Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Defjamz26

Post your "Way too Early " 2018 Mock's

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, indyman411 said:

Here's another draft (I can't stop doing them lol)

 

3: R1P3
QUENTON NELSON
NOTRE DAME
36: R2P4
LB ROQUAN SMITH
GEORGIA
67: R3P3
LB LEIGHTON VANDER ESCH
BOISE STATE
104: R4P4
RB RASHAAD PENNY
SAN DIEGO STATE
140: R5P3
EDGE JOJO WICKER
ARIZONA STATE
178: R6P4
DOMINICK SANDERS
GEORGIA
221: R7P3
WR EQUANIMEOUS ST. BROWN
NOTRE DAME
 
 

Great draft, but unrealistic. No way Smith or LVE last that long. Both are first round picks. Has Brown really fallen that far? A month ago, he was talked about as a first round pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's one more with Minkah at 3:

 

3: R1P3
 
S MINKAH FITZPATRICK
ALABAMA
36: R2P4
 
RB SONY MICHEL
GEORGIA
67: R3P3
LB LEIGHTON VANDER ESCH
BOISE STATE
104: R4P4
EDGE HERCULES MATA'AFA
WASHINGTON STATE
140: R5P3
 
EDGE ANDREW BROWN
VIRGINIA
178: R6P4
 
LB SHAQUEM GRIFFIN
CENTRAL FLORIDA
221: R7P3
 
EDGE MARCELL FRAZIER
MISSOURI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trade down with Jets #6. Get their rd 2 # 50 pick + 4th rd #102 pick+ 2nd rd 2019 pick.  

1. Q.Nelson

2. M.Mcglinchey + A. Key

3.W. Hernandez 

4.S.Michel+ Auden Tate

5. Tre'quan Smith

6.Michael Joseph ( best kept secret)

7. S. Griffin

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, SolidGold said:

Trade down with Jets #6. Get their rd 2 # 50 pick + 4th rd #102 pick+ 2nd rd 2019 pick.  

1. Q.Nelson

2. M.Mcglinchey + A. Key

3.W. Hernandez 

4.S.Michel+ Auden Tate

5. Tre'quan Smith

6.Michael Joseph ( best kept secret)

7. S. Griffin

 

Or D. Guice at 4. Instead of S.Michel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My Mock Draft 2.0 I love this one better than my 1.0 draft.

 

8: R1P8
 
RB SAQUON BARKLEY
PENN ST.
36: R2P4
 
LB TREMAINE EDMUNDS
VA. TECH
39: R2P7
 
EDGE ARDEN KEY
LSU
76: R3P12
 
G WYATT TELLER
VA. TECH
104: R4P4
 
WR CHRISTIAN KIRK
TEXAS A&M
105: R4P5
 
CB QUENTON MEEKS
STANFORD
114: R4P14
 
TE HAYDEN HURST
S. CAROLINA
115: R4P15
 
OT BRIAN O'NEILL
PITTSBURGH
140: R5P3
 
WR ALLEN LAZARD
IOWA ST.
178: R6P4
 
LB SHAQUEM GRIFFIN
UCF
221: R7P3
 
LB CHRIS WORLEY
OHIO ST.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yet another one, although with all of the FA signings around the league, I think this is a solid draft to build up the Colts.

 

3: R1P3
QUENTON NELSON
NOTRE DAME
36: R2P4
EDGE MARCUS DAVENPORT
UTSA
67: R3P3
TE MIKE GESICKI
PENN STATE
104: R4P4
WR MICHAEL GALLUP
COLORADO STATE
140: R5P3
CB TONY BROWN
ALABAMA
178: R6P4
LB GENARD AVERY
MEMPHIS
221: R7P3
RB KALEN BALLAGE
ARIZONA STATE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did this one on First-Pick, fanspeak.com kept stopping at round 2 pick.  I did it without any trades, just because trades are too difficult to predict accurately.  What do you guys think?

 

Your Picks:
Round 1 Pick 6:  Nelson, Quenton, OG, Notre Dame (A)
Round 2 Pick 4: 
 Evans, Rashaan, OLB/ILB, Alabama (B+)
Round 2 Pick 5: 
 Crosby, Tyrell, OT, Oregon (A-)
Round 2 Pick 17: 
 Okoronkwo, Ogbonnia, DE/OLB, Oklahoma (B+)
Round 3 Pick 3: 
 Nnadi, Derrick, DT, Florida State (A-)
Round 4 Pick 4: 
 Cobbs Jr, Simmie, WR, Indiana (A+)
Round 5 Pick 3: 
 Ballage, Kalen, RB, Arizona State (A-)
Round 6 Pick 4: 
 Hill, Holton, CB, Texas (A+)
Round 7 Pick 3: 
 Robertson, Korey, WR, Southern Miss (A+)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would very happy to get a draft like this. With Chubb we get a premier pass rusher, LVE is a good to potentially great MLB, Price is a solid guard, Davis and Green shore up defense, Penny and Scott should contribute. What do you guys think?

6D329F91-A732-4A9E-81AF-89D1CE18838C.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my dream scenario draft for the Colts...

 

Ballard trades 6th overall pick to Buffalo for their 12th, 22nd overall picks, their 96th overall pick, and 2019 2nd round pick

 

Round 1 Pick 12 (BUF):  Smith, Roquan, ILB/OLB, Georgia 
Round 1 Pick 22 (BUF):  Bryan, Taven, DT, Florida
Round 2 Pick 4:  Hernandez, Will, OG, Texas-El Paso
Round 2 Pick 5:  Carter, Lorenzo, DE/OLB, Georgia

Round 2 Pick 17:  Davis, Carlton, CB, Auburn
Round 3 Pick 3:  Penny, Rashaad, RB, San Diego State 
Round 3 Pick 36 (BUF):  Gallup, Michael, WR, Colorado State 
Round 4 Pick 4:  Leonard, Darius, OLB/ILB, South Carolina State
Round 5 Pick 3:  Parker, Brandon, OT, North Carolina AT
Round 6 Pick 4:  Wilson, Cedrick, WR, Boise State 
Round 7 Pick 3:  Nickerson, Parry, CB, Tulane 

 

Analysis for 2018 season - Ballard gets help all over the roster with this draft. He gets impact LBs in Roquan Smith and Darius Leonard, an impact pass rushing DT in Taven Bryan, a potential great OG in Hernandez, a pass rusher in Lorenzo Carter with a very high ceiling, a talented and lengthy corner in Davis to play opposite Wilson, a talented RB in Penny to split carries with Mack, an underrated WR in Gallup who I compare to a poor man's Anquan Boldin, an underrated RT prospect in Parker, and depth at WR and CB in getting Cedrick Wilson and Parry Nickerson.  

 

Analysis for 2019 Draft - Ballard now has the following draft picks to play with: 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Ballard has another draft where he can continue to replenish the roster with young talented players with the 2018 and 2019 drafts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sigh...........   This is beyond really frustrating.    You're accusing me of things I literally haven't done.     That's very Irish of you.    Really annoying.      You ask for benefit of the doubt while never giving it out yourself.   I've put certain things into bold.   I'll try taking them one at a time.   Your first bold...   that this is not me saying that teams that aren't doing this are stupid.    I'm sorry, but when you declare that you've come up that you think is clearly and obvously better,  that you think you've re-invented the wheel and sliced bread,  it certainly feels like you're casting a disapporving eye toward any team that's not doing things your preferred way as a matter of course.   Then you claim,  that I want Ballard in the building ASAP,  but not before January.    Let me see if you understand this word.....   NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!   Was that clear enough for you?       If Irsay had decided in the spring of 16 to fire Grigson and hire Ballard in the spring, I would've been ok with it.   It's not desirable,  but if Irsay made that call THEN,  I'd be ok with it.     Where YOU mis-read me,  is that roughly 95 of owners make this decision during the season.    They see things they don't like and they decide during the season to make a change -- typically when the season ends.    Sometimes, an exec will be fired during the season and someone like Dorsey comes in during the season to oversee things and learn about the organization.    I'm fine with that.  There's no record of me opposing that.   I start with January,  because that's when the business season starts for front office and coaches.   Period.   The NFL views it as preferrable.    But making the switch in the spring is doable, as I've said in every post, and which you have ignored or confused badly.    But if Ballard had been hired in the spring of 16,  I'd have been fine with it.   This isn't the first time I've said some version of this.    This is not some ah-ha moment.   As to the bold declaring that there are tons of qualified guys and that CHOOSING the best guy is another story.   Here's my reponse to that.   No.   nonsense.     They are the same story.    They are connected.    Because you play down the fact that most GM's and most HC's fail.   They get fired before their 4 or 5 year contracts expire.   The owner has seen enough and makes a change.   Saying there are always qualified guys is meaningless.    Because FINDING the best guy who will succeed, isn't just important,  it's EVERYTHING.   All 32 teams can announce they hired a qualified guy.    That isn't hard.    But the vast majority of teams are introducing his successor in a few years.    That's why a franchise like Pittsburgh has very little turnover either in HC or the front office.   While franchises like the Jets or Buffalo or Miami are introducing someone new so often, you can practically set your watch to it.     Generally speaking,  the new GM has a long history of scouting and evaluating talent.   The new HC has a history of success, both as a position coach and a coordinator.   They can easily be called qualified,  (though new guys like Kliff Kingsbury and Zack Taylor do NOT have a long track record of success)  But the vast majority of hires...   are soon enough fired.   That doesn't speak well to their qualifications.      As to you meaning what you're saying...   Of course you mean what you say and I stated that clearly.  I don't know why this should rub you the wrong way.  I literally wrote that I know you mean what you say.    I said what I said as a rhetorical point,  not an attacking point.    My ultimate point was made at the end of my first post to you.   You typically write persuasive arguments.    You're able to frequently made me see your viewpoint.    But not here.    You accuse me of not considering your argument.    I'm sorry,  I am considering what you write.   But I don't see the typical high quality Superman argument.   I don't see points that connect.    Your argument feels like the one you'd make for doable.   It doesn't convince me at all that it's preferable.  
    • Yeah, Ballard said he's a patient guy, and he doesn't mind waiting to pick. We almost traded back from 34 as well if Rock wasn't there. I personally love the "trade back" strategy at the end of round 1, and wouldn't mind doing it in most every draft. A late 1st for a mid-second and early/mid second (from the Redskins) over two drafts is fine with me!
    • Haven't done research on the 2020 draft yet, but if it ends up having an elite WR or OT, I wouldn't mind trading up this year. We'll have to see where we finish (hopefully 32 ), and make a decision from there. Ballard landing the Redskins 2nd rounder may be a brilliant move.
    • I had us 9-7 just based on guessing/hoping/predicting Luck would be healthy and play great. I was right but a lucky guess, I guess  . I thought that would get us a 6th seed. We won 10 games which got us in.
    • For the first time in a while, I am impressed with the Colts development of players. If this current trend continues, a lot of opinions will change. 
  • Members

    • Nate!

      Nate! 44

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,110

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEric07

      IndyEric07 8

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfanej

      coltsfanej 159

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 369

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...