the Ed Dodds who interviews with teams?   I don’t know you or anyone would think that?      He’s very much respected around the NFL which is why multiple teams ask to interview with them most every year. 
  • Members

    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ponyboy

      ponyboy 127

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 734

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,302

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,817

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 331

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,792

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...