Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

csmopar

Draft pick position and success rate

Recommended Posts

Was doing some research and found this: Seems pretty accurate.

 

Historic Success Chart

The numbers show us the following outline for finding consistent starters:

1st Round - OL (83%) LB (70%) TE (67%) DB (64%) QB (63%) WR (58%) RB (58%) DL (58%)

2nd Round - OL (70%) LB (55%) TE (50%) WR (49%) DB (46%) QB (27%) DL (26%) RB (25%)

3rd Round - OL (40%) TE (39%) LB (34%) DL (27%) WR (25%) DB (24%) QB (17%) RB (16%)

4th Round - DL (37%) TE (33%) OL (29%) LB (16%) WR(12%) DB (11%) RB (11%) QB (8%)

5th Round - TE (32%) DB (17%) WR (16%) OL (16%) DL (13%) RB (9%) LB (4%) QB (0%)

6th Round - TE (26%) OL (16%) DL (13%) WR (9%) DB (8%) RB (6%) LB (5%) QB (0%)

7th Round - DB (11%) OL (9%) QB (6%) WR (5%) DL (3%) LB (2%) RB (0%) TE (0%)

 

https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2015/2/20/8072877/what-the-statistics-tell-us-about-the-draft-by-round

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be sure to take your DB in the 7th instead of the 6th; grab a TE in the 6th insteadhaha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, csmopar said:

Was doing some research and found this: Seems pretty accurate.

 

Historic Success Chart

The numbers show us the following outline for finding consistent starters:

1st Round - OL (83%) LB (70%) TE (67%) DB (64%) QB (63%) WR (58%) RB (58%) DL (58%)

2nd Round - OL (70%) LB (55%) TE (50%) WR (49%) DB (46%) QB (27%) DL (26%) RB (25%)

3rd Round - OL (40%) TE (39%) LB (34%) DL (27%) WR (25%) DB (24%) QB (17%) RB (16%)

4th Round - DL (37%) TE (33%) OL (29%) LB (16%) WR(12%) DB (11%) RB (11%) QB (8%)

5th Round - TE (32%) DB (17%) WR (16%) OL (16%) DL (13%) RB (9%) LB (4%) QB (0%)

6th Round - TE (26%) OL (16%) DL (13%) WR (9%) DB (8%) RB (6%) LB (5%) QB (0%)

7th Round - DB (11%) OL (9%) QB (6%) WR (5%) DL (3%) LB (2%) RB (0%) TE (0%)

 

https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2015/2/20/8072877/what-the-statistics-tell-us-about-the-draft-by-round

Team needs bolded. Looks like OL is the most reliable 1st round pick. RB and DL have the same success rate. This does show that in fact that elite QB's  don't grow on trees. It's only 63% in the first round to have a consistent starter, let alone high quality or elite quarterbacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be interesting to see a trend for top 5 picks (although I think there is a good thread on the specific players taken) as it is a big difference between players taken 28th/29th etc than top 5. 

 

My comment primarily refers to RB's as, taking a RB top 5 or even top 10 means that player is a big deal and players like Gurley, Zeke and Fournette are talents that are not really comparable to those taken near the end of the first round.

 

If you are picking middle of the round I think this is a useful analysis but, for me, I would feel like you were missing true game-changing talent by taking an O-lineman as early as we are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are probably some flaws in this analysis.  

 

What's he mean by "starter for half your career".  Do games you are sitting out due to injury count?  

 

Also a problem with RB's is that they are rotated so much these days.  

 

Also just cause you are a starter doesn't mean you are good.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Massive generalisation here. Some fans can understand the nuance of what the team might be trying to achieve as show by @Peterk2011's posts. Given how much the offense improved last year despite Reich being a late hire, not having had time to get the pieces in place he might have ideally wanted, wouldn't you want to see what it can do if can fully implement his vision?     Two points, I think you're right that we might never know the full reason for DeGuglielmo's departure. He seems to wear out his welcome quickly in most places. However he wasn't the only McDaniels hire, I believe Eberflus was as well. 
    • Mod Note I've once again had to remove a number of posts in a topic as they were, aside from a brief interlude of almost intelligent discourse, mostly just personal attacks.    It's fine to disagree, it's fine to "argue" the content of someone's post, it's not fine to resort to name calling and calling other posters out completely out of context to the topic being discussed.    You all know the rules, it would be silly to get banned before the season starts... 
    • definitely talking more about NT. I love Autry, but outside of him it feels like we have a bunch of good not great on the iDL. it's going to be interesting to see how much adding Houston, raises the play of the entire DL.
    • IIRC, almost the same weight. Hines me be one inch shorter.    Like others have said, don't get too attached. He's a scheme guy (Leach), so big questions about how he might translate to the NFL. Most reviews I saw compared him to a change of pace back. Typically change of pace backs are faster. But who knows. Stranger things have happened. 
    • FTFY. You probably meant nearly 5000 posts and 3000 reactions. That's pretty impressive for just 9 months.   Anyway, glad that Inman landed on his feet. I thought he might sign with the Giants who need one or two more WRs. 
  • Members

    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 425

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nickster

      Nickster 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ManningGM

      ManningGM 516

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 837

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Irish YJ

      Irish YJ 1,028

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CantBeStopped

      CantBeStopped 427

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,435

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mike Tahoe

      Mike Tahoe 61

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 392

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • strt182

      strt182 292

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...