Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Super Bowl LII (52) Game Thread

Recommended Posts

I’d just like to point out that “greatest” threw some really bad passes. 3 on the last drive. That likely cost them. Also he fumbled the football the drive before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Happy2BeHere said:

Ok so when is McDaniels officially hired as the coach here now ?

Wouldn't be surprised if it was tomorrow but that would be rough on McDaniels to lose the Superbowl and have to get on a flight right away so they may have to wait until Tuesday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, dgambill said:

Nick Foles MVP. Good for him. He can never play another down and he is a legend. NFC East 3-0 vs Tom.

Nevermind, I misread that lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ReMeDy said:

 

I was waiting for the penalty flag at the end there.

 

"Pass interference. Defense. Hitting Gronk while attempting a catch. Ball is spotted at the spot of the foul."

i was too!  Granted on Jump balls like that they normally don't.  But I will say this, Brady still has a heck of an arm to lob it 50+ like that accurately 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

He needs to let it go......Past should have lost to Jacksonville.

 

Got to give the Eagles credit..

They won with their offense the last 2 weeks.

 

..and Nick Foles was very, very good

Nick Foles and the Eagles did what Seattle and Atlanta couldn't ... close this team out!

 

SO HAPPY!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brad Stevens is the best coach in Boston right now. Yeah I had to go there. Brad forever, forever Brad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You knew the Eagles were destined for this SB win when both the Coleman TD and Ertz TDs did not go in favor of the Patriots, they at least get some of those 50-50 calls. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tsarquise said:

How can a Superbowl MVP not play another down. He kind of proved he can play at high level. 

Yep. He was going to retire. I think Philly re-signs him and keeps him as a backup. Did Hostetler get to play much after he won? I can’t remember.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Valpo2004 said:

Wouldn't be surprised if it was tomorrow but that would be rough on McDaniels to lose the Superbowl and have to get on a flight right away so they may have to wait until Tuesday.

Happened to Pagano.  Wasn't the Super Bowl, but they lost to the Pats and the next day, he was hired as head coach here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Jules said:

 

 

I swear the MVP thing is real with a curse.

 

Enjoy it guys, just glad it's over now.

 

 

I was just telling my wife this. Getting MVP Is never a good thing if you’re in the playoffs 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Happy2BeHere said:

Ok so when is McDaniels officially hired as the coach here now ?

within the next 48 hours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, chad72 said:

You knew the Eagles were destined for this SB win when both the Coleman TD and Ertz TDs did not go in favor of the Patriots, they at least get some of those 50-50 calls. 

 

Agreed but both were right call....yet all season those were reversed...hard to believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TheMarine said:

27545605_10213879355873981_7217846361229

hahahaha.  Should have been the image of Rocky knocking out Draco!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, csmopar said:

i was too!  Granted on Jump balls like that they normally don't.  But I will say this, Brady still has a heck of an arm to lob it 50+ like that accurately 

Watching the replay, it is now funny how Gronk shoved an eagle player to get to end zone. He is one strong dude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jjcolts said:

Watching the replay, it is now funny how Gronk shoved an eagle player to get to end zone. He is one strong dude

yeah and then he tries to flop to draw penalties, which works more than not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, dgambill said:

Nick Foles MVP. Good for him. He can never play another down and he is a legend. NFC East 3-0 vs Tom.

 

Tom beat the Eagles once. NFC East is 3-1 vs Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

haha love how Collinsworth throws in the 2 plays that went the Eagles way at the end to throw shade on it. As if the Pats have not had a million and two plays go their way in the last 20 years, this guy needs to be taken off the air

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SteelCityColt said:

Your SB winners ladies and gents, well played to Nick Foles.

Nick Foles easily the Super Bowl MVP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh, I'm unreasonably happy. If only the Falcons hadn't collapsed or the Seahawks had ran the ball.. all of this GOAT talk wouldn't be.. 

Oh well 

THE PATRIOTS LOSE (or the eagles win..)

