Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Bengals Game Day Thread

LucasOilStadium

By LucasOilStadium,
in Colts Game Day

 Share Followers 5

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 829
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

BlueShoe

BlueShoe 682

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, legend300 said:

My cousin is a bengals fan and he just text me and said I don't know who is worse.  We both agree a tie would be fitting.  Smh

 

Did you tell him about how opposing-team-friendly we are in the third quarter?

 

He might want to ready his popcorn during halftime. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
JCPatriot

JCPatriot 314

Posted
Posted

So Brissett looked decent the first couple games.  That is somewhat typical when a new QB comes in unexpectedly.  He'll have a couple decent games, and then opposing teams shut him down once they get some game film to work with.  So let me ask you this.  In a situation like this, does it make sense to bring in a new QB every couple weeks and just cycle through QBs so that at least the opposing team doesn't know what to prepare for?  It is definitely not a good recipe for success, but what we are doing isn't working.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BlueShoe

BlueShoe 682

Posted
Posted

Mark you calendars guys and gals. This will probably be a trivia question later in the year. 

 

"When was the last time the Colts had a lead in a game?"

 

Two days before Halloween. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
csmopar

csmopar 7,514

Posted
Posted
Just now, BlueShoe said:

Mark you calendars guys and gals. This will probably be a trivia question later in the year. 

 

"When was the last time the Colts had a lead in a game?"

 

Two days before Halloween. 

So much for hanging onto that bandwagon. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
PrincetonTiger

PrincetonTiger 8,520

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, JCPatriot said:

So Brissett looked decent the first couple games.  That is somewhat typical when a new QB comes in unexpectedly.  He'll have a couple decent games, and then opposing teams shut him down once they get some game film to work with.  So let me ask you this.  In a situation like this, does it make sense to bring in a new QB every couple weeks and just cycle through QBs so that at least the opposing team doesn't know what to prepare for?  It is definitely not a good recipe for success, but what we are doing isn't working.

The key thing is what he does was the newness and such wears off

 

 The problem with changing the QB all the time is the chemistry

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Followers 5
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NewColtsFan
      BR Darius Leonard Contract Projection

      By NewColtsFan · Posted

      I’m going to pay Smith less.   He’s a Right Tackle.   I think he’s looking at roughly 4/52, 13m per.   We have perimeter players on both sides.  They’re young and on rookie contracts.   We will add more of them.   Maybe this draft and next...   We don’t have answers now.   But we will soon enough. 
    • Lucky Colts Fan
      a big if

      By Lucky Colts Fan · Posted

      What if I told you...   This thread was all just a figment of your imagination?   The fever-dream of a delusional so-called Colts fan trolling the masses for reactions...
    • Lucky Colts Fan
      Poll: Edge or LT at pick 21?

      By Lucky Colts Fan · Posted

      I'd usually agree, but between what's left in FA, and what's available in the draft... My answer is "Whoever is the highest LEFT Tackle on Ballards' board."  I know you're not supposed to draft based on need... but it's THE single biggest need, and it hasn't been addressed through FA yet.  And what's left in FA is questionable at best.   As the roster stands right now, we should take advantage of this Tackle class to solidify our LT position for the next decade.   I know the Tackle class is deep this year, but I don't like the logic of trading down to take whatever Tackle is left from a group/tier of Tackles.  I'm sure there's a guy or two that Ballard covets above the rest as a future stalwart at LT, and I think one of them will drop to 21.  And if you think there's a guy in this draft that can be your anchor at LT for the next decade, you draft him.   Even if that's the only pick that lands in this draft, a decade-stalwart at LT wins any draft.
    • danlhart87
      Poll: Edge or LT at pick 21?

      By danlhart87 · Posted

      Chiefs are already championship contenders so I'm being very aggressive trading up    WIN NOW MODE 
    • Jared Cisneros
      Poll: Edge or LT at pick 21?

      By Jared Cisneros · Posted

      Bingo. That's why I went Ojulari in the first round for the Titans, I was able to get the last WR in my tier in Tylan Wallace in the 2nd, and Asante Samuel Jr at the end of the 2nd for pure value. You let the players fall to you.

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...