Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Superman

REPORT: Colts expected to hire McDaniels as HC, per NFL.com

Recommended Posts

Does McDaniels affect anyone's thinking on what we might do on draft day?

 

There's obviously been whispers of Barkley - McDaniels' offenses haven't been built on the prototypical elite back play...:dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

Wouldn't be surprised if the Colts fed Kravitz/Holder the "deal not completely done" stuff. It can't look like a deal is already official, which I doubt it is, but yeah.

Deal can't be official until after the SB and McDaniels signs. It's as official as it gets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Shafty138 said:

Wonder if BB just retires at the end of this season, with his staff getting gutted by 2 ccoordinators filling spots by promoting Pats position coaches....

 

Flores the LB coach is rumored to be a candidate too - this season. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Nadine said:

maybe it's just the colts that can't say anything?

 

They can't make anything official, and neither side can announce anything until the Pats season ends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

no rules are broken if nothing is signed from I understand

 

They just post dated it.  LOL!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Virtuoso80 said:

I think it's a promotion not lateral move

If it's not HC, it can be blocked. Eagles QB coach DeFilipo was blocked from taking an OC spot with another team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Don't let csmopar see this...

 

It's a promotion, but the team can block anything that's not a head coaching job. In this case, Eberflus' contract expires after the SB, so the Cowboys can't block him from leaving.

Lol. Right. Csmopar will set you straight on the hiring procedures. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IndyScribe said:

Deal can't be official until after the SB and McDaniels signs. It's as official as it gets.


Yup. That's why I think the Colts want that out there, that it's not official.

But yeah, it's as official as it gets at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Shafty138 said:

Apparently Eberflus is very highly regarded, Dallas fans were often claiming he was their main priority this offseason.

Yep, many Cowboys fans wanted him to be DC but Jones kept Marinelli.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

BOOOOOOO!

Hey, give me a break. I was only joshing.  

 

Image result for drops mic gif

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, IndyScribe said:

Would McDaniels really take Barkley? The offense runs well with Lewis and White, neither of which are on the level of Barkley. If we were to select a RB in the third round, the offense could run well too. 

 

Barkley would be like Kamara but better.  Kamara can do everything. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Shive said:

I swear.... I'm about to have to fight you...lol

 

He will, but I think he'll still call the plays. A young up and commer would be ideal for that position. You want someone that's moldable and can grow into the role while McDaniels runs the show.

 

I'm hoping we get some experienced position coaches though. You really need veteran coaching experience somewhere in that building.

 

As awesome as it would to get someone like Defilippo, he would just leave in a season or two. I assume McDaniels wants someone that will stick around and grow together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do we know anything yet on if he wants roster control or player selection preferences??

 

Not sure how that affects Ballard's job duties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BritAlex said:

Does McDaniels affect anyone's thinking on what we might do on draft day?

 

There's obviously been whispers of Barkley - McDaniels' offenses haven't been built on the prototypical elite back play...:dunno:

I'm leaning towards Chubb. McDaniels has made the offense work with Lewis and White and previously with Blount and other RBs. Colts have Mack. If they pick up one more, McDaniels offense could still work around them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smoke317 said:

Lol. Right. Csmopar will set you straight on the hiring procedures. :D

true, but Eberflus' contract ends after the Superbowl, and he is free to take any job he wants then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good thing is that the coaches are young. Peetz is 34 and McDaniels is 41. There's nothing about Eberflus so I have no idea how old he is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, BritAlex said:

Does McDaniels affect anyone's thinking on what we might do on draft day?

 

There's obviously been whispers of Barkley - McDaniels' offenses haven't been built on the prototypical elite back play...:dunno:

I don't think Barkley necessarily, but I do think McDaniels will want mis-match weapons. I posted in the other thread about the possibility of signing Dion Lewis as a FA and possibly going after a big athletic tight end.like Dallas Goedert in the draft. I think both make sense ... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, IndyScribe said:

If it's not HC, it can be blocked. Eagles QB coach DeFilipo was blocked from taking an OC spot with another team.

