Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

oldunclemark

Jacksonville (+7.5) at New England (1-21-18)

Recommended Posts

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

That ball wasn't even catchable, ok REFS here we go.

It wasn’t even that it’s the fact that the wr was out of bounds...he isn’t even eligible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BOTT said:

Just throw it it up....get penalty

I know, that thing wasn't even catchable, what a joke lmao 14-10 now. I have a feeling the 2nd Half Jacks will collapse!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL to 48 yards out of that 80 yard drive coming from penalties, here we go again with the refs at Gillette, that ball was uncatchable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dgambill said:

That’s a horrible two calls. Horrible.

The hit on Gronk?  That was obvious helmet to helmet 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

 Disaster series for Jax but they still lead at the half

That the most important and they get the ball to start the second half. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:

Its unnecessary roughness to hit the person receiving a pass?

Right he didn't lead with his helmet or anything gronk dove and his head hit his shoulder such a b.s. call

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been a pretty clean game as far as the refs but the reaction by the announcers still sells the ref bias. Every time the Pats throw an incomplete pass they go "noooooooo flag!" Not no flag, which isn't something they say after every incomplete pass in other games, but noooooo flag. Then when they got the flag just now was all YES FLAG! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

Good penalty if he doesn’t come back.

Why the NFL doesn't have the college rule of ejection for a game makes no sense .  You could theoretically do this every week to the opposition's best player with little recourse.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"well they have got Tom Brady, I think we know how special he is, that's why they score at the end of every half."

 

Tony Romo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dgambill said:

It wasn’t even that it’s the fact that the wr was out of bounds...he isn’t even eligible.

 

Exactly. These refs are helping the Pats win. Not a surprise. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, RockThatBlue said:

Its unnecessary roughness to hit the person receiving a pass?

I normally am all for protecting a wr but the defender didn’t lead with his head and even turned his body. Gronk was falling so that is why they hit heads. Gronk is 6’7....church is like 6 inches below. That is just unlucky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, BOTT said:

The hit on Gronk?  That was obvious helmet to helmet 

I might need to look at it again but I don't think he led with his helmet. Gronk put his head down it looked like to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RockThatBlue said:

I might need to look at it again but I don't think he led with his helmet. Gronk put his head down it looked like to me.

Defiantly didn't lead with his helmet even turned his body 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RockThatBlue said:

I might need to look at it again but I don't think he led with his helmet. Gronk put his head down it looked like to me.

Correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

LOL to 48 yards out of that 80 yard drive coming from penalties, here we go again with the refs at Gillette, that ball was uncatchable

 

Yep, that is just ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RockThatBlue said:

I might need to look at it again but I don't think he led with his helmet. Gronk put his head down it looked like to me.

Defenseless receiver....doesn't matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BOTT said:

The hit on Gronk?  That was obvious helmet to helmet 

He turned his body to avoid targeting him. Gronk just stumbled down to him. There was nothing he could do to avoid it he even pulled up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Willis - the 4th round pick they traded up to get will be lucky to make the 53?  Man that is highly questionable. I’d say he is much closer to a lock to make the roster than be cut prior to opening day. 
    • Well Im back been a long haul , my wife being blind had rotator cuff surgery and been in bad turn at same time so my cups been full.  But look lol the Central is just about where I left it. 162 games tells the story . Cards Cubs Brewers all right there together.
    • Faulk was a great player, but he was never a pure grind out yards type running back. Edge was.   James is a huge part of why the offense exploded in 1999 after we traded Faulk & drafted James. The play action to Edge/ bomb over the top to Harrison was absolutely LETHAL 
    • As you have noticed,  I have taken a long time to respond.   Apologies in advance,  my response is long....   Everything you think I "overstated" I personally think I understated.     And I think all the arguments you used to make a case that the spring is more ideal than the winter is hugely overstated.   Look at the last sentence of your post...    how you describe "looking at the bigger picture and taking your time..."        Says who?      Who says an owner didn't look at the bigger picture in December as a disappointing season was coming to an end and that a decision was rushed?    That's entirely written by you as opinion based on zero known facts.    And it's your interpretation that better decisions can be made in the spring.   Huh?    When it's too late to fire the HC and his staff that gave you the disappointing previous season that got the GM fired in the first place.    Now, your new GM has to deal with a HC and staff that he didn't hire.   Now everyone in the building is walking on pins and neeedles wondering if they'll get fired or be retained.   So,  all the advantages of doing those decisions in winter of Y1 for the new GM,  now have to be done in winter of Y2.     So, if they're going to be done,  how is it better to flush a year down the drain and do it the following year?   I see lots of opinion,  and very little fact.    You've tossed out a number of interesting names that are available now....    nice names and none were in the running for a GM job 5 months ago,  and suddenly you think the next hot GM is in the pile?    I appreciate that Nick Caserio might be the exception to the Patriots rule from the BB tree....    but BB has a poor record of turning out good HC's elsewhere.   He might someday....   but not so far.    Front office is decent I think, so maybe Caserio is good?   But Don't you want to get all of this done sooner than later?    Don't you want to rip the band-aid off ASAP?   Doesn't the new GM want to hire his own guy,  his own staff, ASAP?     And if you think the answer is no,  then why don't all GM's who get hired in January,  do it your way?    Why don't they keep the staff,  the HC,  coordinators and assistants,  all the front office types and the scouts,  and do all the changes the following winter?     Why don't they do that?   They don't,  do they?   I really wish this was just a simple thought experiment.   That you were simply making a case that making a GM change in the spring is do-able and not anythig else.    Some here don't understand when it happens at all in the spring and I've made the argument several times that the spring isn't as bad as you think.    Doable under certain circumstances is perfectly OK.   But you're not doing that.     You're not arguing for doable.   Instead you're arguing for desireable.    And you think it's an easy decision.    I confess that even as your biggest admirer,  perhaps BECAUSE I'm your biggest admirer,  I find this position more than a little head scratching.....   Just saying....      
    • Middleton had a contract that was 4 years or longer and the Bucks have his bird rights. That doesn't apply for Randle and the Pelicans.
  • Members

    • shakedownstreet

      shakedownstreet 6,661

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Krauses

      Krauses 78

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IkeAramba

      IkeAramba 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TwoTonShogun

      TwoTonShogun 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bluesmith

      Bluesmith 94

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 5,178

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 1,509

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 804

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...