Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

oldunclemark

Jacksonville (+7.5) at New England (1-21-18)

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, dgambill said:

Makes my wife happy lol...that’s about all that matters to NFL is the casual viewer not the hardcore sport fans.

I miss Katy Perry and the shark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, dgambill said:

I agree but when the receiver falls like that into you and your turning and not leading with the head...that to me is not the spirit of the rule. It only got called because he didn’t get up...but there was no targeting nothing...it’s not the defenders fault Gronks head dropped when he stumbled and the sides hit each other. I can live with that call to protect guys but then to follow it up with PI when the receiver ran his route out of bounds because the defender pinched him that’s just perfect defense...horrible.

 

Oh well... penalty stands. and i felt it was illegal contact earlier, the PI was 'shaky'

 

7 minutes ago, bluebombers87 said:

So the point is to deter those hrs. How does one not do something they can’t control?

 

 

7 minutes ago, dgambill said:

That’s the rule...that isn’t the spirit of the rule. It’s meant to protect receivers from being targeted and defenders from leading with crown and having head to head collisions. Not a wr who trips and falls into a defender who clearly pulled up and even turned his back to the play.

 

The refs are instructed to rule in favors of the 'defenseless' player (QB or receiver) every time.  Bill Polian has expressed this many times on Sirius XM radion and elsewhere.  I think he was on the Competition Committee when the rule was instituted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

I miss Katy Perry and the shark

I’m not a big music guy...I thought Bruno Mars did a decent job...does Justin even have new music??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Bring back Lady Gaga! She rocked!

I could listen to Lady Gaga again (I'd just look at Katy Perry)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

I cant get into Justin Timberlake in the Super Bowl

Crossing my fingers for that *NSYNC reunion 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

way too conservative, folks

 

1st down - run..2nd down - run

Yeah. I didn't like the play calling on that series either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mr. Irrelevant said:

What we’re going to see now is Patriots adapting. They excel at that. It will not be easy for Jax going forward.

If Gronk doesn't come back....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to appreciate Dr. Pepper 's'The Sweet One'  commercials

 

What EXACTLY are they trying to say about those of us who like  Dr. Pepper??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Lambo nailed it! What a kick, that was huge because of field of position too.

Agree.  Could have been a huge momentum swing.  Gutsy call, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ColtsBlueFL said:

I think the independent neurologist will keep Gronk out this game.  We'll see.

I agree.otherwise he'd be on the field by now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as Jax scores some type of points on each drive they will be alright.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

I'm trying to appreciate Dr. Pepper 's'The Sweet One'  commercials

 

What EXACTLY are they trying to say about those of us who like  Dr. Pepper??

It says you're SWEEEEEE-eeeet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

I'm trying to appreciate Dr. Pepper 's'The Sweet One'  commercials

 

What EXACTLY are they trying to say about those of us who like  Dr. Pepper??

I'm trying to figure that out, too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We were discussing the overreaction to the tweet not the play         
    • My God, you're right...   It's a conspiracy, man.   If Reich know tha hez company loyal to stand by the nonsense and the obvimously lack of talent an holes on diz roster then then he knows that if he shows JB can't reaf his progrezions den the opposing teams will have the advantage! Reich try to tank for a top 10 pick! We all know it!   BACK TO THE PILE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!               *I lost today's internal battle, because of my brother to the north... A certain south park song I am dieing to use as justification
    • If VM is saying it, it's likely because he's parroting what management is saying. Not saying it's not true, or true, just saying there's always a narrative. 
    • The lack of light front carries is either play calling, or JB's choice. Light front carries may also be down simply because of down and distance when facing light fronts. I'm guessing this goes at least partly to JB's struggles with reading Ds.   And using "stacked box" stats are very imperfect. It's not always about what how many are in the box, it's what those guys do when the ball is snapped. The stacked box stat typically only measures 8+ defenders in the box at the time of snap. What it doesn't tell you is what the front seven does. Do the LBs play the run or go into coverage is the more accurate measurement, along with how much nickel and dime coverage you see.    If I were a D vs JB, I'd go standard package (no nickel/dime) most of the time, and have the LBs play run or shallow crossing, which is what we are generally seeing. 4 DBs on standard downs is sufficient vs our current O.  I'm going to say Reich and JB are making it more predictable. If the passing game is more successful, and the play calling isn't as conservative, we're not having this problem at all. Like I said in a previous post, very few team have RB1s that are dynamic in both running and passing. And honestly that's not Reich's O. Mack is 12 of 14 (yes only 14), so he's been very reliable. It's more lack of targets and play calling if anything.  He is an APB. An APB does not run it between the tackles often, and that's what Reich typically calls for him... An APB is a change of pace back that is usually more edge, sweep, receiving,  and gimmicky. I'd say his "average" play, is a product of use type. White rushing is 32 attempts for 104 yards, and a 3.3 average. Hines is 22 for 66 and 3.0 with mostly between the T rushes. Last year with Luck, Hines was 85/315 and 3.7 rushing.... do you see the difference....  Yes it's rare to have a stud #1 RB that excels in both. I think we are under utilizing Mack in the passing game, and I think Hines is hampered by both rush play calling, and by JB in the passing game. That's what they numbers suggest anyway. 
    • Humility is on the path to enlightenment...   Some-ish like that...   I try and remind myself daily lol
  • Members

    • Rubles

      Rubles 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • buccolts

      buccolts 3,751

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheMiz

      TheMiz 124

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • LockeDown

      LockeDown 2,270

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gramz

      Gramz 9,754

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ar7

      ar7 366

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Calmack

      Calmack 467

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Sumo63

      Sumo63 272

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PrincetonTiger

      PrincetonTiger 9,474

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 4,325

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...