Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

oldunclemark

Jacksonville (+7.5) at New England (1-21-18)

Recommended Posts

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

That ball wasn't even catchable, ok REFS here we go.

It wasn’t even that it’s the fact that the wr was out of bounds...he isn’t even eligible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BOTT said:

Just throw it it up....get penalty

I know, that thing wasn't even catchable, what a joke lmao 14-10 now. I have a feeling the 2nd Half Jacks will collapse!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL to 48 yards out of that 80 yard drive coming from penalties, here we go again with the refs at Gillette, that ball was uncatchable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dgambill said:

That’s a horrible two calls. Horrible.

The hit on Gronk?  That was obvious helmet to helmet 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

 Disaster series for Jax but they still lead at the half

That the most important and they get the ball to start the second half. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:

Its unnecessary roughness to hit the person receiving a pass?

Right he didn't lead with his helmet or anything gronk dove and his head hit his shoulder such a b.s. call

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been a pretty clean game as far as the refs but the reaction by the announcers still sells the ref bias. Every time the Pats throw an incomplete pass they go "noooooooo flag!" Not no flag, which isn't something they say after every incomplete pass in other games, but noooooo flag. Then when they got the flag just now was all YES FLAG! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

Good penalty if he doesn’t come back.

Why the NFL doesn't have the college rule of ejection for a game makes no sense .  You could theoretically do this every week to the opposition's best player with little recourse.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"well they have got Tom Brady, I think we know how special he is, that's why they score at the end of every half."

 

Tony Romo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dgambill said:

It wasn’t even that it’s the fact that the wr was out of bounds...he isn’t even eligible.

 

Exactly. These refs are helping the Pats win. Not a surprise. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:

Its unnecessary roughness to hit the person receiving a pass?

I normally am all for protecting a wr but the defender didn’t lead with his head and even turned his body. Gronk was falling so that is why they hit heads. Gronk is 6’7....church is like 6 inches below. That is just unlucky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BOTT said:

The hit on Gronk?  That was obvious helmet to helmet 

I might need to look at it again but I don't think he led with his helmet. Gronk put his head down it looked like to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RockThatBlue said:

I might need to look at it again but I don't think he led with his helmet. Gronk put his head down it looked like to me.

Defiantly didn't lead with his helmet even turned his body 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RockThatBlue said:

I might need to look at it again but I don't think he led with his helmet. Gronk put his head down it looked like to me.

Correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

LOL to 48 yards out of that 80 yard drive coming from penalties, here we go again with the refs at Gillette, that ball was uncatchable

 

Yep, that is just ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RockThatBlue said:

I might need to look at it again but I don't think he led with his helmet. Gronk put his head down it looked like to me.

Defenseless receiver....doesn't matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BOTT said:

The hit on Gronk?  That was obvious helmet to helmet 

He turned his body to avoid targeting him. Gronk just stumbled down to him. There was nothing he could do to avoid it he even pulled up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Kenny Moore is a much better CB Tim Jennings.
    • According to Houston whispers, the Texans won't pursue a new candidate this year. O'Brien will be the GM for 2019. If that's true, I think Caserio will end up in there .... just not in 2019. (His contract will expire next year in Boston.)
    • Well, Sanders played mostly close to the box, and was covering the middle area of the field a lot in Dungy's system, and Moore plays in the slot, and he is also covering the middle area of the field as well. So, I kinda see why you saw some similarities. However, they are very different types of players, they play at different positions, so there is hardly any similarity if you break down what they do actually. It might seem a bit similar, but it's very different.   And, as others said, Bob was a generational talent. He played on an entirely different level. Remember when teams use to ran 200 / 300 yards against the Colts D in 2006? The entire regular season? Then Bob came back for the playoffs and the Colts D suddenly turned into the big wall of china. That was Sanders, alone. He was a game changer when healthy.
    • You were correct with your 6 games statement. ;) Only, that 6 games can be gained by being on active roster (which is not game day roster!) or on IR.   (Might worth to add, that players on IR don't count against the 53, but they are under "normal" NFL contract. They can rehab in the team facilities, they can take part in meetings, etc. Please also note, that waiving a player with injury settlement and putting someone on IR are two different move. The latter is the "real" IR. It keeps the player under contract, and be part of the team. The former is practically a cut, with some financial implications. E.g., the team is willing to pay money for the player, if he won't be claimed by another team.)   Regarding Cox, 2017 didn't count as accrued season for him, because he spent most of the year on PS, which does not count. (He wasn't on IR neither. I mean, "under contract" IR, because players can be waived with IR settlement as well, which does not count as accrued season.) Cox will be an ERFA in 2020, and an RFA in 2021.
  • Members

    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 1,752

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 550

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • brently76

      brently76 17

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 96

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • egg

      egg 592

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Four2itus

      Four2itus 2,023

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 18,993

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 881

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 1,203

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Restored

      Restored 1,332

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...