Mel Kiper's Hair

Jon Gruden New Raiders Head Coach

Recommended Posts

Holy moly! The Raiders are truly insane! Why does Gruden have this type of reputation? I really don't get it. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoooa!   Tooty Fruitie Oh Ruddddy.   Whap Bobba Loobop Ah Whap Bam Boom.   Damn that's a long contract.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, stitches said:

Holy moly! The Raiders are truly insane! Why does Gruden have this type of reputation? I really don't get it. 

 

They wanted him. Raiders are gonna Raiders, but he had a cushy, well paying job on MNF, probably making $8m/year. Why go back to coaching if he can make the same money or more as a broadcaster? They had to offer him a financial windfall and some job security to get him out of the booth.

 

I think this contract is a better option than giving him a slice of ownership. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

They wanted him. Raiders are gonna Raiders, but he had a cushy, well paying job on MNF, probably making $8m/year. Why go back to coaching if he can make the same money or more as a broadcaster? They had to offer him a financial windfall and some job security to get him out of the booth.

 

I think this contract is a better option than giving him a slice of ownership. 

Very True 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

They wanted him. Raiders are gonna Raiders, but he had a cushy, well paying job on MNF, probably making $8m/year. Why go back to coaching if he can make the same money or more as a broadcaster? They had to offer him a financial windfall and some job security to get him out of the booth.

 

I think this contract is a better option than giving him a slice of ownership. 

I know but my idea was - why not get a better coach for like... half the money? They could have had anyone for half that money.... 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, stitches said:

I know but my idea was - why not get a better coach for like... half the money? They could have had anyone for half that money.... 

 

 

They might have been able to get someone else (maybe someone even better) for half the money, but this is about more than just the Head Coach position. The Raiders still have 2 more lame duck seasons in Oakland. They need anything they can to keep fans interested. Jon Gruden is a sexy hire that will keep people interested. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mel Kiper's Hair said:

 

I now have "Raiders gonna Raider" to the tune of "Shake it Off" by Taylor Swift in my head.

I still have that damn Barry Manilow song in my head thanks to UncleMark from the Basketball Thread. Freakin Barry of all people!

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

They wanted him. Raiders are gonna Raiders, but he had a cushy, well paying job on MNF, probably making $8m/year. Why go back to coaching if he can make the same money or more as a broadcaster? They had to offer him a financial windfall and some job security to get him out of the booth.

 

I think this contract is a better option than giving him a slice of ownership. 

 

I would've been ok if we had hired Gruden....     but NOT at that contract.  

 

Too much and too long.    I'm happy to let someone else write that check.

 

Our guy is likely to get roughly 5/25...   way more manageable if things ever go South.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess they are figuring he and Derek Carr will make great music together.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just shows why teams like the raiders and browns continue to suck and will likely to continue to suck. This is one of the lamest moves I believe in history of coaching hires. 

 

I'll even go as far as to hedge my bets that the raiders will never win a Super Bowl under Gruden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow thats an insane contract, i heard he is also getting some ownership in the team? This has got to be the craziest coaching contract ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how the deal is structured?  Maybe they have it to where they can easily get out of it in 5 years if it isn't working or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark Davis is way too broke to afford a stadium but can afford to give a coach who has been out of the league for almost a decade, 100 million.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like Gruden, but even I wouldn't have given him 10 years/$100 mil.  That's insane.  Perhaps they want to have him and Carr together/tied to the hip, a la Brady and Belichick?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 21isSuperman said:

I really like Gruden, but even I wouldn't have given him 10 years/$100 mil.  That's insane.  Perhaps they want to have him and Carr together/tied to the hip, a la Brady and Belichick?

The only info I can find on Belichicks contract is it's around 8.9 million a year. Gruden getting that type of money is insane.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

So the Raiders just by passed the Rooney rule?

Yeah I know. They probably brought Lovie in for 5 minutes so they wont get in trouble lmao 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

So the Raiders just by passed the Rooney rule?

No, league said multiple minorities were interviewed..... per nfl.com

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Superman said:

 

They wanted him. Raiders are gonna Raiders, but he had a cushy, well paying job on MNF, probably making $8m/year. Why go back to coaching if he can make the same money or more as a broadcaster? They had to offer him a financial windfall and some job security to get him out of the booth.

 

I think this contract is a better option than giving him a slice of ownership. 

ESPN reporting that ownership stakes are part of the contract pending approval by the rest of the league owners

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, PeterBowman said:

Are we really sure Al Davis isn't dead?

I said in an earlier comment the apple don't fall far from the tree.

Now it's the nut don't fall far from the tree. :D:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for them. At least they wanted a guy and went and got him.

 

Not sure why his salary is bothering folks. He doesn't count against the cap for them. Good for him getting paid 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, stitches said:

I know but my idea was - why not get a better coach for like... half the money? They could have had anyone for half that money.... 

 

Raiders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, csmopar said:

ESPN reporting that ownership stakes are part of the contract pending approval by the rest of the league owners

 

Oh wow. MTC hit the nail on the head...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Superman said:

 

They wanted him. Raiders are gonna Raiders, but he had a cushy, well paying job on MNF, probably making $8m/year. Why go back to coaching if he can make the same money or more as a broadcaster? They had to offer him a financial windfall and some job security to get him out of the booth.

 

I think this contract is a better option than giving him a slice of ownership. 

If the NFL continues to lose viewers, franchise values will decrease.  It's always better to get cash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I actually thought this thread would be about having the 32nd pick in the first round of the NFL draft. That would ensure that the player would have a 5th year option for us as opposed to the 34th pick or later picks, where we only have 4 year contracts.
    • This is a terrific question and a fascinating thread.  I don't have a full understanding of how compensatory picks work, but draft capital seems to be king now (especially in light of the rookie salary cap vs. out-of-control free agent contracts).  We didn't need the NFL to tell us the Colts had the best draft class of 2018.  I have reason to believe more good decisions will be made in FA and draft 2019, so this is indeed an exciting time.     Based on Ballard's 2 grand slams and other fine picks last year, you bet I'd buy a 3rd rounder with a viable backup QB.  You can't make Keenum's arm stronger and I don't know if even Luck can make Bortles more serious about football, but just having one of them aboard means you could warm up to Brissett offers and jockey for position in April.     I guess you'd have to take a look at your big board vs. team needs, run the numbers, and start wheeling and dealing accordingly.  This "game within the game" stuff is truly fascinating and probably one of the reasons I enjoy Fantasy Football so much.  Thanks for your post Superman.  Good stuff!
    • Maybe Jachai Polite will fall or even Devin White. There's some decent options at the #13 spot. Not sure if Montez Sweat is worth the #13 pick, but he might be with the combine and pro day coming up.
    • He brought in so many talent potential lads into the Shoe last year. These no-name guys are quickly becoming recognizable faces.    Gotta say that last years draft was amped with talent for many levels and positions. Some potentially playoff caliber quarterbacks too.   This year’s draft will be interesting as it could pose a challenge for most teams outside of the top 10. 
    • Maybe Denver or Washington due to cap space. I'm hoping we get a player in return if he ends up going anywhere. I wouldn't complain about getting a pick either.    I can get behind this but not just for DeAndre Baker maybe a pass rusher or interior D-line will fall. 
  • Members