I totally forgot about the subject brought up earlier about HC and everything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, IndyScribe said:

Good thing is that the coaches are young. Eberflus is 35 and McDaniels is 41. There's nothing about Peetz so I have no idea how old he is.

34 i think

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, IinD said:

Do we know anything yet on if he wants roster control or player selection preferences??

 

Not sure how that affects Ballard's job duties.

I believe it's standard coach and GM relationship. Ballard will probably draft according to his scheme, and McDaniels will consult with Ballard on other stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BritAlex said:

Does McDaniels affect anyone's thinking on what we might do on draft day?

 

There's obviously been whispers of Barkley - McDaniels' offenses haven't been built on the prototypical elite back play...:dunno:

Judging from where he’s come from and the mistakes he made in Denver, I’d expect him to build from the trenches and defense.  OLine. DLine. And Linebackers. McDaniels schemes guys open. I could see us passing on Barkley & trading back unless his hands are receiver like...  Somebody posted a video of a tight end that looked VERY athletic. From a small school. I hope we can snag him even in the 2nd if we have too.  He looked very Gronk like...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, csmopar said:

It ain't official yet folks 

 

this is about as official as it can be at this time.  I'd be shocked if something happens and he doesn't sign after this report.  As one article mentioned, if a report like this comes out and then McD backs out, that's basically career suicide.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, IndyScribe said:

I'm leaning towards Chubb. McDaniels has made the offense work with Lewis and White and previously with Blount and other RBs. Colts have Mack. If they pick up one more, McDaniels offense could still work around them.

 

Agreed - on one hand I love the idea of Luck getting a true top-level talent to work with, but with your sensible hat on, you have to think that Mack ticks a reasonable amount of boxes in terms of what JM looks for in at least one of his backs. The boxes he doesn't tick could be ticked on day 2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dew5150 said:

Who's going to start the Fire McDaniels thread?

After the Colts lose all 4 games in preseason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, stitches said:

I don't think Barkley necessarily, but I do think McDaniels will want mis-match weapons. I posted in the other thread about the possibility of signing Dion Lewis as a FA and possibly going after a big athletic tight end.like Dallas Goedert in the draft. I think both make sense ... 

That’s it Stitches. Great post. We do have a good history with tight ends named Dallas...  And Goedert looks LEGIT. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, not gonna lie. I'm pretty excited...And I'm usually meh about everything.

 

The possibilities with McDaniel's and Luck...Like nothing we've ever seen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Just hope he does not try to be BB 2.0

He tried that with Denver and failed. I believe he's learned from his failure. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, deedub75 said:

 

Barkley would be like Kamara but better.  Kamara can do everything. 

I really keep going back and fourth on if I want the Colts to take Barkley or Chubb.  I think Barkley is probably the better player but guys like Chubb are hard to find and the Colts can still probably get a very good runningback in the second round.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I quit hunting after coming back from overseas in 1975. It changed my whole outlook on hunting when you are the one that is being hunted. 
    • That's probably about right for a team that hasn't shown anything with a new QB, who we don't know isn't on a steep decline. I personally am a believer of this team and I think we will be better than that but I cannot pretend this ranking is unreasonable. 
    • There's good and bad in every crowd. Whether people be classified by hobby, sport, activism, race, religion,...you name it. There are good and bad in each of them. But if youd like to support the bashing of an entire group of people rather than only the individual perpetrators then you all are more than welcome to enjoy the view from your imaginary moral high ground. 
    • Seriously?   If that’s all hunters did, you wouldn’t have all the bashing of them that there is.....   Come on now....
    • How'd you all figure out that no one ate the meat from those animals from that picture?    It's funny how people like to bash hunters when they fund much of the wildlife here in the states, contribute to economies around the world, and feed many poor in the areas they hunt.    
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...