YAY!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, adubb84 said:

I was just telling my wife this. Getting MVP Is never a good thing if you’re in the playoffs 

 

Wait a minute, speaking of curse.
142246b.jpg

Well, technically he didn't get injured, so only partially a curse... or did he if you count the thumb? Hmm...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, bluebombers87 said:

I’d just like to point out that “greatest” threw some really bad passes. 3 on the last drive. That likely cost them. Also he fumbled the football the drive before.

If we judge him by the 'Peyton Manning standard' we must conclude that his good numbers don't matter because he turned the ball over to lose the game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Gramz said:

AND......  TIME WINS....!!!!:td:

All this time everyone was worried about Tom vs Time but they should have worried about Tom vs Foles. That kid deserves a cold beer...played a perfect game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Brazilian Ninja said:

Nick Foles....just a great job by you......wow...from starter to backup....from backup to hero

Its really something..because there's no chance he will QB the Eagles next season.

I'd retire if I was him. There's nothing more for him to do

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, bluebombers87 said:

I’d just like to point out that “greatest” threw some really bad passes. 3 on the last drive. That likely cost them. Also he fumbled the football the drive before.

He threw for over 400 yards and 2 TDs  and the O scored 33on the best D in the NFL. This game was lost because the Pats D couldn't stop the Eagles at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dgambill said:

All this time everyone was worried about Tom vs Time but they should have worried about Tom vs Foles. That kid deserves a cold beer...played a perfect game.

It was 'Tom vs Accuracy'  and 'Tom vs. Ball Security"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dgambill said:

All this time everyone was worried about Tom vs Time but they should have worried about Tom vs Foles. That kid deserves a cold beer...played a perfect game.

