Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Roster Moves (Countdown to 53)


TKnight24

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

He's a young, backup, with talent and starter potential.  Just what we need behind luck.  not UDFA hopefuls or journeymen. I'm OK with this.

I'm more than OK Tolzien isn't very good and Morris fell behind Walker in camp. Our QB's made it difficult to evaluate the rest of the roster   Anyone who thinks Dorset wasn't getting cut was not paying attention. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

No,  Not really.  He wasn't great,  but he wasn't Curtis painter

I wouldn't argue with that....but unless he's a football genius....he isn't starting for us anytime soon.

I dont think its easy to operate an offense you don't know ....

...and long term..we have Andrew

 

.....I'm just not seeing this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

He's actually been great in Pre-Season.

True...but Morris has also been good. Yet, no one is giving him the benefit of the doubt because "it's just preseason" and he played against the third string. Yet with Brisett, it's worthy of a trade for a starting receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

This is why his time in NE could be short

This is what I said. Not everyone who goes to Pats dominates. They already released Ealy. Dorsett and Allen are just system pieces. BB isn't going to make them good or help them realize their untapped "potential ". If they do anything it'll just be BB making everyone work in his scheme. Dorsett has to compete against Cooks and Malcolm Mitchell. And considering he got outplayed by UDFAs here, his work is cut out for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oldunclemark said:

I wouldn't argue with that....but unless he's a football genius....he isn't starting for us anytime soon.

I dont think its easy to operate an offense you don't know ....

...and long term..we have Andrew

 

.....I'm just not seeing this...

He could learn the offense enough in a few weeks.   I'm guessing it means Luck is out for a lot longer than we thought he was going to be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Flash7 said:

True...but Morris has also been good. Yet, no one is giving him the benefit of the doubt because "it's just preseason" and he played against the third string. Yet with Brisett, it's worthy of a trade for a starting receiver.

I am not really a fan of the trade either but I think Dorsett just wasn't part of our plans. Brissett is a safety blanket in case Andrew misses 2 or 3 weeks. JMO. I like Morris too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Flash7 said:

True...but Morris has also been good. Yet, no one is giving him the benefit of the doubt because "it's just preseason" and he played against the third string. Yet with Brisett, it's worthy of a trade for a starting receiver.

A starting receiver for who? Pretty obviously not on the Colts, and at the point, it doesn't matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Defjamz26 said:

This is what I said. Not everyone who goes to Pats dominates. They already released Ealy. Dorsett and Allen are just system pieces. BB isn't going to make them good or help them realize their untapped "potential ". If they do anything it'll just be BB making everyone work in his scheme. Dorsett has to compete against Cooks and Malcolm Mitchell. And considering he got outplayed by UDFAs here, his work is cut out for him.

Then once Edelman comes back PD will be replaced altogether 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jvan1973 said:

He could learn the offense enough in a few weeks.   I'm guessing it means Luck is out for a lot longer than we thought he was going to be

This move does suggest that....

........we apparently did not want to go into games with Tolzien and no one else who had ever started

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

starter potential is the phrase I question

 

8 minutes ago, Flash7 said:

I think this is where we may differ. I don't see him as a young talent. I see him as a project and someone that's benefitted from the NE system. I project that he will not be nearly as good with the Colts, as most NE QBs struggle mightily once they leave.

 

This is what Mike Reiss, ESPN staff writer wrote about Jacoby recently (before the trade) -

 

"I still think the third layer of insurance at quarterback with a high-intangibles player like Brissett is more valuable than whatever they would use the spot for in other areas. Because of that, I've never strongly considered the possibility that Brissett would be cut. As Belichick has said in the past, if a team doesn't have the quarterback position accounted for at all levels, it puts the entire team at risk. "

 

I feel he has starter potential, which is what I want on the sidelines in case luck takes another injurious hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Derakynn said:

A starting receiver for who? Pretty obviously not on the Colts, and at the point, it doesn't matter. 

I may be wrong--happens often I'm sure, but I projected the starters as TY, Moncrief, and Dorsett. Yes we have Rogers and Natson or Aiken behind him, but I thought he would start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

 

This is what Mike Reiss, ESPN staff writer wrote about Jacoby recently (before the trade) -

 

"I still think the third layer of insurance at quarterback with a high-intangibles player like Brissett is more valuable than whatever they would use the spot for in other areas. Because of that, I've never strongly considered the possibility that Brissett would be cut. As Belichick has said in the past, if a team doesn't have the quarterback position accounted for at all levels, it puts the entire team at risk. "

 

I feel he has starter potential, which is what I want on the sidelines in case luck takes another injurious hit.

If Brisset has starter potential..Brady is 40 and Garrafalo is at the end of his contract..

 

..doesit beg the question as to why NE traded him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oldunclemark said:

If Brisset has starter potential..Brady is 40 and Garrafalo is at the end of his contract..

 

..doesit beg the question as to why NE traded him?

 

Just now, oldunclemark said:

If Brisset has starter potential..Brady is 40 and Garrafalo is at the end of his contract..

 

..doesit beg the question as to why NE traded him?

Could be they needed a WR more? Perhaps hoodie thinks he can coach up Dorset better than we did.... and frankly, with Tom Brady as your QB, gonna be hard not to perform great as a WR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oldunclemark said:

I'm sure that's true.

 Do you think Jacoby Brissett can learn the Colts offense by week two with teammates he's never met?.....

 

I dont

He's going to have to. At least to the point that he's more effective than Tolzien. I am not impressed with Tolzien at all, so that shouldn't take long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

I'm sure that's true.

 Do you think Jacoby Brissett can learn the Colts offense by week two with teammates he's never met?.....

 

I dont

He doesn't have to know the entire playbook to play. Colts played Josh Freeman the same week they signed him a few years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, oldunclemark said:

I'm sure that's true.

 Do you think Jacoby Brissett can learn the Colts offense by week two with teammates he's never met?.....

 

I dont

 

7 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Yes

 

Agree with PT-

I think he can learn the part of the game plan for the second game opponent (team) in two weeks. and add to it from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ballard praised Georgia defensive players and their knowledge of the game.   Georgia defensive players in this year's draft, per Scouts Inc (ESPN): Kamari Lassiter, CB, #45 (doesn't fit Ballard's profile for DBs) Javon Bullard, S, #49 (doesn't fit Ballard's profile for safeties) Tykee Smith, S, #97 (not a great fit for Ballard's profile for safeties) Zion Logue, DT, #222 (long, big, not a standout athlete) Jontrey Hunter, LB, #316 (not a great fit from a size standpoint, didn't run)
    • When did he consult you about who they think is elite?
    • I have heard one GM who says he thinks LTs and defensive players may go earlier than expected. Interesting ro see who wil   Bowers won't be there at 15. He is special if u watch the tape. 
    • If we stay at 15 and pick a player I would expect that player to be one of 19 he graded as a 1st rd talent.   The only WR’s I have seen in the top 20 of the entire draft are Harrison, Nabors and Odunze.  He can sit and hope if he wants but when he’s that close to possibly getting elite seems like it would be smart to move up and get one of them.  And who cares if we have to pay him a big second contract.  You should be happy you hit on a pick.  You really prefer a role player instead of elite?  Because of money.  Omg that’s an unbelievable take.  I can’t believe it.  Wow!
    • It’s hard to get a read from Ballard's presser. It almost seemed liked he co-signed his young DB room and said they’re just going to roll the dice with what they have but maybe add some competition. I get that he feels they can take a leap, but I’m not sure I can be convinced that Flowers or Jones will ever be better than Quinyon Mitchell or Cooper DeJean.   Of all of Ballard’s philosophies regarding team building (specifically related to the draft) the one I have the most issue with is the over confidence and eagerness to bank on low round players and UDFA’s as long term solutions. You have a projected starting secondary consisting a 7th round pick from Yale who did not play well last season, a 7th round corner who well outplayed his draft position, but has clear limitations athletically, a 3rd round safety who is gifted athletically, but we still don’t know if he’s better as FS or SS, and a 2nd round pick who showed great flashes when healthy but is still a question mark.    I get rolling the dice with JuJu, but I don’t see why you wouldn’t look for upgrades for Thomas and Jones/Flowers. I know he said he’d like to add competition there, but drafting a guy 4th round likely isn’t going to give your CB group a boost. I know he said they’re technically not young in his eyes, but they are young. If you’re going to add another “young” corner, add one with high end traits and skills. I’m not dead set on Mitchell or DeJean in round 1 or bust because I also like a couple day 2 corners. I’m just saying I’d much rather take a shot with one of them than just run it back with the same group.   Where we really need talent at for sure though is Edge.
  • Members

    • Chrisaaron1023

      Chrisaaron1023 4,424

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,772

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,104

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 844

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • B~Town

      B~Town 309

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Creekside

      Creekside 763

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 8,973

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,284

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,758

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,116

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...