Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Seahawks Sunday Night Football Game Thread


LucasOilStadium

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MB-ColtsFan said:

Honestly, I think our RB's are decent.  We just need to run off tackle every once and a while.

Maybe we're limited by Mack not being in the lineup, but we have to at least try to run another type of run play, don't we??

Shouldn't We wait till Mack has better than 21 yes and 1.3 YPC before we anoint him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

If we have OL problems and keep losing games and are like 1-4 or 1-5 when Andrew can finally start is there any Colt fan that would risk injuring him just to see Andrew play......Please tell me we will not be THAT DUMB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

I apologize if I did anything

Yeah your the biggest trouble maker here :sarcasm:, Here is he deal no shots would be needed toward anyone if certain people weren't here just to Troll our team and be 100% negative. There are 3 or 4 people that are here just to Troll which is against Forum rules. If you Troll than you should be banned, JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, needanoline63 said:

I’m not ok with luck coming back behind this horrible offensive line. I hope they put him on IR

 

They won't put Luck on IR 

 

That would be a white flag and they have tickets to sell.

 

They will keep Brissett in there as long as possible. Good thing he's mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

Reminder to Everyone 

  Stop with the negativity 

I expected this outcomr, but it’s hard to not have a little bit of negativity. We played so well in the 1st... 

 

right now I just want us to make it out of the game with no injuries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, IndySouthsider said:

Shouldn't We wait till Mack has better than 21 yes and 1.3 YPC before we anoint him?

Nah, i'm not about that.  I'm just saying that maybe they see Mack running the stretch play better than Frank or Turbin and they won't run it until Mack gets back.  Maybe they're throwing out part of the run playbook because Frank and Turbin don't run them well.  I dunno...just speculating.  I got nothing to explain why Chud refuses to run other running plays.  It is pretty frustrating, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a tease.  I suspected the 2nd half would begin a rout because we can't keep two halves of a game together, but ugh is it painful.  Put Tolzien out there to get squished before Brisset gets slaughtered...

 

to think I let myself hope that maybe... just maybe... we would play well in the second half...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RollerColt said:

I expected this outcomr, but it’s hard to not have a little bit of negativity. We played so well in the 1st... 

 

right now I just want us to make it out of the game with no injuries

Being critical of the 2nd Half play does not bother me or others it is trolling that seems to be around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You think the Ed Dodds you see in edited clips here is the same as the Ed Dodds who interviews with teams?   I don’t know you or anyone would think that?      He’s very much respected around the NFL which is why multiple teams ask to interview with them most every year. 
    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
    • Yeah... Richardson needs players who can separate and who can get open deep. IMO "give the inaccurate QB a contested catch receiver with large catch radius" is one of the tropes that hasn't proven to work well. Contested catches have about 50-55% success rate even with the best of contested catch receivers and with relatively accurate QBs... now if you think AR's accuracy is not good, drop that rate even more. The best way to give a relatively inaccurate QB better chance to complete passes is to give him a WR who separates and and who is open so the QB would have more of a margin for error to throw the ball a little behind or ahead or a little higher or lower than ideal. (we are not talking about uncatchable balls here... those will be uncatchable for anyone really). In that regard, one thing I would agree about is - we need WRs who have good hands and have good ball skills.   And this is ignoring that AR has indeed been pretty good with his accuracy on passes at intermediate and long range. His biggest problem coming into the league was the short stuff and he was already showing improvements in that deparment before he got injured.    And Worthy is the WR who created the most separation from anybody in this draft :   
    • Richardson  accuracy  on deep balls is his strength.  Hence why you pair an elite deep threat in worthy.
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 19,241

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pgt_rob

      pgt_rob 1,041

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nate!

      Nate! 588

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 102

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • superrep1967

      superrep1967 942

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jshipp23

      jshipp23 454

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...