So true.  And he was so composed....     I'm am happy for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IMO this is the wrong way to look at it. IMO the reason they drop 7-8 is not because they don't fear the run game - it's because they fear the pass game much more than they fear the run game. This is especially true when you have a combination of 1. Exceptional QB with great receivers and 2. bad running game. In general the level of fear that teams should show is:   1. Fear of great passing attack 2. Fear of bad passing attack 3. Fear of great running attack 4. Fear of bad running attack.    And the distance between 1 and 4 should be light years! And when you get on your team both great passing attack and horrible running attack this forces opponents to send more help to cover.    It is not a coincidence that teams with great running backs like KC(before Hunt got banished) and the Saints(Kamara) and the Rams(Gurley) faced the least amount of stacked boxes ... this goes directly against what you would assume teams would do in a situation where they face elite running backs. The reason is - they just feared those teams passing games MUCH MORE! The passing game dictates how many people you send to cover much more than the running game.    And at the same time teams like Dallas, TEN, JAX had most stacked boxes - it's because the opponents didn't fear their passing game. I'm using just anecdotes here but the data overall supports that. The passing game strength overall dictates coverage vs run support much more than the quality of the run game. The weaker your pass game is the more stacked boxes you will see almost regardless of how good your RB/running game is.    I said 'almost' above because I can see a situation where you need to have some base level of a threat from the run. You need to at least be a threat to run it.   The short answer is ... weak passing game. Notice that this is all relative. No team will 100% leave 8 in the box and not team will 100% leave 8 in coverage. We are talking about percentages. The weaker the passing game, the more attention your run game will get from the defense pre-snap. This is alignment based... now once the snap is made the defenders have to read run and pass keys in order to know whether they should choose optimal strategy for run defense or pass-defense. In general the reason play-action(and RPO) works is because of the THREAT of the run, not the success of the run(it doesn't matter if you run it for 4.2yards a run(where we were last year) or 4.7yard a run(where Reich wants us to be). So ... my point is not that you have to completely ignore the run. You don't ignore it. You still have to keep the threat that you will run it(by running it often enough) in order to make the defenders still read the keys and give you the extra second or so that running the play action gives you while the defenders are reading the run key you are giving(faking to) them. You just don't generally care much if you run for 4.7 or 4.2 when it comes to your passing game or your play-action game. Teams react the same way to 4.7y teams as they do to 4.2y teams when it comes to play action as long as you keep the threat that you will run high enough to make defenders still read their run keys. (now this is another thing I have not seen yet, but expect at some point in the future- some defensive coordinator will say - just screw it - play the pass 100% and don't read the run keys... play the run on your way to the passer and I don't know what will happen then)      Well, that quote is a bit of an exaggeration to bring the point across. You won't really wait for the old timers to die out. Just... the more young blood comes in(Shanahan, McVey, etc.) and tries the new stuff and succeeds with it against the old strategies the more the old timers that are unable to adjust will lose their jobs to the new kids and so on. This pretty much already happened in the NBA. It's a new league now compared to just 5-10 years ago. It didn't happen because the old timers died out, it happened because the new strategies proved better and more efficient and even some of the old timers borrowed from them and incorporated them into their game plans. IMO similar things are happening and will continue to happen in the NFL. It probably will take longer because in general the NFL seems more conservative of a league but IMO it will happen sooner or later.    In 20-30 years I think we will be laughing at things like "establish the run" or "first we need to stop the run", just like we would be laughing at statements like "what this team really needs is more post ups for their center" or "this guy should have just taken one dribble into the 2p range and taken the shorter 20 feet jumper instead of the 24 feet open 3" in the NBA-context right now. 
    • Thats a bummer.  She is talented and her and Matt Taylor worked well together. 
    • "But really what is going to set the tone for us is going to be how we run the football. That is not going to change. We have to run the football. Our goal is going to be a top-five rushing football team. That will set up our play-action pass. That will set up all the big chunk plays. To me that will get us where we want to go.” https://www.colts.com/news/top-takeaways-frank-reich-on-otas-day-1     Just as Reich has stated above I do believe a good ground game opens up more favorable passing opportunities because teams have to committ more personnel than they would like to run defense. That in itself sets up more opportunities for you to get one on one coverage down the field.  I think you get less of those opportunities if you can't run.   If I want more one on one coverage down field I'd like to know how I'm supposed to do that if I don't need to run? I guess maybe you'd say screens or something?  I'm sure he's saying this based off what he's experienced during games and what he's seen on film.
    • One of my issues and I belive Princeton Tiger brought it up also was when your running game is not very effective.  For example in Peytons last years in Indy our run game was abysmal and teams literally ignored all of our play action fakes. Or you can even look at some of our seasons under Pagano.  They dropped 8 and rushed three a large majority of the time because they had little fear that we could do anything on the ground.  Do you think that happens to us with a successful rushing attack? I personally don't believe so.   I think when you are able to run it forces the defense to leave less defenders in coverage.   I don't want to turn this into a long drawn out debate but I believe your contention was it isnt the amount of times you run but more of the effect of the play action itself.  So when the defense is ignoring the play action then what is it that would cause them to honor it again? I believe you would have get some kind of success from your running game which enhances those play action fakes.  It's not just the play action fakes themselves.  I don't really think you need any type of data during a game to tell you that if the defense is committing 8 men or more in the box you've got a better chance of completing passes on the defense.  What causes the defense to committ 8 to 9 men in the box?  A successful running game gets them to do that more often than not.  I think it creates more opportunities for you to face lighter numbers of defenders when you want to pass the ball.   I got to be honest here and say I can't go toe to toe with you on all that stat crunching, but there's just a few things I will just never buy about that data.   And if you're waiting for bodies(us old school thinkers) to die it's going to be a long, long, long time before that happens in the game of football.........
    • He could "beast", and still be a bad addition to the locker room in the long run. 
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 5,226

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CamMo

      CamMo 769

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 365

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewEra

      NewEra 3,602

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • erock

      erock 25

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Buck Showalter

      Buck Showalter 3,770

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Legend

      Legend 3,586

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 5,163

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Franklin County

      Franklin County 451

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...