Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
  • ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well if Brown somehow falls in their lap, I think the Colts pick him. This is the first real knock on him that I've read. 
    • This forum reaaaaallllly need a sarcasm font 
    • No, not at all. Rivers in my mind might be good for a couple more wins, so basically anywhere between 8-8 - 10-6. So it makes no sense for him to be here. Listening to most here about how the season was last year, where we should have really been the same record as I just posted would take place with Rivers, then why do you need Rivers when we can get those results with JB? If Rivers can't win you a SB, there is no reason for him to come here, NONE.
    • I just haven't had anyone answer this directly yet, AND MAKE SENSE, so here goes.   Explain to me how having Rivers as a 1-2 year stop gap any different or virtually better than using Kelly as the stop gap to ultimately see if he could become our franchise QB.   If you sign Rivers for 2 years and he and this team makes the playoffs but doesn't go deep in the playoffs then you have wasted money on Rivers. If it really fails, Rivers will be gone in 2021.    If you let Kelly play for 2020 and this team makes the playoffs but doesn't go deep in the playoffs then you have at least witnessed the potential of Kelly moving forward for many years as our QB. If it really fails, Kelly will be gone in 2021.   ** I left out drafting a QB, as that scenario is the same as the Kelly scenario with exception of the rookie being gone in 2021, from above as I view a rookie and Kelly virtually having the same amount of playing time HERE in INDY. Based on playing time experience as a Colt ONLY, Kelly and a rookie would be both considered rookies from a PLAYING TIME standpoint only. So forget the rookie scenario and concentrate on Rivers vs. Kelly   Do you see why Rivers vs. Kelly is basically the same scenario?   I started a thread earlier that asked the question about the Colts winning the SB under it's current state. A good number said no. If that is the case then why bring Rivers here? In my mind, based on his age, and experience, bringing Rivers here is like the Broncos having Manning for 2 years. The Broncos did that to win a SB and ultimately did. What's different about that situation and the one here in Indy is that the Broncos were ready to win a SB and it was evident as the rest of the team helped aid Manning when he was declining. That is not what is going to happen here if Rivers comes. This team is not strong enough in every facet and Rivers is NO Manning.   So again, Why sign Rivers if you can't win a SB now? Explain to me how signing Rivers is better then letting Kelly play if the scenario outcomes are identical either way with each player in regards to how it would play out this 2020/21 season.   To me, Rivers is nothing more than a waste of money/money dump, if the SB CAN'T BE WON in 2020. **   Explain to me why this ** wouldn't be the case? Because right now, I'm shocked at a good number of you who are okay with having Rivers.   Oh and don't use Rivers as a mentor nonsense. As based on Ballard's approach to coaching he has always believed that "Coaches Coach" so they can mentor and teach a young QB(rookie). Not buying the Rivers Mentor junk.
  • Members

    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 461

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 354

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DiogoZ

      DiogoZ 25

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • boo2202

      boo2202 360

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,422

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonC

      ClaytonC 31

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • aaron11

      aaron11 2,557

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 837

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsArmy84

      ColtsArmy84 177

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsorioles

      coltsorioles 62

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...