Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

jvan1973

Sickest fantasy loss of my life

Recommended Posts

So I play in a league with 1 IDP.  The IDP has to be on the defense you started that week.   So at the end of last night's game I have a 13 point lead with one desperation play left for the redskins.

Of course my opponent had the chiefs defense ave his IDP was Justin Houston.   My opponent scored 14 fantasy points on the last play.   Unreal

Screenshot_20171003-155952_1.png?w=480&h

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

So I play in a league with 1 IDP.  The IDP has to be on the defense you started that week.   So at the end of last night's game I have a 13 point lead with one desperation play left for the redskins.

Of course my opponent had the chiefs defense ave his IDP was Justin Houston.   My opponent scored 14 fantasy points on the last play.   Unreal

Screenshot_20171003-155952_1.png?w=480&h

 

That's awful luck man.  I bet some bettors lost some money off that last play as well, all though I am sure some won as well because the spread was 7.  Crazy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, at least be thankful it wasn't in the playoffs.

 

I had a 25 pt lead going into a SNF match up in my championship game in 2012. This league chose to do its championship game in week 17 instead of week 16 in most leagues. I had Pierre Garcon and Dan Bailey. My opponent had Alfred Morris. Alfred Morris scores 3 TDs, the 3rd TD thanks to a Tony Romo choke job with an INT in the last 3 minutes vs the Redskins that Morris punches it in and his team beats me by 5 points with Morris scoring 40 plus. It was agonizing to watch, those last 3 minutes.

 

I however had revenge on the same player in a championship game 2 years later and beat him by 20 plus, that somewhat made up for it but victory slipping away in a championship game is the worst feeling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see how that's a conflation of two separate issues? (With a sprinkling of a third issue, tbh.)   1) Team A picking at #15 might have a problem with Hockenson, maybe their evaluation of his talent or character or whatever. Maybe they have a second round grade on him. Team B picking at #26 might have Hockenson as a top ten player on their board. And maybe a handful of other teams between those two have higher grades on different players that align with their needs, or maybe they aren't disciplined in their approach or have different draft philosophies. Maybe some of those teams don't see positional value in TEs, so they pass on Hockenson, leaving him available at #26. Again, the point is that not every team has the same board, and there are many reasons why that might be the case.   2) You're adding in the quality of the evaluation. Team B might think more highly of the player than anyone else, and maybe they're right and he turns out to be a stud. Maybe they're wrong, and he's a dud. But that's a question of player evaluation, not draft strategy.   3) Gronk was a second rounder himself. And he's turning out to be one of the best TEs in NFL history. Anyone saying 'Hockenson is the next Gronk' isn't being an honest evaluator, and I don't want my GM drafting players because he's convinced they'll be the next HOF player at any position. The odds stacked heavily against that. (I said the same last year to everyone claiming Barkley was a guaranteed HOFer who would singlehandedly elevate any offense to the top of the league.) That's a way to rationalize drafting a player you're in love with. It's not a disciplined draft strategy.
    • Agreed. My over arching point to BPA vs needs discussion is that the terms themselves can have different meanings, so the various good points made can get lost in the wash.   But I do think the preponderance of thinking lists BPA agnostic of attributes for a given scheme, which is how the national websites tend to do it.  So when GMs pick the 45th ranked player with pick 33, many criticize the pick as "reaching" for a need because they they don't stop to think that 5 or 6 players ranked in between weren't even considered a good fit for the team to begin with.   
    • Him and Lewis will elevate that draft class even higher. 
    • You're putting your own "spin" on this.  It has everything to do with what Ballard chose to do.   Ballard could have prevented his players from hitting free agency at all by overpaying them in the first place.   He doesn't want to overpay, so he "allows" them to hit free agency, find out that no team will overpay, then "brings" them back at their true value.
    • Yes I know, I wasn't going to list all possibilities.  I just listed one possibility to illustrate there is more to it than one person "letting" him test the market then "bringing" him back.     My point was about the tone of the comment coupled with the lack of substance supporting the tone of the comment.   But I see throughout the thread that typical sensitivities about broader things have surfaced so y'all carry on.
  • Members

    • Scott Pennock

      Scott Pennock 1,184

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CamMo

      CamMo 705

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 85

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 2,926

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dr. T

      Dr. T 266

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfansince65

      coltsfansince65 1,217

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 9,138

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 2,669

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsBlueFL

      ColtsBlueFL 5,128

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 2,945

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active: