Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

LucasOilStadium

Colts Vs. Broncos Thursday Night Football Game Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, RollerColt said:

Yeah. Denver is definitely trying their best to lose tonight.

 

Missed field goal, pick from Trevor, and now he's hurt holding his left wrist...

Trying to take our pick from us cmon chuck blow the game already

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RollerColt said:

Yeah. Denver is definitely trying their best to lose tonight.

 

Missed field goal, pick from Trevor, and now he's hurt holding his left wrist...

Unless their defense scores, they cant score enough to hurt anybody

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, lance_m8 said:

Trying to take our pick from us cmon chuck blow the game already

No, lets get a win.....these guys have played hard. They deserve it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold on guys....it's just the first half.

 

We're following the script. Build a first half lead and then totally collapse in the second half.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, oldunclemark said:

No, lets get a win.....these guys have played hard. They deserve it

Players play hard chuck blows it simple 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Flash7 said:

Hold on guys....it's just the first half.

 

We're following the script. Build a first half lead and then totally collapse in the second half.

Agree

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Flash7 said:

Hold on guys....it's just the first half.

 

We're following the script. Build a first half lead and then totally collapse in the second half.

You clearly have not watched Denver play.

 

7-0 might be enough

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

You clearly have not watched Denver play.

 

7-0 might be enough

I've watched us enough not to fall for that trick anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was TY grabbing his hamstring after the last play? Please tell me he's not hurt now too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, lance_m8 said:

Players play hard chuck blows it simple 

again you have not watched Denver at all........settle back

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, mahagga73 said:

Who wants to bet Osweiler is about to play the game of his life? 

He did it with the Texans. It would not surprise me in the least. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Flash7 said:

I've watched us enough not to fall for that trick anymore.

You have no idea, Flash......The NFL's worst offense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, mahagga73 said:

Who wants to bet Osweiler is about to play the game of his life? 

Just told my buddy he is going to come in and light us up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Go Colts! Up 7-0 so far. Lets make the people mad that want to pick 3rd woooohoooo :thmup:. As long as we pick in the Top 10 I am good with it which we will. I just want to read comments from a lot of people that will freak out if we win because we drop a couple of spots in the Draft order lmao 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, oldunclemark said:

again you have not watched Denver at all........settle back

since when are we talking about Denver? ive only talked about the colts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, mahagga73 said:

Who wants to bet Osweiler is about to play the game of his life? 

I don't know... Last year colts in Houston he had the game of his life

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, legend300 said:

Just told my buddy he is going to come in and light us up. 

 

Yeah he owns us, that would not be good lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, oldunclemark said:

You have no idea, Flash......The NFL's worst offense

It's a battle between a 3-win team (Colts) and a 4-win team (Broncos). I'm not expecting much from either team, and I'm also not expecting a W for the Colts. If they do win, great. If not, no worries -- better draft position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

Because we're playing Denver, Lance..

Mark buddy argue with someone else obviously not on the same page

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Go Colts! Up 7-0 so far. Lets make the people mad that want to pick 3rd woooohoooo :thmup:. As long as we pick in the Top 10 I am good with it which we will. I just want to read comments from a lot of people that will freak out if we win because we drop a couple of spots in the Draft order lmao 

Some people just wanna watch the world burn lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, lance_m8 said:

Mark buddy argue with someone else obviously not on the same page

We're winning......they're bad/.........its okay to say what you see

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
    • I had us 9-7 just based on guessing/hoping/predicting Luck would be healthy and play great. I was right but a lucky guess, I guess  . I thought that would get us a 6th seed. We won 10 games which got us in.
    • For the first time in a while, I am impressed with the Colts development of players. If this current trend continues, a lot of opinions will change. 
  • Members

    • Nate!

      Nate! 44

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,110

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 159

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 369

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...